Skip to main content <#maincontent>
We will keep fighting for all libraries - stand with us!
Internet Archive logo A line drawing of the Internet Archive
headquarters building façade.
Search icon An illustration of a magnifying glass.
Search icon An illustration of a magnifying glass.
Upload icon An illustration of a horizontal line over an up pointing
arrow. Upload
User icon An illustration of a person's head and chest. Sign up
| Log in
Web icon An illustration of a computer application window
Wayback Machine
Texts icon An illustration of an open book.
Books
Video icon An illustration of two cells of a film strip.
Video
Audio icon An illustration of an audio speaker.
Audio
Software icon An illustration of a 3.5" floppy disk.
Software
Images icon An illustration of two photographs.
Images
Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape
Donate
Ellipses icon An illustration of text ellipses.
More
Hamburger icon An icon used to represent a menu that can be toggled by
interacting with this icon.
Internet Archive Audio
Live Music Archive Librivox Free
Audio
Featured
* All Audio
* This Just In
* Grateful Dead
* Netlabels
* Old Time Radio
* 78 RPMs and Cylinder Recordings
Top
* Audio Books & Poetry
* Computers, Technology and Science
* Music, Arts & Culture
* News & Public Affairs
* Spirituality & Religion
* Podcasts
* Radio News Archive
Images
Metropolitan Museum
Cleveland
Museum of Art
Featured
* All Images
* This Just In
* Flickr Commons
* Occupy Wall Street Flickr
* Cover Art
* USGS Maps
Top
* NASA Images
* Solar System Collection
* Ames Research Center
Software
Internet Arcade Console
Living Room
Featured
* All Software
* This Just In
* Old School Emulation
* MS-DOS Games
* Historical Software
* Classic PC Games
* Software Library
Top
* Kodi Archive and Support File
* Vintage Software
* APK
* MS-DOS
* CD-ROM Software
* CD-ROM Software Library
* Software Sites
* Tucows Software Library
* Shareware CD-ROMs
* Software Capsules Compilation
* CD-ROM Images
* ZX Spectrum
* DOOM Level CD
Books
Books to Borrow Open Library
Featured
* All Books
* All Texts
* This Just In
* Smithsonian Libraries
* FEDLINK (US)
* Genealogy
* Lincoln Collection
Top
* American Libraries
* Canadian Libraries
* Universal Library
* Project Gutenberg
* Children's Library
* Biodiversity Heritage Library
* Books by Language
* Additional Collections
Video
TV News Understanding 9/11
Featured
* All Video
* This Just In
* Prelinger Archives
* Democracy Now!
* Occupy Wall Street
* TV NSA Clip Library
Top
* Animation & Cartoons
* Arts & Music
* Computers & Technology
* Cultural & Academic Films
* Ephemeral Films
* Movies
* News & Public Affairs
* Spirituality & Religion
* Sports Videos
* Television
* Videogame Videos
* Vlogs
* Youth Media
Search the history of over 835 billion web pages
on the Internet.
Search the Wayback Machine
Search icon An illustration of a magnifying glass.
Mobile Apps
* Wayback Machine (iOS)
* Wayback Machine (Android)
Browser Extensions
* Chrome
* Firefox
* Safari
* Edge
Archive-It Subscription
* Explore the Collections
* Learn More
* Build Collections
Save Page Now
Capture a web page as it appears now for use as a trusted citation in
the future.
Please enter a valid web address
* About
* Blog
* Projects
* Help
* Donate
* Contact
* Jobs
* Volunteer
* People
* Sign up for free
* Log in
Search metadata
Search text contents
Search TV news captions
Search radio transcripts
Search archived web sites
Advanced Search
* About
* Blog
* Projects
* Help
* Donate Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape
* Contact
* Jobs
* Volunteer
* People
Full text of "The Complete Works of AO Deutsch
"
See other formats
THE
COMPLETE
WORKS
OF A. O.
DEUTSCH
© 2020 Alon Oscar Deutsch. All rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-1-71679-045-4
Introduction to
Coenietrics
On the Psychology of Philosophy
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Copyright © 2023 Alon Oscar Deutsch.
All rights reserved.
ISBN-10: 1539927652
ISBN-13: 978-1539927655
DEDICATION
This book is dedicated to my family with love.
“...Socionics and spin-off Cognietrics provide leverage which
could possibly be adapted toward the enhancement of
information flow...” — Marc Carson, Livingry and Building
Technological Leverage to Change the World
CONTENTS
ATA = 132
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to thank Vered Deutsch for editing this book
during her vacation time, and I would like to thank Mikey
Goldenberg for using his degree in philosophy to help me
address some of the epistemological concepts in this book.
Alon Oscar Deutsch
PREFACE
I wrote my first book, An Introduction to Cognietrics, in
otder to bring extended meaning to the suppositions
encountered in the definition of the Myers-Briggs types.
Though many books have been written on this subject, I
felt that few had unifying ideas or were otherwise able to
inspire a coherent, philosophical discussion of its
implications among readers. In writing this book I was
finally able to redefine and then derive the fundamental
epistemological concepts on which our experience of
reality is based using underlying cognitive constructs,
ultimately merging psychology with philosophy itself, and
even discuss ideas that I had not previously encountered,
such as the definition of knowledge in terms of Jungian
dichotomies, the mathematical symmetry of philosophy,
the principles on which the paradoxical Copenhagen
Interpretation of quantum mechanics is founded, and the
differences between induction and deduction, patterns and
concepts, discovery and invention, cause and effect, and
statistics and determinism. These ideas appear repeatedly
in the philosophical literature - for instance, an example of
Cognietrics in epistemology is the following: on page 1 of
Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, Bertrand Russell
states that “The distinction between mathematics and
mathematical philosophy is one which depends upon the
interest inspiring the research, and upon the stage which
the research has reached.’ When one considers that due to
attained importance, and given the change associated with
stages, something reaches a stage not necessarily when one
can begin to think differently about it but rather when he
can begin to feel differently about it due to its own
unchanging state, and that while research is inspired by
logic interest is inspired by emotion, it is obvious that
ii
Introduction to Cognietrics
Russell is (perhaps unknowingly) referring to the
Cognietric distinction between knowledge and
understanding as outlined in my book; note that in the
preface to Our Knowledge of the External World, which
predates Carl Jung’s Psychological Types by 7 years,
Russell tries to shed new light on the distinction between
‘realists and idealists’, not unlike the Jungian dichotomy of
sensation vs. intuition. In this book I also show how the
different personalities work together to accommodate
novel ideas and recurring trends in an endless cycle as
determined by the order of the strongest Jungian Cognitive
Functions, and I describe how different combinations of
personality traits may manifest in each type. I provide
research supporting the existence of mutually exclusive
personality traits in accordance with the Myers-Briges
dichotomies, and explanations for the Jungian Cognitive
Functions that I use to create a short test to aid in
analyzing one’s Jungian type. I also discuss theories of type
development over time, and I provide background on
previous typology theories such as Myers-Briges and
Socionics. I answer frequently asked questions on the
nature, relevance, and justification of Jungian typology,
and I discuss the benefit of mindfulness with respect to
both of the values representing each dichotomy. I must
end by saying that I sincerely hope that this book brings
you as much insight while reading it as it brought me while
writing it, and I wish you the best of luck.
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Boca Raton, Florida
Friday, November 4", 2016
iii
CHAPTER ONE
Introduction
INTP, ISFP, ENF] - what does it all mean? This book
will show you what to expect when you come across one
of these abbreviations. Drawing on references to
epistemology, mathematics, physics, and even competing
measures of intelligence, this book will explain how each
Jungian type engages life.
Related Topics: Psychology, Typology, Personality,
Jung, Myers-Briges, Socionics
Why write a book?
After studying Jungian personality theories for many
years, I wanted to clarify some inconsistencies between
them and tell the world what it is I really have come to
believe. The main idea in this book is that the behaviors
defining the Jungian personalities can be derived from a
combination of unique philosophical rationales which exist
1
Alon Oscar Deutsch
behind each one. Cogniettics is not meant to be a
complete "Lexicon of the Psyche", but it is also not vague,
and makes specific predictions based on my own personal
experiences and impressions of different people. I have
tried to make Cognietrics the most accurate, precise, and
revealing representation of the best ideas (including many
of my own) commonly found in analogous personality
models. I hope that this book will not only allow you to
understand yourself, but also allow you to understand
others, so that you may find common interests or at least
learn from each other.
As for self-development, there are many that say that
the point of personality theory is to identify Weaknesses to
improve them on the path to self-actualization and
becoming a well-rounded person, such that less conscious
Functions become more developed later in life. There are
some who say that if you know your Strengths you can
work on them and achieve more than if you try to
compensate Weaknesses, which aren’t likely to improve to
the point of being competitive with others having them as
Strengths. I believe that any work that is done to improve
the use of any Function is beneficial, but I believe that
using a balanced combination of Weak and Strong
Functions works best.
Background
The Myers-Briges Type Indicator (MBTI) was
developed during and after WWII by Isabel Briges-Myers
and her mother Katherine Cook-Briggs. It was based on
the earlier work of Carl Gustav Jung and was intended to
help distribute different jobs in an efficient manner
according to each job’s suitability for a given psychological
Preference.
Introduction to Cognietrics
Completion of the MBTT results in one of sixteen
Types, each with a unique four-letter designation, with
each letter representing a Preference.
The first letter can be E (Extraverted) or I
(Introverted). Extraverts gain energy in social situations
and lose it while alone, the opposite is true for Introverts.
According to John Gabrieli of Stanford University,
correlation exists between extraversion and the activation
of the amygdala that occurs when happy faces are viewed.
(http://news.stanford.edu/news/2002/july10/sciencegab-
710.html)
The second letter can be S (ensing) or N (Ntuiting).
Sensors ate realistic and live in the moment, whereas
iNtuitives are imaginative and live in the future. According
to Stefania Ashby of Brigham Young University, brain
areas controlling imagination and memory do not overlap.
(http:// www.wited.co.uk/article/neuroscience-of-
imagination)
The third letter can be T (Thinking) or F (Feeling).
Thinkers mostly use logic to make decisions and Feelers
mostly use their emotions. According to Anthony Jack of
Case Western Reserve University, evidence suggests that
empathy and thought repress each other's use.
(https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121030
161416.htm)
The fourth letter can be P (Perceiver) or J (Judger).
Perceivers like to leave their options open (Pe) and tend to
improvise spontaneously (Ji), and Judgers like to make
decisions early (Je) and tend to plan conditionally (Pi).
According to Isabel Briges-Myers, Perceivers primarily
iNtuit or Sense in an extraverted way, and Judgers
primarily Think or Feel in an extraverted way, depending
on which second and third letters are chosen.
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Eighty-nine of the Fortune 100 companies now use the
MBTI in some form, "to maximize individual and team
effectiveness from entry to executive levels".
(https://www.cpp.com/products/mbti/index.aspx)
Usually the best Relationship is said to occur between
Types that have completely opposite letter designations
(since opposites can attract).
Websites such as celebritytypes.com have been known
to guess the personalities of famous cultural icons. Others
try to determine the best travel destination for each
personality.
(http://www. huffingtonpost.com/kali-rogers /which-us-
city-you-should-live-in-based-off-your-myers-briggs-
results_b_8400956.html)
The rarest Type in the population as determined by the
Myers Briggs Foundation is the INFJ at 1.46%. The most
common Type is the ISF] at 13.8%.
(http://www.statisticbrain.com/myers-briggs-statistics /)
The Type that has the highest ratio of representation in
gifted classes to representation in normal classes as
determined by Ugar Sak of the University of Arizona is the
INTP with a numerical value of 3.40:1.
(home.anadolu.edu.tr/~usak/documents/PsychologicalTy
pesofGiftedAdolescentspublishedinJSGE. pdf)
The Type that tends to earn the most as determined by
Truity Psychometrics is the EST] with an average of
$77,000/year.
(http://tech.co/myers-briggs-personality-type-likely-earn-
higher-income-2015-04)
Introduction to Cognietrics
Isabel Myers connected her typology to Carl Jung's
system by ascribing the pairs of each of his Functions to a
Type:
T] uses extraverted thinking, or Te
TP uses introverted thinking, or Ti
FJ uses extraverted feeling, or Fe
FP uses introverted feeling, or Fi
SP uses extraverted sensing, or Se
SJ uses introverted sensing, or Si
NP uses extraverted intuiting, or Ne
NJ uses introverted intuiting, or Ni
A Lithuanian offshoot called Socionics, founded by
Ausra Augustinavidiuté, adds depth to the connection
between Jung and Myers-Briggs - Types whose first or
second Function is Fi or Te are considered to be Serious
whereas Types whose first or second Function is Ti or Fe
are considered to be Merry (Curious in Cognietrics), and
Types whose first or second Function is Si or Ne are
considered to be Reasonable whereas Types whose first or
second Function is Ni or Se are considered to be Resolute.
Critics of the MBTI have shown that often the
resulting Type description is vague or doesn’t match the
test taker, or the test gives a result that is in the margin
between multiple Types, or different results are produced
when the test is taken multiple times.
*The SCFT (Short Cognietrics Functions Test), unlike
the MBTI, eliminates marginal percentages by reducing the
number of questions asked as much as possible, and
eliminates faulty Type descriptions (invalidating the Forer
effect) by focusing on the polarization of specific Jungian
Cognitive Functions from which the descriptions are
actually derived, rather than combinations of the more
vague Myers-Briggs Preferences; however, because the
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Functions are not mutually exclusive like the Preferences,
there is a chance that Functions which are important to the
test taker, though not the Functions indicated by the
MBTIT, will be selected. In this case, the chosen MBTI
Functions may indicate which Personas are typically used
by the test taker; it is possible that test takers will find that
their SCFT Type result is more accurate than their MBTI
Type result! As for taking the test again after some time
has passed - though people change, their most general
tendencies usually do not, which is why certain
characteristics of personality can be identified at a very
eatly age. Studying the Types will provide the vocabulary
necessary for increased self-awareness, comparison, and
Type identification. The short test (SCFT) following the
PAQ will give you an idea about your Cognietrics Type;
however, it will not give you a conclusive argument - an
ENT] who works as a medical doctor may get a different
result than an ENTJ who works as a stock broker. It is
therefore necessary to compare the Type Profiles before
making a decision to determine Type.
Frequently Asked Questions
Did I pass?
There are no wrong answers! Different combinations
of different letters yield different advantages, but
remember - each four-letter code represents a set of
Preferences, not aptitudes.
What if I don't believe that everyone in the world fits
neatly into only sixteen Types?
The MBTI is by no means a complete description of
personality, but the dichotomies that represent the
Preferences are mutually exclusive and so, due to
Introduction to Cognietrics
widespread influence, account for the underpinnings of
every preinclination; people of the same Type can be
fundamentally different and still share these Traits,
however, Cognietrics only makes inferences based upon
the categories described in this book.
What if I think that I am a mix of Types, and that I use
all of the Preferences either together or at different times?
Cognietrics certainly expects people to use all eight
Functions, but a continuous divergence in usage is
expected in order to prevent confusion. It is unlikely that a
lack of Preferences will cause a perfect balance, because
people are noticeably different in this regard, and their
ptimary motives and behaviors by definition are indicative
themselves of imbalance between the Functions. On some
defunct Socionics websites, Jung was quoted as saying "As
experience shows, it is next to impossible - as a result of
unfavourable conditions - that somebody could develop all
his functions at the same time. Social demand bring to
more differentiation (developing) by a person that of his
functions where he is more talented by nature or which
gives him the most evident real means to achieve social
success. A person very often, almost regularly, wholly
identifies himself with the function placed in the most
favourable conditions and due to that the most developed
one. This way psychological types are constructed."
So what is the point of Jungian Cognitive Functions
and their Temperaments? Isn't Sensing just Sensing, and
Feeling just Feeling?
The Functions were Jung's actual original contributions
to personality typology, and were developed further by
Isabel Myers, the Socionicists, and others. The idea is that
the Suggestion (most conscious perceiving Function) and
Meaning (most conscious judging Function) can be
Alon Oscar Deutsch
introverted or extraverted (more specifically, one is
introverted and the other is extraverted; for Judgers the
Meaning is extraverted and for Perceivers the Suggestion is
extraverted). The Function Temperaments also determine
each Type's Values. Here is a story to illustrate the point: A
psychologist asks a man to look at a painting and describe
what he sees. The man says "I see a tree and a lake". The
psychologist then asks "What color is the bird in the
tree?", and the man responds "Oh, I didn't even notice the
bird until you mentioned it". This example proves that
even something as seemingly elementary as Sensation can
be affected by preinclinations, which can vary from person
to person. The fact is, the Preferences confer different
advantages depending on whether the information
processed is meant to be shared or hidden. In addition, as
with any sort of Strength, some people will excel at one
aspect and others will excel in other ways. Judgers are
more comfortable sharing judgments and hiding
perceptions, and Perceivers are more comfortable sharing
perceptions and hiding judgments; there is no reason to
suppose that the Temperament of every Function in the
Consciousness Hierarchy (order of the Functions) should
follow the Exertion (Introverted or Extraverted) of the
Cognietrics Type, which only determines the Exertion of
the Referential, Experimental, Avoidant, and Aggressive
Functions. In general, extraverted Functions are multiply-
applicable (or objective) and represent a breadth of
activity, whereas introverted Functions are self-referential
(or subjective) and represent a depth of activity. Everyone
has in their first and second Functions a judging Function
for using what they already Know and Understand and a
perceiving Function for dealing with new information that
is Inducted or Deduced; as I said before, one Function is
always extraverted and the other is always introverted - this
provides stability and balance to the Type.
Introduction to Cognietrics
If as of yet there is no data or other veracity to support
the predictions made by Cognietrics for each Type, then
what is the point of Cognietrics?
Cognietrics determines the connections between the
Myers-Briges Preferences and the Types that they describe,
but it is just an investigative foray into a much deeper
subconscious that we have not yet noticed. Albert Einstein
said, in Cosmic Religion: With Other Opinions and
Aphorisms (1931), "Imagination is more important than
knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination
embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving
birth to evolution. It is, strictly speaking, a real factor in
scientific research." Unfortunately, the tools are not yet
available for this kind of empirical study...however, just
because something begins as a dream, it does not mean
that it won't one day inspire something of practical value.
If it weren't for Marcel Grossmann introducing Einstein to
the mathematics he needed to make possible general
relativity (as described by Manfred Eigen in From Strange
Simplicity to Complex Familiarity (2013)), the theory
would remain nothing but a daydream. Instead it was
verified by many experiments including the Pound-Rebka
experiment in 1959. Especially when first learning about
Jungian personality, self-awareness can be a huge problem
for many people - do I do this or that? The actual
tendencies may be hard to distinguish at first, but with
study and comparison to others it is possible to make
sense of the theory. Cognietrics is a theory that seeks to
explain the interaction of a lot of different basic elements
and their collective effects. In Cognietrics, the basic
elements are the psychological entities called the Jungian
Cognitive Functions.
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Short Cognietrics Functions Test
1. I agree that:
a. I enjoy validating perspectives.
b. I always leave a memorable impression.
c. | tend to be very awate of the chances for success.
d. I like to keep track of things.
* ifa or b go to #2a, if c ord go to #2b
2a. I agree that:
e. I must honor my beliefs.
f. I can make complex things seem simple.
*oo to #3
2b. I agree that:
g. lam good at making others feel welcome.
h. I usually notice obscure opportunities.
*oo to #3
3. I agree that:
i. I gain energy when interacting with other people.
j. I need to spend time resting alone.
10
Introduction to Cognietrics
Answet Key:
aei-ENFP
aej-INFP
afi-ENTP
afj-INTP
bei-ESFP
bej-ISFP
bfi-ESTP
bfj-ISTP
cei-ENF]
cej-INFJ
chi-ENTJ
chj-INT]
dgi-ESF]
dgj-ISF]
dhi-ESTJ
dhj-ISTJ
Alon Oscar Deutsch
"When an inner situation is not made conscious, it
appears outside as fate." - Carl Gustav Jung
"Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to
an understanding of ourselves." - Carl Gustav Jung
“We may think that we fully control ourselves.
