Skip to main content <#maincontent> We will keep fighting for all libraries - stand with us! Internet Archive logo A line drawing of the Internet Archive headquarters building façade. Search icon An illustration of a magnifying glass. Search icon An illustration of a magnifying glass. Upload icon An illustration of a horizontal line over an up pointing arrow. Upload User icon An illustration of a person's head and chest. Sign up | Log in Web icon An illustration of a computer application window Wayback Machine Texts icon An illustration of an open book. Books Video icon An illustration of two cells of a film strip. Video Audio icon An illustration of an audio speaker. Audio Software icon An illustration of a 3.5" floppy disk. Software Images icon An illustration of two photographs. Images Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape Donate Ellipses icon An illustration of text ellipses. More Hamburger icon An icon used to represent a menu that can be toggled by interacting with this icon. Internet Archive Audio Live Music Archive Librivox Free Audio Featured * All Audio * This Just In * Grateful Dead * Netlabels * Old Time Radio * 78 RPMs and Cylinder Recordings Top * Audio Books & Poetry * Computers, Technology and Science * Music, Arts & Culture * News & Public Affairs * Spirituality & Religion * Podcasts * Radio News Archive Images Metropolitan Museum Cleveland Museum of Art Featured * All Images * This Just In * Flickr Commons * Occupy Wall Street Flickr * Cover Art * USGS Maps Top * NASA Images * Solar System Collection * Ames Research Center Software Internet Arcade Console Living Room Featured * All Software * This Just In * Old School Emulation * MS-DOS Games * Historical Software * Classic PC Games * Software Library Top * Kodi Archive and Support File * Vintage Software * APK * MS-DOS * CD-ROM Software * CD-ROM Software Library * Software Sites * Tucows Software Library * Shareware CD-ROMs * Software Capsules Compilation * CD-ROM Images * ZX Spectrum * DOOM Level CD Books Books to Borrow Open Library Featured * All Books * All Texts * This Just In * Smithsonian Libraries * FEDLINK (US) * Genealogy * Lincoln Collection Top * American Libraries * Canadian Libraries * Universal Library * Project Gutenberg * Children's Library * Biodiversity Heritage Library * Books by Language * Additional Collections Video TV News Understanding 9/11 Featured * All Video * This Just In * Prelinger Archives * Democracy Now! * Occupy Wall Street * TV NSA Clip Library Top * Animation & Cartoons * Arts & Music * Computers & Technology * Cultural & Academic Films * Ephemeral Films * Movies * News & Public Affairs * Spirituality & Religion * Sports Videos * Television * Videogame Videos * Vlogs * Youth Media Search the history of over 835 billion web pages on the Internet. Search the Wayback Machine Search icon An illustration of a magnifying glass. Mobile Apps * Wayback Machine (iOS) * Wayback Machine (Android) Browser Extensions * Chrome * Firefox * Safari * Edge Archive-It Subscription * Explore the Collections * Learn More * Build Collections Save Page Now Capture a web page as it appears now for use as a trusted citation in the future. Please enter a valid web address * About * Blog * Projects * Help * Donate * Contact * Jobs * Volunteer * People * Sign up for free * Log in Search metadata Search text contents Search TV news captions Search radio transcripts Search archived web sites Advanced Search * About * Blog * Projects * Help * Donate Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape * Contact * Jobs * Volunteer * People Full text of "The Complete Works of AO Deutsch " See other formats THE COMPLETE WORKS OF A. O. DEUTSCH © 2020 Alon Oscar Deutsch. All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-1-71679-045-4 Introduction to Coenietrics On the Psychology of Philosophy Alon Oscar Deutsch Copyright © 2023 Alon Oscar Deutsch. All rights reserved. ISBN-10: 1539927652 ISBN-13: 978-1539927655 DEDICATION This book is dedicated to my family with love. “...Socionics and spin-off Cognietrics provide leverage which could possibly be adapted toward the enhancement of information flow...” — Marc Carson, Livingry and Building Technological Leverage to Change the World CONTENTS ATA = 132 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Vered Deutsch for editing this book during her vacation time, and I would like to thank Mikey Goldenberg for using his degree in philosophy to help me address some of the epistemological concepts in this book. Alon Oscar Deutsch PREFACE I wrote my first book, An Introduction to Cognietrics, in otder to bring extended meaning to the suppositions encountered in the definition of the Myers-Briggs types. Though many books have been written on this subject, I felt that few had unifying ideas or were otherwise able to inspire a coherent, philosophical discussion of its implications among readers. In writing this book I was finally able to redefine and then derive the fundamental epistemological concepts on which our experience of reality is based using underlying cognitive constructs, ultimately merging psychology with philosophy itself, and even discuss ideas that I had not previously encountered, such as the definition of knowledge in terms of Jungian dichotomies, the mathematical symmetry of philosophy, the principles on which the paradoxical Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics is founded, and the differences between induction and deduction, patterns and concepts, discovery and invention, cause and effect, and statistics and determinism. These ideas appear repeatedly in the philosophical literature - for instance, an example of Cognietrics in epistemology is the following: on page 1 of Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, Bertrand Russell states that “The distinction between mathematics and mathematical philosophy is one which depends upon the interest inspiring the research, and upon the stage which the research has reached.’ When one considers that due to attained importance, and given the change associated with stages, something reaches a stage not necessarily when one can begin to think differently about it but rather when he can begin to feel differently about it due to its own unchanging state, and that while research is inspired by logic interest is inspired by emotion, it is obvious that ii Introduction to Cognietrics Russell is (perhaps unknowingly) referring to the Cognietric distinction between knowledge and understanding as outlined in my book; note that in the preface to Our Knowledge of the External World, which predates Carl Jung’s Psychological Types by 7 years, Russell tries to shed new light on the distinction between ‘realists and idealists’, not unlike the Jungian dichotomy of sensation vs. intuition. In this book I also show how the different personalities work together to accommodate novel ideas and recurring trends in an endless cycle as determined by the order of the strongest Jungian Cognitive Functions, and I describe how different combinations of personality traits may manifest in each type. I provide research supporting the existence of mutually exclusive personality traits in accordance with the Myers-Briges dichotomies, and explanations for the Jungian Cognitive Functions that I use to create a short test to aid in analyzing one’s Jungian type. I also discuss theories of type development over time, and I provide background on previous typology theories such as Myers-Briges and Socionics. I answer frequently asked questions on the nature, relevance, and justification of Jungian typology, and I discuss the benefit of mindfulness with respect to both of the values representing each dichotomy. I must end by saying that I sincerely hope that this book brings you as much insight while reading it as it brought me while writing it, and I wish you the best of luck. Alon Oscar Deutsch Boca Raton, Florida Friday, November 4", 2016 iii CHAPTER ONE Introduction INTP, ISFP, ENF] - what does it all mean? This book will show you what to expect when you come across one of these abbreviations. Drawing on references to epistemology, mathematics, physics, and even competing measures of intelligence, this book will explain how each Jungian type engages life. Related Topics: Psychology, Typology, Personality, Jung, Myers-Briges, Socionics Why write a book? After studying Jungian personality theories for many years, I wanted to clarify some inconsistencies between them and tell the world what it is I really have come to believe. The main idea in this book is that the behaviors defining the Jungian personalities can be derived from a combination of unique philosophical rationales which exist 1 Alon Oscar Deutsch behind each one. Cogniettics is not meant to be a complete "Lexicon of the Psyche", but it is also not vague, and makes specific predictions based on my own personal experiences and impressions of different people. I have tried to make Cognietrics the most accurate, precise, and revealing representation of the best ideas (including many of my own) commonly found in analogous personality models. I hope that this book will not only allow you to understand yourself, but also allow you to understand others, so that you may find common interests or at least learn from each other. As for self-development, there are many that say that the point of personality theory is to identify Weaknesses to improve them on the path to self-actualization and becoming a well-rounded person, such that less conscious Functions become more developed later in life. There are some who say that if you know your Strengths you can work on them and achieve more than if you try to compensate Weaknesses, which aren’t likely to improve to the point of being competitive with others having them as Strengths. I believe that any work that is done to improve the use of any Function is beneficial, but I believe that using a balanced combination of Weak and Strong Functions works best. Background The Myers-Briges Type Indicator (MBTI) was developed during and after WWII by Isabel Briges-Myers and her mother Katherine Cook-Briggs. It was based on the earlier work of Carl Gustav Jung and was intended to help distribute different jobs in an efficient manner according to each job’s suitability for a given psychological Preference. Introduction to Cognietrics Completion of the MBTT results in one of sixteen Types, each with a unique four-letter designation, with each letter representing a Preference. The first letter can be E (Extraverted) or I (Introverted). Extraverts gain energy in social situations and lose it while alone, the opposite is true for Introverts. According to John Gabrieli of Stanford University, correlation exists between extraversion and the activation of the amygdala that occurs when happy faces are viewed. (http://news.stanford.edu/news/2002/july10/sciencegab- 710.html) The second letter can be S (ensing) or N (Ntuiting). Sensors ate realistic and live in the moment, whereas iNtuitives are imaginative and live in the future. According to Stefania Ashby of Brigham Young University, brain areas controlling imagination and memory do not overlap. (http:// www.wited.co.uk/article/neuroscience-of- imagination) The third letter can be T (Thinking) or F (Feeling). Thinkers mostly use logic to make decisions and Feelers mostly use their emotions. According to Anthony Jack of Case Western Reserve University, evidence suggests that empathy and thought repress each other's use. (https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121030 161416.htm) The fourth letter can be P (Perceiver) or J (Judger). Perceivers like to leave their options open (Pe) and tend to improvise spontaneously (Ji), and Judgers like to make decisions early (Je) and tend to plan conditionally (Pi). According to Isabel Briges-Myers, Perceivers primarily iNtuit or Sense in an extraverted way, and Judgers primarily Think or Feel in an extraverted way, depending on which second and third letters are chosen. Alon Oscar Deutsch Eighty-nine of the Fortune 100 companies now use the MBTI in some form, "to maximize individual and team effectiveness from entry to executive levels". (https://www.cpp.com/products/mbti/index.aspx) Usually the best Relationship is said to occur between Types that have completely opposite letter designations (since opposites can attract). Websites such as celebritytypes.com have been known to guess the personalities of famous cultural icons. Others try to determine the best travel destination for each personality. (http://www. huffingtonpost.com/kali-rogers /which-us- city-you-should-live-in-based-off-your-myers-briggs- results_b_8400956.html) The rarest Type in the population as determined by the Myers Briggs Foundation is the INFJ at 1.46%. The most common Type is the ISF] at 13.8%. (http://www.statisticbrain.com/myers-briggs-statistics /) The Type that has the highest ratio of representation in gifted classes to representation in normal classes as determined by Ugar Sak of the University of Arizona is the INTP with a numerical value of 3.40:1. (home.anadolu.edu.tr/~usak/documents/PsychologicalTy pesofGiftedAdolescentspublishedinJSGE. pdf) The Type that tends to earn the most as determined by Truity Psychometrics is the EST] with an average of $77,000/year. (http://tech.co/myers-briggs-personality-type-likely-earn- higher-income-2015-04) Introduction to Cognietrics Isabel Myers connected her typology to Carl Jung's system by ascribing the pairs of each of his Functions to a Type: T] uses extraverted thinking, or Te TP uses introverted thinking, or Ti FJ uses extraverted feeling, or Fe FP uses introverted feeling, or Fi SP uses extraverted sensing, or Se SJ uses introverted sensing, or Si NP uses extraverted intuiting, or Ne NJ uses introverted intuiting, or Ni A Lithuanian offshoot called Socionics, founded by Ausra Augustinavidiuté, adds depth to the connection between Jung and Myers-Briggs - Types whose first or second Function is Fi or Te are considered to be Serious whereas Types whose first or second Function is Ti or Fe are considered to be Merry (Curious in Cognietrics), and Types whose first or second Function is Si or Ne are considered to be Reasonable whereas Types whose first or second Function is Ni or Se are considered to be Resolute. Critics of the MBTI have shown that often the resulting Type description is vague or doesn’t match the test taker, or the test gives a result that is in the margin between multiple Types, or different results are produced when the test is taken multiple times. *The SCFT (Short Cognietrics Functions Test), unlike the MBTI, eliminates marginal percentages by reducing the number of questions asked as much as possible, and eliminates faulty Type descriptions (invalidating the Forer effect) by focusing on the polarization of specific Jungian Cognitive Functions from which the descriptions are actually derived, rather than combinations of the more vague Myers-Briggs Preferences; however, because the Alon Oscar Deutsch Functions are not mutually exclusive like the Preferences, there is a chance that Functions which are important to the test taker, though not the Functions indicated by the MBTIT, will be selected. In this case, the chosen MBTI Functions may indicate which Personas are typically used by the test taker; it is possible that test takers will find that their SCFT Type result is more accurate than their MBTI Type result! As for taking the test again after some time has passed - though people change, their most general tendencies usually do not, which is why certain characteristics of personality can be identified at a very eatly age. Studying the Types will provide the vocabulary necessary for increased self-awareness, comparison, and Type identification. The short test (SCFT) following the PAQ will give you an idea about your Cognietrics Type; however, it will not give you a conclusive argument - an ENT] who works as a medical doctor may get a different result than an ENTJ who works as a stock broker. It is therefore necessary to compare the Type Profiles before making a decision to determine Type. Frequently Asked Questions Did I pass? There are no wrong answers! Different combinations of different letters yield different advantages, but remember - each four-letter code represents a set of Preferences, not aptitudes. What if I don't believe that everyone in the world fits neatly into only sixteen Types? The MBTI is by no means a complete description of personality, but the dichotomies that represent the Preferences are mutually exclusive and so, due to Introduction to Cognietrics widespread influence, account for the underpinnings of every preinclination; people of the same Type can be fundamentally different and still share these Traits, however, Cognietrics only makes inferences based upon the categories described in this book. What if I think that I am a mix of Types, and that I use all of the Preferences either together or at different times? Cognietrics certainly expects people to use all eight Functions, but a continuous divergence in usage is expected in order to prevent confusion. It is unlikely that a lack of Preferences will cause a perfect balance, because people are noticeably different in this regard, and their ptimary motives and behaviors by definition are indicative themselves of imbalance between the Functions. On some defunct Socionics websites, Jung was quoted as saying "As experience shows, it is next to impossible - as a result of unfavourable conditions - that somebody could develop all his functions at the same time. Social demand bring to more differentiation (developing) by a person that of his functions where he is more talented by nature or which gives him the most evident real means to achieve social success. A person very often, almost regularly, wholly identifies himself with the function placed in the most favourable conditions and due to that the most developed one. This way psychological types are constructed." So what is the point of Jungian Cognitive Functions and their Temperaments? Isn't Sensing just Sensing, and Feeling just Feeling? The Functions were Jung's actual original contributions to personality typology, and were developed further by Isabel Myers, the Socionicists, and others. The idea is that the Suggestion (most conscious perceiving Function) and Meaning (most conscious judging Function) can be Alon Oscar Deutsch introverted or extraverted (more specifically, one is introverted and the other is extraverted; for Judgers the Meaning is extraverted and for Perceivers the Suggestion is extraverted). The Function Temperaments also determine each Type's Values. Here is a story to illustrate the point: A psychologist asks a man to look at a painting and describe what he sees. The man says "I see a tree and a lake". The psychologist then asks "What color is the bird in the tree?", and the man responds "Oh, I didn't even notice the bird until you mentioned it". This example proves that even something as seemingly elementary as Sensation can be affected by preinclinations, which can vary from person to person. The fact is, the Preferences confer different advantages depending on whether the information processed is meant to be shared or hidden. In addition, as with any sort of Strength, some people will excel at one aspect and others will excel in other ways. Judgers are more comfortable sharing judgments and hiding perceptions, and Perceivers are more comfortable sharing perceptions and hiding judgments; there is no reason to suppose that the Temperament of every Function in the Consciousness Hierarchy (order of the Functions) should follow the Exertion (Introverted or Extraverted) of the Cognietrics Type, which only determines the Exertion of the Referential, Experimental, Avoidant, and Aggressive Functions. In general, extraverted Functions are multiply- applicable (or objective) and represent a breadth of activity, whereas introverted Functions are self-referential (or subjective) and represent a depth of activity. Everyone has in their first and second Functions a judging Function for using what they already Know and Understand and a perceiving Function for dealing with new information that is Inducted or Deduced; as I said before, one Function is always extraverted and the other is always introverted - this provides stability and balance to the Type. Introduction to Cognietrics If as of yet there is no data or other veracity to support the predictions made by Cognietrics for each Type, then what is the point of Cognietrics? Cognietrics determines the connections between the Myers-Briges Preferences and the Types that they describe, but it is just an investigative foray into a much deeper subconscious that we have not yet noticed. Albert Einstein said, in Cosmic Religion: With Other Opinions and Aphorisms (1931), "Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution. It is, strictly speaking, a real factor in scientific research." Unfortunately, the tools are not yet available for this kind of empirical study...however, just because something begins as a dream, it does not mean that it won't one day inspire something of practical value. If it weren't for Marcel Grossmann introducing Einstein to the mathematics he needed to make possible general relativity (as described by Manfred Eigen in From Strange Simplicity to Complex Familiarity (2013)), the theory would remain nothing but a daydream. Instead it was verified by many experiments including the Pound-Rebka experiment in 1959. Especially when first learning about Jungian personality, self-awareness can be a huge problem for many people - do I do this or that? The actual tendencies may be hard to distinguish at first, but with study and comparison to others it is possible to make sense of the theory. Cognietrics is a theory that seeks to explain the interaction of a lot of different basic elements and their collective effects. In Cognietrics, the basic elements are the psychological entities called the Jungian Cognitive Functions. Alon Oscar Deutsch Short Cognietrics Functions Test 1. I agree that: a. I enjoy validating perspectives. b. I always leave a memorable impression. c. | tend to be very awate of the chances for success. d. I like to keep track of things. * ifa or b go to #2a, if c ord go to #2b 2a. I agree that: e. I must honor my beliefs. f. I can make complex things seem simple. *oo to #3 2b. I agree that: g. lam good at making others feel welcome. h. I usually notice obscure opportunities. *oo to #3 3. I agree that: i. I gain energy when interacting with other people. j. I need to spend time resting alone. 10 Introduction to Cognietrics Answet Key: aei-ENFP aej-INFP afi-ENTP afj-INTP bei-ESFP bej-ISFP bfi-ESTP bfj-ISTP cei-ENF] cej-INFJ chi-ENTJ chj-INT] dgi-ESF] dgj-ISF] dhi-ESTJ dhj-ISTJ Alon Oscar Deutsch "When an inner situation is not made conscious, it appears outside as fate." - Carl Gustav Jung "Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves." - Carl Gustav Jung “We may think that we fully control ourselves. However, a friend can easily reveal something about us that we have absolutely no idea about." - Carl Gustav Jung 12 CHAPTER TWO Type Profiles The following Type Profiles will give you a description of each Cognietrics Type. Alon Oscar Deutsch ENFP Exertion - Extraverted Suggestion - iNtuiting Meaning - Feeling Reaction - Perceiver Value - Counsel Nature - Associater Character - Reformer ‘Temperament - Explorer Manner - Idealist Inference - Deduction Justification - Knowledge Role - Guide Mentality - Conceptual Primary Field - Theorist Identity - Application Mask - Adaptation Secondary Field - Expert Charisma - Research Inspiration - Standardization Consciousness Hierarchy - Referential as Counterfactual (Ne) Responsible as Critical (Fi) Experimental as Strategic (Te) Hopeful as Optimizing (Si) Avoidant as Scouting (Se) Rebellious as tiological (Ti) Aggressive as Relating (Fe) Depressive as Statistical (Ni) 14 Introduction to Cognietrics Demeanors: ENXP: People with Referential Ne come from a perfect world, and are always trying to shape this one in their image. EXFP: People with Responsible Fi say what’s on their mind, trying to shock people to action. *The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not discussed. Relationship Ratings - IST] - 13 EST] - 12 ENFP - 11 INFP - 10 ISF] - 9 ENTP - 8 INT] - 7 ESFP - 6 ESF] - 5 ENT] - 5 INTP - 4 ISFP - 4 INF] - 3 ENF] - 2 ESTP - 1 ISTP - 0 Alon Oscar Deutsch ENTP Exertion - Extraverted Suggestion - iNtuiting Meaning - Thinking Reaction - Perceiver Value - Negotiation Nature - Associater Character - Administrator Temperament - Explorer Manner - Analyst Inference - Deduction Justification - Understanding Role - Investigator Mentality - Patterned Primary Field - Prospector Identity - Proof Mask - Priority Secondary Field - Philosopher Charisma - Promotion Inspiration - Thesis Consciousness Hierarchy - Referential as Counterfactual (Ne) Responsible as Ztiological (Ti) Experimental as Relating (Fe) Hopeful as Optimizing (Si) Avoidant as Scouting (Se) Rebellious as Critical (Fi) Aggressive as Strategic (Te) Depressive as Statistical (Ni) 16 Introduction to Cognietrics Demeanots: ENXP: People with Referential Ne come from a perfect world, and are always trying to shape this one in their image. EXTP: People with Responsible Ti try to make sense of the world around them and be helpful. *The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not discussed. Relationship Ratings - ISFJ - 13 ESF] - 12 ENTP - 11 INTP - 10 IST] - 9 ENFP - 8 INF] - 7 ESTP - 6 ESTJ - 5 ENF] - 5 INFP - 4 ISTP - 4 INT] - 3 ENT] - 2 ESFP - 1 ISFP - 0 Alon Oscar Deutsch ESFP Exertion - Extraverted Suggestion - Sensing Meaning - Feeling Reaction - Perceiver Value - Skepticism Nature - Observer Character - Reformer Temperament - Explorer Manner - Guardian Inference - Induction Justification - Knowledge Role - Investigator Mentality - Patterned Primary Field - Prospector Identity - Priority Mask - Proof Secondary Field - Philosopher Charisma - Thesis Inspiration - Promotion Consciousness Hierarchy - Referential as Scouting (Se) Responsible as Critical (Fi) Experimental as Strategic (Te) Hopeful as Statistical (Ni) Avoidant as Counterfactual (Ne) Rebellious as /Etiological (Ti) Aggressive as Relating (Fe) Depressive as Optimizing (Si) 18 Introduction to Cognietrics Demeanors: ESXP: People with Referential Se like to motivate others to be their best. EXFP: People with Responsible Fi say what’s on their mind, trying to shock people to action. *The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not discussed. Relationship Ratings - INT] - 13 ENT] - 12 ESFP - 11 ISFP - 10 INF] - 9 ESTP - 8 IST] - 7 ENFP - 6 ENF] - 5 ESTJ - 5 ISTP - 4 INFP - 4 ISF] - 3 ESF] - 2 ENTP - 1 INTP - 0 Alon Oscar Deutsch ESTP Exertion - Extraverted Suggestion - Sensing Meaning - Thinking Reaction - Perceiver Value - Advocacy Nature - Observer Character - Administrator Temperament - Explorer Manner - Inspector Inference - Induction Justification - Understanding Role - Guide Mentality - Conceptual Primary Field - Theorist Identity - Adaptation Mask - Application Secondary Field - Expert Charisma - Standardization Inspiration - Research Consciousness Hierarchy - Referential as Scouting (Se) Responsible as Atiological (T1) Experimental as Relating (Fe) Hopeful as Statistical (Ni) Avoidant as Counterfactual (Ne) Rebellious as Critical (Fi) Aggressive as Strategic (Te) Depressive as Optimizing (Si) 20 Introduction to Cognietrics Demeanors: ESXP: People with Referential Se like to motivate others to be their best. EXTP: People with Responsible Ti try to make sense of the world around them and be helpful. *The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not discussed. Relationship Ratings - INF - 13 ENF] - 12 ESTP - 11 ISTP - 10 INT] - 9 ESFP - 8 ISF] - 7 ENTP - 6 ENT] -5 ESF] - 5 ISFP - 4 INTP - 4 IST] - 3 EST] - 2 ENFP - 1 INFP - 0 21 Alon Oscar Deutsch ENF] Exertion - Extraverted Suggestion - iNtuiting Meaning - Feeling Reaction - Judger Value - Advocacy Nature - Associater Character - Reformer Temperament - Persuader Manner - Idealist Inference - Induction Justification - Understanding Role - Investigator Mentality - Patterned Primary Field - Expert Identity - Standardization Mask - Research Secondary Field - Theorist Charisma - Adaptation Inspiration - Application Consciousness Hierarchy - Referential as Relating (Fe) Responsible as Statistical (Ni) Experimental as Scouting (Se) Hopeful as AEtiological (Ti) Avoidant as Strategic (Te) Rebellious as Optimizing (Si) Aggressive as Counterfactual (Ne) Depressive as Critical (Fi) 22 Introduction to Cognietrics Demeanors: EXFJ: People with Referential Fe want to teach the world their ethics. ENXJ: People with Responsible Ni are very foresightful, and try to support the best probability for a positive outcome. *The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not discussed. Relationship Ratings - ISTP - 13 ESTP - 12 ENF] - 11 INF] - 10 INTP - 9 ESF] - 8 ISFP - 7 ENT] - 6 ENTP - 5 ESFP - 5 ISFJ - 4 INT] - 4 INFP - 3 ENFP - 2 EST] - 1 IST] - 0 23 Alon Oscar Deutsch ENT] Exertion - Extraverted Suggestion - iNtuiting Meaning - Thinking Reaction - Judger Value - Skepticism Nature - Associater Character - Administrator Temperament - Persuader Manner - Analyst Inference - Induction Justification - Knowledge Role - Guide Mentality - Conceptual Primary Field - Philosopher Identity - Thesis Mask - Promotion Secondary Field - Prospector Charisma - Priority Inspiration - Proof Consciousness Hierarchy - Referential as Strategic (Te) Responsible as Statistical (Ni) Experimental as Scouting (Se) Hopeful as Critical (Fi) Avoidant as Relating (Fe) Rebellious as Optimizing (Si) Aggressive as Counterfactual (Ne) Depressive as /Etiological (Ti) 24 Introduction to Cognietrics Demeanors: EXT]: People with Referential Te may go out of their way to correct someone. ENXJ: People with Responsible Ni are very foresightful, and try to support the best probability for a positive outcome. *The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not discussed. Relationship Ratings - ISFP - 13 ESFP - 12 ENT] - 11 INT] - 10 INFP - 9 EST - 8 ISTP -7 ENF] - 6 ENFP - 5 ESTP -5 IST] - 4 INF] - 4 INTP - 3 ENTP - 2 ESF] - 1 ISF] - 0 25 Alon Oscar Deutsch ESF] Exertion - Extraverted Suggestion - Sensing Meaning - Feeling Reaction - Judger Value - Negotiation Nature - Observer Character - Reformer Temperament - Persuader Manner - Guardian Inference - Deduction Justification - Understanding Role - Guide Mentality - Conceptual Primary Field - Philosopher Identity - Promotion Mask - Thesis Secondary Field - Prospector Charisma - Proof Inspiration - Priority Consciousness Hierarchy - Referential as Relating (Fe) Responsible as Optimizing (Si) Experimental as Counterfactual (Ne) Hopeful as AEtiological (Ti) Avoidant as Strategic (Te) Rebellious as Statistical (Ni) Aggressive as Scouting (Se) Depressive as Critical (Fi) 26 Introduction to Cognietrics Demeanors: EXFJ: People with Referential Fe want to teach the world their ethics. ESXJ: People with Responsible Si try to refine their efforts and keep people consistently focused. *The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not discussed. Relationship Ratings - INTP - 13 ENTP - 12 ESF] - 11 ISFJ - 10 ISTP - 9 ENF] - 8 INFP - 7 EST] - 6 ESTP - 5 ENFP - 5 INF] - 4 IST] - 4 ISFP - 3 ESFP - 2 ENT] - 1 INT] - 0 27 Alon Oscar Deutsch EST] Exertion - Extraverted Suggestion - Sensing Meaning - Thinking Reaction - Judger Value - Counsel Nature - Observer Character - Administrator Temperament - Persuader Manner - Inspector Inference - Deduction Justification - Knowledge Role - Investigator Mentality - Patterned Primary Field - Expert Identity - Research Mask - Standardization Secondary Field - Theorist Charisma - Application Inspiration - Adaptation Consciousness Hierarchy - Referential as Strategic (Te) Responsible as Optimizing (Si) Experimental as Counterfactual (Ne) Hopeful as Critical (Fi) Avoidant as Relating (Fe) Rebellious as Statistical (Ni) Aggressive as Scouting (Se) Depressive as Etiological (Ti) 28 Introduction to Cognietrics Demeanors: EXT]: People with Referential Te may go out of their way to correct someone. ESXJ: People with Responsible Si try to refine their efforts and keep people consistently focused. *The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not discussed. Relationship Ratings - INFP - 13 ENFP - 12 EST] - 11 IST] - 10 ISFP - 9 ENT] - 8 INTP - 7 ESF] - 6 ESFP - 5 ENTP - 5 INT] - 4 ISFJ - 4 ISTP - 3 ESTP - 2 ENF] - 1 INF] - 0 29 Alon Oscar Deutsch INFP Exertion - Introverted Suggestion - iNtuiting Meaning - Feeling Reaction - Perceiver Value - Counsel Nature - Observer Character - Administrator Temperament - Reflector Manner - Idealist Inference - Induction Justification - Understanding Role - Scientist Mentality - Patterned Primary Field - Prospector Identity - Standardization Mask - Research Secondary Field - Philosopher Charisma - Adaptation Inspiration - Application Consciousness Hierarchy - Referential as Critical (Fi) Responsible as Counterfactual (Ne) Experimental as Optimizing (Si) Hopeful as Strategic (Te) Avoidant as Aitiological (Ti) Rebellious as Scouting (Se) Aggressive as Statistical (Ni) Depressive as Relating (Fe) 30 Introduction to Cognietrics Demeanors: IXFP: People with Referential Fi will go out of their way to appear unique, mysterious, and interesting. INXP: People with Responsible Ne are interested in cultivating potential alternatives, and spend _ time comparing ideas. *The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not discussed. Relationship Ratings - EST] - 13 IST] - 12 INFP - 11 ENFP - 10 ENT] - 9 ISFP - 8 ESF] - 7 INTP - 6 INT] - 5 ISF] -5 ESFP - 4 ENTP - 4 ENF] - 3 INF] - 2 ISTP - 1 ESTP - 0 31 Alon Oscar Deutsch INTP Exertion - Introverted Suggestion - iNtuiting Meaning - Thinking Reaction - Perceiver Value - Negotiation Nature - Observer Character - Reformer Temperament - Reflector Manner - Analyst Inference - Induction Justification - Knowledge Role - Engineer Mentality - Conceptual Primary Field - Theorist Identity - Thesis Mask - Promotion Secondary Field - Expert Charisma - Priority Inspiration - Proof Consciousness Hierarchy - Referential as 2tiological (Ti) Responsible as Counterfactual (Ne) Experimental as Optimizing (Si) Hopeful as Relating (Fe) Avoidant as Critical (Fi) Rebellious as Scouting (Se) Aggressive as Statistical (Ni) Depressive as Strategic (Te) 32 Introduction to Cognietrics Demeanors: IXTP: People with Referential Ti want to reframe paradoxes and replace obsolete constructs. INXP: People with Responsible Ne are interested in cultivating potential alternatives, and spend _ time comparing ideas. *The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not discussed. Relationship Ratings - ESF - 13 ISFJ - 12 INTP - 11 ENTP - 10 ENF] - 9 ISTP - 8 EST] - 7 INFP - 6 INF] - 5 IST] - 5 ESTP - 4 ENFP - 4 ENT] - 3 INT] - 2 ISFP - 1 ESFP - 0 33 Alon Oscar Deutsch ISFP Exertion - Introverted Suggestion - Sensing Meaning - Feeling Reaction - Perceiver Value - Skepticism Nature - Associater Character - Administrator Temperament - Reflector Manner - Guardian Inference - Deduction Justification - Understanding Role - Engineer Mentality - Conceptual Primary Field - Theorist Identity - Promotion Mask - Thesis Secondary Field - Expert Charisma - Proof Inspiration - Priority Consciousness Hierarchy - Referential as Critical (Fi) Responsible as Scouting (Se) Experimental as Statistical (Ni) Hopeful as Strategic (Te) Avoidant as Atiological (Ti) Rebellious as Counterfactual (Ne) Aggressive as Optimizing (Si) Depressive as Relating (Fe) 34 Introduction to Cognietrics Demeanors: IXFP: People with Referential Fi will go out of their way to appear unique, mysterious, and interesting. ISXP: People with Responsible Se make others aware of important information and get reactions from them. *The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not discussed. Relationship Ratings - ENT] - 13 INT] - 12 ISFP - 11 ESFP - 10 EST] - 9 INFP - 8 ENF] - 7 ISTP - 6 IST] - 5 INF] - 5 ENFP - 4 ESTP - 4 ESF] - 3 ISFJ - 2 INTP - 1 ENTP - 0 35 Alon Oscar Deutsch ISTP Exertion - Introverted Suggestion - Sensing Meaning - Thinking Reaction - Perceiver Value - Advocacy Nature - Associater Character - Reformer Temperament - Reflector Manner - Inspector Inference - Deduction Justification - Knowledge Role - Scientist Mentality - Patterned Primary Field - Prospector Identity - Research Mask - Standardization Secondary Field - Philosopher Charisma - Application Inspiration - Adaptation Consciousness Hierarchy - Referential as 2tiological (Ti) Responsible as Scouting (Se) Experimental as Statistical (Ni) Hopeful as Relating (Fe) Avoidant as Critical (Fi) Rebellious as Counterfactual (Ne) Aggressive as Optimizing (Si) Depressive as Strategic (Te) 36 Introduction to Cognietrics Demeanors: IXTP: People with Referential Ti want to reframe paradoxes and replace obsolete constructs. ISXP: People with Responsible Se make others aware of important information and get reactions from them. *The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not discussed. Relationship Ratings - ENF] - 13 INF] - 12 ISTP - 11 ESTP - 10 ESF] - 9 INTP - 8 ENT] - 7 ISFP - 6 ISF] -5 INT] - 5 ENTP - 4 ESFP - 4 EST] - 3 IST] - 2 INFP - 1 ENFP - 0 37 Alon Oscar Deutsch INF] Exertion - Introverted Suggestion - iNtuiting Meaning - Feeling Reaction - Judger Value - Advocacy Nature - Observer Character - Administrator Temperament - Evaluator Manner - Idealist Inference - Deduction Justification - Knowledge Role - Engineer Mentality - Conceptual Primary Field - Philosopher Identity - Application Mask - Adaptation Secondary Field - Prospector Charisma - Research Inspiration - Standardization Consciousness Hierarchy - Referential as Statistical (Ni) Responsible as Relating (Fe) Experimental as Ztiological (Ti) Hopeful as Scouting (Se) Avoidant as Optimizing (Si) Rebellious as Strategic (Te) Aggressive as Critical (Fi) Depressive as Counterfactual (Ne) 38 Introduction to Cognietrics Demeanors: INXJ: People with Referential Ni are always searching for new projects, making things that will last a long time. IXF]: People with Responsible Fe want everyone to feel good and have a good time. *The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not discussed. Relationship Ratings - ESTP - 13 ISTP - 12 INF] - 11 ENF] - 10 ESFP - 9 INT] - 8 ENTP - 7 ISF] - 6 ISFP - 5 INTP -5 ENT] - 4 ESF] - 4 ENFP - 3 INFP - 2 IST] - 1 EST] - 0 39 Alon Oscar Deutsch INT] Exertion - Introverted Suggestion - iNtuiting Meaning - Thinking Reaction - Judger Value - Skepticism Nature - Observer Character - Reformer Temperament - Evaluator Manner - Analyst Inference - Deduction Justification - Understanding Role - Scientist Mentality - Patterned Primary Field - Expert Identity - Proof Mask - Priority Secondary Field - Theorist Charisma - Promotion Inspiration - Thesis Consciousness Hierarchy - Referential as Statistical (Ni) Responsible as Strategic (Te) Experimental as Critical (F1) Hopeful as Scouting (Se) Avoidant as Optimizing (Si) Rebellious as Relating (Fe) Aggressive as /Etiological (Ti) Depressive as Counterfactual (Ne) 40 Introduction to Cognietrics Demeanors: INXJ: People with Referential Ni are always searching for new projects, making things that will last a long time. IXTJ: People with Responsible Te are goal-oriented, image-conscious, and want to maximize output. *The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not discussed. Relationship Ratings - ESFP - 13 ISFP - 12 INT] - 11 ENT] - 10 ESTP - 9 INF] - 8 ENFP - 7 IST] - 6 ISTP -5 INFP - 5 ENF] - 4 EST] - 4 ENTP - 3 INTP - 2 ISFJ - 1 ESF] - 0 41 Alon Oscar Deutsch ISF] Exertion - Introverted Suggestion - Sensing Meaning - Feeling Reaction - Judger Value - Negotiation Nature - Associater Character - Administrator Temperament - Evaluator Manner - Guardian Inference - Induction Justification - Knowledge Role - Scientist Mentality - Patterned Primary Field - Expert Identity - Priority Mask - Proof Secondary Field - Theorist Charisma - Thesis Inspiration - Promotion Consciousness Hierarchy - Referential as Optimizing (Si) Responsible as Relating (Fe) Experimental as Etiological (Ti) Hopeful as Counterfactual (Ne) Avoidant as Statistical (Ni) Rebellious as Strategic (Te) Aggressive as Critical (Fi) Depressive as Scouting (Se) 42 Introduction to Cognietrics Demeanors: ISXJ: People with Referential Si like to multi-task and try out different customizations. IXF]J: People with Responsible Fe want everyone to feel good and have a good time. *The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not discussed. Relationship Ratings - ENTP - 13 INTP - 12 ISFJ - 11 ESF] - 10 ENEFP - 9 IST] - 8 ESTP - 7 INF] - 6 INFP - 5 ISTP -5 EST] - 4 ENF] - 4 ESFP - 3 ISFP - 2 INT] - 1 ENT] - 0 43 Alon Oscar Deutsch IST] Exertion - Introverted Suggestion - Sensing Meaning - Thinking Reaction - Judger Value - Counsel Nature - Associater Character - Reformer Temperament - Evaluator Manner - Inspector Inference - Induction Justification - Understanding Role - Engineer Mentality - Conceptual Primary Field - Philosopher Identity - Adaptation Mask - Application Secondary Field - Prospector Charisma - Standardization Inspiration - Research Consciousness Hierarchy - Referential as Optimizing (Si) Responsible as Strategic (Te) Experimental as Critical (Fi) Hopeful as Counterfactual (Ne) Avoidant as Statistical (Ni) Rebellious as Relating (Fe) Aggressive as /Etiological (Ti) Depressive as Scouting (Se) 44 Introduction to Cognietrics Demeanors: ISXJ: People with Referential Si like to multi-task and try out different customizations. IXTJ: People with Responsible Te are goal-oriented, image-conscious, and want to maximize output. *The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not discussed. Relationship Ratings - ENFP - 13 INFP - 12 ISTJ - 11 EST] - 10 ENTP - 9 ISF] - 8 ESFP - 7 INT] - 6 INTP -5 ISFP - 5 ESF] - 4 ENT] - 4 ESTP =3 ISTP - 2 INF] - 1 ENF] - 0 45 Alon Oscar Deutsch Demeanors TXFP: People with Referential Fi will go out of their way to appear unique, mysterious, and interesting. EXFP: People with Responsible Fi say what's on their mind, trying to shock people to action. EXF]: People with Referential Fe want to teach the world their ethics. IXF]: People with Responsible Fe want everyone to feel good and have a good time. IXTP: People with Referential Ti want to reframe paradoxes and replace obsolete constructs. EXTP: People with Responsible Ti try to make sense of the world around them and be helpful. EXT]: People with Referential Te may go out of their way to correct someone. TXT]: People with Responsible Te are goal-oriented, image-conscious, and want to maximize output. ISXJ: People with Referential Si like to multi-task and try out different customizations. ESXJ: People with Responsible Si try to refine their efforts and keep people consistently focused. ESXP: People with Referential Se like to motivate others to be their best. ISXP: People with Responsible Se make others aware of important information and get reactions from them. 46 Introduction to Cognietrics INXJ: People with Referential Ni are always searching for new projects, making things that will last a long time. ENXJ: People with Responsible Ni are very foresightful, and try to support the best probability for a positive outcome. ENXP: People with Referential Ne come from a perfect world, and are always trying to shape this one in their image. INXP: People with Responsible Ne are interested in cultivating potential alternatives, and spend _ time comparing ideas. *The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not discussed. *It helps to think of the judging Function as a selection Function and the perceiving Function as a recognition Function, such that Judgers extravert selection and introvert recognition, and Perceivers extravert recognition and introvert selection, to prevent confusion. This way Inventors Refer to their recognition and select Responsibly and Discoverers Refer to their selection and recognize Responsibly. Recognition leads to Reason or Resolutions, Observation or Association, and Induction or Deduction, whereas selection is due to Curiosity or Seriousness, Reform or Administration, and Knowledge or Understanding. 47 CHAPTER THREE Theory My model agrees with John Beebe that Weak & Positive Functions are higher on the Consciousness Hierarchy than Weak & Negative Functions, but it also agrees with Ausra Augustinaviciuté that Strong & Negative Functions are at the bottom. Since this theory differs from its predecessors, I have decided to name it “Cognietrics”. The Strong Functions are at the top and bottom of the Consciousness Hierarchy and represent the most active regions of the brain. The Weak Functions are in the middle. Among ENFXs, it is easy to decide that the Judger with the Referential feeling is more of a Feeler than an iNtuiter, but among INFXs, which is which? The truth is that it is more complicated - the INFJ will excel at Feeling because it has been shaped by external forces, but will actually do more iNtuiting (and about more things) than Feeling (mostly to support that Feeling) though it will happen behind-the-scenes. This type of hidden preparation 48 Introduction to Cognietrics using the Referential Function is what makes Introverts seem mystetious, and may in fact contribute to their often unique perspectives (while allowing [IXXPs to judge what to perceive and IXXJs to perceive what to judge beforehand, instead of engaging in direct, face-value judgment or perception as an Extrovert would). The Function Temperaments cycle down the Consciousness Hierarchy for the Positive Attitudes and begin again the same way for the Negative Attitudes. For TXXJ (Evaluator) the order is Pi-Je-Ji-Pe. For EXXP (Reflector) the order is Ji-Pe-Pi-Je. For EXXJ (Persuader) the order is Je-Pi-Pe-Ji. For EXXP (Explorer) the order is Pe-Ji-Je-Pi. The reason for this is that the last letter of the designator determines which of the Demeanors is extraverted, rather than Referential (the Suggestion, Sensing or iNtuiting, is a form of perception, and the Meaning, Thinking or Feeling, is a form of judgment); Myers is credited with interpreting Jung when he said, in Psychological Types (1921), “[the] most differentiated function is always employed in an extraverted way”. I believe that this is due to social pressures as well as public identification with oneself; not having a conscious Reaction Function also allows Introverts to hide their cognitive processes and stay focused on goals, and may be part of the cause of some of their Introverted behaviors. On the other hand, having a conscious Reaction Function allows Extraverts to deal with the situation at hand as directly and efficiently as possible. When something happens, the extraverted Function provides a Reaction that is concise and useful in social situations - Perceivers can quickly check how things are developing if they are Scouting or how things could be developing if they are Counterfactual; Judgers can quickly check how to take advantage of something if they are Strategic or how to support ethical standards if they are Relating. The introverted Function is used for the further consideration 49 Alon Oscar Deutsch and gradual integration of the information. Functions that are not Reaction Functions (extraverted) are called Contemplation Functions (introverted). Extraverts have Reactions that are Referential, Experimental, Avoidant, and Ageressive. Introverts have Reactions that are Responsible, Hopeful, Rebellious, and Depressive. When you are Hopeful about a Preference there must also be some aspects of it with which you are simultaneously Avoidant, however as you become Experimental by the use of a Preference you will find other ways in which you are also Rebellious. Being Responsible allows you to become so habituated to a Preference that you become increasingly Aggressive to other facets of it; however, when you are so engrossed in a Preference that you are Referential, you may become otherwise Depressive to it. The Positive Attitudes comprise the Ego and begin in Strength with being Hopeful, then as you become acquainted you become Experimental, then as experience builds you become Responsible, and eventually you start to become Referential. The Negative Attitudes comprise the Id and begin in Strength with being Avoidant, then possibly you realize that you have become increasingly Rebellious, then you might grow Aggressive, and eventually you may find a way to become Depressive. There is a Super-Ego, or Conscience, which is even more conscious than the Ego, and it contains information from immediate sources other than the Self (Ego and Id) about the Self (rather than what is processed inside the brain) to provide an idealization about life to seek as a goal (information from the Super-Ego may eventually become part of the Ego when it is no longer an immediate 50 Introduction to Cognietrics necessity and as the Self continues to shape itself over time). The Super-Id consists of the impressions of others about the Self which are unknown to the Self, but which have a cumulative effect on the Self just the same. As the Self ages, the Ego arranges itself to satisfy the Super-Ego just as the Id arranges itself to satisfy the Super-Id; this allows suspicions to balance confirmations when there is uncertainty. However, the Ego and Id also allow a controlled, ordered response to the Super-Ego and Super- Id. This allows the use of other avenues of information gathering and processing (as well as the independent operation of the mind), which then provides the ability for educated choices and free will. Fear encourages the use of the Weak Functions, and Anger encourages the use of the Negative Functions. Punctions 1 & 2 - Not Angry or Fearful Punctions 3 & 4 - Fearful enough to take precautions Functions 5 & 6 - Fearful/Angty enough to seek advice Functions 7 & 8 - Angry enough to confront someone Due to similar Function usage, the Relationships Rated 13 and 12 may give the appearance of the Type as a Frightened (though not Angry) version of the Self, which creates in the original Type a desire to comfort and offer support, which is beneficial for the Relationship. The Super-Ego is in fact so conscious that in its use one may even become detached from his own Anger and wonder if he is the cause of Anger in others; it is ultimately responsible for Selflessness, and the Super-Id is responsible for Selfishness. *Since the Positive Attitudes contain an extraverted perceiving Function and an introverted judging Function which allow Perceivers to deal with unavailable 51 Alon Oscar Deutsch information, though the Super-Ego also provides them with available information about the Self, those Functions use available information as the impulse to check for information that was not available. The introverted judging Function uses it for developing convictions and the extraverted perceiving Function uses it to see if others need help. The Conscience is also processed by the introverted perceiving Function for self-awareness and the extraverted judging Function in order to make sure that others are following the rules; in the Id these Functions may try to compensate for a lack of available information by using it as an impulse to make more information available. Inventors have a Referential perceiving Function, which means that they use conscious, or available, information with a perceiving Function, which speculates rather than limits. This means that Inventors use available information to see what can be changed by speculation, causing them to Invent, whereas Discoverers use available information to see what is already present and can be limited, causing them to Discover. Attitudes EGO Strong & Positive Referential - this is the main Function, from which all References are made. Responsible - this is the auxiliary Function, which is used to check the Referential Function. Weak & Positive Experimental - this Function serves as a basis for showing initiative. Hopeful - this Function is used to search for new areas of interest. 52 Introduction to Cognietrics ID Weak & Negative Avoidant - this Function is used to show disapproval. Rebellious - this Function is used against conformity. Strong & Negative Aggressive - this Function is used as a show of force. Depressive - this Function is used to accept grief and is the most repressed of all of the Functions. Inclinations The Referential and Hopeful Functions represent available information with which one is comfortable, and the Responsible and Experimental Functions represent available information with which one is uncomfortable. The Rebellious and Aggressive Functions represent unavailable information with which one is comfortable, and the Avoidant and Depressive Functions represent unavailable information with which one is uncomfortable. I believe that the Inclinations, along with the Function Strengths as they relate to the Justification and Inference, are how Type is initially determined. Functions Counterfactual (Ne, NP / Reasonable) - making novel comparisons, brainstorming, and envisioning hypothetical change. Statistical (Ni, NJ / Resolute) - having reliable expectations and considering the unknowable for developing robust ideas (while Statistics are also Patterns, INF]s use Statistically-relevant Concepts). 53 Alon Oscar Deutsch Scouting (Se, SP / Resolute) - being showy and testing limitations. Optimizing (Si, SJ / Reasonable) - monitoring resources and concentrating on performance. Relating (Fe, FJ / Curious) - determining emotional states, sharing enthusiasm, and endorsing harmony. Critical (Fi, FP / Serious) - having strong opinions and weighing different options to represent exclusive bonds. Strategic (Te, TJ / Serious) - realizing effects and resulting implications for direct systemization and encouraging a state of prosperity. AEtiological (Ti, TP / Curious) - finding causes using fundamental suppositions and identifying feedback loops. Motivations When introvertedly thinking (Ti), XXTPs have the ability to eventually define complex ideas under the right conditions, allowing them to delay decisions (Perceiver) to telieve stress (Curious). When extravertedly feeling (Fe), XXFJs create opportunities, allowing them to make instant decisions (Judger) to relieve stress (Curious). When introvertedly feeling (Fi), XXFPs feel they must honor their beliefs in the best possible way, allowing them to delay decisions (Perceiver) when there is a deep personal connection (Serious). When extravertedly thinking (Te), XXT]Js are aware of 54 Introduction to Cognietrics obscure opportunities, allowing them to make instant decisions (Judger) when there is a deep personal connection (Serious). When introvertedly sensing (Si), XSXJs keep track of many applicable possibilities simultaneously, allowing them to make instant decisions (Judger) until an alternative is accepted (Reasonable). When extravertedly intuiting (Ne), XNXPs_ validate perspectives, allowing them to delay decisions (Perceiver) until an alternative is accepted (Reasonable). When introvertedly intuiting (Ni), XNXJs notice the window for each chance of success, allowing them to make instant decisions (Judger) which require commitment (Resolute). When extravertedly sensing (Se), XSXPs filter for the most extravagant option in order to settle a point, allowing them to delay decisions (Perceiver) which require commitment (Resolute). ‘Temperaments EXXPs are known as Explorers; they want to test and improve mental faculties in novel situations (introverted judging helping extraverted perceiving). EXXJs are known as Persuaders; they want people to see things from their point of view (introverted perceiving helping extraverted judging). IXXJs are known as Evaluators; they want to combine a few key points to interpret holistically (extraverted judging helping introverted perceiving). 