However, a friend can easily reveal something about us
that we have absolutely no idea about." - Carl Gustav Jung
12
CHAPTER TWO
Type Profiles
The following Type Profiles will give you a description
of each Cognietrics Type.
Alon Oscar Deutsch
ENFP
Exertion - Extraverted
Suggestion - iNtuiting
Meaning - Feeling
Reaction - Perceiver
Value - Counsel
Nature - Associater
Character - Reformer
‘Temperament - Explorer
Manner - Idealist
Inference - Deduction
Justification - Knowledge
Role - Guide
Mentality - Conceptual
Primary Field - Theorist
Identity - Application
Mask - Adaptation
Secondary Field - Expert
Charisma - Research
Inspiration - Standardization
Consciousness Hierarchy -
Referential as Counterfactual (Ne)
Responsible as Critical (Fi)
Experimental as Strategic (Te)
Hopeful as Optimizing (Si)
Avoidant as Scouting (Se)
Rebellious as tiological (Ti)
Aggressive as Relating (Fe)
Depressive as Statistical (Ni)
14
Introduction to Cognietrics
Demeanors:
ENXP: People with Referential Ne come from a
perfect world, and are always trying to shape this one in
their image.
EXFP: People with Responsible Fi say what’s on their
mind, trying to shock people to action.
*The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most
defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not
discussed.
Relationship Ratings -
IST] - 13
EST] - 12
ENFP - 11
INFP - 10
ISF] - 9
ENTP - 8
INT] - 7
ESFP - 6
ESF] - 5
ENT] - 5
INTP - 4
ISFP - 4
INF] - 3
ENF] - 2
ESTP - 1
ISTP - 0
Alon Oscar Deutsch
ENTP
Exertion - Extraverted
Suggestion - iNtuiting
Meaning - Thinking
Reaction - Perceiver
Value - Negotiation
Nature - Associater
Character - Administrator
Temperament - Explorer
Manner - Analyst
Inference - Deduction
Justification - Understanding
Role - Investigator
Mentality - Patterned
Primary Field - Prospector
Identity - Proof
Mask - Priority
Secondary Field - Philosopher
Charisma - Promotion
Inspiration - Thesis
Consciousness Hierarchy -
Referential as Counterfactual (Ne)
Responsible as Ztiological (Ti)
Experimental as Relating (Fe)
Hopeful as Optimizing (Si)
Avoidant as Scouting (Se)
Rebellious as Critical (Fi)
Aggressive as Strategic (Te)
Depressive as Statistical (Ni)
16
Introduction to Cognietrics
Demeanots:
ENXP: People with Referential Ne come from a
perfect world, and are always trying to shape this one in
their image.
EXTP: People with Responsible Ti try to make sense
of the world around them and be helpful.
*The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most
defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not
discussed.
Relationship Ratings -
ISFJ - 13
ESF] - 12
ENTP - 11
INTP - 10
IST] - 9
ENFP - 8
INF] - 7
ESTP - 6
ESTJ - 5
ENF] - 5
INFP - 4
ISTP - 4
INT] - 3
ENT] - 2
ESFP - 1
ISFP - 0
Alon Oscar Deutsch
ESFP
Exertion - Extraverted
Suggestion - Sensing
Meaning - Feeling
Reaction - Perceiver
Value - Skepticism
Nature - Observer
Character - Reformer
Temperament - Explorer
Manner - Guardian
Inference - Induction
Justification - Knowledge
Role - Investigator
Mentality - Patterned
Primary Field - Prospector
Identity - Priority
Mask - Proof
Secondary Field - Philosopher
Charisma - Thesis
Inspiration - Promotion
Consciousness Hierarchy -
Referential as Scouting (Se)
Responsible as Critical (Fi)
Experimental as Strategic (Te)
Hopeful as Statistical (Ni)
Avoidant as Counterfactual (Ne)
Rebellious as /Etiological (Ti)
Aggressive as Relating (Fe)
Depressive as Optimizing (Si)
18
Introduction to Cognietrics
Demeanors:
ESXP: People with Referential Se like to motivate
others to be their best.
EXFP: People with Responsible Fi say what’s on their
mind, trying to shock people to action.
*The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most
defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not
discussed.
Relationship Ratings -
INT] - 13
ENT] - 12
ESFP - 11
ISFP - 10
INF] - 9
ESTP - 8
IST] - 7
ENFP - 6
ENF] - 5
ESTJ - 5
ISTP - 4
INFP - 4
ISF] - 3
ESF] - 2
ENTP - 1
INTP - 0
Alon Oscar Deutsch
ESTP
Exertion - Extraverted
Suggestion - Sensing
Meaning - Thinking
Reaction - Perceiver
Value - Advocacy
Nature - Observer
Character - Administrator
Temperament - Explorer
Manner - Inspector
Inference - Induction
Justification - Understanding
Role - Guide
Mentality - Conceptual
Primary Field - Theorist
Identity - Adaptation
Mask - Application
Secondary Field - Expert
Charisma - Standardization
Inspiration - Research
Consciousness Hierarchy -
Referential as Scouting (Se)
Responsible as Atiological (T1)
Experimental as Relating (Fe)
Hopeful as Statistical (Ni)
Avoidant as Counterfactual (Ne)
Rebellious as Critical (Fi)
Aggressive as Strategic (Te)
Depressive as Optimizing (Si)
20
Introduction to Cognietrics
Demeanors:
ESXP: People with Referential Se like to motivate
others to be their best.
EXTP: People with Responsible Ti try to make sense
of the world around them and be helpful.
*The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most
defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not
discussed.
Relationship Ratings -
INF - 13
ENF] - 12
ESTP - 11
ISTP - 10
INT] - 9
ESFP - 8
ISF] - 7
ENTP - 6
ENT] -5
ESF] - 5
ISFP - 4
INTP - 4
IST] - 3
EST] - 2
ENFP - 1
INFP - 0
21
Alon Oscar Deutsch
ENF]
Exertion - Extraverted
Suggestion - iNtuiting
Meaning - Feeling
Reaction - Judger
Value - Advocacy
Nature - Associater
Character - Reformer
Temperament - Persuader
Manner - Idealist
Inference - Induction
Justification - Understanding
Role - Investigator
Mentality - Patterned
Primary Field - Expert
Identity - Standardization
Mask - Research
Secondary Field - Theorist
Charisma - Adaptation
Inspiration - Application
Consciousness Hierarchy -
Referential as Relating (Fe)
Responsible as Statistical (Ni)
Experimental as Scouting (Se)
Hopeful as AEtiological (Ti)
Avoidant as Strategic (Te)
Rebellious as Optimizing (Si)
Aggressive as Counterfactual (Ne)
Depressive as Critical (Fi)
22
Introduction to Cognietrics
Demeanors:
EXFJ: People with Referential Fe want to teach the
world their ethics.
ENXJ: People with Responsible Ni are very
foresightful, and try to support the best probability for a
positive outcome.
*The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most
defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not
discussed.
Relationship Ratings -
ISTP - 13
ESTP - 12
ENF] - 11
INF] - 10
INTP - 9
ESF] - 8
ISFP - 7
ENT] - 6
ENTP - 5
ESFP - 5
ISFJ - 4
INT] - 4
INFP - 3
ENFP - 2
EST] - 1
IST] - 0
23
Alon Oscar Deutsch
ENT]
Exertion - Extraverted
Suggestion - iNtuiting
Meaning - Thinking
Reaction - Judger
Value - Skepticism
Nature - Associater
Character - Administrator
Temperament - Persuader
Manner - Analyst
Inference - Induction
Justification - Knowledge
Role - Guide
Mentality - Conceptual
Primary Field - Philosopher
Identity - Thesis
Mask - Promotion
Secondary Field - Prospector
Charisma - Priority
Inspiration - Proof
Consciousness Hierarchy -
Referential as Strategic (Te)
Responsible as Statistical (Ni)
Experimental as Scouting (Se)
Hopeful as Critical (Fi)
Avoidant as Relating (Fe)
Rebellious as Optimizing (Si)
Aggressive as Counterfactual (Ne)
Depressive as /Etiological (Ti)
24
Introduction to Cognietrics
Demeanors:
EXT]: People with Referential Te may go out of their
way to correct someone.
ENXJ: People with Responsible Ni are very
foresightful, and try to support the best probability for a
positive outcome.
*The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most
defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not
discussed.
Relationship Ratings -
ISFP - 13
ESFP - 12
ENT] - 11
INT] - 10
INFP - 9
EST - 8
ISTP -7
ENF] - 6
ENFP - 5
ESTP -5
IST] - 4
INF] - 4
INTP - 3
ENTP - 2
ESF] - 1
ISF] - 0
25
Alon Oscar Deutsch
ESF]
Exertion - Extraverted
Suggestion - Sensing
Meaning - Feeling
Reaction - Judger
Value - Negotiation
Nature - Observer
Character - Reformer
Temperament - Persuader
Manner - Guardian
Inference - Deduction
Justification - Understanding
Role - Guide
Mentality - Conceptual
Primary Field - Philosopher
Identity - Promotion
Mask - Thesis
Secondary Field - Prospector
Charisma - Proof
Inspiration - Priority
Consciousness Hierarchy -
Referential as Relating (Fe)
Responsible as Optimizing (Si)
Experimental as Counterfactual (Ne)
Hopeful as AEtiological (Ti)
Avoidant as Strategic (Te)
Rebellious as Statistical (Ni)
Aggressive as Scouting (Se)
Depressive as Critical (Fi)
26
Introduction to Cognietrics
Demeanors:
EXFJ: People with Referential Fe want to teach the
world their ethics.
ESXJ: People with Responsible Si try to refine their
efforts and keep people consistently focused.
*The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most
defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not
discussed.
Relationship Ratings -
INTP - 13
ENTP - 12
ESF] - 11
ISFJ - 10
ISTP - 9
ENF] - 8
INFP - 7
EST] - 6
ESTP - 5
ENFP - 5
INF] - 4
IST] - 4
ISFP - 3
ESFP - 2
ENT] - 1
INT] - 0
27
Alon Oscar Deutsch
EST]
Exertion - Extraverted
Suggestion - Sensing
Meaning - Thinking
Reaction - Judger
Value - Counsel
Nature - Observer
Character - Administrator
Temperament - Persuader
Manner - Inspector
Inference - Deduction
Justification - Knowledge
Role - Investigator
Mentality - Patterned
Primary Field - Expert
Identity - Research
Mask - Standardization
Secondary Field - Theorist
Charisma - Application
Inspiration - Adaptation
Consciousness Hierarchy -
Referential as Strategic (Te)
Responsible as Optimizing (Si)
Experimental as Counterfactual (Ne)
Hopeful as Critical (Fi)
Avoidant as Relating (Fe)
Rebellious as Statistical (Ni)
Aggressive as Scouting (Se)
Depressive as Etiological (Ti)
28
Introduction to Cognietrics
Demeanors:
EXT]: People with Referential Te may go out of their
way to correct someone.
ESXJ: People with Responsible Si try to refine their
efforts and keep people consistently focused.
*The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most
defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not
discussed.
Relationship Ratings -
INFP - 13
ENFP - 12
EST] - 11
IST] - 10
ISFP - 9
ENT] - 8
INTP - 7
ESF] - 6
ESFP - 5
ENTP - 5
INT] - 4
ISFJ - 4
ISTP - 3
ESTP - 2
ENF] - 1
INF] - 0
29
Alon Oscar Deutsch
INFP
Exertion - Introverted
Suggestion - iNtuiting
Meaning - Feeling
Reaction - Perceiver
Value - Counsel
Nature - Observer
Character - Administrator
Temperament - Reflector
Manner - Idealist
Inference - Induction
Justification - Understanding
Role - Scientist
Mentality - Patterned
Primary Field - Prospector
Identity - Standardization
Mask - Research
Secondary Field - Philosopher
Charisma - Adaptation
Inspiration - Application
Consciousness Hierarchy -
Referential as Critical (Fi)
Responsible as Counterfactual (Ne)
Experimental as Optimizing (Si)
Hopeful as Strategic (Te)
Avoidant as Aitiological (Ti)
Rebellious as Scouting (Se)
Aggressive as Statistical (Ni)
Depressive as Relating (Fe)
30
Introduction to Cognietrics
Demeanors:
IXFP: People with Referential Fi will go out of their
way to appear unique, mysterious, and interesting.
INXP: People with Responsible Ne are interested in
cultivating potential alternatives, and spend _ time
comparing ideas.
*The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most
defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not
discussed.
Relationship Ratings -
EST] - 13
IST] - 12
INFP - 11
ENFP - 10
ENT] - 9
ISFP - 8
ESF] - 7
INTP - 6
INT] - 5
ISF] -5
ESFP - 4
ENTP - 4
ENF] - 3
INF] - 2
ISTP - 1
ESTP - 0
31
Alon Oscar Deutsch
INTP
Exertion - Introverted
Suggestion - iNtuiting
Meaning - Thinking
Reaction - Perceiver
Value - Negotiation
Nature - Observer
Character - Reformer
Temperament - Reflector
Manner - Analyst
Inference - Induction
Justification - Knowledge
Role - Engineer
Mentality - Conceptual
Primary Field - Theorist
Identity - Thesis
Mask - Promotion
Secondary Field - Expert
Charisma - Priority
Inspiration - Proof
Consciousness Hierarchy -
Referential as 2tiological (Ti)
Responsible as Counterfactual (Ne)
Experimental as Optimizing (Si)
Hopeful as Relating (Fe)
Avoidant as Critical (Fi)
Rebellious as Scouting (Se)
Aggressive as Statistical (Ni)
Depressive as Strategic (Te)
32
Introduction to Cognietrics
Demeanors:
IXTP: People with Referential Ti want to reframe
paradoxes and replace obsolete constructs.
INXP: People with Responsible Ne are interested in
cultivating potential alternatives, and spend _ time
comparing ideas.
*The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most
defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not
discussed.
Relationship Ratings -
ESF - 13
ISFJ - 12
INTP - 11
ENTP - 10
ENF] - 9
ISTP - 8
EST] - 7
INFP - 6
INF] - 5
IST] - 5
ESTP - 4
ENFP - 4
ENT] - 3
INT] - 2
ISFP - 1
ESFP - 0
33
Alon Oscar Deutsch
ISFP
Exertion - Introverted
Suggestion - Sensing
Meaning - Feeling
Reaction - Perceiver
Value - Skepticism
Nature - Associater
Character - Administrator
Temperament - Reflector
Manner - Guardian
Inference - Deduction
Justification - Understanding
Role - Engineer
Mentality - Conceptual
Primary Field - Theorist
Identity - Promotion
Mask - Thesis
Secondary Field - Expert
Charisma - Proof
Inspiration - Priority
Consciousness Hierarchy -
Referential as Critical (Fi)
Responsible as Scouting (Se)
Experimental as Statistical (Ni)
Hopeful as Strategic (Te)
Avoidant as Atiological (Ti)
Rebellious as Counterfactual (Ne)
Aggressive as Optimizing (Si)
Depressive as Relating (Fe)
34
Introduction to Cognietrics
Demeanors:
IXFP: People with Referential Fi will go out of their
way to appear unique, mysterious, and interesting.
ISXP: People with Responsible Se make others aware
of important information and get reactions from them.
*The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most
defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not
discussed.
Relationship Ratings -
ENT] - 13
INT] - 12
ISFP - 11
ESFP - 10
EST] - 9
INFP - 8
ENF] - 7
ISTP - 6
IST] - 5
INF] - 5
ENFP - 4
ESTP - 4
ESF] - 3
ISFJ - 2
INTP - 1
ENTP - 0
35
Alon Oscar Deutsch
ISTP
Exertion - Introverted
Suggestion - Sensing
Meaning - Thinking
Reaction - Perceiver
Value - Advocacy
Nature - Associater
Character - Reformer
Temperament - Reflector
Manner - Inspector
Inference - Deduction
Justification - Knowledge
Role - Scientist
Mentality - Patterned
Primary Field - Prospector
Identity - Research
Mask - Standardization
Secondary Field - Philosopher
Charisma - Application
Inspiration - Adaptation
Consciousness Hierarchy -
Referential as 2tiological (Ti)
Responsible as Scouting (Se)
Experimental as Statistical (Ni)
Hopeful as Relating (Fe)
Avoidant as Critical (Fi)
Rebellious as Counterfactual (Ne)
Aggressive as Optimizing (Si)
Depressive as Strategic (Te)
36
Introduction to Cognietrics
Demeanors:
IXTP: People with Referential Ti want to reframe
paradoxes and replace obsolete constructs.
ISXP: People with Responsible Se make others aware
of important information and get reactions from them.
*The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most
defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not
discussed.
Relationship Ratings -
ENF] - 13
INF] - 12
ISTP - 11
ESTP - 10
ESF] - 9
INTP - 8
ENT] - 7
ISFP - 6
ISF] -5
INT] - 5
ENTP - 4
ESFP - 4
EST] - 3
IST] - 2
INFP - 1
ENFP - 0
37
Alon Oscar Deutsch
INF]
Exertion - Introverted
Suggestion - iNtuiting
Meaning - Feeling
Reaction - Judger
Value - Advocacy
Nature - Observer
Character - Administrator
Temperament - Evaluator
Manner - Idealist
Inference - Deduction
Justification - Knowledge
Role - Engineer
Mentality - Conceptual
Primary Field - Philosopher
Identity - Application
Mask - Adaptation
Secondary Field - Prospector
Charisma - Research
Inspiration - Standardization
Consciousness Hierarchy -
Referential as Statistical (Ni)
Responsible as Relating (Fe)
Experimental as Ztiological (Ti)
Hopeful as Scouting (Se)
Avoidant as Optimizing (Si)
Rebellious as Strategic (Te)
Aggressive as Critical (Fi)
Depressive as Counterfactual (Ne)
38
Introduction to Cognietrics
Demeanors:
INXJ: People with Referential Ni are always searching
for new projects, making things that will last a long time.
IXF]: People with Responsible Fe want everyone to
feel good and have a good time.
*The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most
defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not
discussed.
Relationship Ratings -
ESTP - 13
ISTP - 12
INF] - 11
ENF] - 10
ESFP - 9
INT] - 8
ENTP - 7
ISF] - 6
ISFP - 5
INTP -5
ENT] - 4
ESF] - 4
ENFP - 3
INFP - 2
IST] - 1
EST] - 0
39
Alon Oscar Deutsch
INT]
Exertion - Introverted
Suggestion - iNtuiting
Meaning - Thinking
Reaction - Judger
Value - Skepticism
Nature - Observer
Character - Reformer
Temperament - Evaluator
Manner - Analyst
Inference - Deduction
Justification - Understanding
Role - Scientist
Mentality - Patterned
Primary Field - Expert
Identity - Proof
Mask - Priority
Secondary Field - Theorist
Charisma - Promotion
Inspiration - Thesis
Consciousness Hierarchy -
Referential as Statistical (Ni)
Responsible as Strategic (Te)
Experimental as Critical (F1)
Hopeful as Scouting (Se)
Avoidant as Optimizing (Si)
Rebellious as Relating (Fe)
Aggressive as /Etiological (Ti)
Depressive as Counterfactual (Ne)
40
Introduction to Cognietrics
Demeanors:
INXJ: People with Referential Ni are always searching
for new projects, making things that will last a long time.
IXTJ: People with Responsible Te are goal-oriented,
image-conscious, and want to maximize output.
*The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most
defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not
discussed.
Relationship Ratings -
ESFP - 13
ISFP - 12
INT] - 11
ENT] - 10
ESTP - 9
INF] - 8
ENFP - 7
IST] - 6
ISTP -5
INFP - 5
ENF] - 4
EST] - 4
ENTP - 3
INTP - 2
ISFJ - 1
ESF] - 0
41
Alon Oscar Deutsch
ISF]
Exertion - Introverted
Suggestion - Sensing
Meaning - Feeling
Reaction - Judger
Value - Negotiation
Nature - Associater
Character - Administrator
Temperament - Evaluator
Manner - Guardian
Inference - Induction
Justification - Knowledge
Role - Scientist
Mentality - Patterned
Primary Field - Expert
Identity - Priority
Mask - Proof
Secondary Field - Theorist
Charisma - Thesis
Inspiration - Promotion
Consciousness Hierarchy -
Referential as Optimizing (Si)
Responsible as Relating (Fe)
Experimental as Etiological (Ti)
Hopeful as Counterfactual (Ne)
Avoidant as Statistical (Ni)
Rebellious as Strategic (Te)
Aggressive as Critical (Fi)
Depressive as Scouting (Se)
42
Introduction to Cognietrics
Demeanors:
ISXJ: People with Referential Si like to multi-task and
try out different customizations.