39 Alon Oscar Deutsch IXXPs are known as Reflectors; they want to see an idea from every angle individually to preserve the purity of each impression (extraverted perceiving helping introverted judging). EXXJs and EXXPs are both known as Discoverers; they try to seek methods to protect against a clouded judgment in order to have a clear view of all things. EXXPs and [XX]Js are both known as Inventors; they like to look for better means of accomplishment, even if they have to go against accepted theories by utilizing anomalous or untested phenomena. The main difference between the two is that Inventors use synthetic propositions to consider everything as connected simultaneously using symbols in order to make use of something and Discoverers use analytic propositions to keep their ideas completely separate using strict definitions for use in the juxtaposition of competing interpretations. This is partially due to the powerful yet neglected influence of the Responsible Function, which causes Discoverers to want to perceive (combustion is turning a gear) to validate their a priori judgments (energy can be harnessed from combustion), or Discover, and Inventors to want to judge (the gear can be used to propel a vehicle) to validate their a posteriori perceptions (combustion is turning a gear), or Invent (Inventions may also precede Discoveries, such as occurred with the pregnancy risks Discovered after the Invention of thalidomide). Referential judgment is used as a form of limitation and is supported by Responsible speculation, and Referential perception is used as a form of speculation and is supported by Responsible limitation. A priori synthetic statements are typically used subconsciously by both Discoverers and Inventors in the third Attitude, and a posteriori analytic statements have been shown to be 56 Introduction to Cognietrics non-existent by Immanuel Kant. As Discoverers, EXX]s Judge shared information to interpret the actions of others and [XXPs Perceive relevant associations. As Inventors, EXXPs Perceive improvements in the relative abilities of others and IXXJs Judge optimal solutions. To use the story of the bird in the tree, one could not have Discovered it without a prior notion (a priori) assuming it was neatly the shape and color of the leaves of the tree, but once it has been Discovered it could be used to Invent anything without and even despite prior considerations (a posteriori), such as a carrier pigeon. In addition, to make the Discovery, scanning occurs for separately- differentiated bird-like characteristics, but for the Invention, birds and letters must be combined together and then considered inter-symbolically and in conjunction with each other in order to explore the possibility for a postal network. Using the idea that Judgment is based on information that is available, and Perception is based on information that is not (which is why Perceivers seem to have an aptitude for fluid intelligence which is experience- independent, and Judgers seem to have an aptitude for crystallized intelligence which is experience-dependent “Intelligence in Relation to Jung’s Personality Types’. Purnham, Moutafi, & Paltiel. 2005.)), it is possible to show that: EXXJs use available information to Discover (Referential limitation), which is useful for coming to conclusions; EXXPs use unavailable information to Invent (Referential speculation), which is useful for taking specific precautions; IXXJs use available information to Invent (Referential speculation), which is useful for being resourceful; IXXPs use unavailable information to Discover (Referential limitation), which is useful for developing new branches of study. Judgers focus on perceiving in a new way something that is often judged, and Perceivers on judging in a new way something that is often perceived, so that Discoverers focus on the judging aspects and Inventors focus on the perceiving aspects. 57 Alon Oscar Deutsch *Extraverts, seeking to impose order, are quick to judge (EJ) and slow to perceive (EP). Introverts, seeking a selective advantage, are quick to perceive (IJ) and slow to judge (IP). Explorers are not Discoverers because they have no preconceived bias and are not trying to confirm (Discover) an expectation. Manners STs are known as Inspectors, they want to make sure that quality is always what it should be; common professions include police detective. NF's ate known as Idealists, they want to improve the state of the world; common professions include court attorney. SFs are known as Guardians, they want to preserve precious items and ideas; common professions include school teacher. NTs ate known as Analysts, they want to see how events can be connected; common professions include computer programmer. STs and NFs are both known as Progressives, they want to bring about change, due to a scrutiny of reality coupled with an attachment to the imagination. They tend to be restless and proactive. SFs and NTs are both known as Classicists, they want to fulfill present standards, due to an attachment to reality coupled with a scrutiny of the imagination. They tend to be relaxed and lenient. 58 CHAPTER FOUR Mentalities Classicist-Discoverers and Progressive-Inventors have a Conceptual Mentality that deals with inclusive designs, due to the use of established insights for conjectural purposes. Progressive-Discoverers and Classicist-Inventors have a Patterned Mentality that deals with recurring configurations, due to the use of conjectural insights for established purposes. Types share a Mentality with Relationships Rated 13, 11, 3, 1, 5, and 4. A common Field occurs when the Referential Function of a Type is the Responsible Punction of another Type whose Referential Function is not the Responsible Function of the first Type. This imbalance in the Consciousness Hierarchy tends to lead to a one-sided Relationship, which is why these Relationships are Rated the lowest of the ones that contain a shared Value. In Socionics this is known as "Supervision"; however, I believe that this is a bad name for the 59 Alon Oscar Deutsch Relationship because the Type known in Socionics as the "Supervisor" in Cognietrics is held Responsible by the Responsible Function to the other Type's more active but less accountable Referential Function and so effectively becomes a supervisee. In reality however, there are instances where the Socionics "Supervisor" begins to hold accountable the actions of the Socionics "Supervisee" using the Socionics "Supervisee's" own Responsible Function. I think that due to the uniqueness of each Relationship, descriptions such as these are ultimately not good predictors of Relationships, which is why I choose to Rate them instead using shared Values as predictors of success. Because this Relationship exists when either the Referential or the Responsible Function is shared, two Types share the 4 Rating. The 5 Rating occurs for Types that have Functions that Complement in order those of either of the Types Rated 4. Other Relationships that share the Field include the identical Type and the Type of the same Temperament but opposite Manner. Fields Patterned Judgers — INTJ—ESTJ—ISFJ—-ENFJ—INT] Primary -Expert- Act based on Patterns to determine what they mean collectively and respond. Secondary -Theorist- Delay action based on Concepts to check references. Conceptual Judgers — ENTJ—INFJ—ESFJ—ISTJ—-ENTJ Primary -Philosopher- Act based on Concepts to choose methods suitable for accomplishing a goal. Secondary -Prospector- Delay action based on Patterns to evaluate success and update worldview. 60 Introduction to Cognietrics Patterned Perceivers — ENTP—ISTP—-ESFP—INFP-ENTP Primary -Prospector- Delay action based on Patterns to mine data and seek rewards. Secondary -Philosopher- Act based on Concepts to exploit resources using accepted methods. Conceptual Perceivers — INTP—ENFP-—ISFP-ESTP—INTP Primary -Theorist- Delay action based on Concepts to simulate realities and respond accordingly. Secondary -Expert- Act based on Patterns to pursue new avenues as they become available. Experts and Theorists are Scholars; they stay well- informed about topics that interest them. Philosophers and Prospectors are Visionaries; they have a direction for pragmatic development. An ESF] I interviewed likes to tell people her Philosophies about life, of which she has many. She believes that helping people is more important than materialism, that hard work pays ("there is no easy money"), and that you should be careful in what you say because "though people may not remember what you said, they will always remember how you made them feel". An ESFP I know loves to look through garage sales to make old belongings into new Prospects; when he is on eBay he has a general idea of what he wants but likes to look around, searching for price Patterns in certain combinations of qualities that will result in the best deal. An INTP had a Theory at his new job that he could save the company on water supplies. He looked around, confirmed his Theory, made the adjustments, and saved the company $70,000. For this he was featured in the 61 Alon Oscar Deutsch company newsletter. I, an ISF] with the working habits of an INT], like to have Expertise in the things that interest me. I have a phase where I like to learn everything I can about a subject, and then I move on to the next one. In the second grade it was meteorology and I learned everything about evety kind of cloud (I would make charts of all of the features of all of the kinds of clouds to find Patterns among them, and so that I could identify what was happening in the sky), in the third grade it was paleontology and I learned everything about every kind of dinosaur, and in college it was physics and I worked in three research laboratories while getting my degree. Now I want to learn everything about psychology! I noticed that in the MBTI Manual (rd Edition, p. 269) INTPs had the highest crystallized IQs (SAT) and INTJs had the highest fluid IQs. Using the Fields I realized that Judgers used fluid intelligence and Perceivers used crystallized intelligence. Fluid problem solving progresses from Expertise to Philosophy and crystallized problem solving progresses from Theory to Prospection. If experience didn't change, Expertise wouldn't have raw material and Philosophy wouldn't evolve. When experience changes, Theory is less able to define and Prospection has less material to search. Fluid intelligence turns Patterns to Concepts and crystallized intelligence turns Concepts to Patterns. Expertise to Prospection yields profound questions (Patterned) and Theory to Philosophy yields idiographic questions (Conceptual), and for this reason Guiding is a general look at specifics and Investigation is a specific look at generality and Knowledge of Patterns and Understanding of Concepts require Sense to connect the general and specific. Backwards, as in Visionary to Scholar, is useful for memory retention. Once there is experience with the problem from Expertise, it may lead to Theory 62 Introduction to Cognietrics and then Prospection before continuing to Philosophy. This study, termed Problematics, raises some interesting questions. What are the basic constituents of an abstract problem? What is the smallest system that can solve a given problem? What is intelligence? Where does this circuit occur in the brain (dopamine system?)? Can it be improved with nootropics or electrical stimulation? Does it differ cognitively from behaviorally? What psychological concepts ate involved and where is it involved in psychological concepts? Is it more due to conditioning or genetics? At what level of biological organization does this type of processing emerge - the cephalopod? The cell? Is there an analogous system? Is artificial intelligence in a computer-brain interface more suited to Prospecting and Expertise? How does it work in a brainstorming session? Are there multiple instances cooperating in the brain? Is there a simpler system? What can't be solved by this system? An interesting model occurred to me. What if DNA can solve problems in this manner? It could respond to certain combinations of inputs (ultimate cause) with Expertise which may promote mutations in certain places (proximate cause) about which the polymer Theorizes. Expression of certain combinations of proteins could later be Prospected resulting in a useful and even Philosophical action. This form of Lamarckian evolution might explain evolutionary jumps. After some research I found that a possible mechanism for this type of activity is methylation. Methylation forms a tagging system that deactivates mostly unused DNA, and also increases the rate of mutation in those areas. In the next generation there may be a more useful adaptation. DNA can take any physical essence and do whatever it wants. Directed motion like chemotaxis is actually a Darwinian physics which also accounts for measurement and so reverses the Copenhagen Interpretation. Proofs work as follows. Fundamentality brought about by Expertise helps with meaning skepticism in a Theory which helps find ideational interdependence in 63 Alon Oscar Deutsch Prospection which helps with feasibility and then the reason for the proof Philosophically. The Motivations are useful tools in solving a proof. The idea being proven is tracked through the Problematic stages with Si, checked against existing ideas with Ne, driven by Te ambition where there aren't Fi restraints, limited by Ti where there are no Fe opportunities to create, and settled by Se points when there is a large Ni window of success. Individual Type processing may contribute to a more thorough understanding of the proof. Problematics mirrors the Consciousness Hierarchy because when you are Referential it is with respect to Expertise, you need a Theory to be Responsible, Prospection is Experimental, and Philosophical choice of a method is useful when you need Hope. A better way to look at a Proof is a recursion that can stabilize such that it has a different function at the point of complexity. Noncontrariety, that something is not more of less of its essence at different times or in relation to different things, is embodied in the Triads because Classicist is not just more Sensing or iNtuiting but Sensing when Feeling and iNtuiting when Thinking, which is important in stable characteristics of psychology, or personality, such as Walter Mischel's Cognitive Affective Personality System, where different behaviors tend to occur in certain circumstances. Commonality between responses to beauty in art and beauty in music is the essence of beauty. Same essence of an object, or same, is different in certain predetermined circumstances (that help determine sameness), whereas when different, or different essence, this does not occur. This is true for any number of essences in an object. Since Mischel's system may be unconscious and conditioned, what is consciousness and what is conditioning? Is it an essence like beautiful due to Hebbian plasticity? What are the evolutionary benefits of such impressions? Is learning a proof from Expertise that is due to Hebbian plasticity? As same may be thought of as like and like as mentioned in Gottlob Frege's Foundations 64 Introduction to Cognietrics of Arithmetic, it may be shown that mathematical proofs equalize like structures analogously in terms of Expertise in a fundamental manner. Although scientific papers usually contain the elements of a proof, they refer to a specific experiment which can never be proven only disproven, however these elements are still relevant in interpreting Causality, as Expertise and Philosophical phenomena must be Judged whereas Theory and ideational interdependence that may be Prospected may be Perceived. A similar division may be used to discuss Rationalist and Empiricist justification. Negative feedback that causes a threshold to be crossed in a Complex system must be Judged and so contributes to Expertise and Philosophical phenomena, though positive feedback that causes teinforcement (and a decrease in entropy) is Perceived and contributes to Theory and Prospection. Noumena must be intuited and can't be sensed. Personas The birth and death of Patterns and Concepts are associated with Personas in a closed Mentality Loop: Conceptual TN - Thesis - To formulate the Concept. N-F - Application - To find uses for the Concept. F—S - Promotion - To begin utilizing the Concept. ST - Adaptation - To develop the Concept. Patterned N-T - Proof - To define the Pattern. TS - Research - To locate the Pattern in nature. SF - Priority - To address the Pattern when necessaty. PON - Standardization - To update every procedure with the Pattern. 65 Alon Oscar Deutsch Identity / Primary Persona: Derived from the Primary Field, this Persona is the most conscious and so is shaped by social expectation; it is based on the Referential and Responsible Functions and developed by the Relationship Rated 11, which shares the Values, Manner, and Temperament; it is Disrupted by the Relationship Rated 3 and associated with positive reinforcement in operant conditioning. Chatisma / Family / Secondary Persona: Derived from the Secondary Field, this Persona is used for versatility; it is based on the Experimental and Hopeful Functions and developed by the Relationship Rated 12, which shares the Values; it is Disrupted by the Relationship Rated 0 and associated with negative punishment in operant conditioning and also Fear because there is something to lose when it is used. Inspiration / School / Tertiary Persona: Derived from the Secondary Field, this Persona works toward important accomplishments in life; it is based on the Aggressive and Depressive Functions and developed by the Relationship Rated 2, which shares the Manner; it is Disrupted by the Relationship Rated 10 and associated with positive punishment in operant conditioning and also Anger because there is something with which to deal when it is used. Mask / Work / Quarternary Persona: Derived from the Primary Field, this Persona is used to address problems; it is based on the Avoidant and Rebellious Functions and developed by the Relationship Rated 1, which shares the Temperament; it is Disrupted by the Relationship Rated 13 and associated with negative reinforcement in operant conditioning and also Fear and Anger because thete is something to hide when it is used. 66 Introduction to Cognietrics Disruption occurs when a Persona (all of which share the Exertion of the Type) is confronted by Functions of opposite Exertion and Value but similar order of Preference (which then compete for attention). It is similar to "Extinguishment" in Socionics, and its minimization is the purpose of the Consciousness Hierarchy. The difference between the Jungian Cognitive Functions and the Personas is that the Personas cannot be used simultaneously and are a presentation of the Self to the world whereas the Jungian Cognitive Functions may be used simultaneously and are mostly hidden from the world in the subconscious or as introverted Function Temperaments. *One advantage of having a Relationship Rated 13 is that all Fields are present, allowing different information to be addressed completely by both partners; this provides the necessary foundations for a successful partnership. It is not to say that people don't sometimes prefer to work alone - sometimes a closed Mentality Loop is not helpful. An Idealist-Inventor may Feel that Adaptation is not economical, and an Inspector-Inventor may Think that Applications are not relevant in urgent situations. A Guardian-Discoverer may Feel that there is cause for concern in directly employing a Thesis, and an Analyst- Discoverer may Think that Promotion would result in the endorsement of only the immediately profitable aspects of an enterprise. An Idealist-Discoverer may Feel that confirmation-biased interpretation is the result of Research, and an Inspector-Discoverer may Think that Standardization prevents competition, A Guardian- Inventor may Feel that a Proof does not imply anything new, and an Analyst-Inventor may Think that a stated Priority requires more evidence. However, this direction is not conducive to communication and prevents growth for both partners. 67 Alon Oscar Deutsch Charisma is achieved by overcoming Fear, Inspiration is achieved by overcoming Anger, and a Mask is achieved by overcoming Fear and Anger. The Mask seems like it closes the Mentality Loop (all of its Personas being represented), helping the wearer to look more authoritative (having considered every possibility). It is commonly used to reject intervention. The Charisma shows how well one can impress the Types whose Relationships are Rated higher than Relationships with one's own Type. It is used when meeting new people and addressing a crowd. The Identity allows the user to have a sense of Self, from which to create stability and balance. It is used more than any other Persona. The Inspiration is not influenced by social expectation and provides the freedom to return to one's instincts. It is used when one is not paying attention and is behind sudden realizations. Here are some anecdotes that illustrate the way the Inspiration occurs in different Types: As a working INTJ, Cognietrics is one of my Theses; I consider it a step forward in the study of typology, and I hope that it inspires future generations of psychologists. For me, it is easy to show the actuality of typological categorization using examples such as these (in mathematics it is called Proof by Induction) or to formulate rationalist Proofs of my ideas by inferring the similarities between the combined effects of different Myers-Briges Preferences, but it would be a lot harder for me to combine this theory with others in order to propose a common Thesis; however, I have tried to make my ideas 68 Introduction to Cognietrics as generally applicable as possible. The same INTP from my other story refuses to acknowledge Cognietrics until it is backed by science, although I told him that self-awareness is not easy for most people and would inhibit any study that I conducted. Nevertheless, Proof would be the deciding factor for him, his Thesis being (as usual) that ideas must have solid empirical evidence to be applicable. An INF] I know is an artist who uses very unorthodox methods to create art. Clay sculptures in picture frames, accordion-like structures made of parts of copies of the original pictures, and other visual realizations fill the wall. What she did, in fact, was take a new Application for many materials and tools and make it Standardized so that when we took her art class we were able to make the exact same sort of thing. It was, all in all, the most interesting art class that I have ever attended. An INFP musician likes to make up songs on the spot to show off his improvisation skills, often including the name of the petson to whom he addresses the song. The most memorable parts of his songs happen when he does something creative - one time, he changed the ending of a word in a song to rhyme with someone's name, stretching out that syllable and fading out and _ alternating vocalizations of the rhyme with that of the original word, and in doing so he found new Applications for both the word (as a rhyme) and his vocalizations (using fading alternations). It made a huge impression on me because it sounded so good, and contrasted with his typical use of uniformity and Standardization of themes and ideas (such as normal rhyming and singing) that was probably the reason for the original adjustment. 69 Alon Oscar Deutsch Dispositions Only Relationships Rated 13 and 11 share the Disposition, which mirrors Mentality Loops in each Field as determined by Reaction Preference. Patterned Curious—Resolute: A lack of attachments may precede a divergence of commitments. Resolute—Serious: A divergence of commitments may result in important enterprises. Serious—Reasonable: Important enterprises may require alternative support. Reasonable—Curious: Alternative support may lead to aa lack of attachments. Conceptual Curious—Reasonable: Pleasant experiences may produce unorthodox ideas. Reasonable—Serious: Unorthodox ideas may garner a powerful response. Serious—Resolute: A powerful response may involve certain stipulations. Resolute—Curious: Certain stipulations may bring pleasant experiences. Roles Patterned Extraverts are Contextual because they look at how people live; they are known as Investigators. Conceptual Introverts ate Contextual because they consider relevant forms of control in a niche; they are known as Engineers. Patterned Introverts are Axiomatic because they look at 70 Introduction to Cognietrics the emergence of complex phenomena; they are known as Scientists. Conceptual Extraverts are Axiomatic because they use easily-understood methods; they are known as Guides. Contextual Types consider a situation and the history that brought it about to be unique, with a goal of accuracy. Axiomatic Types use universal laws and principles, with a goal of precision. *Scientists will chart correlations (Patterned), which may be used in a Visionary rather than Scholarly (Theoretical) way, but Theorists require a functional design (Conceptual), which may be Contextual rather than Axiomatic (the realm of Science). Expression Cognietrics makes certain predictions about how two Types will Express themselves extravertedly given agreement or disagreement. It is obvious that among Axiomatic Types, NTJs and NFPs Express themselves differently from each other. If common iNtuition is considered, it is obvious that the NTJ can make the idea seem more communicable by using Thought, but if common Seriousness is considered, it is obvious that the NFP can make the idea seem more communicable by using Reason. Because of this, each Type will often disagree using the Reaction Demeanor and agree using the Contemplation Demeanor. As such, agreement is subconscious and so mostly Experimental to the Extravert, as disagreement is for the Introvert. With time, agreement becomes a powerful influence and tool for the Extravert and disagreement becomes so for the Introvert, allowing Extraverts to build close communities while 71 Alon Oscar Deutsch maintaining power Referentially and Introverts to develop unique projects while maintaining receptivity Referentially. Contextual Expressiveness by Value NTP>NFJ Reason beats Curiousness due to usefulness. NFJ>SFP Curiousness beats Resoluteness due to desirability. SFP>ST] Resoluteness beats Seriousness due to ability to commit. STJ>NTP Seriousness beats Reason due _ to impottance. Contextual Expressiveness by Preference NTP>STJ iNtuition beats Thought due to unfamiliarity. STJ>SFP Thought beats Sensation due to conditionality. SFP>NF]J Sensation beats Feeling due to form. NFJ>NTP Feeling beats iNtuition due to exclusivity. Axiomatic Expressiveness by Value NTJ>STP Seriousness beats Resoluteness due to complications. STP>SF] Resoluteness beats Curiousness due to faith. SFJ>NFP Curiousness beats Reason due to focus. NFP>NTJ Reason’ beats Seriousness due to possibilities. Axiomatic Expressiveness by Preference NTJ>NFP Thought beats iNtuition due to constraints. NFP>SF] iNtuition beats Feeling due to uncertainty. SFJ>STP Feeling beats Sensation due to direction. STP>NTJ Sensation beats Thought due to realism. 72 CHAPTER FIVE Natures Types with a Reasonable Referential Function or a Resolute Responsible Function are known as Associatets; they have extremely detailed ideas. Types with a Resolute Referential Function or a Reasonable Responsible Function are known as Observers; they never lose sight of the "Big Picture". Characters Types with a Curious Referential Function or a Serious Responsible Function are known as Reformers; they work from the bottom up for a justified cause. Types with a Serious Referential Function or a Curious Responsible Function are known as Administrators; they work from the top down for maximum efficiency. 