IXF]J: People with Responsible Fe want everyone to
feel good and have a good time.
*The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most
defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not
discussed.
Relationship Ratings -
ENTP - 13
INTP - 12
ISFJ - 11
ESF] - 10
ENEFP - 9
IST] - 8
ESTP - 7
INF] - 6
INFP - 5
ISTP -5
EST] - 4
ENF] - 4
ESFP - 3
ISFP - 2
INT] - 1
ENT] - 0
43
Alon Oscar Deutsch
IST]
Exertion - Introverted
Suggestion - Sensing
Meaning - Thinking
Reaction - Judger
Value - Counsel
Nature - Associater
Character - Reformer
Temperament - Evaluator
Manner - Inspector
Inference - Induction
Justification - Understanding
Role - Engineer
Mentality - Conceptual
Primary Field - Philosopher
Identity - Adaptation
Mask - Application
Secondary Field - Prospector
Charisma - Standardization
Inspiration - Research
Consciousness Hierarchy -
Referential as Optimizing (Si)
Responsible as Strategic (Te)
Experimental as Critical (Fi)
Hopeful as Counterfactual (Ne)
Avoidant as Statistical (Ni)
Rebellious as Relating (Fe)
Aggressive as /Etiological (Ti)
Depressive as Scouting (Se)
44
Introduction to Cognietrics
Demeanors:
ISXJ: People with Referential Si like to multi-task and
try out different customizations.
IXTJ: People with Responsible Te are goal-oriented,
image-conscious, and want to maximize output.
*The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most
defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not
discussed.
Relationship Ratings -
ENFP - 13
INFP - 12
ISTJ - 11
EST] - 10
ENTP - 9
ISF] - 8
ESFP - 7
INT] - 6
INTP -5
ISFP - 5
ESF] - 4
ENT] - 4
ESTP =3
ISTP - 2
INF] - 1
ENF] - 0
45
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Demeanors
TXFP: People with Referential Fi will go out of their
way to appear unique, mysterious, and interesting.
EXFP: People with Responsible Fi say what's on their
mind, trying to shock people to action.
EXF]: People with Referential Fe want to teach the
world their ethics.
IXF]: People with Responsible Fe want everyone to
feel good and have a good time.
IXTP: People with Referential Ti want to reframe
paradoxes and replace obsolete constructs.
EXTP: People with Responsible Ti try to make sense
of the world around them and be helpful.
EXT]: People with Referential Te may go out of their
way to correct someone.
TXT]: People with Responsible Te are goal-oriented,
image-conscious, and want to maximize output.
ISXJ: People with Referential Si like to multi-task and
try out different customizations.
ESXJ: People with Responsible Si try to refine their
efforts and keep people consistently focused.
ESXP: People with Referential Se like to motivate
others to be their best.
ISXP: People with Responsible Se make others aware
of important information and get reactions from them.
46
Introduction to Cognietrics
INXJ: People with Referential Ni are always searching
for new projects, making things that will last a long time.
ENXJ: People with Responsible Ni are very
foresightful, and try to support the best probability for a
positive outcome.
ENXP: People with Referential Ne come from a
perfect world, and are always trying to shape this one in
their image.
INXP: People with Responsible Ne are interested in
cultivating potential alternatives, and spend _ time
comparing ideas.
*The less conscious Attitudes are (even in their most
defined state) Experimental, so they are typically not
discussed.
*It helps to think of the judging Function as a
selection Function and the perceiving Function as a
recognition Function, such that Judgers extravert selection
and introvert recognition, and Perceivers extravert
recognition and introvert selection, to prevent confusion.
This way Inventors Refer to their recognition and select
Responsibly and Discoverers Refer to their selection and
recognize Responsibly. Recognition leads to Reason or
Resolutions, Observation or Association, and Induction or
Deduction, whereas selection is due to Curiosity or
Seriousness, Reform or Administration, and Knowledge or
Understanding.
47
CHAPTER THREE
Theory
My model agrees with John Beebe that Weak &
Positive Functions are higher on the Consciousness
Hierarchy than Weak & Negative Functions, but it also
agrees with Ausra Augustinaviciuté that Strong & Negative
Functions are at the bottom. Since this theory differs from
its predecessors, I have decided to name it “Cognietrics”.
The Strong Functions are at the top and bottom of the
Consciousness Hierarchy and represent the most active
regions of the brain. The Weak Functions are in the
middle.
Among ENFXs, it is easy to decide that the Judger
with the Referential feeling is more of a Feeler than an
iNtuiter, but among INFXs, which is which? The truth is
that it is more complicated - the INFJ will excel at Feeling
because it has been shaped by external forces, but will
actually do more iNtuiting (and about more things) than
Feeling (mostly to support that Feeling) though it will
happen behind-the-scenes. This type of hidden preparation
48
Introduction to Cognietrics
using the Referential Function is what makes Introverts
seem mystetious, and may in fact contribute to their often
unique perspectives (while allowing [IXXPs to judge what
to perceive and IXXJs to perceive what to judge
beforehand, instead of engaging in direct, face-value
judgment or perception as an Extrovert would).
The Function Temperaments cycle down the
Consciousness Hierarchy for the Positive Attitudes and
begin again the same way for the Negative Attitudes. For
TXXJ (Evaluator) the order is Pi-Je-Ji-Pe. For EXXP
(Reflector) the order is Ji-Pe-Pi-Je. For EXXJ (Persuader)
the order is Je-Pi-Pe-Ji. For EXXP (Explorer) the order is
Pe-Ji-Je-Pi. The reason for this is that the last letter of the
designator determines which of the Demeanors is
extraverted, rather than Referential (the Suggestion,
Sensing or iNtuiting, is a form of perception, and the
Meaning, Thinking or Feeling, is a form of judgment);
Myers is credited with interpreting Jung when he said, in
Psychological Types (1921), “[the] most differentiated
function is always employed in an extraverted way”. I
believe that this is due to social pressures as well as public
identification with oneself; not having a conscious
Reaction Function also allows Introverts to hide their
cognitive processes and stay focused on goals, and may be
part of the cause of some of their Introverted behaviors.
On the other hand, having a conscious Reaction Function
allows Extraverts to deal with the situation at hand as
directly and efficiently as possible. When something
happens, the extraverted Function provides a Reaction
that is concise and useful in social situations - Perceivers
can quickly check how things are developing if they are
Scouting or how things could be developing if they are
Counterfactual; Judgers can quickly check how to take
advantage of something if they are Strategic or how to
support ethical standards if they are Relating. The
introverted Function is used for the further consideration
49
Alon Oscar Deutsch
and gradual integration of the information. Functions that
are not Reaction Functions (extraverted) are called
Contemplation Functions (introverted). Extraverts have
Reactions that are Referential, Experimental, Avoidant,
and Ageressive. Introverts have Reactions that are
Responsible, Hopeful, Rebellious, and Depressive.
When you are Hopeful about a Preference there must
also be some aspects of it with which you are
simultaneously Avoidant, however as you become
Experimental by the use of a Preference you will find
other ways in which you are also Rebellious. Being
Responsible allows you to become so habituated to a
Preference that you become increasingly Aggressive to
other facets of it; however, when you are so engrossed in a
Preference that you are Referential, you may become
otherwise Depressive to it.
The Positive Attitudes comprise the Ego and begin in
Strength with being Hopeful, then as you become
acquainted you become Experimental, then as experience
builds you become Responsible, and eventually you start to
become Referential.
The Negative Attitudes comprise the Id and begin in
Strength with being Avoidant, then possibly you realize
that you have become increasingly Rebellious, then you
might grow Aggressive, and eventually you may find a way
to become Depressive.
There is a Super-Ego, or Conscience, which is even
more conscious than the Ego, and it contains information
from immediate sources other than the Self (Ego and Id)
about the Self (rather than what is processed inside the
brain) to provide an idealization about life to seek as a goal
(information from the Super-Ego may eventually become
part of the Ego when it is no longer an immediate
50
Introduction to Cognietrics
necessity and as the Self continues to shape itself over
time). The Super-Id consists of the impressions of others
about the Self which are unknown to the Self, but which
have a cumulative effect on the Self just the same. As the
Self ages, the Ego arranges itself to satisfy the Super-Ego
just as the Id arranges itself to satisfy the Super-Id; this
allows suspicions to balance confirmations when there is
uncertainty. However, the Ego and Id also allow a
controlled, ordered response to the Super-Ego and Super-
Id. This allows the use of other avenues of information
gathering and processing (as well as the independent
operation of the mind), which then provides the ability for
educated choices and free will.
Fear encourages the use of the Weak Functions, and
Anger encourages the use of the Negative Functions.
Punctions 1 & 2 - Not Angry or Fearful
Punctions 3 & 4 - Fearful enough to take precautions
Functions 5 & 6 - Fearful/Angty enough to seek advice
Functions 7 & 8 - Angry enough to confront someone
Due to similar Function usage, the Relationships Rated
13 and 12 may give the appearance of the Type as a
Frightened (though not Angry) version of the Self, which
creates in the original Type a desire to comfort and offer
support, which is beneficial for the Relationship.
The Super-Ego is in fact so conscious that in its use
one may even become detached from his own Anger and
wonder if he is the cause of Anger in others; it is ultimately
responsible for Selflessness, and the Super-Id is
responsible for Selfishness.
*Since the Positive Attitudes contain an extraverted
perceiving Function and an introverted judging Function
which allow Perceivers to deal with unavailable
51
Alon Oscar Deutsch
information, though the Super-Ego also provides them
with available information about the Self, those Functions
use available information as the impulse to check for
information that was not available. The introverted judging
Function uses it for developing convictions and the
extraverted perceiving Function uses it to see if others
need help. The Conscience is also processed by the
introverted perceiving Function for self-awareness and the
extraverted judging Function in order to make sure that
others are following the rules; in the Id these Functions
may try to compensate for a lack of available information
by using it as an impulse to make more information
available. Inventors have a Referential perceiving Function,
which means that they use conscious, or available,
information with a perceiving Function, which speculates
rather than limits. This means that Inventors use available
information to see what can be changed by speculation,
causing them to Invent, whereas Discoverers use available
information to see what is already present and can be
limited, causing them to Discover.
Attitudes
EGO
Strong & Positive
Referential - this is the main Function, from which all
References are made.
Responsible - this is the auxiliary Function, which is
used to check the Referential Function.
Weak & Positive
Experimental - this Function serves as a basis for
showing initiative.
Hopeful - this Function is used to search for new areas
of interest.
52
Introduction to Cognietrics
ID
Weak & Negative
Avoidant - this Function is used to show disapproval.
Rebellious - this Function is used against conformity.
Strong & Negative
Aggressive - this Function is used as a show of force.
Depressive - this Function is used to accept grief and
is the most repressed of all of the Functions.
Inclinations
The Referential and Hopeful Functions represent
available information with which one is comfortable, and
the Responsible and Experimental Functions represent
available information with which one is uncomfortable.
The Rebellious and Aggressive Functions represent
unavailable information with which one is comfortable,
and the Avoidant and Depressive Functions represent
unavailable information with which one is uncomfortable.
I believe that the Inclinations, along with the Function
Strengths as they relate to the Justification and Inference,
are how Type is initially determined.
Functions
Counterfactual (Ne, NP / Reasonable) - making novel
comparisons, brainstorming, and envisioning hypothetical
change.
Statistical (Ni, NJ / Resolute) - having reliable
expectations and considering the unknowable for
developing robust ideas (while Statistics are also Patterns,
INF]s use Statistically-relevant Concepts).
53
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Scouting (Se, SP / Resolute) - being showy and testing
limitations.
Optimizing (Si, SJ / Reasonable) - monitoring
resources and concentrating on performance.
Relating (Fe, FJ / Curious) - determining emotional
states, sharing enthusiasm, and endorsing harmony.
Critical (Fi, FP / Serious) - having strong opinions and
weighing different options to represent exclusive bonds.
Strategic (Te, TJ / Serious) - realizing effects and
resulting implications for direct systemization and
encouraging a state of prosperity.
AEtiological (Ti, TP / Curious) - finding causes using
fundamental suppositions and identifying feedback loops.
Motivations
When introvertedly thinking (Ti), XXTPs have the
ability to eventually define complex ideas under the right
conditions, allowing them to delay decisions (Perceiver) to
telieve stress (Curious).
When extravertedly feeling (Fe), XXFJs create
opportunities, allowing them to make instant decisions
(Judger) to relieve stress (Curious).
When introvertedly feeling (Fi), XXFPs feel they must
honor their beliefs in the best possible way, allowing them
to delay decisions (Perceiver) when there is a deep
personal connection (Serious).
When extravertedly thinking (Te), XXT]Js are aware of
54
Introduction to Cognietrics
obscure opportunities, allowing them to make instant
decisions (Judger) when there is a deep personal
connection (Serious).
When introvertedly sensing (Si), XSXJs keep track of
many applicable possibilities simultaneously, allowing them
to make instant decisions (Judger) until an alternative is
accepted (Reasonable).
When extravertedly intuiting (Ne), XNXPs_ validate
perspectives, allowing them to delay decisions (Perceiver)
until an alternative is accepted (Reasonable).
When introvertedly intuiting (Ni), XNXJs notice the
window for each chance of success, allowing them to make
instant decisions (Judger) which require commitment
(Resolute).
When extravertedly sensing (Se), XSXPs filter for the
most extravagant option in order to settle a point, allowing
them to delay decisions (Perceiver) which require
commitment (Resolute).
‘Temperaments
EXXPs are known as Explorers; they want to test and
improve mental faculties in novel situations (introverted
judging helping extraverted perceiving).
EXXJs are known as Persuaders; they want people to
see things from their point of view (introverted perceiving
helping extraverted judging).
IXXJs are known as Evaluators; they want to combine
a few key points to interpret holistically (extraverted
judging helping introverted perceiving).
39
Alon Oscar Deutsch
IXXPs are known as Reflectors; they want to see an
idea from every angle individually to preserve the purity of
each impression (extraverted perceiving helping
introverted judging).
EXXJs and EXXPs are both known as Discoverers;
they try to seek methods to protect against a clouded
judgment in order to have a clear view of all things.
EXXPs and [XX]Js are both known as Inventors; they
like to look for better means of accomplishment, even if
they have to go against accepted theories by utilizing
anomalous or untested phenomena.
The main difference between the two is that Inventors
use synthetic propositions to consider everything as
connected simultaneously using symbols in order to make
use of something and Discoverers use analytic
propositions to keep their ideas completely separate using
strict definitions for use in the juxtaposition of competing
interpretations. This is partially due to the powerful yet
neglected influence of the Responsible Function, which
causes Discoverers to want to perceive (combustion is
turning a gear) to validate their a priori judgments (energy
can be harnessed from combustion), or Discover, and
Inventors to want to judge (the gear can be used to propel
a vehicle) to validate their a posteriori perceptions
(combustion is turning a gear), or Invent (Inventions may
also precede Discoveries, such as occurred with the
pregnancy risks Discovered after the Invention of
thalidomide). Referential judgment is used as a form of
limitation and is supported by Responsible speculation,
and Referential perception is used as a form of speculation
and is supported by Responsible limitation. A priori
synthetic statements are typically used subconsciously by
both Discoverers and Inventors in the third Attitude, and
a posteriori analytic statements have been shown to be
56
Introduction to Cognietrics
non-existent by Immanuel Kant. As Discoverers, EXX]s
Judge shared information to interpret the actions of others
and [XXPs Perceive relevant associations. As Inventors,
EXXPs Perceive improvements in the relative abilities of
others and IXXJs Judge optimal solutions. To use the
story of the bird in the tree, one could not have
Discovered it without a prior notion (a priori) assuming it
was neatly the shape and color of the leaves of the tree,
but once it has been Discovered it could be used to Invent
anything without and even despite prior considerations (a
posteriori), such as a carrier pigeon. In addition, to make
the Discovery, scanning occurs for separately-
differentiated bird-like characteristics, but for the
Invention, birds and letters must be combined together
and then considered inter-symbolically and in conjunction
with each other in order to explore the possibility for a
postal network. Using the idea that Judgment is based on
information that is available, and Perception is based on
information that is not (which is why Perceivers seem to
have an aptitude for fluid intelligence which is experience-
independent, and Judgers seem to have an aptitude for
crystallized intelligence which is experience-dependent
“Intelligence in Relation to Jung’s Personality Types’.
Purnham, Moutafi, & Paltiel. 2005.)), it is possible to show
that: EXXJs use available information to Discover
(Referential limitation), which is useful for coming to
conclusions; EXXPs use unavailable information to Invent
(Referential speculation), which is useful for taking specific
precautions; IXXJs use available information to Invent
(Referential speculation), which is useful for being
resourceful; IXXPs use unavailable information to
Discover (Referential limitation), which is useful for
developing new branches of study. Judgers focus on
perceiving in a new way something that is often judged,
and Perceivers on judging in a new way something that is
often perceived, so that Discoverers focus on the judging
aspects and Inventors focus on the perceiving aspects.
57
Alon Oscar Deutsch
*Extraverts, seeking to impose order, are quick to judge
(EJ) and slow to perceive (EP). Introverts, seeking a
selective advantage, are quick to perceive (IJ) and slow to
judge (IP). Explorers are not Discoverers because they
have no preconceived bias and are not trying to confirm
(Discover) an expectation.
Manners
STs are known as Inspectors, they want to make sure
that quality is always what it should be; common
professions include police detective.
NF's ate known as Idealists, they want to improve the
state of the world; common professions include court
attorney.
SFs are known as Guardians, they want to preserve
precious items and ideas; common professions include
school teacher.
NTs ate known as Analysts, they want to see how
events can be connected; common professions include
computer programmer.
STs and NFs are both known as Progressives, they
want to bring about change, due to a scrutiny of reality
coupled with an attachment to the imagination. They tend
to be restless and proactive.
SFs and NTs are both known as Classicists, they want
to fulfill present standards, due to an attachment to reality
coupled with a scrutiny of the imagination. They tend to
be relaxed and lenient.
58
CHAPTER FOUR
Mentalities
Classicist-Discoverers and Progressive-Inventors have
a Conceptual Mentality that deals with inclusive designs,
due to the use of established insights for conjectural
purposes.
Progressive-Discoverers and Classicist-Inventors have
a Patterned Mentality that deals with recurring
configurations, due to the use of conjectural insights for
established purposes.
Types share a Mentality with Relationships Rated 13,
11, 3, 1, 5, and 4. A common Field occurs when the
Referential Function of a Type is the Responsible
Punction of another Type whose Referential Function is
not the Responsible Function of the first Type. This
imbalance in the Consciousness Hierarchy tends to lead to
a one-sided Relationship, which is why these Relationships
are Rated the lowest of the ones that contain a shared
Value. In Socionics this is known as "Supervision";
however, I believe that this is a bad name for the
59
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Relationship because the Type known in Socionics as the
"Supervisor" in Cognietrics is held Responsible by the
Responsible Function to the other Type's more active but
less accountable Referential Function and so effectively
becomes a supervisee. In reality however, there are
instances where the Socionics "Supervisor" begins to hold
accountable the actions of the Socionics "Supervisee"
using the Socionics "Supervisee's" own Responsible
Function. I think that due to the uniqueness of each
Relationship, descriptions such as these are ultimately not
good predictors of Relationships, which is why I choose to
Rate them instead using shared Values as predictors of
success. Because this Relationship exists when either the
Referential or the Responsible Function is shared, two
Types share the 4 Rating. The 5 Rating occurs for Types
that have Functions that Complement in order those of
either of the Types Rated 4. Other Relationships that share
the Field include the identical Type and the Type of the
same Temperament but opposite Manner.