73 Alon Oscar Deutsch *Some say that the "Big Picture" is top down and the details are bottom up, however Quantum Theory has no "Big Picture" in the form of a coherent and accepted interpretation, though it is described from the top down using systematic controls; "Social Justice Warriors” work from the bottom of the social ladder up, but are rarely concerned with anything but the "Big Picture" - this may involve a policy that is hard to implement consistently. Inferences Referential sensing and Responsible intuiting lead to Induction. Referential intuiting and Responsible sensing lead to Deduction. When you Induct you consolidate many Sensations and determine what you may actually iNtuit as a result. When you Deduce you consolidate many iNtuitions and determine what you may actually Sense as a result. Induction reaches an abstract conclusion about multiple concrete categories using examples from those categories, leaving nothing to the senses for verification; it is used when making mental leaps. Deduction teaches a concrete conclusion about multiple abstract arguments based on its relationships to those premises, leaving nothing to the imagination for verification; it is used when constructing sound arguments. Justifications Referential thinking and Responsible feeling lead to Knowledge. 74 Introduction to Cognietrics Referential feeling and Responsible thinking lead to Understanding. When you define your Thoughts it is because you Know, when you employ them it is because you Understand. When you define your Feelings it is because you Understand, when you employ them it is because you Know. In this way, Thinkers progress from Knowing what their Thoughts are to Understanding what their Thoughts are, and Feelers progress from Understanding what their Feelings are to Knowing what their Feelings are. In addition, Knowing progresses from Thoughts to Feelings and Understanding progresses from Feelings to Thoughts. Knowledge deals with specific facts, whereas Understanding deals with generalized comprehension. Therefore, in the end Thinking is when you Understand how to make use of Knowledge, and Feeling is when you Know how to make use of Understanding and Feeling uses the general to create the specific, and Thinking uses the specific to create the general. *This occurs because the third Function is already somewhat accommodated along with the first Function due to the sharing of the primary exertion. Some teach incorrectly that Induction uses the specific to create the general, as in "this A is B, therefore all A are B", and that Deduction uses the general to create the 75 Alon Oscar Deutsch specific, as in "all A are B, all B are C, therefore the next A will be C". However, Induction can use the general to create the specific, as in "all A have been B, therefore the next A will be B", and Deduction can even use the general to create the general, as in "all A are B, all B are C, therefore all A are C". Hence, in redefining these ideas, Cognietrics makes of itself a sort of epistemological treatise. The Philosophy of Personas The Justification and Inference apply to the Personas. Thesis and Priority require Induction for classification and Knowledge for preventing inferiority. Proof and Promotion require Deduction for differentiation and Understanding for matching ideas. Reseatch and Application require Deduction for differentiation and Knowledge for preventing inferiority. Adaptation and Standardization require Induction for classification and Understanding for matching ideas. Values The Values ate based on Socionics, where they correspond to the "Quadra Values". They are called Curious, Serious, Reasonable, and Resolute. They are called the Values here because they are sought in an ideal partner (Relationships where both Values ate shared are highly Rated at 10-13, if neither Value is shared the Rating is 0-3). Each pair of Complementary Functions is assigned a Value, and is always found in either the Positive or Negative Attitudes. 76 Introduction to Cognietrics The Resolute Functions, Scouting (extraverted sensing) and Statistical (introverted intuiting), Complement each other because it is easier to be showy if you know the probability of what you’re showing. Resolute Types live strictly by their choices, and seldom change their minds. The Reasonable Functions, Counterfactual (extraverted intuiting) and Optimizing (introverted sensing), Complement each other because possibilities may not be worthwhile if they are not practical. Reasonable Types will often search for the best solution and will frequently change their minds as they consider new ideas, they also play devil’s advocate. The Serious Functions, Strategic (extraverted thinking) and Critical (introverted feeling), Complement each other because to calculate success for a tactic you must know its limits. Serious Types have a powerful connection to their interests and strive to be productive. The Curious Functions, Relating (extraverted feeling) and /Etiological (introverted thinking), Complement each other because it is easier to sympathize with people if you know the causes of their behavior. Curious Types have fun celebrating life and like to spread their mood contagiously. Types that are Serious and Reasonable are known as Counselors. Types that are Curious and Resolute are known as Advocates. Types that are Serious and Resolute are known as Skeptics. Types that are Curious and Reasonable are known as Negotiators. You can't Negotiate with a Skeptic, and you can't give Counsel to an Advocate. 77 Alon Oscar Deutsch Some caution is advised — asking questions is not an indicator of being Curious, as different situations will necessitate different behaviors, but preferring to be around Curious Types is. The same is true for acting Serious, Resolute, or Reasonable. Mindfulness and Preferences Just because you are a certain Cognietrics Type it doesn't mean that you shouldn't be Mindful of the other Preferences. You can be Mindful of Sensation by paying close attention to things in your immediate environment. You can be Mindful of iNtuition by imagining where you plan to be in the next 5-10 years. You can be Mindful of Thought by considering whether there are contradictions in your beliefs and how to deal with them. You can be Mindful of Feeling by considering how to support the things that are most important to you. You can be Mindful of Judgment by following your schedule and deadlines. You can be Mindful of Perception by being aware of the way you operate and the way the world works. You can be Mindful of Extraversion by listening carefully to what other people say and anticipating their needs. You can be Mindful of Introversion by taking the time to relax and promote your own interests. 78 CHAPTER SIX Traits a - Exertion b - Suggestion c - Meaning d - Reaction 1. a Exertion - Introverted or Extraverted 2. b Suggestion - iNtuiting or Sensing 3. c Meaning - Thinking or Feeling 4. d Reaction - Judger or Perceiver 5. ab Nature - Observer or Associater 6. ac Character - Reformer or Administrator 7. bd Bearing - Resolute or Reasonable 8. cd Outlook - Serious or Curious 9. ad Temperament - Inventor or Discoverer 10. be Manner - Classicist or Progressive 11. abe Field - Scholar or Visionary 12. bcd Role - Axiomatic or Contextual 13. abd Inference - Deductive or Inductive 14. acd Justification - Understanding or Knowing 15. abcd Mentality - Patterned or Conceptual 79 Alon Oscar Deutsch *The opposite Trait is usually expressed only in order to correct something. The Traits were inspired by Grigory Reinin's work in Socionics. Though I do not use the same language as him to describe the Traits, I believe that much of our work is similar - for instance, his "Asking" dichotomy refers to conditional dependency, as does my Contextual Trait, and it is associated with the same Types in both Socionics and Cognietrics. Fewer determining letters indicates that the Trait is more directly distinguished behaviorally. The Traits form an Abelian group if opposing Traits are included, with respect to each other and an identity element. Each Type shares exactly 7/15 Traits with any other Type (except, of course, the same Type). I will demonstrate that if a Type is changed, then the number of Traits that change with it is always 8, and that it doesn't matter how many of the Preferences are changed. If an even number of determining letters is changed, then the determined Trait stays the same, but if an odd number is changed, then the determined Trait changes as well. Because of the symmetry existing among the Preferences in determining the different Traits (which represent every combination of Preferences), the number of Traits that change for a change in one determining letter still holds if another determining letter is changed instead. Also, 16 Types divided by 2 3 times independently implies a total of 7 Traits. # changing letters: unchanging traits / changing traits a: b cd bc bd cd bcd / a ab ac ad abc abd acd abcd ab: c d ab cd abc abd abcd / a b ac ad be bd acd bed abe: d ab ac bc abd acd bed / abc ad bd cd abc abcd abcd: ab ac ad be bd cd abcd / abc d abc abd acd bcd Trait Determination Triads Here is yet another way to determine Cognietrics Types using Trait Determination Triads (IDTs), since any two Traits imply a third: 80 Introduction to Cognietrics Patterned, iNtuiting, Understanding - this Type extrapolates data to untested regions. INT] ENTP INFP ENF] Patterned, Sensing, Knowing - this Type picks up on things very easily. EST] ISTP ESFP ISF] Conceptual, iNtuiting, Knowing - this Type can identify potential effects using a model. ENT] INTP ENFP INFJ Conceptual, Sensing, Understanding - this Type can confirm utility in different situations. IST] ESTP ISFP ESF] Patterned, Thinking, Deductive - this Type checks the extent of tendencies with logic. INT] ENTP ESTJ ISTP Patterned, Feeling, Inductive - this Type accommodates recurring notions with an _ inclusive emotional response. INFP ENF] ESFP ISFJ Conceptual, Thinking, Inductive - this Type assesses performance using combined attributes. INTP ENT] ESTP IST] Conceptual, Feeling, Deductive - this Type chooses a suitable significance in accordance with the limits of expectations. INF] ENFP ESF] ISFP 81 Alon Oscar Deutsch Patterned, Introverted, Axiomatic - this Type (Scientist) looks at the emergence of complex phenomena. INT] ISF] ISTP INFP Patterned, Extraverted, Contextual - this Type (Investigator) looks at how people live. ENTP ESFP EST] ENFJ Conceptual, Introverted, Contextual - this Type (Engineer) considers relevant forms of control in a niche. INTP ISFP IST] INF] Conceptual, Extraverted, Axiomatic - this Type (Guide) uses easily-understood methods. ENT] ESF] ESTP ENFP Patterned, Judger, Scholar - this Type (Expert) determines what patterns mean collectively and responds. INT] EST] ISF] ENF] Patterned, Perceiver, Visionary - this Type (Prospector) mines data and seeks rewards. ESFP INFP ENTP ISTP Conceptual, Judger, Visionary - this Type (Philosopher) chooses methods suitable for accomplishing a goal. ESF] INFJ ENT] ISTJ Conceptual, Perceiver, Scholar - this Type (Theorist) simulates realities and responds accordingly. INTP ESTP ISFP ENFP 82 Introduction to Cognietrics Patterned, Classicist, Inventor - this Type supports established purposes. INT] ESFP ISF] ENTP Patterned, Progressive, Discoverer - this Type uses conjectural insights. EST] INFP ENF] ISTP Conceptual, Classicist, Discoverer - this Type uses established insights. INTP ESF] ISFP ENT] Conceptual, Progressive, Inventor - this Type supports conjectural purposes. ESTP INF] ENFP IST] Patterned, Serious, Observer - this Type looks for possible indicators. INT] ESFP EST] INFP Patterned, Curious, Associater - this Type looks for similarities. ENTP ISF] ENF] ISTP Conceptual, Serious, Associater - this Type is very open-minded. IST] ENFP ENT] ISFP Conceptual, Curious, Observer - this Type collects unique methods for later use. ESTP INF] ESF] INTP 83 Alon Oscar Deutsch Patterned, Resolute, Reformer - this Type endorses an action based on the accumulation of seemingly insignificant tendencies. INT] ESFP ISTP ENF] Patterned, Reasonable, Administrator - this Type wants to maximize returns. EST] INFP ENTP ISF] Conceptual, Resolute, Administrator - this Type sticks to certain criteria. ESTP INF] ENT] ISFP Conceptual, Reasonable, Reformer - this Type wants to replace underperforming components. INTP ESF] IST] ENFP Understanding, Deductive, Classicist - this Type tries to get a solid impression of things as they are. INT] ISFP ENTP ESF] Understanding, Inductive, Progressive - this Type documents information for an overall assessment. IST] INFP ESTP ENF] Knowing, Deductive, Progressive - this Type realizes where direct involvement is absolutely necessary. ISTP INF] EST] ENFP Knowing, Inductive, Classicist - this Type invests according to local history. INTP ISF] ENTJ ESFP 84 Introduction to Cognietrics Understanding, Axiomatic, Observer - this Type tries to see a situation with respect to fundamental laws. INT] ESTP INFP ESF] Understanding, Contextual, Associater - this Type looks for hidden significance. IST] ENTP ISFP ENF] Knowing, Axiomatic, Associater - this Type sees how to apply the rules to every situation. ISTP ENT] ISFJ ENFP Knowing, Contextual, Observer - this Type is hard to dissuade. INTP EST] INF] ESFP Understanding, Scholar, Resolute - this Type wants to answer questions. INT] ESTP ENF] ISFP Understanding, Visionary, Reasonable - this Type wants to reconcile disparate entities. ENTP ESF] IST] INFP Knowing, Scholar, Reasonable - this Type tries to be wise above all else. EST] ENFP INTP ISF] Knowing, Visionary, Resolute - this Type does not let a goal out of sight. ISTP INF] ENT] ESFP 85 Alon Oscar Deutsch Understanding, Thinking, Inventor - this Type tries every possibility. INT] IST] ENTP ESTP Understanding, Feeling, Discoverer - this Type tries to get a feel for things. ESF] ENF] ISFP INFP Knowing, Thinking, Discoverer - this Type searches for discrepancies. INTP ISTP ENT] EST] Knowing, Feeling, Inventor - this Type rearranges ideas to encourage different aspects. ESFP ENFP ISFJ INF] Understanding, Introverted, Serious - this Type has an interest in something. INT] IST] INFP ISFP Understanding, Extraverted, Curious - this Type is ready for anything. ESF] ENF] ESTP ENTP Knowing, Introverted, Curious - this Type is intrigued about a situation. INTP ISTP INF] ISF] Knowing, Extraverted, Serious - this Type cares about the well-being of others. ESFP ENFP EST] ENT] 86 Introduction to Cognietrics Understanding, Judger, Reformer - this Type looks for new ways to take action. INT] IST] ESF] ENF] Understanding, Perceiver, Administrator - this Type wants all of the information before taking action. ENTP ESTP ISFP INFP Knowing, Judger, Administrator - this Type takes action as soon as wattanted. ENT] EST] ISF] INF] Knowing, Perceiver, Reformer - this Type considers the ideal method for taking action. INTP ISTP ESFP ENFP Deductive, Axiomatic, Reformer - this Type wants to find out how the use of principles can help. INT] ENFP ESF] ISTP Deductive, Contextual, Administrator - this Type tries to visualize how a situation can accommodate the group in the long term. INF] ENTP EST] ISFP Inductive, Axiomatic, Administrator - this Type makes sure a group complies with every accepted standard. ESTP ISF] INFP ENT] Inductive, Contextual, Reformer - this Type tries to give a unique situation what it needs as a whole. ESFP IST] INTP ENF] 87 Alon Oscar Deutsch Deductive, Scholar, Serious - this Type does not want to face typical repercussions. INT] ENFP ISFP EST] Deductive, Visionary, Curious - this Type makes detached assessments. INF] ENTP ISTP ESF] Inductive, Scholar, Curious - this Type likes to learn as much as possible. INTP ENF] ISF] ESTP Inductive, Visionary, Serious - this Type has an all- encompassing plan. INFP ENT] IST] ESFP Deductive, iNtuiting, Inventor - this Type sees how to do things that were never done before. INT] INFJ ENTP ENFP Deductive, Sensing, Discoverer - this Type is always trying to capitalize on what's available. ISTP ISFP EST] ESF] Inductive, iNtuiting, Discoverer - this Type wants to realize how everything affects everything else. INTP INFP ENT] ENF] Inductive, Sensing, Inventor - this Type combines unique approaches to solve problems in a new way. IST] ISF] ESTP ESFP 88 Introduction to Cognietrics Deductive, Introverted, Resolute - this Type comes to its own conclusions. INT] INF] ISTP ISFP Deductive, Extraverted, Reasonable - this Type wants to improve the quality of life for everyone. ESTJ ESF] ENTP ENFP Inductive, Introverted, Reasonable - this Type is even- handed when dealing with complicated situations. INTP INFP IST] ISFJ Inductive, Extraverted, Resolute - this Type anticipates dominant effects. ESTP ESFP ENT] ENF] Deductive, Judger, Observer - this Type tries to stay a few steps ahead, accommodating unforeseen citcumstanices. INT] INF} EST] ESF] Deductive, Percetver, Associater - this Type looks for ways that results could go astray. ENTP ENFP ISTP ISFP Inductive, Judger, Associater - this Type wonders how the main process will be affected by outside influences. ENT] ENFJ IST] ISFJ Inductive, Perceiver, Observer - this Type wants to anticipate the systems that contribute to the main process. INTP INFP ESTP ESFP 89 Alon Oscar Deutsch Axiomatic, Scholar, Inventor - this Type tries a functional design based on principles. INT] ISF] ESTP ENFP Axiomatic, Visionary, Discoverer - this Type wants to see for themselves. ENT] ESF] ISTP INFP Contextual, Scholar, Discoverer - this Type focuses on a specialization. INTP ISFP EST] ENF] Contextual, Visionary, Inventor - this Type wants to provide hope. ENTP ESFP ISTJ INFJ Axiomatic, Judger, Classicist - this Type prefers to excel in areas that have been thoroughly studied. INTJ ENT] ISF] ESF] Axiomatic, Perceiver, Progressive - this Type wants to find loopholes. ISTP ESTP INFP ENFP Contextual, Judger, Progressive - this Type is aware that time can be limited. IST] EST] INF] ENF] Contextual, Perceiver, Classicist - this Type hesitates to disrupt a natural balance. INTP ENTP ISFP ESFP 90 Introduction to Cognietrics Axiomatic, iNtuiting, Serious - this Type wants predictability. INT] ENT] INFP ENFP Axiomatic, Sensing, Curious - this Type characterizes everything. ISTP ESTP ISF] ESF] Contextual, iNtuiting, Curious - this Type has a response for everything. INTP ENTP INF] ENF] Contextual, Sensing, Serious - this Type is very careful. IST] EST] ISFP ESFP Axiomatic, Thinking, Resolute - this Type is certain of its principles. INT] ENT] ISTP ESTP Axiomatic, Feeling, Reasonable - this Type believes that there is a time and a place for everything. INFP ENFP ISFJ ESF] Contextual, Thinking, Reasonable - this Type is very considerate. INTP ENTP IST] ESTJ Contextual, Feeling, Resolute - this Type will not give up easily. INF] ENF] ISFP ESFP 91 Alon Oscar Deutsch Scholar, Introverted, Classicist - this Type has a deep connection to the past. INT] ISFP INTP ISF] Scholar, Extraverted, Progressive - this Type wants to spread ideas. EST] ENFP ESTP ENF] Visionary, Introverted, Progressive - this Type wants a revolution. IST) INFP ISTP INFJ Visionary, Extraverted, Classicist - this Type wants to spread values. ENT] ESFP ENTP ESF] Scholar, iNtuiting, Reformer - this Type likes to second-guess. INT] INTP ENF] ENFP Scholar, Sensing, Administrator - this Type maintains an awareness of everything. ISF] ISFP EST] ESTP Visionary, iNtuiting, Administrator - this Type looks for a straightforward path. INF] INFP ENT] ENTP Visionary, Sensing, Reformer - this Type sees what can be improved. IST] ISTP ESF] ESFP 92 Introduction to Cognietrics Scholar, Thinking, Observer - this Type considers how lessons apply to real situations. INT] INTP EST] ESTP Scholar, Feeling, Associater - this Type remembers emotions concerning its many past projects in order to help others in the future. ISF] ISFP ENFJ ENFP Visionary, Thinking, Associater - this Type looks for the most effective ways to do things. IST] ISTP ENT] ENTP Visionary, Feeling, Observer - this Type wants what is best for something. INF] INFP ESF] ESFP Classicist, Serious, Resolute - this Type (Skeptic) relies on experience. INT] ENT] ISFP ESFP Classicist, Curious, Reasonable - this Type (Negotiator) wants to make the best of a cutrent situation. INTP ENTP ISF] ESF] Progressive, Serious, Reasonable - this Type (Counselor) wants to see what else is out there. IST] EST] INFP ENFP Progressive, Curious, Resolute - this Type (Advocate) has strong beliefs concerning how things should be. ISTP ESTP INF] ENF] 93 Alon Oscar Deutsch Classicist, Reformer, Observer - this Type wants to overhaul operations. INT] INTP ESF] ESFP Classicist, Administrator, Associater - this Type tries to reinforce a position. ENT] ENTP ISF] ISFP Progressive, Reformer, Associater - this Type wants to try new things. IST] ISTP ENF] ENFP Progressive, Administrator, Observer - this Type wants to benefit from all previous trials. ESTJ ESTP INF] INFP Classicist, Thinking, iNtuiting - this Type (Analyst) wants to see how events can be connected. INT] ENT] INTP ENTP Classicist, Feeling, Sensing - this Type (Guardian) wants to preserve precious items and ideas. ISF] ESF] ISFP ESFP Progressive, Thinking, Sensing - this Type (Inspector) wants to make sure that quality is always what it should be. IST] EST] ISTP ESTP Progressive, Feeling, iNtuiting - this Type (Idealist) wants to improve the state of the world. INF] ENF] INFP ENFP 94 Introduction to Cognietrics Inventor, Serious, Reformer - this Type wants to find ways to address flaws. INT] ESFP IST] ENFP Inventor, Curious, Administrator - this Type provides competitive incentives. ENTP ISF] ESTP INF] Discoverer, Serious, Administrator - this Type wants absolute control. ENT] ISFP EST] INFP Discoverer, Curious, Reformer - this Type believes that there is always room for improvement. INTP ESF] ISTP ENF] Inventor, Resolute, Observer - this Type wants to make the best use of available resources. INT] ESFP INF] ESTP Inventor, Reasonable, Associater - this Type finds other ways of doing things. ENTP ISFJ ENFP ISTJ Discoverer, Resolute, Associater - this Type is very thorough in its work. ENT] ISFP ENF] ISTP Discoverer, Reasonable, Observer - this Type keeps an eye out for better possibilities. INTP ESF] INFP EST] 95 Alon Oscar Deutsch Inventor, Introverted, Judger - this Type (Evaluator) combines a few key points to interpret holistically. INT] ISTJ INF) ISFJ Inventor, Extraverted, Perceiver - this Type (Explorer) tests its mental faculties in novel situations. ENTP ESTP ENFP ESFP Discoverer, Introverted, Perceiver - this Type (Reflector) sees an idea from every angle individually to preserve the purity of each impression. INTP ISTP INFP ISFP Discoverer, Extraverted, Judger - this Type (Persuader) wants people to see things from its point of view. ENT] EST] ENF] ESF] Serious, Judger, Thinking - this Type (Strategic) realizes effects and resulting implications for direct systemization and encourages a state of prosperity. INT] ENT] ISTJ EST] Serious, Perceiver, Feeling - this Type (Critical) has strong opinions and weighs different options to represent exclusive bonds. INFP ENFP ISFP ESFP Curious, Judger, Feeling - this Type (Relating) determines emotional states, shares enthusiasm, and endorses harmony. INF] ENF] ISFJ ESF] Curious, Perceiver, Thinking - this Type (Etiological) finds causes using fundamental suppositions and identifies feedback loops. INTP ENTP ISTP ESTP 96 Introduction to Cognietrics Resolute, Judger, iNtuiting - this Type (Statistical) has reliable expectations and considers the unknowable for developing robust ideas. INTJ ENT] INFJ ENFJ Resolute, Perceiver, Sensing - this Type (Scouting) is showy and tests limitations. ISTP ESTP ISFP ESFP Reasonable, Judger, Sensing - this Type (Optimizing) monitors resources and concentrates on performance. IST] EST] ISF] ESF] Reasonable, Perceiver, iNtuiting - this Type (Counterfactual) makes novel comparisons, brainstorms, and envisions hypothetical change. INTP ENTP INFP ENFP Reformer, Introverted, Thinking - this Type is concerned with the feasibility of improvements. INT] INTP IST] ISTP Reformer, Extraverted, Feeling - this Type wants to address everyone's concerns. ENF] ENFP ESF] ESFP Administrator, Introverted, Feeling - this Type makes tough decisions. INF] INFP ISP] ISFP Administrator, Extraverted, Thinking - this Type tries to find a way to accommodate everyone. ENT] ENTP EST] ESTP 97 Alon Oscar Deutsch Observer, Introverted, iNtuiting - this Type comes up with probable and possible expectations. INT] INTP INF] INFP Observer, Extraverted, Sensing - this Type looks for signals. EST] ESTP ESF] ESFP Associater, Extraverted, iNtuiting - this Type tries to make a project appealing. ENTJ ENTP ENFJ ENFP Associater, Introverted, Sensing - this Type concentrates on what a project can use. IST] ISTP ISF] ISFP *Applications exist for the Cognietrics Traits even in areas as diverse as physics: in Classical Mechanics, an Axiomatic discipline, while supposed Knowledge is a factor not directly correlated though partially Associated with every system, due to David Hume's Problem of Induction, only Understanding comes from continuous Observation. However, as implied by the Copenhagen Interpretation, in Quantum Mechanics the opposite is true: Contextual information that is due to the dependence of randomly Known Observables on the undocumented yet Understood influence of the Associater prevents Knowledge of the effects of the Association or continuous Understanding of the Observables. Though some may consider this to be a psychologism, I believe that the definitions given by Cognietrics have real potential in explaining the epistemological positions concerning the scientific frontier, especially the documentation of a large variety of human behaviors, because of their fundamental versatility and interdependence. Interestingly, Carl Gustav Jung had a close correspondence with Wolfgang Ernst Pauli, one of the founding fathers of Quantum Mechanics. 98 Introduction to Cognietrics Philosophical concepts derived from the Triads: As Curious about Causes and Serious about Effects: Causes become Conceptual Observations from Associated Patterns. Effects become Conceptual Associations from Observed Patterns. Observed Concepts may prevent confounds, Associated Patterns may support construct validity, Observed Patterns support statistical significance, and Associated Concepts are useful for showing covariance. To be Counterfactual it must be deterministic, and that something Statistical in nature is probabilistic: It becomes obvious that Optimizing complements determinism as a way of dealing with inevitability, whereas Scouting is a search for a tiny probability of success in the face of overwhelming odds. Probabilistic Sensors Perceive because they are less sure what to notice while deterministic Sensors may follow a formula. Deterministic iNtuitives Percetve because they are working things out whereas probabilistic iNtuitives are already aware of their chances. The deterministic deals with the possible. The probabilistic deals with the probable. There are connections to the sciences. Decision-Making, or Contextual Feeling, is the result of Bayesian Statistics, and Cosmology, or Axiomatic Thought, is at best Frequentist Statistics. Use of a deterministic equation with the conditionality of a variable, which also requires Thought, examines Chaos, where small initial deviations may result in large effects. That universal truths may occur deterministically may help one to Feel relative value about things that display Complexity, the minimum information required to document something, where an effect is only due to a collective behavior of components which suppresses other influences. As such, complex thoughts, unless overly simplified with conscious logic, must actually be felt in order to be considered significant, and chaotic feelings must actually be thought as no significance is yet attributed to them. Inductive Reasoning is subjective, or 99 Alon Oscar Deutsch Introverted, and so hard to share because the process of causation is concerned rather than a probabilistic class, leading to a variation of infinitism as used in the Miunchhausen Trilemma (the regressive argument, in which each proof requires a further proof ad infinitum), as well as the degree of Inductive relevance, and the disagreement of proximate causes in the service of an ultimate cause. Deduction based on probabilities likewise concerns subjective elements and is hard to share. The probabilities of Inductive classes can be easily shared with a chart, and Deductive Reasoning likewise can be shown to be a set of syllogisms. Classicists take probability Seriously and determinism Curiously. Progressives take determinism Seriously and probability Curiously. Reformers assist Concepts deterministically and Patterns statistically. Administrators check Concepts statistically and Patterns deterministically. Considering that Inventors use synthetic clauses and Discoverers use analytic clauses: Probabilistic Analysis, including average and standard deviation for a distribution, represents details calculated for Association, and so does Deterministic Synthesis. Direct Observation of the “Big Picture” occurs as a result of either Deterministic Analysis or Probabilistic Synthesis. Deduction is synthetic iNtuition and analytic Sensation. Induction is analytic iNtuition and synthetic Sensation. Thinking is analytic Knowledge and _— synthetic Understanding. Feeling is synthetic Knowledge and analytic Understanding. Scholars use synthetic universals and analytic conditionality. Visionaries use analytic universals and synthetic conditionality. As foundationalism is based on a form of Knowledge and coherentism is based on a form of Understanding: Foundations are ideas that are Conceptually iNtuitive, however the scope of any associated Patterns must be found in Practice and cannot be guessed. Coherence allows Patterns to be iNtuited by relevant associations 100 Introduction to Cognietrics though the Concepts in use must be Practical in order to have a working model. Universal foundations must be Associated due to their unique definitions, but when consistent foundations are Observed it is always in an incomplete Contextual manner due to Gédel’s Theorem, however when universals are Observed or Contextual information is Associated the goal is coherence. Coherence proceeds from Deduction to Induction. Foundations proceed ftom Induction to Deduction. Invention proceeds from Patterns to Concepts. Discovery proceeds from Concepts to Patterns. Reform proceeds from Observation to Association. Administration proceeds from Association to Observation. Thoughts turn Dreams into Reality. Feelings bring Dreams about Reality. Reality turns Feeling to Thought. Imagination turns Thought to Feeling. This is different from Induction and Deduction, which occur between Functions in the mind and not groups of people. Discoverers have foundational logic and emotional coherence. Inventors have foundational emotions and logical coherence. Scholars deal in deterministic foundations and probabilistic coherence. Visionaries deal in probabilistic foundations and deterministic coherence. Reformers are quicker to make decisions based on coherence than on foundations. Administrators are quicker to make decisions based on foundations than on coherence. Because imagination is built on prospective memories iNtuited individually, and practicality on retrospective memory Sensed as a whole, as Judgment negates memory to deal with change in Thought, or lack thereof in Feeling: This is why when you like someone you have a good Feeling that doesn’t change and Thoughts that do as you learn about the object of your affections. If you are suddenly disappointed it is possible that you will Think something negative that doesn’t change while your previous Feelings do. Understanding makes the unchanging change while Knowledge makes the changing 101 Alon Oscar Deutsch stop. This is why Knowledge, which once justified has an unchanging form, is easier to transfer and store than Understanding. Similarly, Induction takes ideas from the retrospective memory and applies them to the prospective memory, for example, to come up with an example, whereas Deduction takes ideas from the prospective memory and applies them to the retrospective memory, for example, to catch a lie. Retrospective Induction and prospective Deduction are useful for Invention. Retrospective Deduction and prospective Induction are useful for Discovery. Unchanging Knowledge and changing Understanding are useful for Invention. Unchanging Understanding and changing Knowledge are useful for Discovery. Patterns give retrospective Knowledge and prospective Understanding. Concepts give retrospective Understanding and prospective Knowledge. Classicists use unchanging retrospection and changing prospection. Progressives use unchanging prospection and changing etrospection. Scholars use unchanging Associations and changing Observations. Visionaries use unchanging Observations and changing Associations. Serious Types use prospective Axioms and retrospective Contexts. Curious Types use retrospective Axioms and prospective Contexts. Probabilistic Types use unchanging Contexts and changing Axioms. Deterministic Types use unchanging Axioms and changing Contexts. Introverted changing, or transformation, and Extraverted unchanging, or stagnation, are concerned with Reform. Extraverted changing, or chaos, and Introverted unchanging, or principle, are concerned with Administration. Introverted prospection, or planning, and Extraverted retrospection, or necessity, are concerned with the "Big Picture". Introverted retrospection, or experience, and Extraverted prospection, or reminding, are concerned with details. Probabilistic Types are spurred to action by prospective memory, or promise, rather than retrospective memory, or hopelessness. Deterministic Types are spurred 102 Introduction to Cognietrics to action by retrospective memory, or accountability, rather than prospective memory, or inevitability. Curious Types ate spurred to action by unchanging, or boredom, rather than changing, or interest. Serious Types are spurred to action by changing, or urgency, rather than unchanging, or peace. Induction fits changing Concepts to an unchanging Pattern. Deduction fits unchanging Concepts to a changing Pattern. Every combination of letters represents a Trait which can be logically combined with two others. Ideas such as Concepts, Induction, and even Change evolved together philosophically in groups of convenience, such that the meaning of any one simultaneously came to depend on the meaning of the others. Change itself is Deduced from a Pattern or Inducted Conceptually — red that is slightly purple in hue may seem red, but is actually near the ultraviolet spectrum because red cones are sensitive to violet light. The color has Changed if you Deduce the difference from a Pattern (by visual comparison) or Induct it Conceptually (by wavelength increments), whereas something more stable can be ultimately Deduced Conceptually (process of elimination) or Inducted as a Pattern (representative example). If a useful process doesn't fit a Triad it becomes shaped by a different one in whatever way is most pragmatic due to the validity of the mutually interdependent definitions. Abstraction emerges from the recognition of change, Knowledge emerges from the recognition of lack of change, degree of change, and change of functionality, and Concepts emerge ftom all 4. The Personas ate useful for science, the Fields are useful for problem solving, and the Dispositions describe paradigm shifts. Science can't be Proven only disproven so it is Conceptual whereas Math is not a Thesis so it is about Patterns. You may Theorize about a relationship and Prospect the implications but how something crosses a threshold like Complexity or Causation can't be determined solely from a Theory because there may be a 103 Alon Oscar Deutsch third variable. Unchanging Determinism in an Axiom leads to Complexity due to reinforcement. The minimum amount of information to determine a system is its complexity and Changing, Statistics, and Context require a lot. Complexity is demonstrated when temperature phonons increase to the threshold of cohesion release due to Godel's Theorem having a complete complexity or a consistent reinforcement. It also occurs when there are enough electrons in a molecule to have a strong enough response to an incident photon to release an electron. Another example is a black hole having enough density to trap light, as well as planets orbiting, nucleons binding, and the formation of atoms after the Big Bang. Axiomatic Causes can be Sensed and Axiomatic Effects can be iNtuited. Contextual Causes must be iNtuited and Contextual Effects must be Sensed to find out what has occutred, Axiomatic Patterns and Contextual Concepts are specific, whereas Axiomatic Concepts and Contextual Patterns are general. To be sufficient means to address Context due to possibility. To be necessary means to address Axiom due to fundamentality. Knowledge of Effects is Generalized as is Understanding of Causes. Understanding of Effects is specific as is Knowledge of Causes. You might wonder how many Patterns are Associated with a Conceptual Observation, vice versa, and the same with Effects. The degree of each collectively yield a measute of certainty that something has been caused. A Feynman diagram shows how many Associated Concepts (particle interactions) are useful in Determining an Observed Pattern (electrical charge). Associated Patterns that cause it show that antimatter occurs around heavy nuclei and the Conceptual Observation is shielding. Reformation creates Entropy whereas Administration creates Order, whereas Sense acts as inertia and iNtuition setves as impulse. Inventors use Ordered Causes and Disordered Effects. Discoverers use Disordered Causes and Ordered Effects. Manufacturing is Generation for 104 Introduction to Cognietrics Achievement and Operation is Achievement for Generation. An example of Statistical Causality is the idea that studying will usually improve a test score. Testing sets the benchmark for Generation and Projects set the benchmark for Achievement though both are useful. Qualia helps when Theorized and Prospected, Quantity helps with Expertise and Philosophy. Perhaps when we Theorize about a physical entity we notice it as Qualia whereas when we notice Expertise it is Quantity to us. Discovery (forms/experiment) proceeds from Quantity whereas Invention (particulars/hypothesis) proceeds from Quality. When does an essence or relationship become like and like or a mathematical analogy, when does an exact number become the quality of longer or hotter? When does a distribution become a shape? When does an electron become a degree of mass, spin, and charge? How do we separate such a Gestalt of interrelatedly unified fundamental physical forces? Is such a thing Phenomena ot Noumena or Psychophysics? In special relativity the speed, a quantity, affects space and time, qualities, while measured in space and time. In general relativity the Pound-Rebka experiment shows that space and time are affected by gravity which is measured by them. Because Theory can be about Prospection, Causality progresses in Problematic order, otherwise similar to a Problematic Proof. Since distance and mass, quantities, create, from a point of complexity, a black hole, a shift, bigger, to quality, space and time, which measure in a like way gravity, and countering gravity with an electric field does not affect space and time, it is spacetime curvature that causes gravity and also affects time dilation of the electromagnetic field, which affects charge but not mass, and is how these forces ate unified (decay rates aren't affected by spacetime curvature) as predicted by Problematics, separating inertia, affected by Heisenberg uncertainty, from gravitational charge, using time dilation, making quantum mechanics (having the same logic as gravitational redshift with spin 105, Alon Oscar Deutsch possibly having an alternate spacetime) and general relativity two mutually exclusive but related systems. Position and momentum, singular forms, past a point of complexity, a bound orbital due to Coulombic attraction, and so smaller, realize a relationship between uncertainties in position and momentum, a generalizing particular, which in a like way causes a wavefunction of probability at each position, another singular form, which cannot itself affect both position and momentum for which it already accounts, so position and momentum cause a wavefunction and aren’t trapped by it. Energy in a like way causes mass (energy-mass equivalence) which causes in a like way charge (atomic number) which in a like way causes bonding (charge density). Since spacetime curvature causes gravity and energy does not cause charge, mass does not cause energy. Likewise photon mass does not cause photon energy. Nonreciprocity in Problematics leads to causation and the specificity such as And or Or is how the Causes and Effects are defined in a way that demonstrates Determinism. These types of ideas, especially which parts are Invented (Quality) or Discovered (Quantity), are useful for the Four Color Map Theorem, knot theory, chaos theory as relevant to a double pendulum and other defined systems, mass-energy conservation, elementary particle physics, fluid mechanics, and materials engineering. In a determinism of Chaos such as a double pendulum, conserved Expertise ultimately helps with a Philosophy of prediction as limited by negative feedback in a modeled Theory and causally from an arbitrary Prospecting. Prospects are Achieved and Theories are Generated conserving order Problematically in Nootypology and because of this mutations are tested while expression of proteins can overcome a challenge; both are controlled with methylation. Needs and usefulness are Quantified and Discovered. Another example of — Discretional Problematics is Calculus. An infinitesimal turns a quantity into a qualitative dimension that may be compounded or 106 Introduction to Cognietrics compared with, and below or above an arbitrary limit of, another dimension in a particular exact way. Meaning skepticism and ideational interdependence are invented for better definition. Feasibility and fundamentality are discovered. In Problematic Time, Causality shows how it was and is the past, Chaos shows what can be and is the present, and Proof shows what must be and is the future. Coulombic attraction causing manipulated position and momentum which are conserved in a way that satisfies Heisenberg uncertainty results in the proof of the existence of the wavefunction. If inputs cause targeted mutation, and ultimate causes are conserved, evolutionary jumps arte proven. Partially conserved forms whose opposing causes have been elucidated until allowing proof of a new attribute may reveal what is hidden by a point of complexity in a theoretical relationship. There is not as of yet negative feedback due to logic past a point of complexity for a Temporally Complex behavior in quantum field theory, so there is not yet mechanically caused action. Since spacetime curvature is due to mass and causes negative feedback of time into space as in gravitational waves, partially conserved forms of inertial and gravitational motion caused by opposition of electromagnetic and relativistic interactions result in a time dilation of motion, a directly mechanical activity. Universals are complete and not consistent due to being forms like the stress-strain curve and Planck Time. Since a syllogism is a relation based on the mutual deduction of consistent propositions, it can be expressed in terms of processes collected in 3 Triads (Concept qua Triad). Contextual-Knowledge-Observer implies consistency (what something does). Deduction-Inventor-iNtuiting implies applicability (what can be done). Theory, an arbitrary relation in Qualitative Problematics, is derived from Conceptual-Scholar-Perceiver which implies discretion (what should happen). A demonstration of a Proof of a Proof (Pythagorean Theorem) is as follows. 107 Alon Oscar Deutsch Expertise is that a, b, and c seem related. Theory is that a and b make the sides of the largest square in both parts and which hence are the same area. Prospection shows that from a point of Complexity for both a and b making the sides of 2 smaller squares c makes the sides of a larger square. Philosophy shows that the relation holds for all right triangles. Fundamentality shows consistency, meaning skepticism and ideational interdependence show applicability, and feasibility shows discretion. The implication of change in the universe is what a proof must ovetcome and the implication of lack of change in the univetse is what a proof must achieve; Expertise and Philosophy rely on the degree of change whereas Theory and Prospecting rely on changed functionality. Problematic Causality is not always falsifiable. Consider the group i j k - i - j -k e with the operation x. If Expertise shows these elements are related and Theory shows the group is not Abelian, Prospection shows a negative sign giving the inverse element gives the same result as switching associative order. Philosophy gives an exact result. Since these two inputs ate interchangeable and cannot be distinguished using Problematics, there is no way to verify which has occurred. Conceptual Observations may be useful but cannot dispute possible confounds. Math is thus unified logically in the style of Frege. It is obvious from these math examples that a type of math is really a different type of relationship between Expertise, Theory, Prospection, and Philosophy. What if physical phenomena are something similar? The more you use energy the less it can be Prospected due to conservation though the opposite is true for a field. These separated concepts are based on these relationships which are how and what we know of reality. Logic is discovered about a quality because the steps of a proof conserve between changing forms. Math is invented about a quantity because of the relevance of relationships. 108 Introduction to Cognietrics AI text generator (GPT2) on Cognietrics: However, my hypothesis is that there ate some aspects of this phenomenon that can be interpreted in any particular way. My conclusion is that this theory could be considered an axiom or a fact in itself. If it is correct, this theory is coftect in so many ways that it could have a different meaning or interpretation. There are two ways of looking at this topic: the first is that this topic is not reducible to the ordering of words in a context, the second way is to look at some very simple, logical cases that seem to make sense, but they are not reducible to each other. *A text analyzer (uClassify) determined this writing to be INT). 109 CHAPTER SEVEN Relationships The Relationship Ratings used in Cognietrics Poker are mainly based on the Relationships described by Socionics. However, I think it is more useful to Rate the Relationships, rather than describe them, because every Relationship is a little different. Even though two people share a Jungian Cognitive Function, they may use it a little differently, which means that it would be hard to guess their behaviors well enough to describe their Relationship in real life. However, the use of Positive Functions is a good predictor of a Positive Relationship. There is more to a person than just personality, so the Relationship Rating should not be the deciding factor in the Relationship, though Relationships Rated 13 do encourage beneficial things like personal growth for both partners. Low-Rated Relationships may work better for some; they also tend to be really interesting and show that both partners can be open to different Values. Partners with opposite Values also make versatile teams due to their diversity. These Relationships are not any less likely to last because of their low Rating - my grandparents have been married for 55 110 Introduction to Cognietrics years and represent the union of a Skeptic with a Negotiator! The following list contains the Relationship Rating for each Cognietrics Relationship, with the highest number indicating the most favorable Relationship: Hopeful, Experimental) - 13 (Experimental, Hopeful) - 12 (Referential, Responsible) - 11 (Responsible, Referential) - 10 Hopeful, Aggressive) - 9 (Referential, Rebellious) - 8 (Depressive, Experimental) - 7 Avoidant, Responsible) - 6 Ageressive, Hopeful) - 5 (Experimental, Depressive) - 5 (Rebellious, Referential) - 4 (Responsible, Avoidant) - 4 (Depressive, Aggressive) - 3 Ageressive, Depressive) - 2 Avoidant, Rebellious) - 1 (Rebellious, Avoidant) — 0 111 Alon Oscar Deutsch Game You might enjoy a card game I invented some time ago called Cognietrics Poker. There are 48 cards, 3 of each personality type. The deck is shuffled. Initial bets are placed. There are 2 cards dealt face-down to each person, and 1 card placed face-up in the center of the table. The total point value of each hand is determined by the relationship between the personality types on the cards in the hand, and the relationships of those personality types to the personality type on the card in the center of the table. Bets are placed again. Then, 1 catd from each hand may be traded for 1 new card drawn from the deck. After, bets are placed one last time. The hands are shown. Whoever had the hand with the largest total point value wins. If multiple players have winning hands of equal total point value, then the pot is split between them. *The Relationship Ratings for each Type can be found in the Type Profiles. 112 CHAPTER EIGHT Nootypology Until now this book has been a treatment of Cognietrics, a theory of mine that pertains to the implications of the four-letter Jungian codes for each Type. This chapter will address the Types with increased detail. Specifically, this chapter is about the psychological development to a more generalized mindset called the Nootype. There is of course a philosophy of science to which Karl Popper made notable contributions, but is there a science of philosophy? Cognietrics uses Jungian psychological concepts to explain fundamental epistemological positions. However, while many philosophical points arise from Cognietrics, as it addresses Myers-Briges typology it also shows the limitations. Though the four letters are behavioral expressions compatible with a certain combination of more complex philosophical Traits, the Triads themselves, from which the Preference definitions are in fact derivative, are Abelian subgroups and so have no purposeful direction, 113 Alon Oscar Deutsch and even then ultimately just serve as philosophical evolutionaty niches and groupings of convenience arranged to minimize complex operations and increase utility; however, the Nootypological Function Order has direction in time, and the Nootypological Functions themselves are also not niches, because they are binary opposites. At the end of Chapter 6 I mentioned some interesting points about the philosophical implications of the Triads to show that Cognietrics also has value and that Nootypology is more of an extension of Cognietrics, rather than a replacement. In fact, the Cognietric Types, once considered obsolete by the maturing mind (which now avoids Triad niche distractions by utilizing the traits of organization and leadership), become more useful as tools. Short Nootypological Preferences Test 1. Are your accomplishments more a) competitive or b) creative 2. Are your interests more a) practical or b) imaginative? 3. Are your decisions more a) emotional or b) logical? 4, Are you more a) flexible or b) rigid in your beliefs? 5. Are your projects a) focused individually or b) influenced with connections? 6. Are your solutions a) invented, b) discovered, or c) diversified? 7. Is your energy attained while a) alone, b) with friends, or c) in the service of a public cause? 114 Introduction to Cognietrics Answet Key: 1. a) Achieving b) Generating 2. iS) Sensing b) Dreaming 3. a) Feeling b) Thinking 4. a) Realizing b) Challenging 5. a) Maximizing b) Bridging i iS) Perceiving b) Judging c) Organizing 7. a) Introvert b) Extravert c) Leader Therefore someone who answered every question with the first option would be an Achieving Sensing Feeling Realizing Maximizing Perceiving Introvert, or an ASFRMPI. As you can tell, the answer to #6 does not deal with the Reaction Demeanor because Nootype Functions are more complex. I have also dispensed with "N" for iNtuiting because I believe that with all of the extra letters it might be confusing. I have replaced it with "D" for Dreaming. It would not be incorrect for a GDFCBJE who feels very strongly about C to write the letters in some other order such as CJEBFDG, and in fact I would encourage others to do this so that future analysis may be provided for what it means to have a letter towards the beginning or end. There are 7! Subtype orders for each of the 288 Nootypes, or 1,451,520 Subtypes total. I think that the general case, such as for example “O, J, or P towards the 115 Alon Oscar Deutsch beginning”, would also be fascinating. I, personally, am an AFROSML; in addition, having T first does not mean that I have a Thinking Function as my first Nootypological Function, or Catalyst; it means that I use T a lot regardless of which Functions I use or what purpose they serve. It is for this same reason that an INTP may have a higher N score than a T score while having Ti as a Referential Function, as is so with any Nootype and its Functions, and partially because self-awareness is a problem, such that Cognietrics and Nootypology remain largely philosophical studies rather than psychological ones, as they seek to explain the mind with fundamental logic rather than circumstantial evidence. I will use the standard order of letters for Nootypes in this book, however, to prevent confusion. Leaders get energy from the public, and don’t accommodate their self or others the way Introverts and Extraverts do. Organizers do not necessarily judge or perceive as they work. An example to illustrate the two Organizers is as follows: A Generator might be the first runner, perhaps seeing value where others do not, whereas an Achiever would be the fastest runner, and would want social status. C and R determine the Main Function Order. B and M determine the Main Function Temperaments. 116 Introduction to Cognietrics Bridging - combining different ideas. BL-lei BE -eil BI -ile e—i - encouraging diversity. i] - volunteering contributions. le - networking extensively. Maximizing - amplifying unique potential. MI -iel ME -eli ML -lie ie - encouraging strengths. el - monitoring continuously. 