Fields
Patterned Judgers —
INTJ—ESTJ—ISFJ—-ENFJ—INT]
Primary -Expert- Act based on Patterns to determine
what they mean collectively and respond.
Secondary -Theorist- Delay action based on Concepts
to check references.
Conceptual Judgers —
ENTJ—INFJ—ESFJ—ISTJ—-ENTJ
Primary -Philosopher- Act based on Concepts to
choose methods suitable for accomplishing a goal.
Secondary -Prospector- Delay action based on Patterns
to evaluate success and update worldview.
60
Introduction to Cognietrics
Patterned Perceivers —
ENTP—ISTP—-ESFP—INFP-ENTP
Primary -Prospector- Delay action based on Patterns to
mine data and seek rewards.
Secondary -Philosopher- Act based on Concepts to
exploit resources using accepted methods.
Conceptual Perceivers —
INTP—ENFP-—ISFP-ESTP—INTP
Primary -Theorist- Delay action based on Concepts to
simulate realities and respond accordingly.
Secondary -Expert- Act based on Patterns to pursue
new avenues as they become available.
Experts and Theorists are Scholars; they stay well-
informed about topics that interest them.
Philosophers and Prospectors are Visionaries; they
have a direction for pragmatic development.
An ESF] I interviewed likes to tell people her
Philosophies about life, of which she has many. She
believes that helping people is more important than
materialism, that hard work pays ("there is no easy
money"), and that you should be careful in what you say
because "though people may not remember what you said,
they will always remember how you made them feel".
An ESFP I know loves to look through garage sales to
make old belongings into new Prospects; when he is on
eBay he has a general idea of what he wants but likes to
look around, searching for price Patterns in certain
combinations of qualities that will result in the best deal.
An INTP had a Theory at his new job that he could
save the company on water supplies. He looked around,
confirmed his Theory, made the adjustments, and saved
the company $70,000. For this he was featured in the
61
Alon Oscar Deutsch
company newsletter.
I, an ISF] with the working habits of an INT], like to
have Expertise in the things that interest me. I have a
phase where I like to learn everything I can about a
subject, and then I move on to the next one. In the second
grade it was meteorology and I learned everything about
evety kind of cloud (I would make charts of all of the
features of all of the kinds of clouds to find Patterns
among them, and so that I could identify what was
happening in the sky), in the third grade it was
paleontology and I learned everything about every kind of
dinosaur, and in college it was physics and I worked in
three research laboratories while getting my degree. Now I
want to learn everything about psychology!
I noticed that in the MBTI Manual (rd Edition, p.
269) INTPs had the highest crystallized IQs (SAT) and
INTJs had the highest fluid IQs. Using the Fields I
realized that Judgers used fluid intelligence and Perceivers
used crystallized intelligence. Fluid problem solving
progresses from Expertise to Philosophy and crystallized
problem solving progresses from Theory to Prospection.
If experience didn't change, Expertise wouldn't have raw
material and Philosophy wouldn't evolve. When experience
changes, Theory is less able to define and Prospection has
less material to search. Fluid intelligence turns Patterns to
Concepts and crystallized intelligence turns Concepts to
Patterns. Expertise to Prospection yields profound
questions (Patterned) and Theory to Philosophy yields
idiographic questions (Conceptual), and for this reason
Guiding is a general look at specifics and Investigation is a
specific look at generality and Knowledge of Patterns and
Understanding of Concepts require Sense to connect the
general and specific. Backwards, as in Visionary to Scholar,
is useful for memory retention. Once there is experience
with the problem from Expertise, it may lead to Theory
62
Introduction to Cognietrics
and then Prospection before continuing to Philosophy.
This study, termed Problematics, raises some interesting
questions. What are the basic constituents of an abstract
problem? What is the smallest system that can solve a
given problem? What is intelligence? Where does this
circuit occur in the brain (dopamine system?)? Can it be
improved with nootropics or electrical stimulation? Does it
differ cognitively from behaviorally? What psychological
concepts ate involved and where is it involved in
psychological concepts? Is it more due to conditioning or
genetics? At what level of biological organization does this
type of processing emerge - the cephalopod? The cell? Is
there an analogous system? Is artificial intelligence in a
computer-brain interface more suited to Prospecting and
Expertise? How does it work in a brainstorming session?
Are there multiple instances cooperating in the brain? Is
there a simpler system? What can't be solved by this
system? An interesting model occurred to me. What if
DNA can solve problems in this manner? It could respond
to certain combinations of inputs (ultimate cause) with
Expertise which may promote mutations in certain places
(proximate cause) about which the polymer Theorizes.
Expression of certain combinations of proteins could later
be Prospected resulting in a useful and even Philosophical
action. This form of Lamarckian evolution might explain
evolutionary jumps. After some research I found that a
possible mechanism for this type of activity is methylation.
Methylation forms a tagging system that deactivates mostly
unused DNA, and also increases the rate of mutation in
those areas. In the next generation there may be a more
useful adaptation. DNA can take any physical essence and
do whatever it wants. Directed motion like chemotaxis is
actually a Darwinian physics which also accounts for
measurement and so reverses the Copenhagen
Interpretation. Proofs work as follows. Fundamentality
brought about by Expertise helps with meaning skepticism
in a Theory which helps find ideational interdependence in
63
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Prospection which helps with feasibility and then the
reason for the proof Philosophically. The Motivations are
useful tools in solving a proof. The idea being proven is
tracked through the Problematic stages with Si, checked
against existing ideas with Ne, driven by Te ambition
where there aren't Fi restraints, limited by Ti where there
are no Fe opportunities to create, and settled by Se points
when there is a large Ni window of success. Individual
Type processing may contribute to a more thorough
understanding of the proof. Problematics mirrors the
Consciousness Hierarchy because when you are Referential
it is with respect to Expertise, you need a Theory to be
Responsible, Prospection is Experimental, and
Philosophical choice of a method is useful when you need
Hope. A better way to look at a Proof is a recursion that
can stabilize such that it has a different function at the
point of complexity. Noncontrariety, that something is not
more of less of its essence at different times or in relation
to different things, is embodied in the Triads because
Classicist is not just more Sensing or iNtuiting but Sensing
when Feeling and iNtuiting when Thinking, which is
important in stable characteristics of psychology, or
personality, such as Walter Mischel's Cognitive Affective
Personality System, where different behaviors tend to
occur in certain circumstances. Commonality between
responses to beauty in art and beauty in music is the
essence of beauty. Same essence of an object, or same, is
different in certain predetermined circumstances (that help
determine sameness), whereas when different, or different
essence, this does not occur. This is true for any number
of essences in an object. Since Mischel's system may be
unconscious and conditioned, what is consciousness and
what is conditioning? Is it an essence like beautiful due to
Hebbian plasticity? What are the evolutionary benefits of
such impressions? Is learning a proof from Expertise that
is due to Hebbian plasticity? As same may be thought of as
like and like as mentioned in Gottlob Frege's Foundations
64
Introduction to Cognietrics
of Arithmetic, it may be shown that mathematical proofs
equalize like structures analogously in terms of Expertise
in a fundamental manner. Although scientific papers
usually contain the elements of a proof, they refer to a
specific experiment which can never be proven only
disproven, however these elements are still relevant in
interpreting Causality, as Expertise and Philosophical
phenomena must be Judged whereas Theory and ideational
interdependence that may be Prospected may be
Perceived. A similar division may be used to discuss
Rationalist and Empiricist justification. Negative feedback
that causes a threshold to be crossed in a Complex system
must be Judged and so contributes to Expertise and
Philosophical phenomena, though positive feedback that
causes teinforcement (and a decrease in entropy) is
Perceived and contributes to Theory and Prospection.
Noumena must be intuited and can't be sensed.
Personas
The birth and death of Patterns and Concepts are
associated with Personas in a closed Mentality Loop:
Conceptual
TN - Thesis - To formulate the Concept.
N-F - Application - To find uses for the Concept.
F—S - Promotion - To begin utilizing the Concept.
ST - Adaptation - To develop the Concept.
Patterned
N-T - Proof - To define the Pattern.
TS - Research - To locate the Pattern in nature.
SF - Priority - To address the Pattern when
necessaty.
PON - Standardization - To update every procedure
with the Pattern.
65
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Identity / Primary Persona: Derived from the Primary
Field, this Persona is the most conscious and so is shaped
by social expectation; it is based on the Referential and
Responsible Functions and developed by the Relationship
Rated 11, which shares the Values, Manner, and
Temperament; it is Disrupted by the Relationship Rated 3
and associated with positive reinforcement in operant
conditioning.
Chatisma / Family / Secondary Persona: Derived from
the Secondary Field, this Persona is used for versatility; it is
based on the Experimental and Hopeful Functions and
developed by the Relationship Rated 12, which shares the
Values; it is Disrupted by the Relationship Rated 0 and
associated with negative punishment in operant
conditioning and also Fear because there is something to
lose when it is used.
Inspiration / School / Tertiary Persona: Derived from
the Secondary Field, this Persona works toward important
accomplishments in life; it is based on the Aggressive and
Depressive Functions and developed by the Relationship
Rated 2, which shares the Manner; it is Disrupted by the
Relationship Rated 10 and associated with positive
punishment in operant conditioning and also Anger
because there is something with which to deal when it is
used.
Mask / Work / Quarternary Persona: Derived from the
Primary Field, this Persona is used to address problems; it
is based on the Avoidant and Rebellious Functions and
developed by the Relationship Rated 1, which shares the
Temperament; it is Disrupted by the Relationship Rated 13
and associated with negative reinforcement in operant
conditioning and also Fear and Anger because thete is
something to hide when it is used.
66
Introduction to Cognietrics
Disruption occurs when a Persona (all of which share
the Exertion of the Type) is confronted by Functions of
opposite Exertion and Value but similar order of
Preference (which then compete for attention). It is similar
to "Extinguishment" in Socionics, and its minimization is
the purpose of the Consciousness Hierarchy.
The difference between the Jungian Cognitive
Functions and the Personas is that the Personas cannot be
used simultaneously and are a presentation of the Self to
the world whereas the Jungian Cognitive Functions may be
used simultaneously and are mostly hidden from the world
in the subconscious or as introverted Function
Temperaments.
*One advantage of having a Relationship Rated 13 is
that all Fields are present, allowing different information to
be addressed completely by both partners; this provides
the necessary foundations for a successful partnership. It is
not to say that people don't sometimes prefer to work
alone - sometimes a closed Mentality Loop is not helpful.
An Idealist-Inventor may Feel that Adaptation is not
economical, and an Inspector-Inventor may Think that
Applications are not relevant in urgent situations. A
Guardian-Discoverer may Feel that there is cause for
concern in directly employing a Thesis, and an Analyst-
Discoverer may Think that Promotion would result in the
endorsement of only the immediately profitable aspects of
an enterprise. An Idealist-Discoverer may Feel that
confirmation-biased interpretation is the result of
Research, and an Inspector-Discoverer may Think that
Standardization prevents competition, A Guardian-
Inventor may Feel that a Proof does not imply anything
new, and an Analyst-Inventor may Think that a stated
Priority requires more evidence. However, this direction is
not conducive to communication and prevents growth for
both partners.
67
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Charisma is achieved by overcoming Fear, Inspiration
is achieved by overcoming Anger, and a Mask is achieved
by overcoming Fear and Anger.
The Mask seems like it closes the Mentality Loop (all of
its Personas being represented), helping the wearer to look
more authoritative (having considered every possibility). It
is commonly used to reject intervention.
The Charisma shows how well one can impress the
Types whose Relationships are Rated higher than
Relationships with one's own Type. It is used when
meeting new people and addressing a crowd.
The Identity allows the user to have a sense of Self,
from which to create stability and balance. It is used more
than any other Persona.
The Inspiration is not influenced by social expectation
and provides the freedom to return to one's instincts. It is
used when one is not paying attention and is behind
sudden realizations.
Here are some anecdotes that illustrate the way the
Inspiration occurs in different Types:
As a working INTJ, Cognietrics is one of my Theses; I
consider it a step forward in the study of typology, and I
hope that it inspires future generations of psychologists.
For me, it is easy to show the actuality of typological
categorization using examples such as these (in
mathematics it is called Proof by Induction) or to
formulate rationalist Proofs of my ideas by inferring the
similarities between the combined effects of different
Myers-Briges Preferences, but it would be a lot harder for
me to combine this theory with others in order to propose
a common Thesis; however, I have tried to make my ideas
68
Introduction to Cognietrics
as generally applicable as possible.
The same INTP from my other story refuses to
acknowledge Cognietrics until it is backed by science,
although I told him that self-awareness is not easy for
most people and would inhibit any study that I conducted.
Nevertheless, Proof would be the deciding factor for him,
his Thesis being (as usual) that ideas must have solid
empirical evidence to be applicable.
An INF] I know is an artist who uses very unorthodox
methods to create art. Clay sculptures in picture frames,
accordion-like structures made of parts of copies of the
original pictures, and other visual realizations fill the wall.
What she did, in fact, was take a new Application for many
materials and tools and make it Standardized so that when
we took her art class we were able to make the exact same
sort of thing. It was, all in all, the most interesting art class
that I have ever attended.
An INFP musician likes to make up songs on the spot
to show off his improvisation skills, often including the
name of the petson to whom he addresses the song. The
most memorable parts of his songs happen when he does
something creative - one time, he changed the ending of a
word in a song to rhyme with someone's name, stretching
out that syllable and fading out and _ alternating
vocalizations of the rhyme with that of the original word,
and in doing so he found new Applications for both the
word (as a rhyme) and his vocalizations (using fading
alternations). It made a huge impression on me because it
sounded so good, and contrasted with his typical use of
uniformity and Standardization of themes and ideas (such
as normal rhyming and singing) that was probably the
reason for the original adjustment.
69
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Dispositions
Only Relationships Rated 13 and 11 share the
Disposition, which mirrors Mentality Loops in each Field
as determined by Reaction Preference.
Patterned
Curious—Resolute: A lack of attachments may precede
a divergence of commitments.
Resolute—Serious: A divergence of commitments may
result in important enterprises.
Serious—Reasonable: Important enterprises may
require alternative support.
Reasonable—Curious: Alternative support may lead to
aa lack of attachments.
Conceptual
Curious—Reasonable: Pleasant experiences may
produce unorthodox ideas.
Reasonable—Serious: Unorthodox ideas may garner a
powerful response.
Serious—Resolute: A powerful response may involve
certain stipulations.
Resolute—Curious: Certain stipulations may bring
pleasant experiences.
Roles
Patterned Extraverts are Contextual because they look
at how people live; they are known as Investigators.
Conceptual Introverts ate Contextual because they
consider relevant forms of control in a niche; they are
known as Engineers.
Patterned Introverts are Axiomatic because they look at
70
Introduction to Cognietrics
the emergence of complex phenomena; they are known as
Scientists.
Conceptual Extraverts are Axiomatic because they use
easily-understood methods; they are known as Guides.
Contextual Types consider a situation and the history
that brought it about to be unique, with a goal of accuracy.
Axiomatic Types use universal laws and principles, with
a goal of precision.
*Scientists will chart correlations (Patterned), which
may be used in a Visionary rather than Scholarly
(Theoretical) way, but Theorists require a functional design
(Conceptual), which may be Contextual rather than
Axiomatic (the realm of Science).
Expression
Cognietrics makes certain predictions about how two
Types will Express themselves extravertedly given
agreement or disagreement. It is obvious that among
Axiomatic Types, NTJs and NFPs Express themselves
differently from each other. If common iNtuition is
considered, it is obvious that the NTJ can make the idea
seem more communicable by using Thought, but if
common Seriousness is considered, it is obvious that the
NFP can make the idea seem more communicable by
using Reason. Because of this, each Type will often
disagree using the Reaction Demeanor and agree using the
Contemplation Demeanor. As such, agreement is
subconscious and so mostly Experimental to the
Extravert, as disagreement is for the Introvert. With time,
agreement becomes a powerful influence and tool for the
Extravert and disagreement becomes so for the Introvert,
allowing Extraverts to build close communities while
71
Alon Oscar Deutsch
maintaining power Referentially and Introverts to develop
unique projects while maintaining receptivity Referentially.
Contextual Expressiveness by Value
NTP>NFJ Reason beats Curiousness due to
usefulness.
NFJ>SFP Curiousness beats Resoluteness due to
desirability.
SFP>ST] Resoluteness beats Seriousness due to ability
to commit.
STJ>NTP Seriousness beats Reason due _ to
impottance.
Contextual Expressiveness by Preference
NTP>STJ iNtuition beats Thought due to
unfamiliarity.
STJ>SFP Thought beats Sensation due to
conditionality.
SFP>NF]J Sensation beats Feeling due to form.
NFJ>NTP Feeling beats iNtuition due to exclusivity.
Axiomatic Expressiveness by Value
NTJ>STP Seriousness beats Resoluteness due to
complications.
STP>SF] Resoluteness beats Curiousness due to faith.
SFJ>NFP Curiousness beats Reason due to focus.
NFP>NTJ Reason’ beats Seriousness due to
possibilities.
Axiomatic Expressiveness by Preference
NTJ>NFP Thought beats iNtuition due to constraints.
NFP>SF] iNtuition beats Feeling due to uncertainty.
SFJ>STP Feeling beats Sensation due to direction.
STP>NTJ Sensation beats Thought due to realism.
72
CHAPTER FIVE
Natures
Types with a Reasonable Referential Function or a
Resolute Responsible Function are known as Associatets;
they have extremely detailed ideas.
Types with a Resolute Referential Function or a
Reasonable Responsible Function are known as Observers;
they never lose sight of the "Big Picture".
Characters
Types with a Curious Referential Function or a Serious
Responsible Function are known as Reformers; they work
from the bottom up for a justified cause.
Types with a Serious Referential Function or a Curious
Responsible Function are known as Administrators; they
work from the top down for maximum efficiency.
73
Alon Oscar Deutsch
*Some say that the "Big Picture" is top down and the
details are bottom up, however Quantum Theory has no
"Big Picture" in the form of a coherent and accepted
interpretation, though it is described from the top down
using systematic controls; "Social Justice Warriors” work
from the bottom of the social ladder up, but are rarely
concerned with anything but the "Big Picture" - this may
involve a policy that is hard to implement consistently.
Inferences
Referential sensing and Responsible intuiting lead to
Induction.
Referential intuiting and Responsible sensing lead to
Deduction.
When you Induct you consolidate many Sensations and
determine what you may actually iNtuit as a result. When
you Deduce you consolidate many iNtuitions and
determine what you may actually Sense as a result.
Induction reaches an abstract conclusion about
multiple concrete categories using examples from those
categories, leaving nothing to the senses for verification; it
is used when making mental leaps.
Deduction teaches a concrete conclusion about
multiple abstract arguments based on its relationships to
those premises, leaving nothing to the imagination for
verification; it is used when constructing sound arguments.
Justifications
Referential thinking and Responsible feeling lead to
Knowledge.
74
Introduction to Cognietrics
Referential feeling and Responsible thinking lead to
Understanding.
When you define your Thoughts it is because you
Know, when you employ them it is because you
Understand.
When you define your Feelings it is because you
Understand, when you employ them it is because you
Know.
In this way, Thinkers progress from Knowing what
their Thoughts are to Understanding what their Thoughts
are, and Feelers progress from Understanding what their
Feelings are to Knowing what their Feelings are. In
addition, Knowing progresses from Thoughts to Feelings
and Understanding progresses from Feelings to Thoughts.
Knowledge deals with specific facts, whereas
Understanding deals with generalized comprehension.
Therefore,
in the end Thinking is when you Understand how to
make use of Knowledge, and Feeling is when you Know
how to make use of Understanding
and
Feeling uses the general to create the specific, and
Thinking uses the specific to create the general.
*This occurs because the third Function is already
somewhat accommodated along with the first Function
due to the sharing of the primary exertion.
Some teach incorrectly that Induction uses the specific
to create the general, as in "this A is B, therefore all A are
B", and that Deduction uses the general to create the
75
Alon Oscar Deutsch
specific, as in "all A are B, all B are C, therefore the next A
will be C". However, Induction can use the general to
create the specific, as in "all A have been B, therefore the
next A will be B", and Deduction can even use the general
to create the general, as in "all A are B, all B are C,
therefore all A are C".
Hence, in redefining these ideas, Cognietrics makes of
itself a sort of epistemological treatise.
The Philosophy of Personas
The Justification and Inference apply to the Personas.
Thesis and Priority require Induction for classification
and Knowledge for preventing inferiority.
Proof and Promotion require Deduction for
differentiation and Understanding for matching ideas.
Reseatch and Application require Deduction for
differentiation and Knowledge for preventing inferiority.
Adaptation and Standardization require Induction for
classification and Understanding for matching ideas.
Values
The Values ate based on Socionics, where they
correspond to the "Quadra Values". They are called
Curious, Serious, Reasonable, and Resolute. They are
called the Values here because they are sought in an ideal
partner (Relationships where both Values ate shared are
highly Rated at 10-13, if neither Value is shared the Rating
is 0-3).
Each pair of Complementary Functions is assigned a
Value, and is always found in either the Positive or
Negative Attitudes.
76
Introduction to Cognietrics
The Resolute Functions, Scouting (extraverted sensing)
and Statistical (introverted intuiting), Complement each
other because it is easier to be showy if you know the
probability of what you’re showing. Resolute Types live
strictly by their choices, and seldom change their minds.
The Reasonable Functions, Counterfactual (extraverted
intuiting) and Optimizing (introverted sensing),
Complement each other because possibilities may not be
worthwhile if they are not practical. Reasonable Types will
often search for the best solution and will frequently
change their minds as they consider new ideas, they also
play devil’s advocate.
The Serious Functions, Strategic (extraverted thinking)
and Critical (introverted feeling), Complement each other
because to calculate success for a tactic you must know its
limits. Serious Types have a powerful connection to their
interests and strive to be productive.
The Curious Functions, Relating (extraverted feeling)
and /Etiological (introverted thinking), Complement each
other because it is easier to sympathize with people if you
know the causes of their behavior. Curious Types have fun
celebrating life and like to spread their mood contagiously.
Types that are Serious and Reasonable are known as
Counselors.
Types that are Curious and Resolute are known as
Advocates.
Types that are Serious and Resolute are known as
Skeptics.
Types that are Curious and Reasonable are known as
Negotiators.
You can't Negotiate with a Skeptic, and you can't give
Counsel to an Advocate.
77
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Some caution is advised — asking questions is not an
indicator of being Curious, as different situations will
necessitate different behaviors, but preferring to be around
Curious Types is. The same is true for acting Serious,
Resolute, or Reasonable.
Mindfulness and Preferences
Just because you are a certain Cognietrics Type it
doesn't mean that you shouldn't be Mindful of the other
Preferences.
You can be Mindful of Sensation by paying close
attention to things in your immediate environment.
You can be Mindful of iNtuition by imagining where
you plan to be in the next 5-10 years.
You can be Mindful of Thought by considering
whether there are contradictions in your beliefs and how
to deal with them.
You can be Mindful of Feeling by considering how to
support the things that are most important to you.
You can be Mindful of Judgment by following your
schedule and deadlines.
You can be Mindful of Perception by being aware of
the way you operate and the way the world works.
You can be Mindful of Extraversion by listening
carefully to what other people say and anticipating their
needs.
You can be Mindful of Introversion by taking the time
to relax and promote your own interests.
78
CHAPTER SIX
Traits
a - Exertion
b - Suggestion
c - Meaning
d - Reaction
1. a Exertion - Introverted or Extraverted
2. b Suggestion - iNtuiting or Sensing
3. c Meaning - Thinking or Feeling
4. d Reaction - Judger or Perceiver
5. ab Nature - Observer or Associater
6. ac Character - Reformer or Administrator
7. bd Bearing - Resolute or Reasonable
8. cd Outlook - Serious or Curious
9. ad Temperament - Inventor or Discoverer
10. be Manner - Classicist or Progressive
11. abe Field - Scholar or Visionary
12. bcd Role - Axiomatic or Contextual
13. abd Inference - Deductive or Inductive
14. acd Justification - Understanding or Knowing
15. abcd Mentality - Patterned or Conceptual
79
Alon Oscar Deutsch
*The opposite Trait is usually expressed only in order
to correct something. The Traits were inspired by Grigory
Reinin's work in Socionics. Though I do not use the same
language as him to describe the Traits, I believe that much
of our work is similar - for instance, his "Asking"
dichotomy refers to conditional dependency, as does my
Contextual Trait, and it is associated with the same Types
in both Socionics and Cognietrics. Fewer determining
letters indicates that the Trait is more directly distinguished
behaviorally. The Traits form an Abelian group if
opposing Traits are included, with respect to each other
and an identity element. Each Type shares exactly 7/15
Traits with any other Type (except, of course, the same
Type). I will demonstrate that if a Type is changed, then
the number of Traits that change with it is always 8, and
that it doesn't matter how many of the Preferences are
changed. If an even number of determining letters is
changed, then the determined Trait stays the same, but if
an odd number is changed, then the determined Trait
changes as well. Because of the symmetry existing among
the Preferences in determining the different Traits (which
represent every combination of Preferences), the number
of Traits that change for a change in one determining letter
still holds if another determining letter is changed instead.
Also, 16 Types divided by 2 3 times independently implies
a total of 7 Traits.
# changing letters: unchanging traits / changing traits
a: b cd bc bd cd bcd / a ab ac ad abc abd acd abcd
ab: c d ab cd abc abd abcd / a b ac ad be bd acd bed
abe: d ab ac bc abd acd bed / abc ad bd cd abc abcd
abcd: ab ac ad be bd cd abcd / abc d abc abd acd bcd
Trait Determination Triads
Here is yet another way to determine Cognietrics Types
using Trait Determination Triads (IDTs), since any two
Traits imply a third:
80
Introduction to Cognietrics
Patterned, iNtuiting, Understanding - this Type
extrapolates data to untested regions.
INT] ENTP INFP ENF]
Patterned, Sensing, Knowing - this Type picks up on
things very easily.
EST] ISTP ESFP ISF]
Conceptual, iNtuiting, Knowing - this Type can
identify potential effects using a model.
ENT] INTP ENFP INFJ
Conceptual, Sensing, Understanding - this Type can
confirm utility in different situations.
IST] ESTP ISFP ESF]
Patterned, Thinking, Deductive - this Type checks the
extent of tendencies with logic.
INT] ENTP ESTJ ISTP
Patterned, Feeling, Inductive - this Type
accommodates recurring notions with an _ inclusive
emotional response.
INFP ENF] ESFP ISFJ
Conceptual, Thinking, Inductive - this Type assesses
performance using combined attributes.
INTP ENT] ESTP IST]
Conceptual, Feeling, Deductive - this Type chooses a
suitable significance in accordance with the limits of
expectations.
INF] ENFP ESF] ISFP
81
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Patterned, Introverted, Axiomatic - this Type (Scientist)
looks at the emergence of complex phenomena.
INT] ISF] ISTP INFP
Patterned, Extraverted, Contextual - this Type
(Investigator) looks at how people live.
ENTP ESFP EST] ENFJ
Conceptual, Introverted, Contextual - this Type
(Engineer) considers relevant forms of control in a niche.
INTP ISFP IST] INF]
Conceptual, Extraverted, Axiomatic - this Type (Guide)
uses easily-understood methods.
ENT] ESF] ESTP ENFP
Patterned, Judger, Scholar - this Type (Expert)
determines what patterns mean collectively and responds.
INT] EST] ISF] ENF]
Patterned, Perceiver, Visionary - this Type (Prospector)
mines data and seeks rewards.
ESFP INFP ENTP ISTP
Conceptual, Judger, Visionary - this Type (Philosopher)
chooses methods suitable for accomplishing a goal.
ESF] INFJ ENT] ISTJ
Conceptual, Perceiver, Scholar - this Type (Theorist)
simulates realities and responds accordingly.
INTP ESTP ISFP ENFP
82
Introduction to Cognietrics
Patterned, Classicist, Inventor - this Type supports
established purposes.
INT] ESFP ISF] ENTP
Patterned, Progressive, Discoverer - this Type uses
conjectural insights.
EST] INFP ENF] ISTP
Conceptual, Classicist, Discoverer - this Type uses
established insights.
INTP ESF] ISFP ENT]
Conceptual, Progressive, Inventor - this Type supports
conjectural purposes.
ESTP INF] ENFP IST]
Patterned, Serious, Observer - this Type looks for
possible indicators.
INT] ESFP EST] INFP
Patterned, Curious, Associater - this Type looks for
similarities.
ENTP ISF] ENF] ISTP
Conceptual, Serious, Associater - this Type is very
open-minded.
IST] ENFP ENT] ISFP
Conceptual, Curious, Observer - this Type collects
unique methods for later use.
ESTP INF] ESF] INTP
83
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Patterned, Resolute, Reformer - this Type endorses an
action based on the accumulation of seemingly
insignificant tendencies.
INT] ESFP ISTP ENF]
Patterned, Reasonable, Administrator - this Type wants
to maximize returns.
EST] INFP ENTP ISF]
Conceptual, Resolute, Administrator - this Type sticks
to certain criteria.
ESTP INF] ENT] ISFP
Conceptual, Reasonable, Reformer - this Type wants to
replace underperforming components.
INTP ESF] IST] ENFP
Understanding, Deductive, Classicist - this Type tries to
get a solid impression of things as they are.
INT] ISFP ENTP ESF]
Understanding, Inductive, Progressive - this Type
documents information for an overall assessment.
IST] INFP ESTP ENF]
Knowing, Deductive, Progressive - this Type realizes
where direct involvement is absolutely necessary.
ISTP INF] EST] ENFP
Knowing, Inductive, Classicist - this Type invests
according to local history.
INTP ISF] ENTJ ESFP
84
Introduction to Cognietrics
Understanding, Axiomatic, Observer - this Type tries
to see a situation with respect to fundamental laws.
INT] ESTP INFP ESF]
Understanding, Contextual, Associater - this Type
looks for hidden significance.
IST] ENTP ISFP ENF]
Knowing, Axiomatic, Associater - this Type sees how
to apply the rules to every situation.
ISTP ENT] ISFJ ENFP
Knowing, Contextual, Observer - this Type is hard to
dissuade.
INTP EST] INF] ESFP
Understanding, Scholar, Resolute - this Type wants to
answer questions.
INT] ESTP ENF] ISFP
Understanding, Visionary, Reasonable - this Type
wants to reconcile disparate entities.
ENTP ESF] IST] INFP
Knowing, Scholar, Reasonable - this Type tries to be
wise above all else.
EST] ENFP INTP ISF]
Knowing, Visionary, Resolute - this Type does not let a
goal out of sight.
ISTP INF] ENT] ESFP
85
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Understanding, Thinking, Inventor - this Type tries
every possibility.
INT] IST] ENTP ESTP
Understanding, Feeling, Discoverer - this Type tries to
get a feel for things.
ESF] ENF] ISFP INFP
Knowing, Thinking, Discoverer - this Type searches
for discrepancies.
INTP ISTP ENT] EST]
Knowing, Feeling, Inventor - this Type rearranges ideas
to encourage different aspects.
ESFP ENFP ISFJ INF]
Understanding, Introverted, Serious - this Type has an
interest in something.
INT] IST] INFP ISFP
Understanding, Extraverted, Curious - this Type is
ready for anything.
ESF] ENF] ESTP ENTP
Knowing, Introverted, Curious - this Type is intrigued
about a situation.
INTP ISTP INF] ISF]
Knowing, Extraverted, Serious - this Type cares about
the well-being of others.
ESFP ENFP EST] ENT]
86
Introduction to Cognietrics
Understanding, Judger, Reformer - this Type looks for
new ways to take action.
INT] IST] ESF] ENF]
Understanding, Perceiver, Administrator - this Type
wants all of the information before taking action.
ENTP ESTP ISFP INFP
Knowing, Judger, Administrator - this Type takes
action as soon as wattanted.
ENT] EST] ISF] INF]
Knowing, Perceiver, Reformer - this Type considers
the ideal method for taking action.
INTP ISTP ESFP ENFP
Deductive, Axiomatic, Reformer - this Type wants to
find out how the use of principles can help.
INT] ENFP ESF] ISTP
Deductive, Contextual, Administrator - this Type tries
to visualize how a situation can accommodate the group in
the long term.
INF] ENTP EST] ISFP
Inductive, Axiomatic, Administrator - this Type makes
sure a group complies with every accepted standard.
ESTP ISF] INFP ENT]
Inductive, Contextual, Reformer - this Type tries to
give a unique situation what it needs as a whole.
ESFP IST] INTP ENF]
87
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Deductive, Scholar, Serious - this Type does not want
to face typical repercussions.
INT] ENFP ISFP EST]
Deductive, Visionary, Curious - this Type makes
detached assessments.
INF] ENTP ISTP ESF]
Inductive, Scholar, Curious - this Type likes to learn as
much as possible.
INTP ENF] ISF] ESTP
Inductive, Visionary, Serious - this Type has an all-
encompassing plan.
INFP ENT] IST] ESFP
Deductive, iNtuiting, Inventor - this Type sees how to
do things that were never done before.
INT] INFJ ENTP ENFP
Deductive, Sensing, Discoverer - this Type is always
trying to capitalize on what's available.
ISTP ISFP EST] ESF]
Inductive, iNtuiting, Discoverer - this Type wants to
realize how everything affects everything else.
INTP INFP ENT] ENF]
Inductive, Sensing, Inventor - this Type combines
unique approaches to solve problems in a new way.
IST] ISF] ESTP ESFP
88
Introduction to Cognietrics
Deductive, Introverted, Resolute - this Type comes to
its own conclusions.
INT] INF] ISTP ISFP
Deductive, Extraverted, Reasonable - this Type wants
to improve the quality of life for everyone.
ESTJ ESF] ENTP ENFP
Inductive, Introverted, Reasonable - this Type is even-
handed when dealing with complicated situations.
INTP INFP IST] ISFJ
Inductive, Extraverted, Resolute - this Type anticipates
dominant effects.
ESTP ESFP ENT] ENF]
Deductive, Judger, Observer - this Type tries to stay a
few steps ahead, accommodating unforeseen
citcumstanices.
INT] INF} EST] ESF]
Deductive, Percetver, Associater - this Type looks for
ways that results could go astray.
ENTP ENFP ISTP ISFP
Inductive, Judger, Associater - this Type wonders how
the main process will be affected by outside influences.
ENT] ENFJ IST] ISFJ
Inductive, Perceiver, Observer - this Type wants to
anticipate the systems that contribute to the main process.
INTP INFP ESTP ESFP
89
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Axiomatic, Scholar, Inventor - this Type tries a
functional design based on principles.
INT] ISF] ESTP ENFP
Axiomatic, Visionary, Discoverer - this Type wants to
see for themselves.
ENT] ESF] ISTP INFP
Contextual, Scholar, Discoverer - this Type focuses on
a specialization.
INTP ISFP EST] ENF]
Contextual, Visionary, Inventor - this Type wants to
provide hope.
ENTP ESFP ISTJ INFJ
Axiomatic, Judger, Classicist - this Type prefers to excel
in areas that have been thoroughly studied.
INTJ ENT] ISF] ESF]
Axiomatic, Perceiver, Progressive - this Type wants to
find loopholes.
ISTP ESTP INFP ENFP
Contextual, Judger, Progressive - this Type is aware
that time can be limited.
IST] EST] INF] ENF]
Contextual, Perceiver, Classicist - this Type hesitates to
disrupt a natural balance.
INTP ENTP ISFP ESFP
90
Introduction to Cognietrics
Axiomatic, iNtuiting, Serious - this Type wants
predictability.
INT] ENT] INFP ENFP
Axiomatic, Sensing, Curious - this Type characterizes
everything.
ISTP ESTP ISF] ESF]
Contextual, iNtuiting, Curious - this Type has a
response for everything.
INTP ENTP INF] ENF]
Contextual, Sensing, Serious - this Type is very careful.
IST] EST] ISFP ESFP
Axiomatic, Thinking, Resolute - this Type is certain of
its principles.
INT] ENT] ISTP ESTP
Axiomatic, Feeling, Reasonable - this Type believes
that there is a time and a place for everything.
INFP ENFP ISFJ ESF]
Contextual, Thinking, Reasonable - this Type is very
considerate.
INTP ENTP IST] ESTJ
Contextual, Feeling, Resolute - this Type will not give
up easily.
INF] ENF] ISFP ESFP
91
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Scholar, Introverted, Classicist - this Type has a deep
connection to the past.
INT] ISFP INTP ISF]
Scholar, Extraverted, Progressive - this Type wants to
spread ideas.
EST] ENFP ESTP ENF]
Visionary, Introverted, Progressive - this Type wants a
revolution.
IST) INFP ISTP INFJ
Visionary, Extraverted, Classicist - this Type wants to
spread values.
ENT] ESFP ENTP ESF]
Scholar, iNtuiting, Reformer - this Type likes to
second-guess.
INT] INTP ENF] ENFP
Scholar, Sensing, Administrator - this Type maintains
an awareness of everything.
ISF] ISFP EST] ESTP
Visionary, iNtuiting, Administrator - this Type looks
for a straightforward path.
INF] INFP ENT] ENTP
Visionary, Sensing, Reformer - this Type sees what can
be improved.
IST] ISTP ESF] ESFP
92
Introduction to Cognietrics
Scholar, Thinking, Observer - this Type considers how
lessons apply to real situations.
INT] INTP EST] ESTP
Scholar, Feeling, Associater - this Type remembers
emotions concerning its many past projects in order to
help others in the future.
ISF] ISFP ENFJ ENFP
Visionary, Thinking, Associater - this Type looks for
the most effective ways to do things.
IST] ISTP ENT] ENTP
Visionary, Feeling, Observer - this Type wants what is
best for something.
INF] INFP ESF] ESFP
Classicist, Serious, Resolute - this Type (Skeptic) relies
on experience.
INT] ENT] ISFP ESFP
Classicist, Curious, Reasonable - this Type (Negotiator)
wants to make the best of a cutrent situation.
INTP ENTP ISF] ESF]
Progressive, Serious, Reasonable - this Type
(Counselor) wants to see what else is out there.
IST] EST] INFP ENFP
Progressive, Curious, Resolute - this Type (Advocate)
has strong beliefs concerning how things should be.
ISTP ESTP INF] ENF]
93
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Classicist, Reformer, Observer - this Type wants to
overhaul operations.
INT] INTP ESF] ESFP
Classicist, Administrator, Associater - this Type tries to
reinforce a position.
ENT] ENTP ISF] ISFP
Progressive, Reformer, Associater - this Type wants to
try new things.
IST] ISTP ENF] ENFP
Progressive, Administrator, Observer - this Type wants
to benefit from all previous trials.
ESTJ ESTP INF] INFP
Classicist, Thinking, iNtuiting - this Type (Analyst)
wants to see how events can be connected.
INT] ENT] INTP ENTP
Classicist, Feeling, Sensing - this Type (Guardian)
wants to preserve precious items and ideas.
ISF] ESF] ISFP ESFP
Progressive, Thinking, Sensing - this Type (Inspector)
wants to make sure that quality is always what it should be.
IST] EST] ISTP ESTP
Progressive, Feeling, iNtuiting - this Type (Idealist)
wants to improve the state of the world.
INF] ENF] INFP ENFP
94
Introduction to Cognietrics
Inventor, Serious, Reformer - this Type wants to find
ways to address flaws.
INT] ESFP IST] ENFP
Inventor, Curious, Administrator - this Type provides
competitive incentives.
ENTP ISF] ESTP INF]
Discoverer, Serious, Administrator - this Type wants
absolute control.
ENT] ISFP EST] INFP
Discoverer, Curious, Reformer - this Type believes that
there is always room for improvement.
INTP ESF] ISTP ENF]
Inventor, Resolute, Observer - this Type wants to make
the best use of available resources.
INT] ESFP INF] ESTP
Inventor, Reasonable, Associater - this Type finds
other ways of doing things.
ENTP ISFJ ENFP ISTJ
Discoverer, Resolute, Associater - this Type is very
thorough in its work.
ENT] ISFP ENF] ISTP
Discoverer, Reasonable, Observer - this Type keeps an
eye out for better possibilities.