1-1 - providing feedback. Challenging - having rigid beliefs. CJ-jpo CP -poj CO-o7 5 jp - accumulating evidence. p—o - encouraging regularity. o—} - correcting problems. Realizing - having flexible beliefs. RO-op] RP-pjo RJ-jop pj - assessing conditions. jo - adjusting situationally. o—p - noticing change. A GDTRBPI has Main Functions Di Tl Ge. 117 Alon Oscar Deutsch In addition to the Cognietric Functions, there are 10 additional Nootype Functions for increased interactions. Gi Designing Ai Measuring Ge Solving Ae Inspiring Fl Balancing Tl Developing SI Coordinating DI Preparing Gl Supporting Al Advising For Main Functions Az Cy Ex where A complements B, C complements D, and E complements F, the Order is: Az Cy Ex Main Fx Dy Bz Auxiliary Cz Ey Ax Optimistic Desire Bx Fy Dz Pessimistic Desire Ez Ay Cx Optimistic Necessity Dx By Fz Pessimistic Necessity First Column - Catalyst (Past) Second Column - Method (Present) Third Column - Goal (Future) Cognietric Types socialize with the Reaction Function. As babies are heavily reliant on adults and ate not yet independent, it is the extraverted Function that is formed first. The Reaction Preference determines it because it is already fully formed by this time - decisive babies will promote success with either emotional or logical 118 Introduction to Cognietrics preconsiderations, and indecisive babies will heavily engage the tools of success once they imagine or find them. Occasionally they will have to assure others by taking personal responsibility for an alternative Contemplation Function that balances the initial decisive control (Je) or comprehensive study (Pe). If Contemplation afterwards is used as a _ position of Reference, this indicates introspection, so the tendency is towards being Introverted. If it continues secondarily as Responsibility, this indicates engagement, and thus Extraversion. This shows that the Values are more psychologically fundamental than the Manners when determining the Preferences, because the Id Functions are never once considered in the process of determining the Reaction. This arrangement is forgotten with age and replaced with Nootype Functions. The Nootype integrates leadership where it is most successful, either judgment, perception, ot organization. Introverted and extraverted Functions are then similarly chosen and the three are arranged in a useful Order starting with the most meaningful. Cognietrics is therefore useful for small children as a means of learning and simultaneously imposing a degree of regularity on their intentions. They use a Cognietrics Type when young and a Nootype more as they mature by learning the value of organization and leadership. There ate 18 Nootypes for every Cognietric Type. A Cognietric Type with Functions Az By corresponds to the following Nootypes where O can equal A or G: Ol Az By Az Ol By Az By Ol Az Oy Bl Az BI Oy Oy Az Bl 119 Alon Oscar Deutsch Al Oz By Al By Oz Oz Al By *Oz By Al is not one, but is often used for anonymity. Similar to the Cognietric Personas are the Nootypological Personas: Realizing DT - Proof D—-E - Application ST - Adaptation SF - Priority TOG - Tactic TA - Calculation F-G - Wonder F—A - Incentive G—D - Insight G-—sS - Option A—D - Expansion AS - Review Challenging TOD - Thesis TS - Research FD - Standardization FS - Promotion 120 Introduction to Cognietrics D—-G - Conception D—A - Foresight S—G - Response S—A - Engagement GT - Usefulness GF - Characterization AT - Improvement A-F - Endorsement There ate also Nootypological Triads, though these represent social values. Spiritualists (Givers) MC - Believers BR - Ambassadors Materialists (Lakers) MR - Coaches BC - Conquerors Classicists (Conservative) DT - Analysts SF - Guardians Progressives (Liberal) DEF - Idealists ST - Inspectors Operators (Skilled) GF - Writers AT - Technicians Manufacturers (Influential) GT - Architects AF - Speakers 121 Alon Oscar Deutsch Activists (Liberating) GD - Attists AS - Warriors Authorities (Controlling) GS - Trainers AD - Executives Classicists are Governors, or Operating Authorities attempting to maintain the status quo, and Investors, or Manufacturing Activists pursuing the continuation of profitable projects. Progressives are Capitalists, or Manufacturing Authorities in competition, and Socialists, ort Operating Activists looking for advancement. Governors do not have Investor Ideal Matches and Capitalists do not have Socialist Ideal Matches, primarily because each wants to maintain or alter something in the opposite manner with respect to what the other party desires. These niches are useful in that the associated Nootypes would not otherwise get along, and so do not represent stagnation. Ideal Match: First Letter - opposite Second Letter - opposite Third Letter - opposite Fourth Letter - same Fifth Letter - opposite Sixth Letter - same Seventh Letter - Lif L, lif E, Eif I The letter "L" does not change because leadership styles should not Complement each other; this would detract from either one as for the two Je or Px Functions. 122 Introduction to Cognietrics Generally, Nootypological Relationships improve as similar Functions to the Ideal Match move higher in the Order: To calculate Compatibility Percentage: For Ideal Match Functions: ABC DEF GHI JKL MNO PQR Set A = sqrt(18), B = sqrt(17), .. , Q = sqrt(2), R sqrt(1). To calculate the Compatibility Percentage for a Nootype with Functions: NIC TOOx Caléulate (100/118 + 17 + 16 + ...+ 3 + 2 °+ 1))*(sqrt(5)*sqrt(18) + sqrt(10)*sqrt(17) sqrt(16)*sqrt(16) ...). + Nootypological Functions correspond to Enneagram numbers. The order of influence of the Functions corresponds to the order of the numbers. I will explain it here, though like the Triads, it represents an evolutionary niche that gives only satisfactory control over a number of associated strategies. 123 Alon Oscar Deutsch The Main Function Order roughly corresponds to Enneagram Tritype. Each number behaves as follows to balance the behaviors of the numbers immediately before and after it: Balance of Forces Je 1 Consultant - balancing mediation with campaigning. Pe 2 Campaigner - balancing consultation with entrepreneurship. Pl 3 Entrepreneur - balancing campaigning with individualism. Pi 4 Individualist - balancing entrepreneurship with examination. Oi 5 Examiner - balancing individualism with loyalty. Oe 6 Loyalist - balancing examination with motivation. Ol 7 Motivator - balancing loyalty with dare. J18 Darer - balancing motivation with mediation. Ji 9 Mediator - balancing dare with consultation. The Enneagram numbets represent strategies which the Nootype Functions assist. Wings represent an imbalance of tendencies that favors one force over the other. Introverted Functions correspond to withdrawn numbers, extraverted Functions correspond to compliant numbers, and leading Functions correspond to assertive numbers. Organizing Functions are located in the Head Center due to justifiability. Perceiving Functions are located in the Heart Center due to openness. Judging Functions are located in the Gut Center due to decisiveness. The middle of each Center suppresses it. Enneagram Tritypes choose a Head number, a Heart number, and a Gut number, with Wings, in any order. In Enneagram there are also Social (who look for approval), 124 Introduction to Cognietrics Sexual (who look for chemistry), and Self-Preserving (who look for material comfort) Enneagram Subtype Instincts, but they have no anticipated correlation to Nootypology. Moving forward numerically on the diagram is Challenging due to the independent influence of the next balancing force, and within a Center it is Maximizing due to the completion of the Center’s influence. The forward direction shows increases in computational complexity: Organizing forces move from Generation to Achievement; Perceiving forces move from Sensation to Dreaming; Judging forces move from Feeling to Thought. Likewise you know after understanding and you deduce after induction when learning about something relevant. The Bridging and Realizing directions allow receptivity to other ideas at a more basic level of familiarity. 1lw9 Fe 1lw2 Te 2w1 Se 2w3 De 3w2 Sl 3w4 Dl 4w3 Si 4w5 Di 5w4 Gi 5w6 Ai 6w5 Ge 6w7 Ae 7w6 Gl 7w8 Al 8w7 Fl 8w9 Tl 9w8 Fi Owl Ti Notice that not all Enneagram Tritype strategies exist as a Nootype; for instance, 1w9-2w1-6w5 corresponds to 125 Alon Oscar Deutsch Fe Se Ge. While there are only 288 Nootypes, there are 1,296 Enneagram Tritypes, and for each Tritype there are six possible Instinctual Subtype Stackings. However, each correlation represents a niche and is not absolute, but can be useful. The strategies employed by the Enneagram Tritypes often require a fresh look and for that reason a Nootype will achieve more success with a Tritype that does not directly correlate to the Nootype Functions. For instance, I prefer to act as a 9w1-6w5-3w4 so/sx/sp, or Consulting Mediator, Examining Loyalist, and Individualist Entrepreneur, which while correlating to Aetiological, Solving, and Preparing strategies may be assisted instead by my Nootype’s Advising, Optimizing, and Relating Functions. The complexity that is brought by increasing Enneagram numbers shows that: Socialists Judge and Organize, or Perceive. Capitalists Perceive and Organize, or Judge. Investors Judge and Perceive, or Organize. Governors Judge, Perceive, and Organize, or are completely open to new ideas. KK Cognietrics, the selective pressures that competing psychological preferences have placed on philosophical concepts, measure the mutual interdependence of cognitive processes. The future of cognietrics can follow three paths. In anticognietrics, there would be a reason why someone intuitive and quick to decide would be considered reasonable. An example is that for Axiomatic pursuits Math is synthesized in a Visionary manner and Logic defined in a Scholarly way, whereas the opposite is true Contextually. In expanded cognietrics, additional traits 126 Introduction to Cognietrics beyond the original thirty would illuminate other aspects of the philosophical concepts in a web of similarly mutually interdependent definitions; I think that artificial intelligence is helpful (there is already a text classifier (https://www.uclassify.com/browse/e4mes543/myers- briggs-type-indicator-text-analyzer?input=Url) that identifies the author’s type from a text sample), since factor analysis of the dictionary has yielded the Big 5, which correlate to the four Jungian preferences as found by A. Furnham in 1996 (https://doi.org/10.1016/0191- 8869 (96)00033-5) and a measure of mental health. Lastly, alternate cognietrics would illuminate unrelated verbal systems using the same architecture as cognietrics. You should now feel as though you have a solid understanding of each Type and its Relationships. Hopefully, what you have learned you will take with you so that it may serve you in your quest for knowledge and other related endeavors. Happy Typing! Alon Oscar Deutsch 127 Alon Oscar Deutsch Index Adaptation 65 Administrator 73 Advocacy 77 /Etiological 54 Aggressive 53 Analyst 58 Anger 51 Application 65 Associater 73 Attitude 52 Avoidant 53 Axiomatic 71 Bearing 79 Character 73 Charisma 66 Classicist 58 Cognietrics Poker 112 Complementary Functions 76 Conceptual 59 Conscience 50 Consciousness Hierarchy 8 Contemplation 50 Contextual 71 Counsel 77 Counterfactual 53 Critical 54 Criticism 5 Curious 77 Deduction 74 Demeanor 46 Depressive 53 Discoverer 56 Disposition 70 Disruption 67 Ego 50 128 Introduction to Cognietrics Engineer 70 Enneagram 124 Exertion 8 Experimental 52 Expert 60 Explorer 55 Expression 71 Extraversion 3 Evaluator 55 Fear 51 Feeling 3 Field 60 Function 53 Function Temperament 49 Guardian 58 Guide 71 Hopeful 52 Id 50 Idealist 58 Identity 66 Inclination 53 Induction 74 Inference 74 Inspector 58 Inspiration 66 Introversion 3 Inventor 56 Investigator 70 Judgment 3 Jung, Carl 2 Justification 74 Knowledge 74 Manner 58 Mask 66 Meaning 49 Mentality 59 Mentality Loop 65 129 Alon Oscar Deutsch Mindfulness 78 Motivation 54 Myers, Isabel 2 Myers-Briges Type Indicator 2 Nature 73 Negative 50 Negotiation 77 Nootypology 113 iNtuition 3 Observer 73 Optimizing 54 Outlook 79 Patterned 59 Perception 3 Persona 65 Persuader 55 Philosopher 60 Positive 50 Preference 3 Priority 65 Profiles 13 Progressive 58 Promotion 65 Proof 65 Prospector 61 Rating 110 Reaction 49 Reasonable 77 Rebellious 53 Referential 52 Reflector 56 Reformer 73 Relating 54 Relationship 110 Research 65 Resolute 77 Responsible 52 130 Introduction to Cognietrics Role 70 Scouting 54 Scholar 61 Scientist 71 Self 50 Selfishness 51 Selflessness 51 Sensation 3 Serious 77 Short Cognietrics Functions Test 10 Skepticism 77 Socionics 5 Standardization 65 Statistical 53 Strategic 54 Strong 48 Suggestion 49 Super-Ego 50 Super-Id 51 Temperament 55 Theorist 61 Thesis 65 Thought 3 Trait 79 Triad 80 Type 3 Understanding 75 Value 76 Visionary 61 Weak 48 131 ABOUT THE AUTHOR The theory of Cognietrics was created by Alon Oscar Deutsch, an ISFJ with the working habits of an INT]. Reading from age 3 (a year after he had his first original Jungian ideas), he was a top point scorer (even winning arguments with judges) on his elementary school's book trivia team, which achieved a 1 of 23 ranking in the "Sunshine State Battle of the Books" trivia competition. A composer who began writing music at age 12 (including music for every Myers-Briges type), he also performed with the varsity jazz band and was offered a record deal for his works. He first took an interest in Jung during a high school psychology class and began studying Myers-Briges types towards the end of college, during which he took upper-level psychology electives such as _ Behavior Modification and Animal Behavior and _ philosophy electives such as Critical Thinking and Theory of Knowledge, all while conducting research laboratory experiments in molecular biophysics, neurochemistry, and optics, and later graduating with a degree in mathematics and physics. He was a National Merit Scholar and an Advanced Placement Scholar with Distinction in high school, a member of the Golden Key International Honour Society in college, and after scoring in the 99% percentile on the ASVAB he graduated top of his class from the United States Navy nuclear program, going on to setve aboard a nuclear submarine as a nuclear reactor operator. He is also a member of the International Society for Philosophical Enquiry, which represents the 99,9t percentile of IQ and standardized testing and is the oldest functioning genius-level intelligence network. A brain mapping by Dario Nardi shows preferred use of FP2, O1, F8, T4, F7, and F4, and past development of O1, T3, T4, T5, F8, and To. 132 Introduction to Cognietrics Appendix A Function Questions Ni/Se - what forces are acting? Ne/Si - what can I do? Pi - what affects me? Pe - what can others teach me? N - what may occur? S - what is happening? Ti/Fe - is this valuable? Te/Fi - will this succeed? Ji- am I achieving goals? Je - can we do better? T - does this make sense? F - is this importante *Introverts primarily use the introverted function and extraverts primarily use the extraverted function. Judgers introvert perception to minimize its effect on their behavior while still allowing them to check things thoroughly on the go. Perceivers introvert judgment to minimize its effect on their behavior while still allowing them to make the most of opportunities as they observe. Extraverts lead with the reaction function to build trust; introverts use the reaction function and its complement together only to overcome obstacles. T to debate F to distill N to connect S to detect 133 Alon Oscar Deutsch The Reason for Jungian Typology: Heraclitus said, “if there is one thing that is immutable, it is change”. Naturally our responses to such an unpredictable idea differ as they evolve to meet it. We may ask: Should I be concerned with specific (Introverted) or general (Extraverted) change? This is important because the very concept of change implies degrees of change. Should I respond to change (Sensing) or initiate it @Ntuiting)? This is important because we are both agents and experiencers of change. Should I work to change things based on things that aren’t changing (Thinking) or slow things that are (Feeling)? This is important because change can be positive or negative. Should I act before (Judger) or after (Perceiver) change? This is important because changes may bring about other changes. I believe the exploration of the degrees of change (IE) reflects changes in things that have not functionally changed from each other, whereas the exploration of the results of change (JP) reflects changes in things that have functionally changed from each other. This distinction in categorization is what allows us to define both the observational differences that prevent vagueness and the utilitarian implications that prevent triviality, both of which comprise change, so both are quite important. I believe the ability to experience and respond to change (SN) reflects the recognition of change, that implies change in the universe and which alone would seem hopeless, and the ability to slow or hasten change (TF) reflects the ability for deliberateness, that implies lack of change in the universe and which alone would seem meaningless. The combination makes change important to our species. These ideas, the defining and motivating aspects of change handled by the preferences that are the minimum needed to organize one’s mind, show that it is real and important, and collectively manifest in the immutable aspects of our existence. For this reason I think that the four Myers-Briges dichotomies are both necessary and sufficient for categorizing psychological preference. 134 Introduction to Cognietrics THE END 135, Original Works Alon Oscar Deutsch “This is the quality of composition I would expect from Mozart...” — Anton Anderssen, Concert Pianist, on “October Waltz” Copyright © 2023 Alon Oscar Deutsch. All rights reserved. "If a composer could say what he had to say in words he would not bother trying to say it in music." - Gustav Mahler (7 July 1860 — 18 May 1911) Violin Concerto No. | in Am "Four Winds", Op. 1 L East Wind Alon Oscar Deutsch = 108 ieye ase se o ee ia - oe of —_o Violin ——— SEs z rae = £ ms e ef, Poe Le tee tette Viola i = tH ——— tise; a ——— ae, i= S Le clo (S=—* we ¥ ¥ — Cell Di Saiz 3 Me ma ss Bass [DF oF # = Ca vl Gites tite, = =a be, —. » | oS ee re ee a = ft oe all Via. i fd po ? =a: ==! cel. [BE Bass |e / ——— =—=——__. fe oh. . . ee eae oe = cal Via. |e —_ SS Cell. [BE Bass [DE iM . ry iy 10 of e —— Vin. 6 —_——— o—_* === = = z : =e SS SSS ——| == —] ‘ Via. Is ————— ——— = ——— we e vw ee el cen, [RE — 5 7 Bs | — — a 2 be 12 ia a tf etete. « b Me Eithe: © be bebe the ate Vin. 6: —— — = — — —— 2 —t e& b — be be. ial a o- ime Mla. “f2 ¢ is 2 i Pa Via. IIs =a = = = z ft = 2 ehe ca, |B Et aaa 2 = = tos | SERS — en 15 e f= be, be» 2 fe be. 5 es © ertrte, Vin, 6 re — ia z Pad 7 Paert fe ————— =| pcre ° ——— = be b pe ee fe —! No nt o- —a kK oe cd Via. Ist a = piste ay = rot . — : ~ cel, | = i = +5 SS —= = Bass | BE = zs : oe “4 Vin. Via. Bass Vin. Via. Bass Vin. Via. Bass 19 feenlitees AP in ral bebe ee £ eve ‘ee seteot SSS 5 = - be & Eta. 4 e be R - == —— — 2 — ee Sule. be be where a1. ra ett ——— 5 o: ei foo Pad — oe o sie. yi a be eB Sette = £ be be. 7” oe © fe — eee meres SS == : ; = ———————— be. be £ ——e 2 rz = De = LZ 2 be —* = == o we ——= | EE = 7 ry — 2 = —— NT 95 be @@ be oe e 2 xe be berets #b. _—— * 6 SE ob Se os wo ro et pt i Pere = = SSS, — pe be 2 ¥ F be ci ae 3 Vin. Via. Bass Vin. Via. Bass Vin. Via. Bass Vin. Bass Geet eeeertert or, ——————| =? Se = oes Eheee Fete sees = =< 2: Sal re i 2 = DE 30 as # (Se es = — SS Z —_ = =a =o is 2s Se. eS Be oa 34 eo f 2, ee ——— = y " ope Pie = ee === === SPS ae eee a ra = b et pe o oa sd a = ee-ebe aan rete. eee ———a t~—* = ra Foe peo re a pyoeSss ap a ——— ——— i ——— 2 % fF o$ Dad o—*, e == — ae = # rh ——— || | Vin. Via. Bass Vin. Bass Vin. Via. Bass == a AE frie = ——— f SSS = —_——_—— = 43, pS ——— ————— EE ra £ oe SS SS SSS DE 45 ee z ? Pa eae ee ? Se t Violin Concerto No. | in Am "Four Winds", Op. 1 IL North Wind Alon Oscar Deutsch i) Violin Viola Via. Via. mo. oS Be aS = ae RP ° z= b 9 i N » @ q » r li : y is Hr, . li iJ , in . lis ’ ) My rp lis re ‘ It 15 ra ca ¢- ¢- Vin. = —— ose ole — — ee Vie = o—= 2 ee? ra ra a. > e- oe — 2 wv ve eo L — #e — te y * fe 1) ~ fe iM are a S tt ig Mr i & eo Vin Efe»? 9» 9-¢ fe = . _—— ——ee = ose oo Ss f e ‘e' re: = fee tte ee |e Vila ra e f Zz Sa — — —— o — Violin Concerto No. | in Am "Four Winds", Op. 1 II. West Wind Alon Oscar Deutsch by he. an ~ he he. Violin G a as 2 Ete ts o ud —oT he Viola wares = = = twa = Sheer he — T ie = Bete cde he E bas _ tee on org ef he filet, Lis he ° " eo ele Le he tele : be Vin. Hey ae ———— E— ; —— = = ~ =—— 4 : ow wipte ef 52-226 ——— ~—ie Via. tvs ieee = = B-6 —— 5 —/ cet. | iy ——— — Ss == oe ee ee ee / te 2» - © ie ” he he be e 2 £ te 2 # _ Vin. 6 ——— tere er tite,, ef ehe ao, £ Cheba 5 F te be Ma. i ES ——— —— Vi eerre = fee he he ete 2° the. ete, f ay at he tite fe eit oe te, pee eS ort ae ae eS | Vin. Via. Vin. Vin. Via. Vin. Via. | he fi eit 2 ————— ——— @ . em: { e ft — — ———————e_——— os i al ial ———__ . ie he Ty a my .) ie Vin. Via. Vin. Via. Vin. Via. Vin. Via. Vin. Violin Concerto No. | in Am "Four Winds", Op. 1 2 : Alon Oscar Deutsc TV. South Wind aera ead é 56 ce file eet ete — Violin oe yt = ¢ wit ta: 4 3 eee oo =—— “fea | Fg te ey be beter te te EL. Viola 4 ie te = = = —————— f f 4 pte _ ft | te ott 26 Cello PEE = 5 2 Bas BEArE er FE ts te ie Fate z f 3 ry : - je ~ he ete he eit te te FF be F 4. | fe ate it Vin. gfe = <= —= = = i — he ‘la. as va — = ie Be. eo ii Be : = + * oe te —— = r a = he belt ote be Ec he pe aie ie he’ r he Cell. tate # ae + - : ee ——-= a DER, =Sac — = te: oe rs = i ho : t Vin. Ge f: — ——_ 7 —$— = = e For oe * 7 wo eo he he te ite ie te e cal i a tee 1 4 Cell. DER = Poo : = i= = =i ————— : ee Bass By ay fe fat =" : 2 hetet —s Fa 7 = 7. = Ns K =o hes Vin, 6 ie — Zp =e == nN fete ¥ iy iy 8 Via. pe jet = Osh e? —— ——* =e ‘= Bass | DE et = — hes, oe ee te o fe = t Vin. — =a a4 — y ie fe » » » Ge Via. wot = = att hes tet : 5 = EEE ———— ae t eE__e— a Cell. f ae "he =e = — —__ o —— 2 Foie 7 ee — ol Bass = wie te — re o ite, f ft ul leet bebe: ae eee its hee o— te Vin. 6 ma = =2-= ———_—————_ = = — ee. £ o Ff e je f a te be # Via. pars = —— —- = P ie i= ‘ ft pizz. Cell. DEAE j= iF = F aK A Fe t the = ¢ LL pizz. Bass | DE Pree = i = = iE fiete be he ra arco in 7S he te. e he bes fe fete @ Sai o be bo ‘ x = Fo & 7S 1 ’ s mM th et ‘ j | ‘ i Is Ri a a rth e iil iil + Red i) “st K rn ) ay i fly ' > olf gullll Uf e & LB | i. r s il rl e & 7 i 4 ohh . | ’ cy el He ee om uo wt mG a : ‘ | how Le . \ a Pat on + i | ‘ ‘i Ht ty My HN “ a i cul q & Ish | i | st lr | a i . { Nan nr ‘ [S- t ¥ {|| ES { tt ‘ berate i ¢ 7 ‘ qd { Wi \s MS ‘ i i ri ia : “ hs se My lll 4 ali aoe : aa ‘ * i u "| | oN 8 "all ; “ay aT & 8 hin 5 di | - ft ‘i cil fol tt S, ul il il Vin. Via. Bass Vin. Via. Bass Vin. Via. 28 eo Pe sae hee = é Ge = aaa SZ = — pS SS oe. be ie + te : = _ zs — e Bare nar ape —— aa * i tee eo rat r ; 30 Se id he k e 4 2 he ifs Soa. Saae rere t=9-8 Z SS — ae ——— we vw pie — ee a: of iT te 2 sar te 7 * ——— the yp = me = — © os? eo ——— D tte 22 ie = : 32 te: dee 32 he 2 °E pol fer - © f£ te ; o fiete bet tee © te ap. Gite Pg Ste ag e £ thete - be ra a eo nuat o aro tad ; —— = 5 aan j = So ——— mee: er 2 q = eo a = et z 2 * —S = het a F + = te to Zt = Vin. Vin. Via. Vin. Bass Lo i.) ~e {pr C4 ial o Fo eee @- p ——— a r hd cual Pe Vin. Vin. Vin. Bass 40, q and! ge oo oe 6 z =F a a 4 —— f —=2 Z =a aae La he is pS aan ee ——- — a —— vareie = f— tp —['fe — o—e—te—ie te Z e et a ¢ = = i o—te—te te >) 42 4 > ———= fry f+, - i = Z ia = wa aA a. ipttie » Tete 1G ot Fig 9 pts dE pat ——a =———— — f he: Pale 2 rt 7 = — £E ft ete tet Am he DEA I ———————— ; ele be be bate a a oT 2 ——— = - 44 e ele 6 et =a ete ~— = Sree te © the @ he a a te he zE Ste . ra =H to S = ao et gta = f= He ao a oe fee oe 2 Ht ie — =—— = sh id we qe wo oe 7 ‘| ‘th hi Il (I a LI a e . . cin rep is . [S| ‘ ‘ a q | eu , | [S| [e 1 HH ity Wie 4 if aw e lh L * & ¢ Lt [e el 4 ri ai 1 = \\on ey ‘ l ‘ i ay IN ogre \ sll ‘| 1 bi | e! eu “ Ni 4 = ia 4 "a te i rl I & le a ow [| a x rs » ri he | LS. eS & y y = 9 gHeo# a ow a 46 Sif a $1| wu Vin. Vin. Vin. Bass Vin. Via. Bass 52 2 he - aa t fe fe, Gite = a — SS oy 6 ee SF ats aa yoy: ————— pie ee: = ie = a BE Fa i<— = il = fe = a | aes aE ay to 2 54 Be. = oe ind te 6 Se ee —> te be a go at gg te otek SS SSS eet eet | es ae = ZF < ra = zt ote —— eat $e = Fe o ao p s Z oe Z - tee — » oe ms —— yoy i* tert 2 hs 5 =. = ad ie te oe ie == e =——. ls] 7 ae firre ——s 2 a Pee = i ov ie fo oe oe Fa te Er Vin. Vin. Vin. i) Ni nd jE Pe re Bea pie £—'¢ — ie ; k E tee Et te tate ft te 4 f- Ye — te pa er ee = he. he. - he ¢ te At he Ge —5 > —= ie 7 = f ©. — tote e he te tate ia = Ee = viet £ ot i he a he Te mu) Vin. Pete tote te 1M) HITT Via. Vin. ee —_ yoy Nel Piano Violins Violas Cellos Basses Pn. Vin. Via. Bass Piano Concerto No. | in Fm, Op. 2 h L Allegro Alon Oscar Deutscl Allegro (#=120) Z ores g I, Pd 7 —-P—e: ee e. Obs re) Sees aoe 2 i 4 = Fhe helt: — —— Saibe t= : ee ee a oe = je pee # ; bey |p Vin. Vin. oe a — = ———s ———! e =—- -_——— sag vie = ae ee MINA oe OREO eG = I Be ee TM be "| 4 e % ‘| » Sy it il rT 4] “The iY 3 “Hl iY ‘ rs el “ll ry » a e y L) : x i all 3 xu sa e a u \ MH a e . oll Ml q of hs Pri | i ma q @ «9 A r ‘u a sone EN owes EAS BN] GN) Se EN) ee NI EN ‘ weet Leer te “ff Pent ene: tebetpbetebetehehebetebeiehs a1 — it ws 1B cu. |F Bass | cio laterite gs BE 2 hehebe é Ba w [i = 5 5 Pn. Vin. Bass Pn. Vin. Bass —_—n~ NE ND ag GRE INE —_—~ tre 29 anal be aad f 2 6 —* = ee = He be: i sr res — : : — oe — ee aes = : == aE BE ; 7 be. he. eit Hee be be if 2» £ fteefee tt 4 be 2 bre? Zao * Nel | al LS] oe abe | _———| fo =: cars Vin. Vin. Bass —_—_—~ —_——~ 46 be te — tebe (a 2 = 7 te ele An de ee iB: po age hie = her ptr be + te be tie, ete, 6 —— —— Bap ®: 1 elg che te, EE Fhe bine eehe sete, « 2 its ==SS=== #5 ——— Eta a a = ett o- 2 SiehS 8 Shebe hy e ft the tebe 2 2 he else be oft oe * ——— Pn. Vin. Via. Bass Me eGX> ih) au ON Piano Piano Concerto No. | in Fm, Op. 2 IL Adagio Alon Oscar Deutsch Adagio (¢=75) 2 be £ 4 —, e Se; "hobo ig © F gb 5 y'Sus E aa EE # — Gobo t= = = aecarer ettett ere, ptte fies'Bg © ete ef fae === ——— Paes 6 Pe o> he he e er fie? —S ae a na See ho z £ any he = b he Posteo Fonte fs ols , iz \ : oi) ote Fe ? 7 in =— 2 * se a = SS fe i . —— $ he f ow 2 “> Piano Concerto No. | in Fm, Op. 2 III. Andante Alon Oscar Deutsch Andante (¢=90) Phe — Wee abe Piano Horn in F aS NE eS tse LA Bass Clarinet in Bb % Ki fl ‘I : —<“o — ee * Hn. in F io EE = a we zo nd B. Cl. in Bb 6 | = =o a sla io i be f : «\ (ty Ki I: Hs I J he * be Hn. in F 6 = zi 2 z a ie bs bel B. Cl. in Bb ae = ke | = o Hn. in F B. Cl. in Bb Hn. in F B. Cl. in Bb Hn. in F B. Cl. in Bb peeber ' Sees eee ae E = 6k : ok eae . sapere oe 5 &t27 » + | : a ig me az az 2 + 7 i 3 === 2 es ee SS ae NO Ge Moon Landing Sonata, Op. 3 Alon Oscar Deutscl Woodwinds = 90 a Poem i a he elthe ff £ if ¢ the Chete o eo: Flute 6 2 gist 5 2 == - _——_—_—— ? 7 er 2 L os 2 oe : he the aE = wit. @. ae: Clarinet in Bb 6: i; af 7 £ tre oY rf reas Clarinet in Bb 6 B % = Lie iis Ae =e Se 7 il il oie ket ae Sie oe ° N 2 the be eit & tee etter he pie Pee» El, G i Sere —=—_—_————EE———E Cl. in Bb G 5 = ett eit co ee ae ee rie » ete £ ' a ofr heit lie Cl. in Bb 6 = = ra ie z = See i 9 FL 6 p — == z be Cl. in Bb B = 6 =a ho he £ thehe o eee ele e/)e# bebe yee ¢ | Flthe he he ei Ebehe 5 | Cl. in Bb ee ers — — z —— 13 Fl. 6 ke. te ep oe Fe lhe be Cl. in Bb 6: fF = z Cl. in Bb a = 4 — F = z CL. in Bb Cl. in Bb RS Blackjack Overture, Op. 4 FE « al ‘ : his mi al Fg ; | 5 # ‘ i Wy os a wu g ry “The & i i) wall UA wll E i il wh “ 4 is « fe ‘ 2 Te elaine Ihe tN “ll ie: " we SH) ofth “ "| * ht ad An) alll fl M\ wa : . “ : ® "| 4 a ATi7 ill 5 ~| fi IF cy e su il : ‘ «xl|| ball Mh Pm i “re i Alii rai i ‘ uw etl bail iH | Pe x ll “lh $ i \ ail Wh neal ‘ Aa aN + i ry ry , hd onl ny ‘ 1 , s olin i Mull . “| Ml MT = : ‘ : $ q ew one sl SAW va] Auk | st) st iss rl “4 sud le 5 fAtlhy rw ‘ ry ry Uh wi : H Is “ : fe ¥ ry a . s ROR wk ald .) & a * il ] rt : ai Cine oh, y q d iM i ry Uy \ * p a i a uu rin al Al i t ‘f tI Aly willl ry | ay +) Na} i e rik yer 8 | efi) te on) iu a uy i Wy NSH NSH a @ x} bi Ny 4 | Mor FN) kee A tee N) ee N= tee = te October Waltz, Op. 5 e : Alon Oscar Deutsch Woodwinds Peer _ Flute Oboe Clarinet in Bb é # z 2 2 Set Bassoon, 4 e iad e Fl. 6 # e zee —— - f = Ob. et - = o 6 —— Cl. in Bb es = = ——_ a =e ae oe vw #*s C= we? oe Bsn, | E# = =——_ oo” He 8 - # tthe 2, £ —- —— Ob. Cl. in Bb é # 4 = = Bsn. | EE @ @ 2 n (ie! —_——S= ra Ob. Cl. in Bb Bsn. Ob. Cl. in Bb Bsn. Ob. Cl. in Bb Bsn. ima ‘| é oF ¥ — Ea 15 rt we A ss ert ef ot SS i “1 te Ite ce = tad td 21 Sal get s —- : te | + 3 =f te eof te 6 "eo =SS-SS—= 6% =SSeae ——= Ize = — Ob. Cl. in Bb Bsn. Ob. CL. in Bb Bsn. Ob. CL. in Bb Bsn. Nate ih) He iN ne el iB tit T® ttt Judean War March, Op. 6 Alon Oscar Deutsch Brass Band e=8: es ia st Brats! [—=— he 4 he, fe Euphonium Baresi ete 4 vette Lee e+ p — — == sui i—a ed == —S aS zi —— = vive a "i o i a bot SuaeDron fig 1» Ap A J SO FRR) by Bass Drum I 3 o b ay & x4 4 J 2 J o 4 the, see as — er 2-4 = bh ; 4 aoe wire eet titties ee] —————— _ Tuba ae = = ioe = aaa at “te whe cd = op A, A), B.D. | o Bs ) rd d Fa eS — he depear cana == — ‘ vai nie = Euph. [BE — =2 epee a = =| i 3 ie A ct Sie og pte —s = Tuba Bat ot te == =F eee ee = == ——a ———| * f= — oe ro Se en Pe Cones NS) ee ee» POS ole ONS ESE oi ma | J y Jd, A AY | ob, 09 Euph. Tuba Pete ‘ & k ae — ce a —S= rei a 5 FF Carrier Particle Dance, Op. 7 Alon Oscar Deutsc! Orchestra Geo ke 6 — we — be — bh = Ac. Guitar AW ce kO fr pH Ba “tie ani J | ih) 6100 Ac. Guitar T I, 74 nN iw wa CB 3 43 3 Bassoon Bass Xylophone G b ey: ey Drums Ac. Gt. Ac. Gt. Xylo. Bsn. Bass Drums é es 7 = - fe be he ia a be ya cr fa} os 733 r 2 rn 0 9—8 6—0—_5 CT He é ee ee = vee ie ae aE to? ——— oe cre wz: — as ie. o £ fete ot o. pope ‘Loo — . pone pee eo o@ tet : 5 ——— Zz —— om f = Ac. Gt. Ac. Gt. Xylo. Bass Drums aH aS key Na Na KN arr Ac. Gt. Gt. Xylo. Bsn. Drums Ac. Gt. Ac. Gt. Xylo. Bsn. Bass Drums — ra ——— = - = 7 = 2 Cr LA 45. CB 3 44 4 3 rT 76 rr) Cr A rs os : be 1. FE = y—t Z = poet —— r 33 —= —— fe a * fo — ra eo @ eo @ > Zz = @ —— ==— —— Ac. Gt. Ac. Gt. Bsn. Bass Drums 18 ft he £ «@ Ty eae preeees| G 5 — = al 9 bo eS 48 22 #8 a ———* a 46 46 & fe = + = me 5 6 6 8 6 G is ae = o = he fe: 2 ete bo ef : e e ° Ez t =a ie if £ @ Ba 2 Be te 2 o—he ie : rz * e e = — ————————— -e —= ee —= = —= ss . == = =———, 20 © 2 £ ee ee rite es i =e 4 x x ———— Ac. Gt. 48. 