INTP ESF] INFP EST]
95
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Inventor, Introverted, Judger - this Type (Evaluator)
combines a few key points to interpret holistically.
INT] ISTJ INF) ISFJ
Inventor, Extraverted, Perceiver - this Type (Explorer)
tests its mental faculties in novel situations.
ENTP ESTP ENFP ESFP
Discoverer, Introverted, Perceiver - this Type
(Reflector) sees an idea from every angle individually to
preserve the purity of each impression.
INTP ISTP INFP ISFP
Discoverer, Extraverted, Judger - this Type (Persuader)
wants people to see things from its point of view.
ENT] EST] ENF] ESF]
Serious, Judger, Thinking - this Type (Strategic) realizes
effects and resulting implications for direct systemization
and encourages a state of prosperity.
INT] ENT] ISTJ EST]
Serious, Perceiver, Feeling - this Type (Critical) has
strong opinions and weighs different options to represent
exclusive bonds.
INFP ENFP ISFP ESFP
Curious, Judger, Feeling - this Type (Relating)
determines emotional states, shares enthusiasm, and
endorses harmony.
INF] ENF] ISFJ ESF]
Curious, Perceiver, Thinking - this Type (Etiological)
finds causes using fundamental suppositions and identifies
feedback loops.
INTP ENTP ISTP ESTP
96
Introduction to Cognietrics
Resolute, Judger, iNtuiting - this Type (Statistical) has
reliable expectations and considers the unknowable for
developing robust ideas.
INTJ ENT] INFJ ENFJ
Resolute, Perceiver, Sensing - this Type (Scouting) is
showy and tests limitations.
ISTP ESTP ISFP ESFP
Reasonable, Judger, Sensing - this Type (Optimizing)
monitors resources and concentrates on performance.
IST] EST] ISF] ESF]
Reasonable, Perceiver, iNtuiting - this Type
(Counterfactual) makes novel comparisons, brainstorms,
and envisions hypothetical change.
INTP ENTP INFP ENFP
Reformer, Introverted, Thinking - this Type is
concerned with the feasibility of improvements.
INT] INTP IST] ISTP
Reformer, Extraverted, Feeling - this Type wants to
address everyone's concerns.
ENF] ENFP ESF] ESFP
Administrator, Introverted, Feeling - this Type makes
tough decisions.
INF] INFP ISP] ISFP
Administrator, Extraverted, Thinking - this Type tries
to find a way to accommodate everyone.
ENT] ENTP EST] ESTP
97
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Observer, Introverted, iNtuiting - this Type comes up
with probable and possible expectations.
INT] INTP INF] INFP
Observer, Extraverted, Sensing - this Type looks for
signals.
EST] ESTP ESF] ESFP
Associater, Extraverted, iNtuiting - this Type tries to
make a project appealing.
ENTJ ENTP ENFJ ENFP
Associater, Introverted, Sensing - this Type
concentrates on what a project can use.
IST] ISTP ISF] ISFP
*Applications exist for the Cognietrics Traits even in
areas as diverse as physics: in Classical Mechanics, an
Axiomatic discipline, while supposed Knowledge is a
factor not directly correlated though partially Associated
with every system, due to David Hume's Problem of
Induction, only Understanding comes from continuous
Observation. However, as implied by the Copenhagen
Interpretation, in Quantum Mechanics the opposite is true:
Contextual information that is due to the dependence of
randomly Known Observables on the undocumented yet
Understood influence of the Associater prevents
Knowledge of the effects of the Association or continuous
Understanding of the Observables. Though some may
consider this to be a psychologism, I believe that the
definitions given by Cognietrics have real potential in
explaining the epistemological positions concerning the
scientific frontier, especially the documentation of a large
variety of human behaviors, because of their fundamental
versatility and interdependence. Interestingly, Carl Gustav
Jung had a close correspondence with Wolfgang Ernst
Pauli, one of the founding fathers of Quantum Mechanics.
98
Introduction to Cognietrics
Philosophical concepts derived from the Triads:
As Curious about Causes and Serious about Effects:
Causes become Conceptual Observations from
Associated Patterns. Effects become Conceptual
Associations from Observed Patterns. Observed Concepts
may prevent confounds, Associated Patterns may support
construct validity, Observed Patterns support statistical
significance, and Associated Concepts are useful for
showing covariance.
To be Counterfactual it must be deterministic, and that
something Statistical in nature is probabilistic:
It becomes obvious that Optimizing complements
determinism as a way of dealing with inevitability, whereas
Scouting is a search for a tiny probability of success in the
face of overwhelming odds. Probabilistic Sensors Perceive
because they are less sure what to notice while
deterministic Sensors may follow a formula. Deterministic
iNtuitives Percetve because they are working things out
whereas probabilistic iNtuitives are already aware of their
chances. The deterministic deals with the possible. The
probabilistic deals with the probable. There are
connections to the sciences. Decision-Making, or
Contextual Feeling, is the result of Bayesian Statistics, and
Cosmology, or Axiomatic Thought, is at best Frequentist
Statistics. Use of a deterministic equation with the
conditionality of a variable, which also requires Thought,
examines Chaos, where small initial deviations may result
in large effects. That universal truths may occur
deterministically may help one to Feel relative value about
things that display Complexity, the minimum information
required to document something, where an effect is only
due to a collective behavior of components which
suppresses other influences. As such, complex thoughts,
unless overly simplified with conscious logic, must actually
be felt in order to be considered significant, and chaotic
feelings must actually be thought as no significance is yet
attributed to them. Inductive Reasoning is subjective, or
99
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Introverted, and so hard to share because the process of
causation is concerned rather than a probabilistic class,
leading to a variation of infinitism as used in the
Miunchhausen Trilemma (the regressive argument, in
which each proof requires a further proof ad infinitum), as
well as the degree of Inductive relevance, and the
disagreement of proximate causes in the service of an
ultimate cause. Deduction based on probabilities likewise
concerns subjective elements and is hard to share. The
probabilities of Inductive classes can be easily shared with
a chart, and Deductive Reasoning likewise can be shown
to be a set of syllogisms. Classicists take probability
Seriously and determinism Curiously. Progressives take
determinism Seriously and probability Curiously.
Reformers assist Concepts deterministically and Patterns
statistically. Administrators check Concepts statistically
and Patterns deterministically.
Considering that Inventors use synthetic clauses and
Discoverers use analytic clauses:
Probabilistic Analysis, including average and standard
deviation for a distribution, represents details calculated
for Association, and so does Deterministic Synthesis.
Direct Observation of the “Big Picture” occurs as a result
of either Deterministic Analysis or Probabilistic Synthesis.
Deduction is synthetic iNtuition and analytic Sensation.
Induction is analytic iNtuition and synthetic Sensation.
Thinking is analytic Knowledge and _— synthetic
Understanding. Feeling is synthetic Knowledge and
analytic Understanding. Scholars use synthetic universals
and analytic conditionality. Visionaries use analytic
universals and synthetic conditionality.
As foundationalism is based on a form of Knowledge
and coherentism is based on a form of Understanding:
Foundations are ideas that are Conceptually iNtuitive,
however the scope of any associated Patterns must be
found in Practice and cannot be guessed. Coherence
allows Patterns to be iNtuited by relevant associations
100
Introduction to Cognietrics
though the Concepts in use must be Practical in order to
have a working model. Universal foundations must be
Associated due to their unique definitions, but when
consistent foundations are Observed it is always in an
incomplete Contextual manner due to Gédel’s Theorem,
however when universals are Observed or Contextual
information is Associated the goal is coherence.
Coherence proceeds from Deduction to Induction.
Foundations proceed ftom Induction to Deduction.
Invention proceeds from Patterns to Concepts. Discovery
proceeds from Concepts to Patterns. Reform proceeds
from Observation to Association. Administration proceeds
from Association to Observation. Thoughts turn Dreams
into Reality. Feelings bring Dreams about Reality. Reality
turns Feeling to Thought. Imagination turns Thought to
Feeling. This is different from Induction and Deduction,
which occur between Functions in the mind and not
groups of people. Discoverers have foundational logic and
emotional coherence. Inventors have foundational
emotions and logical coherence. Scholars deal in
deterministic foundations and probabilistic coherence.
Visionaries deal in probabilistic foundations and
deterministic coherence. Reformers are quicker to make
decisions based on coherence than on foundations.
Administrators are quicker to make decisions based on
foundations than on coherence.
Because imagination is built on prospective memories
iNtuited individually, and practicality on retrospective
memory Sensed as a whole, as Judgment negates memory
to deal with change in Thought, or lack thereof in Feeling:
This is why when you like someone you have a good
Feeling that doesn’t change and Thoughts that do as you
learn about the object of your affections. If you are
suddenly disappointed it is possible that you will Think
something negative that doesn’t change while your
previous Feelings do. Understanding makes the
unchanging change while Knowledge makes the changing
101
Alon Oscar Deutsch
stop. This is why Knowledge, which once justified has an
unchanging form, is easier to transfer and store than
Understanding. Similarly, Induction takes ideas from the
retrospective memory and applies them to the prospective
memory, for example, to come up with an example,
whereas Deduction takes ideas from the prospective
memory and applies them to the retrospective memory,
for example, to catch a lie. Retrospective Induction and
prospective Deduction are useful for Invention.
Retrospective Deduction and prospective Induction are
useful for Discovery. Unchanging Knowledge and
changing Understanding are useful for Invention.
Unchanging Understanding and changing Knowledge are
useful for Discovery. Patterns give retrospective
Knowledge and prospective Understanding. Concepts give
retrospective Understanding and prospective Knowledge.
Classicists use unchanging retrospection and changing
prospection. Progressives use unchanging prospection and
changing etrospection. Scholars use unchanging
Associations and changing Observations. Visionaries use
unchanging Observations and changing Associations.
Serious Types use prospective Axioms and retrospective
Contexts. Curious Types use retrospective Axioms and
prospective Contexts. Probabilistic Types use unchanging
Contexts and changing Axioms. Deterministic Types use
unchanging Axioms and changing Contexts.
Introverted changing, or transformation, and
Extraverted unchanging, or stagnation, are concerned with
Reform. Extraverted changing, or chaos, and Introverted
unchanging, or principle, are concerned with
Administration. Introverted prospection, or planning, and
Extraverted retrospection, or necessity, are concerned with
the "Big Picture". Introverted retrospection, or experience,
and Extraverted prospection, or reminding, are concerned
with details. Probabilistic Types are spurred to action by
prospective memory, or promise, rather than retrospective
memory, or hopelessness. Deterministic Types are spurred
102
Introduction to Cognietrics
to action by retrospective memory, or accountability,
rather than prospective memory, or inevitability. Curious
Types ate spurred to action by unchanging, or boredom,
rather than changing, or interest. Serious Types are spurred
to action by changing, or urgency, rather than unchanging,
or peace. Induction fits changing Concepts to an
unchanging Pattern. Deduction fits unchanging Concepts
to a changing Pattern. Every combination of letters
represents a Trait which can be logically combined with
two others. Ideas such as Concepts, Induction, and even
Change evolved together philosophically in groups of
convenience, such that the meaning of any one
simultaneously came to depend on the meaning of the
others. Change itself is Deduced from a Pattern or
Inducted Conceptually — red that is slightly purple in hue
may seem red, but is actually near the ultraviolet spectrum
because red cones are sensitive to violet light. The color
has Changed if you Deduce the difference from a Pattern
(by visual comparison) or Induct it Conceptually (by
wavelength increments), whereas something more stable
can be ultimately Deduced Conceptually (process of
elimination) or Inducted as a Pattern (representative
example). If a useful process doesn't fit a Triad it becomes
shaped by a different one in whatever way is most
pragmatic due to the validity of the mutually
interdependent definitions. Abstraction emerges from the
recognition of change, Knowledge emerges from the
recognition of lack of change, degree of change, and
change of functionality, and Concepts emerge ftom all 4.
The Personas ate useful for science, the Fields are useful
for problem solving, and the Dispositions describe
paradigm shifts. Science can't be Proven only disproven so
it is Conceptual whereas Math is not a Thesis so it is about
Patterns. You may Theorize about a relationship and
Prospect the implications but how something crosses a
threshold like Complexity or Causation can't be
determined solely from a Theory because there may be a
103
Alon Oscar Deutsch
third variable. Unchanging Determinism in an Axiom leads
to Complexity due to reinforcement. The minimum
amount of information to determine a system is its
complexity and Changing, Statistics, and Context require a
lot. Complexity is demonstrated when temperature
phonons increase to the threshold of cohesion release due
to Godel's Theorem having a complete complexity or a
consistent reinforcement. It also occurs when there are
enough electrons in a molecule to have a strong enough
response to an incident photon to release an electron.
Another example is a black hole having enough density to
trap light, as well as planets orbiting, nucleons binding, and
the formation of atoms after the Big Bang. Axiomatic
Causes can be Sensed and Axiomatic Effects can be
iNtuited. Contextual Causes must be iNtuited and
Contextual Effects must be Sensed to find out what has
occutred, Axiomatic Patterns and Contextual Concepts are
specific, whereas Axiomatic Concepts and Contextual
Patterns are general. To be sufficient means to address
Context due to possibility. To be necessary means to
address Axiom due to fundamentality. Knowledge of
Effects is Generalized as is Understanding of Causes.
Understanding of Effects is specific as is Knowledge of
Causes. You might wonder how many Patterns are
Associated with a Conceptual Observation, vice versa, and
the same with Effects. The degree of each collectively yield
a measute of certainty that something has been caused. A
Feynman diagram shows how many Associated Concepts
(particle interactions) are useful in Determining an
Observed Pattern (electrical charge). Associated Patterns
that cause it show that antimatter occurs around heavy
nuclei and the Conceptual Observation is shielding.
Reformation creates Entropy whereas Administration
creates Order, whereas Sense acts as inertia and iNtuition
setves as impulse. Inventors use Ordered Causes and
Disordered Effects. Discoverers use Disordered Causes
and Ordered Effects. Manufacturing is Generation for
104
Introduction to Cognietrics
Achievement and Operation is Achievement for
Generation. An example of Statistical Causality is the idea
that studying will usually improve a test score. Testing sets
the benchmark for Generation and Projects set the
benchmark for Achievement though both are useful.
Qualia helps when Theorized and Prospected, Quantity
helps with Expertise and Philosophy. Perhaps when we
Theorize about a physical entity we notice it as Qualia
whereas when we notice Expertise it is Quantity to us.
Discovery (forms/experiment) proceeds from Quantity
whereas Invention (particulars/hypothesis) proceeds from
Quality. When does an essence or relationship become like
and like or a mathematical analogy, when does an exact
number become the quality of longer or hotter? When
does a distribution become a shape? When does an
electron become a degree of mass, spin, and charge? How
do we separate such a Gestalt of interrelatedly unified
fundamental physical forces? Is such a thing Phenomena
ot Noumena or Psychophysics? In special relativity the
speed, a quantity, affects space and time, qualities, while
measured in space and time. In general relativity the
Pound-Rebka experiment shows that space and time are
affected by gravity which is measured by them. Because
Theory can be about Prospection, Causality progresses in
Problematic order, otherwise similar to a Problematic
Proof. Since distance and mass, quantities, create, from a
point of complexity, a black hole, a shift, bigger, to quality,
space and time, which measure in a like way gravity, and
countering gravity with an electric field does not affect
space and time, it is spacetime curvature that causes gravity
and also affects time dilation of the electromagnetic field,
which affects charge but not mass, and is how these forces
ate unified (decay rates aren't affected by spacetime
curvature) as predicted by Problematics, separating inertia,
affected by Heisenberg uncertainty, from gravitational
charge, using time dilation, making quantum mechanics
(having the same logic as gravitational redshift with spin
105,
Alon Oscar Deutsch
possibly having an alternate spacetime) and general
relativity two mutually exclusive but related systems.
Position and momentum, singular forms, past a point of
complexity, a bound orbital due to Coulombic attraction,
and so smaller, realize a relationship between uncertainties
in position and momentum, a generalizing particular,
which in a like way causes a wavefunction of probability at
each position, another singular form, which cannot itself
affect both position and momentum for which it already
accounts, so position and momentum cause a
wavefunction and aren’t trapped by it. Energy in a like way
causes mass (energy-mass equivalence) which causes in a
like way charge (atomic number) which in a like way causes
bonding (charge density). Since spacetime curvature causes
gravity and energy does not cause charge, mass does not
cause energy. Likewise photon mass does not cause
photon energy. Nonreciprocity in Problematics leads to
causation and the specificity such as And or Or is how the
Causes and Effects are defined in a way that demonstrates
Determinism. These types of ideas, especially which parts
are Invented (Quality) or Discovered (Quantity), are useful
for the Four Color Map Theorem, knot theory, chaos
theory as relevant to a double pendulum and other defined
systems, mass-energy conservation, elementary particle
physics, fluid mechanics, and materials engineering. In a
determinism of Chaos such as a double pendulum,
conserved Expertise ultimately helps with a Philosophy of
prediction as limited by negative feedback in a modeled
Theory and causally from an arbitrary Prospecting.
Prospects are Achieved and Theories are Generated
conserving order Problematically in Nootypology and
because of this mutations are tested while expression of
proteins can overcome a challenge; both are controlled
with methylation. Needs and usefulness are Quantified and
Discovered. Another example of — Discretional
Problematics is Calculus. An infinitesimal turns a quantity
into a qualitative dimension that may be compounded or
106
Introduction to Cognietrics
compared with, and below or above an arbitrary limit of,
another dimension in a particular exact way. Meaning
skepticism and ideational interdependence are invented for
better definition. Feasibility and fundamentality are
discovered. In Problematic Time, Causality shows how it
was and is the past, Chaos shows what can be and is the
present, and Proof shows what must be and is the future.
Coulombic attraction causing manipulated position and
momentum which are conserved in a way that satisfies
Heisenberg uncertainty results in the proof of the
existence of the wavefunction. If inputs cause targeted
mutation, and ultimate causes are conserved, evolutionary
jumps arte proven. Partially conserved forms whose
opposing causes have been elucidated until allowing proof
of a new attribute may reveal what is hidden by a point of
complexity in a theoretical relationship. There is not as of
yet negative feedback due to logic past a point of
complexity for a Temporally Complex behavior in
quantum field theory, so there is not yet mechanically
caused action. Since spacetime curvature is due to mass
and causes negative feedback of time into space as in
gravitational waves, partially conserved forms of inertial
and gravitational motion caused by opposition of
electromagnetic and relativistic interactions result in a time
dilation of motion, a directly mechanical activity.
Universals are complete and not consistent due to being
forms like the stress-strain curve and Planck Time. Since a
syllogism is a relation based on the mutual deduction of
consistent propositions, it can be expressed in terms of
processes collected in 3 Triads (Concept qua Triad).
Contextual-Knowledge-Observer implies consistency
(what something does). Deduction-Inventor-iNtuiting
implies applicability (what can be done). Theory, an
arbitrary relation in Qualitative Problematics, is derived
from Conceptual-Scholar-Perceiver which implies
discretion (what should happen). A demonstration of a
Proof of a Proof (Pythagorean Theorem) is as follows.
107
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Expertise is that a, b, and c seem related. Theory is that a
and b make the sides of the largest square in both parts
and which hence are the same area. Prospection shows
that from a point of Complexity for both a and b making
the sides of 2 smaller squares c makes the sides of a larger
square. Philosophy shows that the relation holds for all
right triangles. Fundamentality shows consistency,
meaning skepticism and ideational interdependence show
applicability, and feasibility shows discretion. The
implication of change in the universe is what a proof must
ovetcome and the implication of lack of change in the
univetse is what a proof must achieve; Expertise and
Philosophy rely on the degree of change whereas Theory
and Prospecting rely on changed functionality. Problematic
Causality is not always falsifiable. Consider the group i j k -
i - j -k e with the operation x. If Expertise shows these
elements are related and Theory shows the group is not
Abelian, Prospection shows a negative sign giving the
inverse element gives the same result as switching
associative order. Philosophy gives an exact result. Since
these two inputs ate interchangeable and cannot be
distinguished using Problematics, there is no way to verify
which has occurred. Conceptual Observations may be
useful but cannot dispute possible confounds. Math is thus
unified logically in the style of Frege. It is obvious from
these math examples that a type of math is really a
different type of relationship between Expertise, Theory,
Prospection, and Philosophy. What if physical phenomena
are something similar? The more you use energy the less it
can be Prospected due to conservation though the
opposite is true for a field. These separated concepts are
based on these relationships which are how and what we
know of reality. Logic is discovered about a quality because
the steps of a proof conserve between changing forms.
Math is invented about a quantity because of the relevance
of relationships.
108
Introduction to Cognietrics
AI text generator (GPT2) on Cognietrics: However, my
hypothesis is that there ate some aspects of this
phenomenon that can be interpreted in any particular way.
My conclusion is that this theory could be considered an
axiom or a fact in itself. If it is correct, this theory is
coftect in so many ways that it could have a different
meaning or interpretation. There are two ways of looking
at this topic: the first is that this topic is not reducible to
the ordering of words in a context, the second way is to
look at some very simple, logical cases that seem to make
sense, but they are not reducible to each other. *A text
analyzer (uClassify) determined this writing to be INT).
109
CHAPTER SEVEN
Relationships
The Relationship Ratings used in Cognietrics Poker are
mainly based on the Relationships described by Socionics.
However, I think it is more useful to Rate the
Relationships, rather than describe them, because every
Relationship is a little different. Even though two people
share a Jungian Cognitive Function, they may use it a little
differently, which means that it would be hard to guess
their behaviors well enough to describe their Relationship
in real life. However, the use of Positive Functions is a
good predictor of a Positive Relationship. There is more to
a person than just personality, so the Relationship Rating
should not be the deciding factor in the Relationship,
though Relationships Rated 13 do encourage beneficial
things like personal growth for both partners. Low-Rated
Relationships may work better for some; they also tend to
be really interesting and show that both partners can be
open to different Values. Partners with opposite Values
also make versatile teams due to their diversity. These
Relationships are not any less likely to last because of their
low Rating - my grandparents have been married for 55
110
Introduction to Cognietrics
years and represent the union of a Skeptic with a
Negotiator! The following list contains the Relationship
Rating for each Cognietrics Relationship, with the highest
number indicating the most favorable Relationship:
Hopeful, Experimental) - 13
(Experimental, Hopeful) - 12
(Referential, Responsible) - 11
(Responsible, Referential) - 10
Hopeful, Aggressive) - 9
(Referential, Rebellious) - 8
(Depressive, Experimental) - 7
Avoidant, Responsible) - 6
Ageressive, Hopeful) - 5
(Experimental, Depressive) - 5
(Rebellious, Referential) - 4
(Responsible, Avoidant) - 4
(Depressive, Aggressive) - 3
Ageressive, Depressive) - 2
Avoidant, Rebellious) - 1
(Rebellious, Avoidant) — 0
111
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Game
You might enjoy a card game I invented some time ago
called Cognietrics Poker.
There are 48 cards, 3 of each personality type. The deck
is shuffled. Initial bets are placed. There are 2 cards dealt
face-down to each person, and 1 card placed face-up in the
center of the table. The total point value of each hand is
determined by the relationship between the personality
types on the cards in the hand, and the relationships of
those personality types to the personality type on the card
in the center of the table. Bets are placed again. Then, 1
catd from each hand may be traded for 1 new card drawn
from the deck. After, bets are placed one last time. The
hands are shown. Whoever had the hand with the largest
total point value wins. If multiple players have winning
hands of equal total point value, then the pot is split
between them.
*The Relationship Ratings for each Type can be found
in the Type Profiles.
112
CHAPTER EIGHT
Nootypology
Until now this book has been a treatment of
Cognietrics, a theory of mine that pertains to the
implications of the four-letter Jungian codes for each
Type. This chapter will address the Types with increased
detail. Specifically, this chapter is about the psychological
development to a more generalized mindset called the
Nootype.
There is of course a philosophy of science to which
Karl Popper made notable contributions, but is there a
science of philosophy? Cognietrics uses Jungian
psychological concepts to explain fundamental
epistemological positions. However, while many
philosophical points arise from Cognietrics, as it addresses
Myers-Briges typology it also shows the limitations.
Though the four letters are behavioral expressions
compatible with a certain combination of more complex
philosophical Traits, the Triads themselves, from which
the Preference definitions are in fact derivative, are
Abelian subgroups and so have no purposeful direction,
113
Alon Oscar Deutsch
and even then ultimately just serve as philosophical
evolutionaty niches and groupings of convenience
arranged to minimize complex operations and increase
utility; however, the Nootypological Function Order has
direction in time, and the Nootypological Functions
themselves are also not niches, because they are binary
opposites. At the end of Chapter 6 I mentioned some
interesting points about the philosophical implications of
the Triads to show that Cognietrics also has value and that
Nootypology is more of an extension of Cognietrics,
rather than a replacement. In fact, the Cognietric Types,
once considered obsolete by the maturing mind (which
now avoids Triad niche distractions by utilizing the traits
of organization and leadership), become more useful as
tools.
Short Nootypological Preferences Test
1. Are your accomplishments more a) competitive or b)
creative
2. Are your interests more a) practical or b)
imaginative?
3. Are your decisions more a) emotional or b) logical?
4, Are you more a) flexible or b) rigid in your beliefs?
5. Are your projects a) focused individually or b)
influenced with connections?
6. Are your solutions a) invented, b) discovered, or c)
diversified?
7. Is your energy attained while a) alone, b) with
friends, or c) in the service of a public cause?
114
Introduction to Cognietrics
Answet Key:
1. a) Achieving b) Generating
2.
iS)
Sensing b) Dreaming
3. a) Feeling b) Thinking
4. a) Realizing b) Challenging
5. a) Maximizing b) Bridging
i
iS)
Perceiving b) Judging c) Organizing
7. a) Introvert b) Extravert c) Leader
Therefore someone who answered every question with
the first option would be an Achieving Sensing Feeling
Realizing Maximizing Perceiving Introvert, or an
ASFRMPI.
As you can tell, the answer to #6 does not deal with
the Reaction Demeanor because Nootype Functions are
more complex. I have also dispensed with "N" for
iNtuiting because I believe that with all of the extra letters
it might be confusing. I have replaced it with "D" for
Dreaming.
It would not be incorrect for a GDFCBJE who feels
very strongly about C to write the letters in some other
order such as CJEBFDG, and in fact I would encourage
others to do this so that future analysis may be provided
for what it means to have a letter towards the beginning or
end. There are 7! Subtype orders for each of the 288
Nootypes, or 1,451,520 Subtypes total. I think that the
general case, such as for example “O, J, or P towards the
115
Alon Oscar Deutsch
beginning”, would also be fascinating. I, personally, am an
AFROSML; in addition, having T first does not mean that
I have a Thinking Function as my first Nootypological
Function, or Catalyst; it means that I use T a lot regardless
of which Functions I use or what purpose they serve. It is
for this same reason that an INTP may have a higher N
score than a T score while having Ti as a Referential
Function, as is so with any Nootype and its Functions, and
partially because self-awareness is a problem, such that
Cognietrics and Nootypology remain largely philosophical
studies rather than psychological ones, as they seek to
explain the mind with fundamental logic rather than
circumstantial evidence. I will use the standard order of
letters for Nootypes in this book, however, to prevent
confusion.
Leaders get energy from the public, and don’t
accommodate their self or others the way Introverts and
Extraverts do.
Organizers do not necessarily judge or perceive as they
work.
An example to illustrate the two Organizers is as
follows: A Generator might be the first runner, perhaps
seeing value where others do not, whereas an Achiever
would be the fastest runner, and would want social status.
C and R determine the Main Function Order. B and M
determine the Main Function Temperaments.
116
Introduction to Cognietrics
Bridging - combining different ideas.
BL-lei
BE -eil
BI -ile
e—i - encouraging diversity.
i] - volunteering contributions.
le - networking extensively.
Maximizing - amplifying unique potential.
MI -iel
ME -eli
ML -lie
ie - encouraging strengths.
el - monitoring continuously.
1-1 - providing feedback.
Challenging - having rigid beliefs.
CJ-jpo
CP -poj
CO-o7 5
jp - accumulating evidence.
p—o - encouraging regularity.
o—} - correcting problems.
Realizing - having flexible beliefs.
RO-op]
RP-pjo
RJ-jop
pj - assessing conditions.
jo - adjusting situationally.
o—p - noticing change.
A GDTRBPI has Main Functions Di Tl Ge.
117
Alon Oscar Deutsch
In addition to the Cognietric Functions, there are 10
additional Nootype Functions for increased interactions.
Gi Designing
Ai Measuring
Ge Solving
Ae Inspiring
Fl Balancing
Tl Developing
SI Coordinating
DI Preparing
Gl Supporting
Al Advising
For Main Functions Az Cy Ex where A complements
B, C complements D, and E complements F, the Order is:
Az Cy Ex Main
Fx Dy Bz Auxiliary
Cz Ey Ax Optimistic Desire
Bx Fy Dz Pessimistic Desire
Ez Ay Cx Optimistic Necessity
Dx By Fz Pessimistic Necessity
First Column - Catalyst (Past)
Second Column - Method (Present)
Third Column - Goal (Future)
Cognietric Types socialize with the Reaction Function.
As babies are heavily reliant on adults and ate not yet
independent, it is the extraverted Function that is formed
first. The Reaction Preference determines it because it is
already fully formed by this time - decisive babies will
promote success with either emotional or logical
118
Introduction to Cognietrics
preconsiderations, and indecisive babies will heavily engage
the tools of success once they imagine or find them.
Occasionally they will have to assure others by taking
personal responsibility for an alternative Contemplation
Function that balances the initial decisive control (Je) or
comprehensive study (Pe). If Contemplation afterwards is
used as a _ position of Reference, this indicates
introspection, so the tendency is towards being
Introverted. If it continues secondarily as Responsibility,
this indicates engagement, and thus Extraversion. This
shows that the Values are more psychologically
fundamental than the Manners when determining the
Preferences, because the Id Functions are never once
considered in the process of determining the Reaction.
This arrangement is forgotten with age and replaced with
Nootype Functions. The Nootype integrates leadership
where it is most successful, either judgment, perception, ot
organization. Introverted and extraverted Functions are
then similarly chosen and the three are arranged in a useful
Order starting with the most meaningful. Cognietrics is
therefore useful for small children as a means of learning
and simultaneously imposing a degree of regularity on their
intentions. They use a Cognietrics Type when young and a
Nootype more as they mature by learning the value of
organization and leadership.
There ate 18 Nootypes for every Cognietric Type. A
Cognietric Type with Functions Az By corresponds to the
following Nootypes where O can equal A or G:
Ol Az By
Az Ol By
Az By Ol
Az Oy Bl
Az BI Oy
Oy Az Bl
119
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Al Oz By
Al By Oz
Oz Al By
*Oz By Al is not one, but is often used for anonymity.
Similar to the Cognietric Personas are the
Nootypological Personas:
Realizing
DT - Proof
D—-E - Application
ST - Adaptation
SF - Priority
TOG - Tactic
TA - Calculation
F-G - Wonder
F—A - Incentive
G—D - Insight
G-—sS - Option
A—D - Expansion
AS - Review
Challenging
TOD - Thesis
TS - Research
FD - Standardization
FS - Promotion
120
Introduction to Cognietrics
D—-G - Conception
D—A - Foresight
S—G - Response
S—A - Engagement
GT - Usefulness
GF - Characterization
AT - Improvement
A-F - Endorsement
There ate also Nootypological Triads, though these
represent social values.
Spiritualists (Givers)
MC - Believers
BR - Ambassadors
Materialists (Lakers)
MR - Coaches
BC - Conquerors
Classicists (Conservative)
DT - Analysts
SF - Guardians
Progressives (Liberal)
DEF - Idealists
ST - Inspectors
Operators (Skilled)
GF - Writers
AT - Technicians
Manufacturers (Influential)
GT - Architects
AF - Speakers
121
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Activists (Liberating)
GD - Attists
AS - Warriors
Authorities (Controlling)
GS - Trainers
AD - Executives
Classicists are Governors, or Operating Authorities
attempting to maintain the status quo, and Investors, or
Manufacturing Activists pursuing the continuation of
profitable projects. Progressives are Capitalists, or
Manufacturing Authorities in competition, and Socialists,
ort Operating Activists looking for advancement.
Governors do not have Investor Ideal Matches and
Capitalists do not have Socialist Ideal Matches, primarily
because each wants to maintain or alter something in the
opposite manner with respect to what the other party
desires. These niches are useful in that the associated
Nootypes would not otherwise get along, and so do not
represent stagnation.
Ideal Match:
First Letter - opposite
Second Letter - opposite
Third Letter - opposite
Fourth Letter - same
Fifth Letter - opposite
Sixth Letter - same
Seventh Letter - Lif L, lif E, Eif I
The letter "L" does not change because leadership
styles should not Complement each other; this would
detract from either one as for the two Je or Px Functions.
122
Introduction to Cognietrics
Generally, Nootypological Relationships improve as
similar Functions to the Ideal Match move higher in the
Order:
To calculate Compatibility Percentage:
For Ideal Match Functions:
ABC
DEF
GHI
JKL
MNO
PQR
Set A = sqrt(18), B = sqrt(17), .. , Q = sqrt(2), R
sqrt(1).
To calculate the Compatibility Percentage for a
Nootype with Functions:
NIC
TOOx
Caléulate (100/118 + 17 + 16 + ...+ 3 + 2 °+
1))*(sqrt(5)*sqrt(18) + sqrt(10)*sqrt(17)
sqrt(16)*sqrt(16) ...).
+
Nootypological Functions correspond to Enneagram
numbers. The order of influence of the Functions
corresponds to the order of the numbers. I will explain it
here, though like the Triads, it represents an evolutionary
niche that gives only satisfactory control over a number of
associated strategies.
123
Alon Oscar Deutsch
The Main Function Order roughly corresponds to
Enneagram Tritype.
Each number behaves as follows to balance the
behaviors of the numbers immediately before and after it:
Balance of Forces
Je 1 Consultant - balancing mediation with
campaigning.
Pe 2 Campaigner - balancing consultation with
entrepreneurship.
Pl 3 Entrepreneur - balancing campaigning with
individualism.
Pi 4 Individualist - balancing entrepreneurship with
examination.
Oi 5 Examiner - balancing individualism with loyalty.
Oe 6 Loyalist - balancing examination with motivation.
Ol 7 Motivator - balancing loyalty with dare.
J18 Darer - balancing motivation with mediation.
Ji 9 Mediator - balancing dare with consultation.
The Enneagram numbets represent strategies which
the Nootype Functions assist. Wings represent an
imbalance of tendencies that favors one force over the
other. Introverted Functions correspond to withdrawn
numbers, extraverted Functions correspond to compliant
numbers, and leading Functions correspond to assertive
numbers. Organizing Functions are located in the Head
Center due to justifiability. Perceiving Functions are
located in the Heart Center due to openness. Judging
Functions are located in the Gut Center due to
decisiveness. The middle of each Center suppresses it.
Enneagram Tritypes choose a Head number, a Heart
number, and a Gut number, with Wings, in any order. In
Enneagram there are also Social (who look for approval),
124
Introduction to Cognietrics
Sexual (who look for chemistry), and Self-Preserving (who
look for material comfort) Enneagram Subtype Instincts,
but they have no anticipated correlation to Nootypology.
Moving forward numerically on the diagram is Challenging
due to the independent influence of the next balancing
force, and within a Center it is Maximizing due to the
completion of the Center’s influence. The forward
direction shows increases in computational complexity:
Organizing forces move from Generation to Achievement;
Perceiving forces move from Sensation to Dreaming;
Judging forces move from Feeling to Thought. Likewise
you know after understanding and you deduce after
induction when learning about something relevant. The
Bridging and Realizing directions allow receptivity to other
ideas at a more basic level of familiarity.
1lw9 Fe
1lw2 Te
2w1 Se
2w3 De
3w2 Sl
3w4 Dl
4w3 Si
4w5 Di
5w4 Gi
5w6 Ai
6w5 Ge
6w7 Ae
7w6 Gl
7w8 Al
8w7 Fl
8w9 Tl
9w8 Fi
Owl Ti
Notice that not all Enneagram Tritype strategies exist
as a Nootype; for instance, 1w9-2w1-6w5 corresponds to
125
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Fe Se Ge. While there are only 288 Nootypes, there are
1,296 Enneagram Tritypes, and for each Tritype there are
six possible Instinctual Subtype Stackings. However, each
correlation represents a niche and is not absolute, but can
be useful. The strategies employed by the Enneagram
Tritypes often require a fresh look and for that reason a
Nootype will achieve more success with a Tritype that
does not directly correlate to the Nootype Functions. For
instance, I prefer to act as a 9w1-6w5-3w4 so/sx/sp, or
Consulting Mediator, Examining Loyalist, and Individualist
Entrepreneur, which while correlating to Aetiological,
Solving, and Preparing strategies may be assisted instead
by my Nootype’s Advising, Optimizing, and Relating
Functions.
The complexity that is brought by increasing
Enneagram numbers shows that:
Socialists Judge and Organize, or Perceive.
Capitalists Perceive and Organize, or Judge.
Investors Judge and Perceive, or Organize.
Governors Judge, Perceive, and Organize, or are
completely open to new ideas.
KK
Cognietrics, the selective pressures that competing
psychological preferences have placed on philosophical
concepts, measure the mutual interdependence of
cognitive processes. The future of cognietrics can follow
three paths. In anticognietrics, there would be a reason
why someone intuitive and quick to decide would be
considered reasonable. An example is that for Axiomatic
pursuits Math is synthesized in a Visionary manner and
Logic defined in a Scholarly way, whereas the opposite is
true Contextually. In expanded cognietrics, additional traits
126
Introduction to Cognietrics
beyond the original thirty would illuminate other aspects
of the philosophical concepts in a web of similarly
mutually interdependent definitions; I think that artificial
intelligence is helpful (there is already a text classifier
(https://www.uclassify.com/browse/e4mes543/myers-
briggs-type-indicator-text-analyzer?input=Url) that
identifies the author’s type from a text sample), since
factor analysis of the dictionary has yielded the Big 5,
which correlate to the four Jungian preferences as found
by A. Furnham in 1996 (https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-
8869 (96)00033-5) and a measure of mental health. Lastly,
alternate cognietrics would illuminate unrelated verbal
systems using the same architecture as cognietrics. You
should now feel as though you have a solid understanding
of each Type and its Relationships. Hopefully, what you
have learned you will take with you so that it may serve
you in your quest for knowledge and other related
endeavors.
Happy Typing!
Alon Oscar Deutsch
127
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Index
Adaptation 65
Administrator 73
Advocacy 77
/Etiological 54
Aggressive 53
Analyst 58
Anger 51
Application 65
Associater 73
Attitude 52
Avoidant 53
Axiomatic 71
Bearing 79
Character 73
Charisma 66
Classicist 58
Cognietrics Poker 112
Complementary Functions 76
Conceptual 59
Conscience 50
Consciousness Hierarchy 8
Contemplation 50
Contextual 71
Counsel 77
Counterfactual 53
Critical 54
Criticism 5
Curious 77
Deduction 74
Demeanor 46
Depressive 53
Discoverer 56
Disposition 70
Disruption 67
Ego 50
128
Introduction to Cognietrics
Engineer 70
Enneagram 124
Exertion 8
Experimental 52
Expert 60
Explorer 55
Expression 71
Extraversion 3
Evaluator 55
Fear 51
Feeling 3
Field 60
Function 53
Function Temperament 49
Guardian 58
Guide 71
Hopeful 52
Id 50
Idealist 58
Identity 66
Inclination 53
Induction 74
Inference 74
Inspector 58
Inspiration 66
Introversion 3
Inventor 56
Investigator 70
Judgment 3
Jung, Carl 2
Justification 74
Knowledge 74
Manner 58
Mask 66
Meaning 49
Mentality 59
Mentality Loop 65
129
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Mindfulness 78
Motivation 54
Myers, Isabel 2
Myers-Briges Type Indicator 2
Nature 73
Negative 50
Negotiation 77
Nootypology 113
iNtuition 3
Observer 73
Optimizing 54
Outlook 79
Patterned 59
Perception 3
Persona 65
Persuader 55
Philosopher 60
Positive 50
Preference 3
Priority 65
Profiles 13
Progressive 58
Promotion 65
Proof 65
Prospector 61
Rating 110
Reaction 49
Reasonable 77
Rebellious 53
Referential 52
Reflector 56
Reformer 73
Relating 54
Relationship 110
Research 65
Resolute 77
Responsible 52
130
Introduction to Cognietrics
Role 70
Scouting 54
Scholar 61
Scientist 71
Self 50
Selfishness 51
Selflessness 51
Sensation 3
Serious 77
Short Cognietrics Functions Test 10
Skepticism 77
Socionics 5
Standardization 65
Statistical 53
Strategic 54
Strong 48
Suggestion 49
Super-Ego 50
Super-Id 51
Temperament 55
Theorist 61
Thesis 65
Thought 3
Trait 79
Triad 80
Type 3
Understanding 75
Value 76
Visionary 61
Weak 48
131
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
The theory of Cognietrics was created by Alon Oscar
Deutsch, an ISFJ with the working habits of an INT].