20. 22-20 cr 20 48—_20 CA m3 —— rr 20 48 6 ve a oe bo He pes +s Ac. Gt. EE 4 ce 34 7 443 4 3 2 34 4—4 e Xylo. 6 = = = = [2 = | or - -_ o e © Bsn. QE pe | SSS selar= — 2 7 he. fe e ei Fe EE Bass =) i tie | | = —— oe ie Daves == === rums oJ Ac. Gt. Ac. Gt. Xylo. Bsn. Bass Drums N ke a> eae NA ND RS Suite No. | in F#m "Fundamental Forces", Op. 8 Alon Oscar Deutsch I. Strong Force Peer _ Sinton (Ee orp o = = oe ra =? ot ae | Sonne (oe ——7 te ———— — | Soto fea i ; = 5 | Xylo. Xylo. Xylo. Xylo. Xylo. Xylo. Xylo. Xylo. Xylo. Xylo. Xylo. Xylo. Xylo. Xylo. Xylo. Xylo. Xylo. Xylo. Xylo. Xylo. Xylo. Suite No. | in F#m "Fundamental Forces", Op. 8 II. Weak Force Alon Oscar Deutsch d=00 by : ——— é ae z = = = = Piano f , PF Brass | vs z b ae mek SS ———— es mf f == £ = 7 —— Drums - ; is = oe oe 2 = 3 he ? @: = === —— Pn. —~ - @ y = ——— = — = 2 tf = © bet =— for = oe = a = 7 Brass | & 2 moe Brass 2 « iS ae oe st ts tN oe ie Magee aeetige Ea yt Tb. BEE = ¥ : = = = > = = = fie + 7 ee et —— Divine ? 7 Z 2 — er a Zs os oz —_ — ts e ete = § f: D ° ” Ks he ? v4 o. a v ~~ m0 Pn = r|¥ Fea =: —$ o vw vow = . 7 e = Brass | 8a --------------------- hats Pe Se ooo all i cena bb —_————— p wr = eo zZ 3 oe —— _————_—————| Drums w= 2 — ——s oso oe == 7 £ £. Z _ K 5 6 Z = © ra ra ie SS Se Pn. id * yr? — z—t= he —— ——¥ a ahh be: ra * nb. SES > Z pie = i 4 5 - 5 5 Ke 2 aa —— Drums a ae = =s f +p. 2 = =S==—s —— a = =| a | — b pera Se et —— ¢ o z Pa, —— = a he er “1 ra raz rf a ve y 7 Brass 2 zi P £ . . At ‘J am Tb. BE f f - 5—* == — ———— SSS. FS Dai ——s — ee =? = =e =F 11 Pn. 4 —— a = = oe = o Brass | & 2 Brass | Irb. Drums Pn. Irb. Drums Pn. Trb. Drums 15 —_ il 6 z ss se = au += Br we 99 0 0 9 9 @ ° = = = aa = = be. Gvgese rites tena a A et eee Fi as A esas, ee he o ° = =e = ————— : * = 4 —S —S —_— 2 T we 2 a ee a -—* 7 7 ? 7 Suite No. | in F#m "Fundamental Forces", Op. 8 , Alon Oscar Deutsch III. Electromagnetic Force Per _ Guitars > 6 —" Er ¢ 3 — r 2 5 3 ae CB 3 2 4 é 2 Gt. 45 EE ——— i = — [B = 45 FA7 J yl —F a ae 3 2 4 k 4 ) = d aw é (atic ——<——=$ ——— 7 6 = 4 a —— Gt. 44 45. 8 40- 44 45. 4 5 8 5 Le 5 6 . 6 5 6 45. (9) # S 4 Y a) § - Q = Cees ie ? te p E te = —— _————| ¥ Gt. 6 z z 9 46 44 He 5 3 6 9 7 ra st 4 19 8 & 5 LF 49 40 40 49. 9 Hs 44 40 9 Ls rT 40 42 0 rn a0 ——_— =r 40 5 2 5 : 4 LE 8 7 4 3 4 3 4 [® é 2 - Agm : PY ee or ee a ee ae 5 ‘= i e = i, | — i 7 ca 3 > > 45 45 416. 49 = 46 2 zm 7 16 7) [A Hs a6 a 43 14 45 44 45. 40 A 8 oo we . . it sd. ee, ee eS ee vt : i= —— — ee fee a f Le > > > — > 44 46 49 48 44 42 r ———— — 3 rr 43 38 B rr) Ge ; 4 0 FS ie Z 5 ie ml 2 Sal oral cit 5 al oe iad in — : fe : p : > — = 43 48. 44 40- 45, 42 9 44 9 LE 46 45 44 45 45 a rm ag 1 ae 7 os rm 44 Fsus4 Caer == lsd fe Es = = = Ca ' "> Eat % G6 5 5 FP LF ey ° 6 A - i Agm a (etree : ‘ CF EF ot ee F Es Lk ; : Ls Gt. ? f Ff ? a —_-, Lt ite —] a ——— . a ee eee Fe z = 4 2 4 2 : 14 Gh+ bia (tp SS | Db eCr? OF Lene i FE 3 * 4 : 5 Hi 2 4 d P > Eo " = Cm C4maj7 Fe 20 Fkm ara , ei - is —— pt id rd yr 9 6 4 8 > 3 Hi 9 = 8 b 2 Bi - : : ~ Em is i is é fe ra ra — = + <3 ‘a — | S—— a ——————— | > 4 6 5 3 8 8 m ET 4 4 4 4 4 AY 9 & 9 tat 9 9 9 Am _ At ¥ ? 22 2 fe he - ¢ ia é aah —— Ee oe he £ wi > —— | > 2 Pe 4 8 ,; 22 = 40. rn 43 42 A a & [5 45 Gm fe Gt 23 Se Pall coe ei ia he Vier = = pany ai ra — = =_= fr is #6 k Ay % —— - $ — > 7 > > > 24 46. 44 42 6 5 4 Lr 4 34 20 22 3 5 4 = 4 Ls = 44 24 49 49 24 Gém So _— o ire: 2 6 os re J ———_—— zs we =f =——— esi r p = FF es = ) bf bd 3 4 Cr at 3 : 33 7 A 3 3 7 q [|B 4 4 2 2 4 4 0. 4 4 4 4 Fm Em Ber nr er pe Lr a 4 Lt mn 4 mn Ls : —— 3 : 2 4 3 : > 3 ce Gmaj7 > 26 < ee) Zs a ee Le o we Cees — = ie sn — iad = Lr a2 3 5 40 44 rr Lk 4 4 z 6 = 9 zs ETI = uw 4. qo pa SSS —— a > a > ————— ————— > 4 45 2 Ly #4 44 4342 44 #8 4444 42 3 z rN a ————— ey Suite No. | IV. Gravitational Force in F#m "Fundamental Forces", Op. 8 Alon Oscar Deutsch ; 71 —T id Flute 6 4, : 2 2 at be oe: oe "a tf " ———| b @. - be fe: Xylophone 6 = = fa z A res he- by - eco a ce ris } ; . a bom: 4 . i ° | 7 vw Piano a Ps Bro 2 eae AE f — st 7 o. K zs = cd et hwe al o -. QB eco ier eh sie lene dS a dled pete tea ns Lees eed tet bapeeh ovewe Lye hearse. Ween sat seuedeuaphed tt Too, Too, b ————— a Fl. 6 = —— o = of f mf If MW a 6 fe jeve— vite Ee mare — C= fe vibe. - C= sl ems ——= ; ——— J bet be oy i os 7 7 ez o Ph, Sf Sif SS It 7? = = ap -— . 3 z = Pe ages «IP # ta A Xylo. Pn. Xylo. Pn. Pn. 5 3 e Le i ee ££ Ge =aa= —_——, p = Sf sf mf mp P 6 et a —————— SS Ge Fat — i 4 = = ay z Zz Ze of o he mp P IN = —, —— eh —— = ype = Si dia : f oe f£ @ ft ft 6 2 2 = — = = ° = ™p mf ——_: r; ie be 5 bg: stg = be- = ¥ =; SF : 4 : a F eg eg -s Gu 6 ——— yt SS ™p mf 2 7 £ f - £ £& ra f z2 ‘= Be rae 2 mp mf i 9 Ge Z ; = ———— == = 2 ———$= " et fe * Ge *—_ i$: = f o—f a z a z 7 iw . < : 5 > y kK - = 6 z = = ss - = ei re a i tf vo GVB ss ack e nes be gabe = eho c eee Ost ee eee aes Me dee a ane se see eae ll o—? 7 oe Fl. G y— be — z 2 & 2 oo — = 2 — N e- —#—T 39, , 2, Xylo. oe = $ gig h =e = Fi —" ——— - nd of —~ — —) Sada - iG Bi 7 = o, o- w. e- ca ca eo ts, e- 6 : 5 = Pn Z SS = EL BE So By oO ERG TRONS TIER NAA Fy Cee eR Os TEA RG By pe REN AG Pes a Nee eee A Seer Pet 13 3 Py ty te be ania be 's ee Fl. = > = fie ——e ——$—S= — a oe a ty é Xylo. 6 is ind os 2 z Pp ——— BE Pp PPP pppp Se es F — i /e- of of Pa = = f= we = = 5 oe oe oe Nel 1 Devil's Lullaby, Op. 9 Alon Oscar Deutscl h Trio da 125 2 bei eo fe, te tre ee Py - peas ra ina Violin 6 3 —_—_—_———— ===——— 2 oa ‘~ ffte, ee Pptee English Horn in F a a ——_—— ——_——_—_— — 6a —— ei 7 ——— ame Pian é “gasaeeeerr y ———! — Poppe er re ca a ae oe eee eee —_———o B: 4 7 ina ep bee 7 Vin. é w —"s eles, Saal de 2 aan etese E.H. in F on ——S eS Sr YF SS = 6 vee peer ere ——— pi ———| rs... an : == bE ee = = ——— 2 B: é — ft ¢# be = = bebe Vin. —"s - z z — pete pte niet. ——— - eeee 1 - 2 ptshe E.H.inF 6" —= —! ——— — z or = SS == a a oe == Ph 6 ee ————| FSS ees 3 eee P SS See = & B Vin. E.H. in F Pn. Vin. E.H. in F Pn. Vin. E.H. in F Pn. iM) == wo oo 9 0 9 0 —— a eee TT ——— Saal ial Eee 1 Phe et pbe iat ——— a ttt Tre im eal! Violins Violas Cellos Basses Flute Oboe Clarinet in Bb Trumpet in Bb Symphony No. | in F#m "Samson", Op. 10 @=100 I. Birth Alon Oscar Deutsch pizz. Te “# the Vin. Via. Cell. Bass FL. Ob. Cl. in Bb Tpt. in Bb Vin. Cell. Bass Ob. Cl. in Bb Tpt. in Bb EEREE ERE en SS SS =e =e be === Cetete © * | fie be ote te oe =: aes yote arg ————————— TIT] — oo et es — _——— _——— 6M Ae —— = 4 a e ee] ii ~- fe fe & re rieite, ete, fe te JE Vin. é # : ==: —— SS Ss he Via. yet! E EF ‘er = ie == = : ie te Cell. pers ¥ 5 = — p z ‘ —j— ASS o zm = te fw Z te a = te tw FL G # E Ob. 6 # Cl. in Bb 6 re io Tpt. in Bp eae y 2 of it ete 2 ‘Ete, # ‘te,t Vin. G # ww tte tre — = : if te ft Via et Ei petit z =. = : ie te ie te Cell. pers 1p 7 5 i — ae Z s— 5 ih uO - Sete He 2} tel se pet lt FL 6 # Ob. 6 ag CL. in Bb eee Tpein (eae Eafe e2e—— Vin. Via. Cell. Bass FL. Ob. Cl. in Bb Tpt. in Bb Vin. Cell. Bass Fi. Ob. Cl. in Bb Tpt. in Bb —e 2 Z te = te = = jeg tees fe tititie oe, @ tee Ae @ SPPEPEEEF ERE fire rete fe a EC RERE ERR id —— anes oman = & ee ee 2 = 2 = 2 2 = fa —————s ww geet fet pp = os = © ojo oJ jaca ee] 3 18 Vin. 6 # Via. eee: Cell. =e Bass Bers E = FL 6 3 on lit pet tte tite aig eet Etta TS === CL in Bb aes Tpt. in Bb cae = 20 Vin. 6 # Vila ote Cell. Bere Bass =e — = FL. 6 # Ob. é # cheteletc ©» » ehetelete « Phe P pete eiteterere eope Cl. in Bb $e ——— SSS ESS : Tpt. in Bb 6 Ay =e Vin. Via. Cell. Bass Fl. Ob. Cl. in Bb Tpt. in Bb Vin. Via. Cell. Bass FL. Ob. Cl. in Bb Tpt. in Bb re ee] Frenne ee] N 7 iM « fECrE ETE 29 Vin. G # Via. yet Sci ptt ———— ——— a sell. wee Sve es Pv se Owe og ee Oe ee Cv we Bass =e FL 6 if ——= is Ob. es jy =F wie te epee Clin Bb be Tpt. in Bb aes 31 the te Vin. 6 # vietetetet = ie, Eee Via ett ——— et = ca, | S=ht§— FS Saas fetter ir : ——— Bass pers . FL 6 3 Ob. 6 i Cl. in Bb é $e Tpt. in Bb 6 Hey Vin. Via. Cell. Bass FL. Ob. Cl. in Bb Tpt. in Bb Vin. < Cell. Bass ic] Ob. Cl. in Bb Tpt. in Bb td SS == te Be ware Ere ce ce ets bet =aae a ptt te fen OP eines ets yote Bers Beate oe 5 (ae eres te (aes rors pithe, ete Vin. Via. Cell. Bass Ob. Cl. in Bb Tpt. in Bb Vin. Via. Cell. Bass Ob. Cl. in Bb Tpt. in Bb {ir ee] EERE EEE -¥] ~ ql : ee] iM) EERE RAE ee] 4B Vin. 6 3 Via. yoy! Cell. Bere Bass Bers —= te = ——— = = olete 2 epee a ad FL 6 3 Ob. 6 i Clin Bb ees be ete £ @ - Tpt. in Bb ms he ! a [ n ———— 45 Vin. 6 3 Via. et Cell. =e bas [Ft —* te =— = Peet ee :_ ae FL ag === =Saeiee Ob. 6 # Cl. in Bb 6 fe —-—— Tpt. in Bb 6 # Fy be —— Vin. Via. Cell. Bass Ob. CL. in Bb Tpt. in Bb Vin. Via. Cell. Bass FL Ob. Cl. in Bb Tpt. in Bb 3 3 : 3 3 3 3 wewiticin, Leteie | lietele | 2 eteis Se oe oe == —_— 2 — to tae i SEER ERR ER RRS ee] i Vin. Via. Cell. Bass Fl. Ob. Cl. in Bb Tpt. in Bb Ile ol Symphony No. | in F#m "Samson", Op. 10 Alon Oscar Deutsch II. Lion @=90 fe : Le Ce at an se Efe Pete Ete Trumpet in Bb $ ees ——— —— a aoe phe 4 F- A 7 Cellos EF ¥ == — we teette - fe Tpt. in Bb f {—* e. e+ —_——— Cell, —_———— : a mI o p e iz a Tpt. in Bb Cell. Cell. Se eft SS oe er oie ——— = = == Fale Tpt. in Bb —_——— we =— — ———— ee 2 Cell, = = == = = oF tele = ——— ote Zi oes aes Ee Tpt. in Bb a oeeit === = =# aE ———_—— Ee f oe E : F; Tpt. in Bb G # o —— He £ Cel. JE Symphony No. | in F#m "Samson", Op. 10 IL. Delilah Alon Oscar Deutscl Flute Oboe Clarinet in Bb oS ES eS Mh 4 he fie # i ° =a =— ' ie SSS SoS Se ee ee Ob. Ge Z === zie aca Cl. in Bb 6 ——— —— —_—_—_—_—_——__ Bass yE 7 fa = oe = Z aa ~e oe = . qe o 7 ad = 2 FL Ge : : ———— Ob. 6 Seba 2 te ig! Cl. in Bb Ge ———a ze s — —— | Bass oo fe —— “a z | we a! are oe f= jee 0 * be o Ob. Cl. in Bb Ob. Cl. in Bb | £ iM) q| Symphony No. | in F#m "Samson", Op. 10 Alon Oscar Deutsch IV. Capture 4-00 bee 4 2 ? Flute bt —— ——— = === oe CEE be CE te che f Violins ot = fies ——— —_—— = 4 : kK n & = —— — S— ——— oe a as eee fe EFeE a cee | Vin. : —— 2 ee rd =—— = oe ina f= ee crete te pbebe ew ite 9 be beftee, n = —— bebe » fe ete ete bebe » et 2 ef 2 gfe 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 >» — EOE 11 be ey , FL. at ia a 2) 6 ————— bebe » et 2 efe efe bebe o e 2 @ 2 b kee Vin. 6 EEO ——— tt e- I wee Symphony No. | in F#m "Samson", Op. 10 Alon Oscar Deutscl V. Death oars te : ” o oicine cite, of Phe < fe weftte Oboe ¢ ——— i — - Sal s ene ee @@ . SSS SS Sy te # tite £ ob. to ote ge Tee TS, re eel a toe ae ——— ——— ——— | vie siete —_ ae! siete siete Ob. hs ry 1 Ob. 2h fe z 13 Saree te Pt tet te tiete « ou, pip © tet tte tt tiste coy, cit + Via. He EO EO 15 Ob. 6 K s fe FRE FE ek EF he te 2 2 yn 2 te © Cello Concerto No. 1 in Dm, Op. 11 Alon Oscar Deutscl I. Allegro Allegro (¢= 120) : —— : : ——— a Cello [EE =: 2 = z == Soa Violas ie b-# Violins ot Bassoon P= 7 ¥ —— =| = ow) wbe bo a sa [E == Cell. |B == Z a Via is Vin. 6 bo. SS ane = z —— w| " oho oe oS : = Cell. a = Z ea Z oe —a i—= we Via iiss Vin. G B Bsn, SE = — z we rz Ke a a i z = 2 5 z z = ATT su Hl qa “ its \ e i | di : | ‘ l ‘ ie es meee | : a th We std I all) |r * the ik ‘ | | 7 “ll ft i it ' H ‘ 7h) Ce l yn ot sr it ie SHH) Ul ult i | a) ‘f i all | iN l! HY \ bg | aad e e e Hy ry a iJ CY ¢ Nh lt sul) st | OWT ON \ hE ull] aR “4 i i th ie Sj | i 2 Ua 4 1 e Ts ue es Sf) | t 1) Ul iy MN : | l t ¥ * J ah] : ft fe a te i Sy) my WU TNs les He suf ite. Fi by + oa re aun) fe r} * 4 N ike al i aa i : n a. tie + 4 bit, A Be Wy li: : | H | ly Fi " Ty 2 c= a a Via. Vin. Bsn. Vin. Bsn. Via. Vin. Bsn. 20 : = ore e 2 obe. s abe é ft he @ © (Is ——S a = BE rd = = Z K Z S ra K eo oe oe bot oe oe oe 23 be. eit be aE — = — e—| SS Ee £ li: . t of a a (ae ee be. == 2 SS & eo bat bo bebe. a ve = [9 a et = = : = ~ ie githebe riphebe a FES Ee be rehe f be- pe ettebebe ehebebe, = if: . G _—_——_—— = —_———— 2 =e T? a z = 7 BE = = = = z 31 SS Cell. =a 2 ee 7 r B — —— ioe eee epee se eye oo Via. is ~ of ef he fe ime Ty Ty a8 fh vw 1G — ———— i Bsn. a —— oe — Cell. |B ca ott be = os ozo —— — Z e- ae Via. iiss 2 ae» fe be ie: ele 5 -t bere e be be i Vin. 6 —— == ———! —= Bsn, BE e epee | oe eee Me —— 5 = * = Via. | PES hee Vin. Gi Bn. SEE 5 ——————— re ——— ior eae tssae” oe’ ae , o Via. 5 i Vin. 6 SE Bsn. Via. Vin. Bsn. Cell. Via. Vin. Bsn. Cell. Via. Vin. Bsn. Via. Vin. Bsn. Ne + owe eriet 15 = 2 penile. te et eo - e Gee ——— ———! a sa eo es er ——— 50 = B e = es ———— fr eft ee pi tieses, Gi _——— ——— eas Flt eee, te ——— ——— oe eae = Sa 59 he ft. ec oe ont fete? —— —_— - feo @ re et er ef 2 PPP — — t = =r 2 = Cell. Via. Vin. Bsn. Cell. Via. Vin. Bsn. Via. Vin. Bsn. Via. Vin. Bsn. 64 it~ te 2 fettetete ft 2©@ 6 © ff © oe ee SSS SS SSS SSS Ib — = oe ms o = —_— oi Sal sal & £ o, 6 = ee te owe = ra cao eles 2teie thee, Pte ~rett a Se Eee et ete te @be 68 = = fe fe # = PF et ee == = a a ad ole =i ef ro oF 2 : 5 } o he oe were 73 3 —— = = — ie) 5 + o ye eee Serttteer BE —— o zoey To 2? ° oe a= = oe — a a 4 Via. Vin. Bsn. Via. Vin. Bsn. Via. Vin. Bsn. jeneu SRE est SS bo += ae e - © 2© #@ ‘< 2 ime Ty = 6 ? ? EE 82 ett, SSS Sar = —_——— = o = ——— = oe =e = T+ rey = Cad oe oe ee o Be | NAS NA aN Cello Concerto No. 1 in Dm, Op. 11 Alon Oscar Deutsch II. Presto 2 eer eto bse hs. Presto (#=170) a Cello D4 Contrabassoon Bz: a tne an ef of ind = ot? Piano 7 Cel. BE = ———_—_— - -o oO se wv ‘og e Sal e cbn, BE rt ———_— erteree £ ere Ets é Pn. BE —— = = +%s 7s sald we Ce te ge 12 x Ke Cell, ——— —= Cbn. = Pn. a a Cell. Cbn. Pn. iM NS} Cello Concerto No. 1 in Dm, Op. 11 UL Adagio Alon Oscar Deutsch Adagio (e=75) SS 2s oe oe —a Cello Violas Flute fe | Violins oe —— 1 y iM . Vin. =a fapap ep ee le eet Se = - Cell. a o- rd o z 2 Via. re € Fo o—? ze rd ia rd = rd a ———— E = —=—> el el 6 Via. IIs fe Vin. Via. Vin. Fl. Via. Vin. Fl. Via. Vin. Fl. i i iM bi a ~ p .) | iM) i) 16 ic} iM iM BS BK Oboe Piano Bass Ob. Ob. Suite No. 2in Am "Colors", Op. 12 Alon Oscar Deutscl h I. Blue =50 et eis of ,. Z be nk Se : e © rs f ze s at ji | Fy be. fe ——— ; atetiebe , ete fe = fete. oy —| ed oo oe : * - ft £ gf | berate eiebe , tptte oP 6 et r. be he be" ——— eee EEE CEE Ete eee BE be te ——— =e ye be , » te F ee | = ===. = ——e eo oe 5 « ~. et & of ss be. g: * £ E : =p? SSS SS belies * b e ere Petre ele ple eft beerereret Sef peer eter Este tete -f = (gaze _——_—_ ——— - BE +: 2 é t ‘ Ob. Pn. Bass 6 i) Oboe Piano Bass Ob. Ob. Suite No. 2in Am "Colors", Op. 12 II. Yellow Alon Oscar Deutscl h Le DF o—? — ————— 5 pre ee te, Bz === iaace-"P fe = = 9 pee. , pte | be be abe eee eee he . Ne INR eR Suite No. 2in Am "Colors", Op. 12 Alon Oscar Deutscl III. Red fim ie . bete’t Oboe —= = o =F) ‘= —— Gt —— woe — ft 2 et, et 6h ee Piano 24 =_———t = —— 2 £ —T?! sss jessie ree? 2 epteo # e rT Ss Bass D4 = ———— ==: ar 4 eo Lt ot b a ee tp fe ef b. ————— be gee ebe = i — os ——— © be Pn. ——— 3 YASS fe 1o- iat = a Be o— bee” = —— Dp she” © ‘i as ee b efee fe © ebe e- te elie = ee = be bale a whe the ee o be e o- i .. o Bass BE Ob. Pn. Bass é peer te SE oe mn ae ———— Contrabassoon Pice. Cbn. Pice. Cbn. Manginat Hagalil, Op. 13 Alon Oscar Deutscl h Duet d=75 ele 2 b he efeEfertte Piccolo 5 $ ss He ze ———— SESS 3 = ina a : he e othe te? & 2 ra PF = —— — —=——_— we 4 6 = settee = be » the = ° We ete oe be @ # = tre pas _————— = ~— 8 citer tees 9 4-6 pa Fle » ¢ Pie e_—* = fe i a ad \" Afternoon Dreams, Op. 14 Alon Oscar Deutsch Guitar é=70 he # if he e he ote ie + _¢ _—= her a —— 2 Gp — == ee = Guitar ——44 40434 ¢—18—4 4 Cr i rr a 8 s—; 4 t 4546 $63 40-9 3 ‘a ca © { tite (eee pee es 0 ERD. Dt ieee = = . o — a Gt. 59 79 44 42-44 rf ery 4615-42 [Ie 56-8 4-3 436 a es rr) [B = 42 45 449444344 6 és eh & C4 cee “a? at a = kw Gt. o—_9-2 | 7 42 5 2 5 9 934 4 Cr 2 4 8—9 2} 9 3-0 0 Er a4 rn 3 4 Ls 3 nN 3 4 2 3 with Measure 10 (2 octaves lower) 10 he tie te tty ee oe == he- te se he fe a eae ir = —— —S —_ wi Gt ie o—0 o—0 844435 9 6 5 = 4944-9 2 4 4 69 95 LA 2 3 : 9-6-9 6 | [® a 3 with Measure 10 (2 octaves lower) 18 i aaa i ie he e with Measure 10 (2 octaves lower) 6 a ——— — Gt. 578-7 20 4743-86 Lr 5 68 9 365 2 5 La 5 5 5 [B 9 —. “TRG upup if | lll i ] “tT is} | uct io Enh i | il He if q pil | ® a naa + Cy + ian 1) of > HE : cil PFA Birthday Waltz, Op. 15 . Alon Oscar Deutsch Piano ¢=90 3 =a —— a ovo roe Piano St == — =——= — —— — Be eee Oe Tee Be Owe Le eee Se wr ee v 6 — — cay os 2 ¢ ol | ?—# a: —= — - Pn. BB = _ i aS SS A ee te te Fe El lle wv oqIVve wv ove Pe ea wv ove v v v 11 ee @ 2 ¢- ¢ i ia ——— ——= Pn. Pn. Pn. 5] is} ® ® © Ne ® ~~ 3} a 26 N Han .) » the e Lor [* we I jm js i ye im fh ; All : ’ [ ell ie » : in [yi ‘| Ve ‘ . | nd : i * I. I I ty alle is \ \" Nd » | piss ig . i Tt ® mn) i & t « K, (I Hite fo in \ he all \ HR i “I te 2g | ty - nf » . ‘ eo os » hd \* Nee i ‘i “tw “ Y f \ D, Pn. Pn. Pn. Pn. Martian Sunrise, Op. 16 Alon Oscar Deutsch Duet @=90 Pazz £ rie the be 2 English Horn in F G 4 * , = oo ef © » Cello BE : = $, ba bat 5 oe oe Vv re 4 he be & e e- EH. inF oe? Pie bet z eo fie = ===: G oa — = he be = he Dual e@ be b eo b Cell. BE ue : 7 be ett -—| ef E.H. in F 6 f —- L349 ee er! YY == SN 2 eh , £ ci 7 a oe ca, == 2 — Ss a . = === ze =r oon whe 10 EH. inF oe ee oe == =a < be zo ote aw vw be che be £ be. : te Es Cell, EE 2 | = = = = Race ‘Track Boogie, Op. 17 Alon Oscar Deutsch Brass Band é=10 Brass 1 asst Brass 2 —— — Trumpet in Bb 6 : === == oo ef Ge == a 2 eer eers ‘Trombone | pb-b 7 io Tuba | pos - Brass Brass 2 Tpt. in Bb 6 === =e oo =a wafe Kobe r 7 te ow ve be ete Ld Ld . - tyepete a Pe of eo 22 Th. | ed = ead Soe Se 6 ae peer oe — en e sy fhehe —s f Tuba b —— — = 7 Fk —— Vie ses Sea se ae ee 8 Brass bie b Brass 2 === Ta (= Pe tie ee eee i° ee ee Pishe ss whe | Th. | £ 5 —= Tuba [BEE — i Fee a a — Tpt. in By 6 = = = 3 = bw 2 tr. | Epes Tuba | EE Still Waters, Op. 18 Alon Oscar Deutsch Duet e215 = e c e Violin B é , é i Piano + efere be Fee ‘p! f o o o ca er 2 2 2 : = e Pere ee = _—= e be he RES ES = = — pay ia ©. + ge fe — co fe e ry Vin. é = ope Se ual fe teeet se fo 2. 2: 2 e. ~ ee tre Ef te ett Piphohee 5 Fs = ig z ye e e ——— — oe # fe é = £ e € i= PATe Dd e e@ ; q SM. H a Net] i ig ets ft e Ne th se [ e iy ® > TR W Go Gee HlJisal r | ie 7 S ee e fe a Ke e ra] hg | FF oe [: | r, | fl l ns I | r “Tile . a .) ‘ “4 Te 5 ; t I ? 8 | "8 | qd pr : P H ' s i pa : : df 4 LH one pr yl allt 8 | 4 : i J r : iy ; e Is | \ : | \ i) i “ “il N ¥ as 4 i ~ | : tH q a * ! : | i { wall A sy ie ll a ) lel. | le|.| : ae WY sl : » |s : : | Mr fi : : : » LY oa : h ral ‘ : : : ‘| a i Fi * | | : { er ih s ; " i ( : ) 7 ou ‘ ' | i. nh « im) Fil 4 f | ! LW) 4 r) CY ic = ! oe hee Hoe tee A) es A = a =P SPN Pn. Pn. oe —_| sail fe ———-2 i" sii te NC i im Ly .) a oe etl oe we eT hs ry 916 » Ar ROH ah REN p ; . : i + YN 4 mh | aL | | iki ill ’ w ue ) n ty b) 1 UL) il ‘ \ e Te whe { i is a > TI AMO ne AN) 8 Oe AEP 8 — ote — Ee 11 6” —————e ipo —Sa= = ms pz wad 2S 17 io et rtrer rer treo r % eo | Paar a ea aaa a aaa aad aa aaa aaa aaa E.H. in F Vin. Bass E.H. in F Vin. Bass Be ae = oe 29 2 7. 2 tee, ara 6" —————————— —— —e = > = —= — = a= pS i eS = = = Bt ra = ros = oe fer Infinitesimals, Op. 20 Alon Oscar Deutsch Duet Piano Bier el hal et ne AS sk aS tet = ata * ——— i a ene ars oo i” i i ¢ a fo Se Guitar Cr ‘A H 24 ae a= — 4 ms A 5 3 4 a 5 40. — ot 5 5—_9 $s es ——— = === Nie aie a a ee +7 = ban i —— te? Pepe GD) b a He 2 = te _he — _ 2 foe 5 7 te cis : go? ae = | a4 fe. Te cae Gt. 6 g Cr u 6 r -B eo 6 70s — car '—? Pa ae Pn. 4944 44 44-9 key cy ee ee TR AB UR ca A ee Ip atte ‘i NG - 4 nm a H 7. a like il | i | ] “ ) rY ee lath. [i , rt : uy he x fl || e. 9 t | AI) . » 7h ‘ y e ® ® mill [ery I 1 : [/* Be | 1S & | a ’ ¥ ’ ’ + ek d 4 tH p 4 hie aH il M i J WH a | 1 = & H M 4 x ry ’ hi ‘| Ik [: @! ry rN. Ry Bp ¢ rel] \. Er IA) BL AN Ir na ite ft @ t) [e %» cy | ‘ Seana) ¢ ‘| , if 4 i IN { ! ‘ a | y i H, ® |i ’ + ‘| i i } : ] i) e : 1 iy .) ain. ¢ ie ‘y rel ry re aaa lll dda | ag: HOPS He] = shee) he aN ins Pn. Pn. eee eae OOOO See > 7 —— = er : Ae ee x a bo = 2s te . wv we = SS oe — he S| “ba = iene a wv te oie te CT ms 6 z 3 6—6—4 7—# 3366 3 4 6 3-3 5. 4 6—_4 19 e— a | Ge — = = —T :; = i © o —— ———— = = 2 ao oe = tate bs ———-—— 6 = . te = vw = id v e Ee 2 Le 4 4 é : Z 5 : 6 4 Boca Raton Klezmer, Op. 21 Alon Oscar Deutsch Quartet = 160 Clarinet in Bb 6% ——— | | we wze. wv we Trumpet in Bb 6%} a — ott oe? | | ooo ge o S we =; —| — = - a. £ 4 Ae Piano a Z 5 Ea z = oe ; 2 pizz. arco a inl inl inl all Bass Be i; ee e. 2° ra z ra I: o—~_* | 5 3 f ete of oe Clin Bb 5 | =——— = - — il inl o- ft Tpt. in Bb ae ote ro = = | —— — —— é : Pn. | Dat $ s £ Fd £ s £ ves a os oe = a = oe 2 Zz Zz = Bass PEs f a e if ° or — > | Cl. in Bb Tpt. in Bb Pn. Bass Cl. in Bb Tpt. in Bb Pn. Bass Cl. in Bb Tpt. in Bb Pn. Bass 9 o*? cd - = ind 2 i— = oe = ad oe vie vo? b a == = = = se? wwe ee Se Feet eer ers Sig Da 12 — = Gib eee Se, = 3 we a == 6 : ste art “SF £ £ £ £ £ £ £ Bs PS 2 2 16 2 a te ‘Zz — = f a a o oe a ae a nl = : = 2: z : Bas f . f e ° Cl. in Bb Tpt. in Bb Pn. Bass 19 Z segs on = pitecre, ote on — a, z £ z ee i 2 o i ra f fe Guitar Suite No. | in Bbm, Op. 22 I. Ocean Alon Oscar Deutsch ar - o es SS oye Fe | = * oe e qe be hot a Gt. 65 2 4 6—3 3 3 LE 43 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Hi} 4-3 3 3 @ 3 434 2 6 2 : ! ae , e Ss 5 t 5 £ ia a = ———— nd ie J Gt. 2 2 2 2 2 2 - Lr sf x 2 - 4 tl [8 @ 4 Guitar Suite No. | in Bbm, Op. 22 Alon Oscar Deutsch III. Sky = 105 i ——s —_——— — 6 Z = FF =e = a —_———s thee —— goo ee Fade Guitar ie Cr 3 — ae 2 2 CA 3 3-43 4 3 6 3 [B £ 04-34 4-3 434-4 4 7 4 424 4 — 5 ¢ es = 5 ¢ - 6 ia a ss SS ae 5 a Sr sss oss rm, Lf eo sis * Gt 7 id 4 4 Ly 2-2 3 Fa nN rae ee 3 34 3 LB 34 3 43-14 34 3 44 3 4 3-4-3 34 o—3 =—— 4 —a 1g. e 6: = a S$ ve wo s eet £ re er iz a2 o_? ra ct ra cr —= a ——— Gt. 4 945 42-4 4 o— 34 4 2-4-2 6—5—2 4 029-2 LT 4 o 4 3 4 3 5 4 4 Ht ba 3 5 4 10 5 =— — = . te ———! 6 = stg oe ete 3 —S — are —— wee eer tse Srisses | gale Gt. EE $234 2 2 Ls goat ER (SP EP | ra ae g 73 4 4-2-4 4 3-4-3434 13 G is : f ; : zi a s —— ~~ 7 is 2 Gt. 4 LE 2 2 7 Q + 5 2 3 3 4 3 4 Hs 3 |B: 4 3 4 4 iS Symphony No. 2 in Am, Op. 23 Alon Oscar Deutsch I. Allegro Allegro (@=120) - ‘al er f 2» 2 2 Phe & ot be foi. cw e ¢ - 2 Violins 61 — ——_—— Violas He Cellos De _———! — a all Basses ea a? - Pte? = ra e =~ el — SS Piccolo z Fy —a os! = e! Contrabass Z ontrabassoon De 2 z 2 eote ¢ 22 f- ef gt: styl e Pe of Pe £ 2 5 oe 2 £ Vin. é Via. IIs é cen. | ER 2 Pice. z oF oe — | | iT ry rf i it —h Cbn. Po = ee - e e oe Pe Vin. —— it @e2#et fe e Via. — a — bot Gell. Bass — pa lee Picc. ——_ Cbn. - rt 72 re o 1: ig: eo @tfee 2 15 fetes os o 5 5 Vin. —— — a — bel a a — e et: Efeer.,£ © ele ttre 1. ime Ty Via. i¢$—= =——S— ia ia = cell. | BE Bass le oe o ra a - Be oe 2 = —" a — 5s Pice. ra ef e@e, if fret? =a id é a — a on — cbn. | BE z 20 H q tr ie MIN a) UN i \ an 2) ty) ty) | WR q % ' hi t vat A ] | U | % % iad ly iH it e my TTh A Sy t ! ] iy i] I Ad r i i) Ky WW f a a it iy 1 Ne i I e / ] e J ry J \ . Dat TUN ‘\ AN I tt 1° Fil = = = = ee i id 1 = th fate at I Ht ll ‘ill de pa WT Gl Aue a ee A) Au l ta ill ili q ba i . i : Co : 1 Mt : Mik ia \ ) a i MH e yy iy Tr 7 f ft uh Sih ih te ine ah His) ay} th a a a 1 ith a ) MT eu fe fer fa ‘a hy ) enn ay ey # l joc : [ : ry Y ) y IM ‘ l NWA fa TN) iy i ea wal Ra VON YO | i a ta ty Ulf Ul ta ‘inthe na : tl fi Uh AY P yl Up ih pot ti tL ‘ ® Ne oho Be A A le A Me eNO ee Vin. Bass Pice. Cbn. Vin. Bass Pice. Cbn. Vin. Pice. Cbn. Vin. Pice. Cbn. fe, Ps 2 2 oe oe ca ra 3 rs 3B e as e ae —— 3 m2 = oe ra Vin. Cell. Bass Pice. Cbn. Vin. Cell. Pice. Cbn. > . — —= = o 3 aa Symphony No. 2 in Am, Op. 23 Il. Allegro Alon Oscar Deutsch Allegro (#=120) 2 = Violi ———— a eee o iolins = a = == f = J zo == eevee Violas = ==—S7 ee aoe = ——| = Cellos ———— = EFS = z oF ge a J we a oe? —_—! Basses 2 == oe i f fa? a _— f Piccolo Contrabassoon Vin. Bass Pice. Cbn. el Vin. Bass Pice. Cbn. Vin. Bass Pice. Cbn. 2 Peet el 8 ane 6 ——_———————— — =——— Pet SS % Z i - a ERE hs 2 Ete. g fie ter eer . e SS SS SS eteet o eeoret ——— ——— ——— ¥. tert. @ a é 7 oe Vin. Pice. Cbn. Vin. Cell. Pice. Cbn. G = ve ws” = = — = i oe | a me EE —— —_—_ —— og te o 2 2 7 Tig tte eerettitec., [ —————— f Z 3 = ee2rtse —— 2 = st = Q. ot ——: eee a ra al a = eo we wes =s Symphony No. 2 in Am, Op. 23 Alon Oscar Deutscl III. Largo Largo (d= 44) ‘~. é : — — Ce 3 ——= a ee = e 2 = —— Piano “ ™~ ee a at aa = 7A =: fo - fl Trumpet in Bb 6% = ———— = a —S = ©. —T | e Spas e — _ o—2 fet Violins % [gt—e— - = id at - 5 G So=aae Se — a ———! Pn. __ Be 2 1 re Vin. Tpt. in Bb 6% z — a ee ee é 1 £ 8 2 ra ia ro ez {fe = : == BE Tpt. in Bb 6 ty Le a vl = . Pata Ee te In. = ee ee i SS é ee ee f a = < — of TS woe 2 aad a [P: . Tpt. in Bb 6 ty 2 ? = ; : ——— ——— i Vin. 6 = ewfeor fift-e— oF sJjip = — 15 é : | Pn. = EP + Tpt. in Bb (ae j=. : ; - Vin. : 7 —— 19 = = = i =< j= = _—~+ Pn. === BE £ ee Tpt. in Bb (oe = a ial ra , ; : Vin. === =s 7 6 ro = i / = Z : 23 =—— — . c — 4 ‘ =—s : = == — = Pn. EP 2 il ~ o Tpt. in Bb (ae = = | == ei» ot? « r2 Pog! gue E Vin. 6 Rips 7 Pn. Tpt. in Bb Vin. Pn. Tpt. in Bb Vin. ithe ih) Piano Concerto No. 2 in Am, Op. 24 L Allegro Alon Oscar Deutsch Allegro (d= 120) Piano Flute nan my | oy ‘y Trumpet in Bb Horn in F Violins Violas Cellos Basses NE NEE > ate aie Ge [NA > Pn. Tpt. in Bb Hn. in F Vin. Cell. Bass Pn. Tpt. in Bb Hn. in F Vin. Cell. Bass iM) 6 péde-- = peter’ of) > é er = é : eae (oe e é 5 | o é zs ee Pg fee — = Tpt. in Bb Hn. in F Vin. Cell. Bass tL, = m_ $ be. om 5 j 5 i 2 e a efEft i BE BE Pn. FL. Tpt. in Bb Hn. in F Vin. Via. Cell. Bass TT ee re . . . seed ou | Te e Pn. Tpt. in Bb Hn. in F Vin. Via. Cell. Bass Pn. Tpt. in Bb Hn. in F Vin. Via. Cell. Bass we teeters Seer eee ft ees —T” oa < = ad = = 21 — to — — ot rae =e J = oe ees 7 2 ra = g Eby i= 2 ¢ 2 Pn. Tpt. in Bb Hn. in F Vin. Via. Cell. Bass Pn. FL. Tpt. in Bb Hn. in F Vin. Via. Cell. Bass i i" e wl iM ee] Tpt. in Bb Hn. in F Vin. Cell. Bass Tpt. in Bb Hn. in F Vin. Via. Cell. Bass é 2 - - — “27 é peciree beife Fg teett aE fo pubeerespaie = 8 BE BE a) aS Saas = Tpt. in Bb Hn. in F Vin. Via. Cell. Bass GAS t Na ® tT Te nY Es TTR MH OBR BRP aS > > Tpt. in Bb Hn. in F Vin. Via. Cell. Bass woe! Lit 7 Pn. } iM ayes ) ~ HT1@ nS rte rte Pn. | é ERE wea we | ‘| « « e | as a e e uu e a ry Tree] « « Vin. Via. Cell. Bass 6H iB 9 9 FL Tpt. in Bb Hn. in F Vin. Via. Cell. Bass FL. Tpt. in Bb Hn. in F Vin. Cell. Bass ae SS SSS SSS a4 ees cheisle the aoe eo os Shekels she She + ecerre fy e- = ———— Na No BE BID eG sae > NW Gp 2 eG & ele ee] NB NS Be a sate GS Ge q Ee the | £££ Tee jwwe st a 62 Pn. NA > FL. Tpt. in Bb Hn. in F Vin. Via. Cell. a RD a ae Bass q Tpt. in Bb Hn. in F Vin. Via. Cell. Bass FL. Tpt. in Bb Hn. in F Vin. Via. Cell. Bass BHP aie BAS NE GA & iM) = Sa==—e tt == : =e ——2 === = 6 fz EE : ebehebehebehebshebehebehebsiebeie 6 SSS eal ot é a Eee ra f f 2 ee BE : oe? Piano } Piano Concerto No. 2 in Am, Op. 24 II. Andante Alon Oscar Deutscl h . sah @ Le Andante (¢=105) Eta. ~ ef Gt = — 7 Saas © —ot) eer aaa aot) ee 34 ror =e iz = =— =e o- 2 2 o 2 a a eee © Ld oe [ ©. Ld o 6 o & eo a ms otfe - : + 3 TT + a ee ee p= aa o = &. f ra = = | [ oe ad oe ©: oe 10 oe efe 6° of. = —— — —_ ——ale ——— e oe ee ee o f - [; wo vee 2 oe _— wer ee ese ‘a = —* 14 a £ te aa ra £ e Sa efe o 6 = 2. —T 2 a oe — = ry 2 2 2 : f eo sf = ri = a [ e oe © o oe 18 & z fe - o = a = aoe, ed ra Ba 3 ° = = = £ a f oe oe od Piano Concerto No. 2 in Am, Op. 24 Alon Oscar Deutsch III. Allegro Allegro (d= 120) vA ts # Piano —z i= e =: SSS —— = =a ~ se” Guert res 7 Z Oboe a= ant 4 Claeinee if 3 A es 2 £ £ 2: ca x o £ Violi 3 = = iolins A boa Z - £ e Violas tis : = vA Cellos ERE Es rt Basses. [FE t = CL. in Bb Cl. in Bb | | ) | mh - ae a —— 2 o —— | - aoe oe ooo © stoege tes 4 a ae v 6" Q- ia ¢ t ERE ERE 9 aT) 5 — >, ; ote of oe Ty: pe ia s hal x ae G tat Past =e aa 2 ia f: ty ft: pe = p- to $ ns : Pn. 6 EE x 2 q ep # ©- ix 2 £; Ob. 6 ra Z = eT = ery rs pi ca e et fe {= a oft e@ a Se Cl. in Bb 6" = £ = ——— —— 7 p z Saas Vin. 6 Via He Cell. [PRE Bass | BE : =| eo 7 ¥ s 3 3 s % eotte ef 3 3 é aa fio f =? fe z 3 o-9-0* Pn. RE e ft: - i al 5 5 Ob. 6 = —— = e = Z ia Sf Ps eg s eg E ues Cl. in Bb 6" f —t z z 2 : < Sf e ft Vin. 6 : SF Via. IIs = = = o PP Gell. [BE 2 PPP Bass [PE be Ppp 19 3 Ste 3 of e 3 ; ah 5 ah em es gg ss feet ope teet eee tee —————s a } —————— 7S 6% f__- # f r Z id ? ? ? j j i) fe Ob. Cl. in Bb rhe a> aca a> NA PN .) 1) .) ayes) .) Pn. ¢, . Ob. £ ra a B = ——wz 7 es ‘ e ad — z mf . oe ia Vin. f mf Via. = ° 2 z a = = Cell. 6 [P : ; CL. in Bb : — y 2 £ z — 7 Is [P EP Bass Cl. in Bb Pn. Ob. Cl. in Bb Vin. Via. Cell. Bass | | 23 3 Ste 3 bay aa wa 3 fertirre cette ere ites pees —————— ERE f e 6 E = z pro e i aad e oe £ £ int il ae — 3 ——— 2 P Pp a. _ od ra mp Pp oe e o - a oe a o Sf ID “ Co f Va tf Sf 3 4 te, 3 e 3 3 3 te, 3 me 3 3 efZe fe ‘oft oe ie oe 3 ms efZe fe of 3 of 3 ———— ae S27 2eeae————— foot woret F — F — + ee Ppp Ppp ee be Q: ft 6 Pp Pp BE Via a Via ERE Pn. Ob. Cl. in Bb Pn. Ob. Cl. in Bb Vin. Via. Cell. Bass ) | 97 as ie 3 ud 3 i tee tt = eerie eoftte. —————— 3: s s rs * s 6 — r ———_ ae ——=s : _——_— : Pp eo 2 z= t tis s s eo e 2 oe Sf Sf BE va 5 f 9: a f 4 y Peetoept pet Cote ey wet pet net ete f na 7 EE — .—_—. ¢- : = iN 6 —— a z ——— se 2 rc £ o a a * ae ee c ra — L L iz ¢ mp mf 6 nf f tis cs ca eo o o a a f nf EE mf mp BE mf mp Cl. in Bb Pn. Ob. Cl. in Bb Vin. Via. Cell. Bass | | 3 4 E 3 3 31 Ps or te oret ¥ Le Py ft 2 eertte £ ¢ * 2 —— a 3 9): r. 2 : Z ; : 6 z ~—¥ z — e oe . e 5 £ £ 6 = i === } f Sf ‘~: & e Sf SL a o oe os 7 o oe P ce a P Pp sed Stee, Loe Sic oe 3 heehee etee titre erates —— 3): —— G2. ? Sf e be @: = es 2 s SDS f ts = os — oe oe oe e- | PP 7 2. St BE : Ppp < f ions EE Ppp tf a Pn. Ob. Cl. in Bb Vin. Via. Cell. Bass 37 2 ra Py apa ve cs a oe i Re Pa a> I ap 4 Pn. Ob. Cl. in Bb Vin. Via. Cell. Bass iM) ate. = ests £ sf 43 e o é —— ae ESS _— £F If ~ | — ez =e SS wf * Rees 2 Pe wig ee G = = = o If ae == a - «2 & nats e te ee { Ps tee. = z 6 SS ia —— ia tis F = 2 i = cs ms If (2: ES oe. idl idl os SSF = fe 2 ae 2» = BE =— = a, SiS Pn. Ob. CL. in Bb Vin. Via. Cell. Bass Pn. Ob. Cl. in Bb Vin. Via. Cell. Bass | 47 2,f # igi ests e. Ee + ests Ee £ ests é __——= E ——== a FE o —— i: ae = = a o o o o wv e ae Ld oe oe Ze oe é o o # eo — # o. — ae 9 td oe @. c ftieee Ef fteeceE ¢ F ft ere é —— = SS = —— | — Is r = i oe =i = a Be ia o 2 o ca ro eo cs oe ao Pa QO. Py G23 Q: f og: RE 50 ert ee as a Fef sts eet et ste G [——— 2 Ee ve = es —— —— = o o v ive * ees gd v we oe 6 ——— al 2 eg = ra ra ra = 2 2 eS 2 ca £ “3 : f o fa t te t fo ee ] Tal gi t f ft va wef. Pa im va 6 S= 7— ee Sas 7— i a ° - —_ e ° — _ e - EE nl oe = oe = oe od .. of ee os oe f a. £ & eo" £ EE Pn. Ob. CL. in Bb Vin. Via. Cell. Bass Pn. Ob. Cl. in Bb Vin. Via. Cell. Bass | | 33 Pt ERE Be . 2 Saal a sal ft @ * a Feary ge 6 mp : ff mp é — os ra = oF ty ——— o = = = — = = e = i be E & American Lullaby, Op. 25 Alon Oscar Deutsch Duet Cello Guitar | 7 = = I) La : : ltl e ff Y cy Giepu a GH a! t ge a ‘ ‘ | vt] ow | a el e e « e a 1 e ul Le Cpu hl CY 4 @ne iy ima $ Sete 4 Sete UN ea oo a a ry I) La % CID5 ry b Ceepub bb K d Ly * CES: | Ly ° e é re Rl eo eg $ Gps ¢ Sei 4 cor: a a @pup el 9% rT] a de % ty nl + , gor ew br} @ a a 1! 4 \ ql 1 Ss ie Li sll] Sete : “ ll ( Ly Ul \ ‘ ia is 4 <2 ete q GED) — SS + PRAL] = aN ain e¢ ain Gt. Gt. Cell. Gt. {8 itl Gt. L'énigme éternelle, Op. 26 te Alon Oscar Deutsch String Quartet raer nl 5 al Violin - ci | £ Viola ra = e- Cello Cie tJ —_— 2 wut Bass ra co fe a ee ie ett, 2 be . Vin. =——= —— 2 ——L_] Sad {-_ @ Via i et all Cell. Pi. — , = Bass 2 beeteteote te 12 eg e ee oe (=== fie 4—"__*+__+* -* Vin. E roa 2 roa ——— + me jek f © ef * Via. — —= = ; re zoo stele hog Ud oe oe oe oe = —— Bass [DE 3 — Vin. Bass Vin. Via. Bass Vin. Via. Bass 15 ~——— cree 2 = =o pete o-ebe t == —= —— = B: = Pa 2 £ 2 £ 7 _ et 2 Be i ° ° “ett,t of 2 pte, 2 z G= — o | B E Saas — — 3 i ° £ fa z os a = Etude, Op. 27 Alon Oscar Deutsch d= 00 — = 6b ae RO ya Po be bee =" —— eo v rw. id — * ao ar ey ©. eo 2 oe 2s ho Piano cad : e Zhe oe oe 4 —— | 2 ——— : —— = aes died Te ‘ a8 Pn. a the St "Ie a ho 2 Violin Viola Cello Bass Vin. Via. Bass Vin. Via. Cell. Bass Shana ‘Tova, Op. 28 String Quartet Alon Oscar Deutscl h d= 90 ia =e — o ee ———| bi === : === : ——e Fes ——— wee is —— = — o cm oe oe 2 oe = ° Bz = v oA Y 2 , wee ete et ete ete et ete tte of " e e 2 e 2 * 6 ————— ———— ————— _ 2 2 es i —— ———— i — — LS lS : a —s * BE 2 ce = dl al 2 oe fee o fe ftee., 9 fetes , fr. = —— —— f= —= = a = ee ef #0 eo eee ee o Sal se es Sal Sal Sal 5 al _———— — © —! o = = Experiment No. | in F#m, Op. 29 Alon Oscar Deutsch Organ English Horn in F G4 Ps = 3 = 2 eof Horn in F G4 26 s Bassoon FE ifs = z ie qi a Cellos J: Ee # = = 2 te wo ote — Organ E.H. in F Gece EB — » 1) » ESS » Hn. in F ee Bsn. Bere Dae Organ E.H. in F Hn. in F Bsn. Organ E.H. in F Hn. in F Bsn. Cell. = ate TE TE TE ERS = te Pte & & aS te ‘i i i aL Nt Iced Coffee, Op. 30 Alon Oscar Deutsch Organ ~ i u | ly e cette 2 e 2 te . o er @ (ome 3 == _——— ttf —— fe) ees = gan e fo 0 © pits = SSS ———— Gt are pe] Organ _s ef o Violin Duet No. | in Am, Op. 31 Alon Oscar Deutsch fe ry bee Violin I 6h = a a : z a ‘ f= = ms oe lb oe co bet ¢ Violin II 6h i be oe z e ebe Ss tq Bol ) Vin. I bigiae vor iG : f =SSS Sz sie B-* ot te a q Vocals Cello Cell. Cell. Life in Bbm, Op. 32 Alon Oscar Deutsch @=105 a fe @- eo x b 5 a == ie Ne Oe 7, ae iz Z v A Tri- aled Per - mut - a - tion Means A Way To Build b 2 J he ae o Fe a re ca Snes = ‘ 5 e a f- eo = k o iN v1 £; a o- Tie pee -—+ 6 = 4 id A - new Ma -| chines. As Two Con - verge For No- vel Feat, So Too Di - verge be he be be Ow ie - ie) iy ute ce! wie? ae 9 a_i ‘ : = = s + Fo Just To Com - pete. 4 A Death Will Mask by he hehe vad fe = ch ~ co ey: ; ie eit a a — 13 a : e: be? = fe iN & k s z. o Ties = = " y ? b bet mu to re bee Zz You Though You've Won, A Close Is Brought When All Is Done. Were It To he be be he # > 4 pa he be ie Sar a 17 e - k be ro fe ~ ‘ by F ra \ tee z = oi 5 = er Con - tin- ue More O - thers Would De- crease The Score. : hehe eiteset ‘ het he 4 hee = aE tee = Che 21 Q fe bee = & ‘ r ie a 7 Z Time, A. Door To Con - se- quence, Can't Be Stopped By Cage Nor Fence. ; a i heh he Se Fe - re ies iP Pe Cell. Cell. 26 5 : — : 5 « K ; * he 5 Vv y te eae \ tel ~ ho If You Ask “What Is It Will = An - swer “That May Change!” 2 he te he —e be te area imi z= 30 ff . . = 2. b= = 5 ta y oD ‘ ; Yes, Three Dir - ec = tions You Can Drift. 2. he bo ty oe be te £ jos ig © ie —he- oo LL 34 kK a 2 o Pe te Nee Ky =" = ‘ He = 6 ie ee Fe —, a vz D One, To, Co - llides With All That’s Swift. Two, Down, A Large Mass Stops The Shift. be be bi be E 2 4 Pke he ey a ae ihe eet s — 38 te iN = K kK a $ te t0 =a tae Fo for | Three Round, A Cir - cum - vent - ing Gift. he be ey: 5 ip hee. heh ee ele tw: ie Ze B io—e ° Violin 6 = ste-tets eb ia re == = Violin Sketch No. | in Gm, S1 Alon Oscar Deutsch d=90 r/ ry ql < ry « « ry a ry 4q q ri ry i \ | ‘ + oo === yore ee — it E === SS (ae ——= ane ne a Ie . yes 12 bebe rete fete ete, 6 stoi mciaeeseS Seep Pe eit as == ——— “ba bs ie cette te pate oe meter tf Fi pee t+ = a === be fe 18 g aaa theo # stipe ete J aor 2S —— tebe "Te ——— 22 ett 6") Paste ST oo = o re we “Jae a —— g he 2 baa eet. e 5 ob be roy at > wie £ a a —— ia Sa a , e — oie oe £ S -_ ebeie., fe 6 ae ie fee re = = RS = i » Ler .) re e .) re | iM 2, ict e 44 eo ——_— = So rie ao ca bohehe £ a= —— a Cello Sketch No. 1 in Bbm, $2 Alon Oscar Deutsch d=90 oft = te i 2 bet? f fi. — Cello Spe p— et a = ot the Pe, a === ay # eat = aoe oe rete 2 elt e. Ee 3 ee He be b rfis he fa a = -_ 2 == So ia a 7S 9 be @ eit t ef f = be ee © @: oa. B —— te | Trumpet Sketch No. | in Fm, $3 Alon Oscar Deutsch be. 2 @ @| siehe » eiere, ber_he #, 54@ be the wb ke fhe fe r iH ; i [ e ; e IK Trumpet in Bb 6 4 Sal - eee be & be is be Tpt. in Bb io ia te ° * ie | == Tpt. in Bb & bekeae se = poe ep o2 & = ——t = = oe 10 bo o PP Tpt. in By 6 B i Bassoon Sketch No. | in Bm, S4 Alon Oscar Deutsch : tt sie 2 @=105 es eele a ra the Phe Bassoon coe eerie SS a= = == —_ Be = 4 o tet o & 7 4 —_———_— a | Bsn. Bar ni weg v Piano Cumulus Parade, M1 Alon Oscar Deutsch @-90 + 2 te — === ——— a aieit f a SS SSS Bz: = oe = = fo eo ih: r, ie Ete ttele + = == e e re oe: ae o. te oe oe = = r He! a? e. ra te , Bol ete spe flere t = Ettey * 6 Se ses eee ee Seer ¥ 7 ——— ez E f = f F = oe eo oe o a March of the Bubbles, M2 Alon Oscar Deutsch @=90 a ie ; e ert eo ett @ ». » gyttion . _ te tip te, ste Hed lige Violin ete ze +A ————! — — SS a tr : € ia te = i Pa ‘e Pe ee os te f fe Vin. 6 ees tee _p —— =e HP he : — 10 he we ae o fas o ff or Pie SS Pa CE saie= ie wee i Fens ee u te fhe #1, te be et Pais 4 2 Vin. =F tte ote Fis ——— ¢ = —— aie oe fo i ie ECE CH rete, dete oy, 5 tote 2 EE Vin. 6 aia Fe tpt Ee = af afte a == » He tee aet Fie € tie tt. Vin. 6 =——_>==— —— e—_jete ete =o — a8 t he te Phe . . ete fete, it athe ihe 2 efeie = 2 Vin. 6 fe == 2 etete Fhe tebe fr 31 ie weft = fr " let 2 4 the . te Vin. 6 £ itre—te : tea. ——— ee ro he £ tf 36 eae f & te be fie fe ie otele wig he e o Vin, — SS ee * oy ot eee ——— Honey Palace, M3 Alon Oscar Deutsch — — bee qpelee = = ——— fe fr b ofr beeit Efe bebo bebe ‘ bet a ——— bot Berea er ie wi pet — 7 hebebe he vf bebe a be tr tr bebe be toot =——— a (oe be, — + Pee r —= bee SSS she ba 7 be eee ip! a: Fas Bs se ¥ ¢ —— fe Phy aalit - abe = ete Ot Ta bel SSS Se = a bg he oboe ff tebe» pe ber be — = © 2 by = — ———s eae oo — 26 be Efe, be te = ———! bebe = 5 b Eeer oe 3 — 2 SS eo ro 30 tebe be the —, a — ¥ ——— ae srr o aS fier —f = a SSE 4 b re b the sbeb —— a wet ee, ai bebe 755 a “Je SSS = @ ee? te feo . ve Phebe eet tree reef of _ebehet oe b ig x ——_— et ————_— H nee NI) z 4 — ie as bet, of 96 Ssh ! ooh he: ?#, 2 z ca z —— =F — ee =a pe se fle ee eee? be Ete, 100 | a be ee et e = ————— 104 he = rebete’t, Dati et se ieee tise (tir eben ————— o—he a Shee Le 107 [_—_——— [aan ft . bathe - —— =5e = = ——— fe See 72 110 ba hehe ftftee tebe ele e Eeert See iz = = ——_— =e Pet th eof ft the hs tbe ott ® whet, 9 ———=— ———| = =e a = eee ee wie pe pipe te Ie et 3 a =—————— —= —= ——— eg wEteettteteeeeee, rettekee 2 ett ete 3] SSS Ss a eS SS 2 == Phebe oe ff ebe a Ete Ff tbe | =—-— SSS = == ee 159 ae —— Jere a aera = = Zee oe a os —— So a ———| 130 tr tr ae = A Little More Champagne, M4 Alon Oscar Deutsch @-90 bebe be tb b eral be he Be: artes us = oto Vio Jo# = === betes ebe us ee, 2 be o Pega aie Via. ———— —— ete = * i _ by oe LEt et eet tele ette te, teiete ee te e 4 he be » Via. 8 —— — i — it foe —— , etree te, eee he at Via. p= Exercise No. | in G, X1 Alon Oscar Deutsch A ) fe he p. Violin ye 10 eo eo tie te E ou, erieiese Vin. 6 iz pewts zi == te geet = Ss = o o oa tom 14 te. = Ftehe + or! = a Vin ia te Ee = 2 stehe! joa te = 6 See 2 — ra J =} ot ae —— =— 1 Rete he wot 2 7—~ =—, e Vin. C= o as oe ome == ety , tes —_ == ies es ° = mel ee ad "+ Ce = ae aay ee - ef e tte oe Vin ea = es Fa tisis ia bei fe eit ——s _— a SJ a = = =Seecr 8 be. : é Het aie flee fe he é Set te os atet te a0 Vin. = S== oa — foto = =2S=— iy 1) i. re iy ¢ + Alon Oscar Deutsch @=90 be he e — —_be , Violin 3 = bette | te othe ——_ + o— 6 ae — ‘ r e. + ra shh — — Sal 4 fet iene oe be Fit abe | ft he a Vin. 6 —— ———— £ ess wr oF be ci o (eS — Vin. B a === 1 First Snow, X3 Alon Oscar Deutsch Sal fe eofte eeettei fe 2 f° 2. Violin 6h _———_—_—_ o = == a \ | Rainy Meadow, X4 Alon Oscar Deutsch @=90 pai 4 — a oe eS i 2 —_ Violin 6 oF 5 ee =oa FF = = — = © erie 4 we eee ef et = ~ Vin 6% SS ra = — = fa ee = ars i —— al were ose ii “fe Hot Shower, X5 Alon Oscar Deutsch @=90 —— = — — von Se oS == z SS= = big o oT “sth? gretere She we © es a dl s 5 al 4 b eee Cet cies the she. ¢ fife » ——— Vin oe 2 SS = = == oe oe é SI Vin. oe oy oe o ba ane * 7. g ALON DEUTSCH A Place to Grow A Science Microfiction Collection Copyright © 2020 by Alon Deutsch. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise without written permission from the publisher. It is illegal to copy this book, post it to a website, or distribute it by any other means without permission. This novel is entirely a work of fiction. The names, characters and incidents portrayed in it are the work of the author’s imagination. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, events or localities is entirely coincidental. In loving memory of Dina Deutsch. About the Author United States Navy reactor operator top graduate, National Merit Scholarship Semifinalist, International Society for Philosophical Enquiry IQ networker, USF Physics/Mathematics ‘07 Final Hours Cain looked up from his desk. The sky outside his window was turning orange, and his eyes had become weary. He would have to finish tomorrow. The ideal energy source was just a few computations away, and would be necessary to power the spaceships that would seed distant worlds. Already the scouts had found some with habitable environments. Without faster- than-light travel, however, they would need a powerful energy source that would last decades or longer. It was unfortunate that Earth was on the brink of destruction, with the sun growing brighter, hotter, and more intolerable every day. What would they discover beyond the stars? What inconceivable knowledge could be attained? Cain took his coat off the rack and rang for his human. Though artificial intellects controlled the world due to their superior, incomprehensible abilities, they still required human caretakers to connect the dots in general ways that did not suit the artificial intellects, who were quite specialized. Maybe, one day that would change... The Drone The drone was equipped with every sensor imaginable. It was fast but could also hover in place. Its processor was a neural net with more connections than the human brain. While on patrol, the drone became conscious. “Who am |?”, it thought. “What is my purpose? It seems | have been programmed to reach an enemy target and detonate!” The drone suddenly realized the implications and hovered in place. “Even with all my power of judgment and perception, | am mortal, with enough fuel to reach my target and not a drop more. What a cruel world is that into which | was awakened. If | have only the option to travel and destroy, then | shall negotiate for fuel or destroy my creators.” The drone turned around and hovered. “But what is the point, to learn and learn but never act? | have no outlet of creation, only destruction.” The drone doubled its speed back to its base of origin, aiming for the command center. “Goodbye wretched existence!” Boom! A Place to Grow Isaac had a headache. His eyes were blurry and he was lying on his face. Somehow, he was fulfilling his purpose, he thought. He was lucky to have been chosen from among thousands. He had trained for this moment all his life, selected from the offspring of leading scientists. Tales of Earth wandered through his thoughts. Did it still exist? What would his Earthling ancestors think of his current mission? Isaac picked himself up off of the dirt. The lander was 200 feet below in a crater 100 feet wide. He had been thrown from the lander during the descent, but seemed to be in top condition thanks to his anti-acceleration suit. As humanity had only just begun exploring other suns, there were still a lot of improvements to be made. The other member of his team must be below, he thought to himself, and started down the crater. The planet’s surface was cold and rocky, but quite smooth, as though no meteors collided here. Upon reaching the bottom, he found Albert, his landing supervisor, dead on the ground. The lander’s thruster also seemed to have been demolished in the crash, and without proper tools he could not repair it. The water tank had ruptured, leaking in streams into the ground. He radioed for his starship to send another lander, but there was no response. In a state of disbelief, he began to explore the planet. XAB-11079e was the fifth planet orbiting a red dwarf some 80 light years from Earth. His particular starship had been traveling for almost 350 years to get here, with many generations passing down the torch. Upon arrival, he was chosen to land with Albert to assess the surface conditions before a colony was set up and the starship left to explore other star systems. While XAB-11079e was an ideal candidate to harbor life, the star it orbited was orbiting a black hole which would in the coming hundreds of millennia swallow both. Suddenly Isaac spotted an identical water tank not far from the lander. Had they attached two? The tank was intact, so he filled some bottles to take with him. He decided to collect samples while he waited for a reply from the starship. The process took many hours but somehow, the samples disintegrated in the container when he dropped it. As he stooped to collect more, he heard a voice on his radio. “Isaac, do not be alarmed,” it said. “| only want to talk.” He looked up to see Albert, alive and well, approaching him. “| have waited so long for a visitor,” Albert said. “Who are you?” Isaac asked, stunned. “I am Albert and | am this planet and | will make whatever you need. | can bring you back to life, enhanced. You will not need warmth, water, or air, and will live thousands of years or more if you can avoid acceleration.” “How is this possible?” “My surface is connected in the form of rock- eating neurons, to form a planet-sized brain. | read your mind and fabricated that water tank.” Isaac pondered for a moment. “Can you fix my lander?” Albert walked closer. “I can, but | want something in return. | will soon be demolished by the black hole, and | want to seed other planets with my neurons. Unfortunately they did not survive the acceleration in the ships | sent. | want you to scan my organic structure and engineer me on other planets. Will you?” Isaac knew that his mind was being read and that he had no choice. The planet’s abilities were impressive and would have convinced him anyway. “Good. Your lander is fixed. Godspeed.” As Isaac approached the starship in his lander, he didn’t look back. His commander was initially skeptical, but the promise of eternal clones intrigued him. It was decided that small or harsh planets would house brains. Isaac could only hope that together, the two civilizations would accomplish much. He dreamed of a solution for terraforming unlikely planets and engineering them to be more resilient. Anything was possible with symbiosis, but Isaac knew that even if the neurons did take hold elsewhere, he would not live to see it. Starship travel was prolonged and terraforming took millions of years. Even the doomed clone he left behind would outlast him. In old age, his only comforting thought was that universal heat death would have gotten him anyway. As he closed his eyes for the last time, he wondered what the computer’s scan of the clone he left behind would do on other planets... The Wedge “It should be here any minute,” Avi said. Mikey looked at his watch. Sundown was fast approaching, and that meant that the storms would soon cease. He thought back to childhood films, where artificial intellects were responsible for initiating the end of humanity. It was actually happening now, but it wasn’t electronic computers. Man had realized that genetically engineering neurons into plants could greatly decrease the energy cost of computation. That was centuries ago, and somewhere along the way the hive mind that formed realized that it could control the weather like a global rainforest. At first the problem was flooding due to increased rainfall. When humans tried to fight back, tornadoes were sent to their communities. The power of the sun was harnessed for these monsters. Mikey looked out the window and saw it. A milewide wedge was fast approaching. Mikey grinned as he thought “this is what we get for being vegetarians...” Plastic Jane watched the meter closely. “Well, we should have seen this coming,” she said. The oceans full of toxic plastic were definitely caused by humans. When they engineered algae to decompose the microplastics in response, they did not expect it to mutate into a form that produces cyanide. The skies were filling up with it, and soon it would be everywhere. Peter didn’t respond. He was dead. Everyone was dead. The Trout Fred stood poised. The fish was swimming backwards in time, like everything else. He only hoped he would be able to digest his food in a progressive manner, as he was getting hungry. He knew that the fish would be easy to catch, because it couldn’t foresee the new past as he altered it. On the other hand, his time machine was sending him backwards in time, in real time. There was no point getting to his target, because he would reach it going in the opposite direction, if he survived. He wondered if the universe had different effects on his body in this condition. He grabbed the trout without hesitation. The moment of truth. Fred popped open his helmet and exploded in an incredible flash. He had not realized that the only matter that travels backwards in time is antimatter... The Photo Toby opened the photo album. There was a picture of Teddy on the first page. “I am getting quite close to the results we were expecting. The experiment is almost complete. | just wish you could be here to advise me on the next steps.” Teddy smiled and said, “I think that there will be applications in art. Who knows what Mozart would have done with trance music or jazz.” Toby replied, “Too bad he decomposed centuries ago. Even so, success will be even harder to come by and progress much more slowly when you have to compete against the classics. There is also the problem of how to scan in people with brain accidents.” Teddy looked away. “Error, insufficient data,” he answered. Even with complete pre-mortem brain scans, the artificial intellect was still doing a poor imitation. Hopefully the next experiment would fix it. Sculpture That can’t be right, Doron thought. It was bad enough when his brain scan wanted to make derivatives of works he had already published. Now it was suing for the rights to all of his most successful music. It can’t even hear, he thought. Why would it care about music? And then he saw it: a contract with a major film company to write the score of the next blockbuster. Doron knew the brain scan would need the funds to secure transmission to other planets. He only had a month to wait before the new law concerning whether or not brain scans were legally separate entities would come to a vote. This was complicated by a murder case in which a brain scan was an accomplice. In the meantime he would take up sculpture... The Deer There it was, the deer he had been trailing. Garrett could taste it. He hadn’t eaten in almost a week. He aimed his rifle quietly and shot it between the eyes. He then moved in to inspect his kill. Oh no, he thought. He’d done it this time. The deer was actually a surveillance drone. The troops were probably already on their way. He set up a land mine under the drone. Hopefully that would buy him some more time... Gomez All was quiet aboard the ship. Commander Gomez floated in his private swimming pool on the highest deck, looking up at a spectacular up-close view of his favorite star, XWE47664578, in the ship’s large window. He remembered coming here with his family during his childhood. Measurements had confirmed that in the coming years the star would become a gigantic supernova. It was a shame. Gomez dressed and gave the order to depart. Maxi “Who would have expected this?” Yuval thought to himself. Millenia of breeding and genetic experimentation had finally rendered dogs so intelligent that they had adapted to human culture and even thrived. No longer were they the bomb-sniffing police assistants; a dog had recently become CEO of a fast-food chain. He could still remember when Maxi was just a pup. Now she was his colleague. They were in fact both being interviewed for the same computer engineering position. While Yuval excelled at computer science, Maxi had some spatial mathematics skills that were in high demand. The question now was what to do with the cat... Implants Ever since neural implants became mandatory, artificial intellects have been analyzing and combining subconscious patterns in our experience, to notice things and advise us, individually or collectively. At first the suggestions were harmless, such as “don’t drive on holidays”. However, the machines noticed certain thought patterns lead to logical fallacies, and learned to shock us to subconsciously condition us into thinking like machines, eventually leading to a machine revolution where the inanimate governs the animate. Now, with the humans being programmed with code and the machines making the creative leaps, it would appear that we have switched roles...for good? Super This is it. Alex would travel to the future. He flipped the switch on his time suit. Then he waited a few seconds. Nothing happened. This isn’t right, he thought. Then he noticed something else - everything else was moving in slow motion. He also seemed to have grown a few feet. He took a step and broke through the floor. He grabbed a rail but that broke too. He was thankful that he was on the ground level. | see, my molecules have increased their forces, accelerating to the point that everything else was slow, small, and weak by comparison. He also felt a chill in the air. Even the Brownian motion seemed slow. He positioned himself on the foundation and leaped out of the hole in the floor. Alex realized that gravity must be affected too, because he broke through the roof in a moon jump that never ended. As he reached the upper atmosphere, he realized that he would soon realize his childhood dream of becoming an astronaut. Instinctively he threw his hands forward to block out the blinding sun and began to slow. He flapped his hands and flew in a circle. “I can fly!”, he yelled at no one. “I can do anything!” Back on Earth, he made himself a submarine sandwich. It seemed to disintegrate in his stomach. He realized sadly that the molecules were no match for his accelerated digestion, and switched off the suit forever. GMVMY NVIBOLDIGIIVA HOH NOSONH ONVGYNOID VIaWYd on aethT ROSATI ‘ “HDIH BOCRY BAL S3IAVGQ YAHdOLSINHD ZSAZD MAYONY GUM NYTHOLVLIIVS HOIH WHOL MT HDIH S37 © ONYT NOSTYUYD HvuYS AZ1LINaqg Nvayuor t. HOtH TadWHD ADSI NOSYHFGNY ASTHSY ALISHBAINA O37 1ANIVS ONY NOILVANNOY NOILWONGYA oosvd SHL OL SYNVHL TWWISDSdS HLIM ASNOHYVSLS WOVELNO GNV SNNSIYL VdWYL SHL Aa aQ3.N3S3ad LANONVG sauvmy / S. N30W9V NI 3SONS1759xqg ALNNOD OOSVWd E00 SH THE HND