Reading from age 3 (a year after he had his first original
Jungian ideas), he was a top point scorer (even winning
arguments with judges) on his elementary school's book
trivia team, which achieved a 1 of 23 ranking in the
"Sunshine State Battle of the Books" trivia competition. A
composer who began writing music at age 12 (including
music for every Myers-Briges type), he also performed
with the varsity jazz band and was offered a record deal for
his works. He first took an interest in Jung during a high
school psychology class and began studying Myers-Briges
types towards the end of college, during which he took
upper-level psychology electives such as _ Behavior
Modification and Animal Behavior and _ philosophy
electives such as Critical Thinking and Theory of
Knowledge, all while conducting research laboratory
experiments in molecular biophysics, neurochemistry, and
optics, and later graduating with a degree in mathematics
and physics. He was a National Merit Scholar and an
Advanced Placement Scholar with Distinction in high
school, a member of the Golden Key International
Honour Society in college, and after scoring in the 99%
percentile on the ASVAB he graduated top of his class
from the United States Navy nuclear program, going on to
setve aboard a nuclear submarine as a nuclear reactor
operator. He is also a member of the International Society
for Philosophical Enquiry, which represents the 99,9t
percentile of IQ and standardized testing and is the oldest
functioning genius-level intelligence network. A brain
mapping by Dario Nardi shows preferred use of FP2, O1,
F8, T4, F7, and F4, and past development of O1, T3, T4,
T5, F8, and To.
132
Introduction to Cognietrics
Appendix A
Function Questions
Ni/Se - what forces are acting?
Ne/Si - what can I do?
Pi - what affects me?
Pe - what can others teach me?
N - what may occur?
S - what is happening?
Ti/Fe - is this valuable?
Te/Fi - will this succeed?
Ji- am I achieving goals?
Je - can we do better?
T - does this make sense?
F - is this importante
*Introverts primarily use the introverted function and
extraverts primarily use the extraverted function. Judgers
introvert perception to minimize its effect on their
behavior while still allowing them to check things
thoroughly on the go. Perceivers introvert judgment to
minimize its effect on their behavior while still allowing
them to make the most of opportunities as they observe.
Extraverts lead with the reaction function to build trust;
introverts use the reaction function and its complement
together only to overcome obstacles.
T to debate
F to distill
N to connect
S to detect
133
Alon Oscar Deutsch
The Reason for Jungian Typology: Heraclitus said, “if
there is one thing that is immutable, it is change”.
Naturally our responses to such an unpredictable idea
differ as they evolve to meet it. We may ask: Should I be
concerned with specific (Introverted) or general
(Extraverted) change? This is important because the very
concept of change implies degrees of change. Should I
respond to change (Sensing) or initiate it @Ntuiting)? This
is important because we are both agents and experiencers
of change. Should I work to change things based on things
that aren’t changing (Thinking) or slow things that are
(Feeling)? This is important because change can be
positive or negative. Should I act before (Judger) or after
(Perceiver) change? This is important because changes may
bring about other changes. I believe the exploration of the
degrees of change (IE) reflects changes in things that have
not functionally changed from each other, whereas the
exploration of the results of change (JP) reflects changes in
things that have functionally changed from each other.
This distinction in categorization is what allows us to
define both the observational differences that prevent
vagueness and the utilitarian implications that prevent
triviality, both of which comprise change, so both are quite
important. I believe the ability to experience and respond
to change (SN) reflects the recognition of change, that
implies change in the universe and which alone would
seem hopeless, and the ability to slow or hasten change
(TF) reflects the ability for deliberateness, that implies lack
of change in the universe and which alone would seem
meaningless. The combination makes change important to
our species. These ideas, the defining and motivating
aspects of change handled by the preferences that are the
minimum needed to organize one’s mind, show that it is
real and important, and collectively manifest in the
immutable aspects of our existence. For this reason I think
that the four Myers-Briges dichotomies are both necessary
and sufficient for categorizing psychological preference.
134
Introduction to Cognietrics
THE END
135,
Original Works
Alon Oscar Deutsch
“This is the quality of composition I would expect from Mozart...”
— Anton Anderssen, Concert Pianist, on “October Waltz”
Copyright © 2023 Alon Oscar Deutsch. All rights reserved.
"If a composer could say what he had to say in words he would not bother trying to say it in music."
- Gustav Mahler (7 July 1860 — 18 May 1911)
Violin Concerto No. | in Am "Four Winds", Op. 1
L East Wind Alon Oscar Deutsch
= 108
ieye ase se o ee ia - oe of —_o
Violin ——— SEs z rae =
£
ms e ef, Poe Le tee tette
Viola i = tH ———
tise; a ——— ae, i=
S Le
clo (S=—* we ¥ ¥ —
Cell Di Saiz 3 Me ma ss
Bass [DF oF # =
Ca
vl Gites tite, = =a be, —.
» | oS ee re ee a =
ft oe
all
Via. i fd
po ? =a: ==!
cel. [BE
Bass |e
/ ——— =—=——__. fe oh. . .
ee eae oe =
cal
Via. |e —_ SS
Cell. [BE
Bass [DE
iM
.
ry
iy
10
of e ——
Vin. 6 —_——— o—_* === =
= z : =e
SS SSS ——| ==
—]
‘
Via. Is ————— ——— = ———
we e vw ee el
cen, [RE — 5 7
Bs | — —
a 2
be
12 ia
a tf etete. « b Me Eithe: © be bebe the ate
Vin. 6: —— — = — — —— 2 —t
e& b — be be. ial
a o- ime
Mla. “f2 ¢ is 2 i Pa
Via. IIs =a = = = z
ft = 2 ehe
ca, |B Et aaa 2 = =
tos | SERS —
en
15 e f= be, be» 2 fe
be. 5 es © ertrte,
Vin, 6 re — ia z Pad 7 Paert fe ————— =|
pcre ° ——— =
be b
pe ee fe —!
No nt o- —a kK oe cd
Via. Ist a = piste ay = rot . —
: ~
cel, | = i = +5 SS —=
=
Bass | BE = zs :
oe “4
Vin.
Via.
Bass
Vin.
Via.
Bass
Vin.
Via.
Bass
19 feenlitees AP in ral bebe ee £ eve ‘ee seteot
SSS 5 =
- be & Eta. 4 e be
R - == —— — 2
— ee Sule.
be be where a1.
ra ett ———
5
o: ei foo Pad
— oe
o sie. yi a be eB
Sette =
£ be be. 7” oe © fe
— eee meres
SS == : ;
= ————————
be.
be £ ——e
2 rz = De = LZ 2 be —*
= == o we ——=
|
EE = 7 ry — 2 =
—— NT
95 be @@ be oe e
2 xe be berets #b. _—— *
6 SE ob Se os wo ro et
pt i Pere = = SSS, —
pe be 2
¥ F
be ci
ae 3
Vin.
Via.
Bass
Vin.
Via.
Bass
Vin.
Via.
Bass
Vin.
Bass
Geet
eeeertert or,
——————| =? Se
= oes
Eheee
Fete sees = =<
2: Sal
re
i 2 =
DE
30
as #
(Se es
= — SS Z
—_ = =a =o is
2s Se. eS
Be
oa
34
eo f 2, ee ——— =
y " ope Pie
= ee === === SPS ae eee
a ra = b et pe
o oa sd
a
= ee-ebe
aan rete.
eee ———a
t~—*
=
ra
Foe peo re a pyoeSss ap a ———
——— i ——— 2 %
fF o$ Dad o—*, e ==
— ae =
# rh ———
||
|
Vin.
Via.
Bass
Vin.
Bass
Vin.
Via.
Bass
== a AE frie
= ——— f SSS = —_——_—— =
43,
pS ——— —————
EE ra £ oe
SS SS SSS
DE
45
ee z ?
Pa eae ee ?
Se t
Violin Concerto No. | in Am "Four Winds", Op. 1
IL North Wind Alon Oscar Deutsch
i)
Violin
Viola
Via.
Via.
mo. oS
Be aS = ae RP ° z=
b 9
i
N
» @
q
»
r
li
:
y
is
Hr,
.
li
iJ
,
in
.
lis
’
)
My
rp
lis
re
‘
It
15
ra
ca ¢- ¢-
Vin. = ——
ose ole — —
ee
Vie = o—= 2 ee? ra ra
a. > e- oe — 2
wv ve eo L — #e —
te
y
*
fe
1)
~
fe
iM
are a S
tt
ig
Mr
i
&
eo
Vin Efe»? 9» 9-¢ fe =
. _——
——ee = ose oo Ss
f e
‘e' re: = fee tte ee |e
Vila ra e f Zz Sa
— — —— o —
Violin Concerto No. | in Am "Four Winds", Op. 1
II. West Wind Alon Oscar Deutsch
by he. an ~ he he.
Violin G a as 2 Ete ts o ud
—oT he
Viola wares = = = twa = Sheer he —
T ie =
Bete cde he E bas _ tee
on org ef he filet, Lis
he ° " eo ele Le he tele : be
Vin. Hey ae ———— E— ; —— = =
~ =—— 4
: ow wipte ef 52-226 ——— ~—ie
Via. tvs ieee = = B-6 —— 5 —/
cet. | iy ——— — Ss == oe ee ee ee
/ te 2» - © ie ” he he be e 2 £ te 2 # _
Vin. 6 ———
tere er tite,, ef ehe ao,
£ Cheba 5 F te be
Ma. i ES ——— ——
Vi eerre = fee
he he ete
2° the. ete, f ay at he tite fe eit
oe te, pee eS ort ae ae eS |
Vin.
Via.
Vin.
Vin.
Via.
Vin.
Via.
|
he
fi
eit
2
————— ———
@ . em:
{ e ft
— — ———————e_———
os i al
ial
———__
. ie he
Ty
a
my
.)
ie
Vin.
Via.
Vin.
Via.
Vin.
Via.
Vin.
Via.
Vin.
Violin Concerto No. | in Am "Four Winds", Op. 1
2 : Alon Oscar Deutsc
TV. South Wind aera ead
é 56 ce
file eet ete —
Violin oe yt = ¢ wit ta:
4 3 eee oo =—— “fea |
Fg te ey be beter te te EL.
Viola 4 ie te = = = ——————
f f
4 pte _ ft | te ott 26
Cello PEE = 5 2
Bas BEArE er FE ts te ie Fate z
f
3 ry : - je ~ he
ete he eit te te FF be F 4. | fe ate it
Vin. gfe = <= —= = = i —
he
‘la. as va — = ie Be. eo
ii Be : = + * oe te —— = r a =
he
belt ote be Ec he pe aie ie he’ r he
Cell. tate # ae + - :
ee ——-=
a DER, =Sac — = te: oe rs = i
ho : t
Vin. Ge f: — ——_ 7 —$— = = e
For oe * 7 wo
eo he he te ite ie te e cal i
a tee 1 4
Cell. DER = Poo : = i= =
=i
—————
: ee
Bass By ay fe fat ="
: 2 hetet —s Fa
7 = 7. = Ns K =o hes
Vin, 6 ie — Zp =e == nN fete
¥
iy
iy
8
Via. pe jet = Osh e? —— ——* =e ‘=
Bass | DE et = —
hes, oe ee te
o fe = t
Vin. — =a a4 — y
ie
fe
»
»
»
Ge
Via. wot = = att hes tet : 5 = EEE ————
ae
t eE__e— a
Cell. f ae "he =e =
— —__ o —— 2 Foie 7
ee — ol
Bass = wie te —
re o
ite, f ft
ul leet bebe: ae eee its hee o— te
Vin. 6 ma = =2-= ———_—————_ = =
—
ee. £ o Ff e je f a te be #
Via. pars = —— —- = P ie
i=
‘ ft pizz.
Cell. DEAE j= iF = F aK A
Fe t the = ¢
LL pizz.
Bass | DE Pree = i = = iE
fiete
be
he
ra
arco
in
7S
he te.
e
he bes
fe
fete @
Sai o
be
bo
‘
x
=
Fo
&
7S
1 ’
s mM th et
‘ j |
‘ i Is
Ri a a rth e iil iil
+ Red i) “st K
rn ) ay i
fly ' > olf gullll Uf
e & LB
| i. r s il
rl e & 7
i 4 ohh . |
’ cy el He
ee om
uo wt mG a
: ‘ | how Le
. \ a Pat
on + i |
‘ ‘i
Ht ty My HN
“ a i
cul q & Ish | i |
st lr | a
i . { Nan
nr ‘ [S- t
¥ {|| ES { tt
‘ berate i ¢ 7
‘ qd { Wi \s MS
‘ i i
ri ia :
“ hs se
My lll 4 ali aoe
: aa ‘ *
i u "| | oN 8
"all ; “ay
aT & 8 hin 5 di | -
ft ‘i cil fol tt S, ul il il
Vin.
Via.
Bass
Vin.
Via.
Bass
Vin.
Via.
28 eo Pe sae
hee = é
Ge = aaa SZ = —
pS SS
oe. be ie
+ te
: = _ zs — e
Bare nar ape —— aa * i tee eo
rat r ;
30 Se id he k e 4 2 he
ifs Soa. Saae rere t=9-8 Z
SS — ae ——— we vw
pie — ee a:
of iT te 2
sar te 7 * ———
the yp =
me = —
© os? eo ———
D tte 22 ie = :
32 te: dee
32 he 2 °E pol fer - © f£ te ;
o fiete bet tee © te ap.
Gite Pg Ste ag
e £ thete
- be ra a eo nuat o
aro tad ; —— = 5 aan j =
So ———
mee: er
2 q = eo a = et z 2 *
—S = het a
F + = te to Zt =
Vin.
Vin.
Via.
Vin.
Bass
Lo
i.)
~e
{pr
C4
ial
o Fo
eee @-
p ——— a
r hd
cual Pe
Vin.
Vin.
Vin.
Bass
40, q
and! ge oo oe
6 z =F a a 4 —— f —=2 Z =a aae
La he is
pS aan ee ——-
— a ——
vareie = f— tp —['fe — o—e—te—ie
te Z e
et a ¢ = = i o—te—te te
>)
42 4 >
———= fry f+, -
i = Z ia = wa aA a.
ipttie » Tete 1G ot Fig 9 pts dE
pat ——a =———— — f
he: Pale 2 rt 7
= — £E ft ete tet Am he
DEA I ————————
; ele be be
bate a a oT 2 ——— = -
44 e ele
6 et =a ete ~— = Sree
te © the @ he a
a te he zE Ste
. ra =H to S = ao
et gta = f= He ao
a oe fee oe
2 Ht ie — =—— =
sh id we qe wo oe 7
‘| ‘th hi Il (I
a LI
a e . .
cin rep is . [S|
‘ ‘
a q | eu ,
| [S| [e
1 HH ity Wie
4 if aw e
lh L * & ¢
Lt [e el 4
ri ai 1
= \\on ey ‘ l
‘ i ay
IN ogre \ sll ‘|
1 bi | e! eu
“ Ni 4 = ia 4
"a te i rl I &
le a ow
[| a x rs
» ri he |
LS. eS & y y = 9
gHeo# a ow a
46
Sif
a
$1|
wu
Vin.
Vin.
Vin.
Bass
Vin.
Via.
Bass
52 2 he - aa
t fe fe, Gite
= a — SS oy
6 ee SF ats aa
yoy: ————— pie ee: = ie
= a
BE Fa i<— = il = fe =
a | aes
aE ay to 2
54
Be. = oe ind te
6 Se ee —> te
be a
go at gg te otek
SS SSS
eet eet |
es ae = ZF < ra = zt ote ——
eat $e = Fe o ao
p s Z oe Z - tee —
» oe ms ——
yoy i* tert 2 hs 5 =.
= ad ie te oe ie
== e =——. ls]
7 ae firre ——s 2 a Pee =
i ov ie fo oe
oe Fa te Er
Vin.
Vin.
Vin.
i)
Ni
nd
jE Pe re Bea
pie £—'¢ —
ie
; k E tee Et te
tate ft te 4 f- Ye — te
pa er ee =
he. he.
- he ¢ te At he
Ge —5 > —=
ie 7 =
f ©. — tote
e he te
tate ia = Ee = viet £ ot i
he a
he
Te
mu)
Vin.
Pete tote te
1M)
HITT
Via.
Vin. ee —_
yoy
Nel
Piano
Violins
Violas
Cellos
Basses
Pn.
Vin.
Via.
Bass
Piano Concerto No. | in Fm, Op. 2
h
L Allegro Alon Oscar Deutscl
Allegro (#=120)
Z
ores
g I,
Pd
7 —-P—e: ee e. Obs re)
Sees aoe
2
i 4 = Fhe helt:
— —— Saibe t=
: ee ee
a oe = je pee # ; bey
|p
Vin.
Vin.
oe a —
= ———s
———! e =—-
-_——— sag vie = ae ee
MINA oe OREO eG =
I Be ee TM be
"| 4
e % ‘|
» Sy
it il
rT 4] “The
iY
3 “Hl
iY ‘ rs
el
“ll
ry
»
a e y
L)
: x
i all
3 xu sa
e
a u \
MH a
e
. oll
Ml q
of hs
Pri | i
ma q
@
«9 A r
‘u a
sone EN owes EAS BN] GN) Se EN) ee NI EN
‘ weet Leer te
“ff Pent ene: tebetpbetebetehehebetebeiehs a1 — it
ws 1B
cu. |F
Bass |
cio laterite gs BE
2 hehebe
é
Ba
w [i
=
5
5
Pn.
Vin.
Bass
Pn.
Vin.
Bass
—_—n~
NE ND ag GRE INE
—_—~
tre
29 anal be aad f 2
6 —* = ee = He be: i sr res —
: : — oe —
ee aes =
: ==
aE
BE
; 7 be. he.
eit Hee be be if 2» £ fteefee tt
4 be 2 bre? Zao *
Nel
|
al
LS]
oe abe |
_———|
fo
=:
cars
Vin.
Vin.
Bass
—_—_—~
—_——~
46
be te
— tebe
(a 2 = 7 te
ele An de ee
iB:
po age hie = her ptr be + te be tie, ete,
6 —— ——
Bap
®:
1 elg
che te, EE Fhe bine eehe sete, «
2 its ==SS=== #5
——— Eta a
a
=
ett o- 2
SiehS 8 Shebe hy
e
ft
the tebe
2
2
he else be
oft
oe *
———
Pn.
Vin.
Via.
Bass
Me eGX>
ih)
au
ON
Piano
Piano Concerto No. | in Fm, Op. 2
IL Adagio Alon Oscar Deutsch
Adagio (¢=75) 2 be
£ 4 —, e Se; "hobo
ig © F gb 5 y'Sus E aa
EE # — Gobo t=
= = aecarer
ettett ere, ptte fies'Bg © ete ef fae
=== ——— Paes
6
Pe
o>
he he e
er fie? —S ae
a na See
ho
z £ any he = b he
Posteo Fonte fs ols , iz
\
:
oi)
ote
Fe
?
7 in =—
2 * se a = SS
fe i .
—— $ he f ow 2
“>
Piano Concerto No. | in Fm, Op. 2
III. Andante Alon Oscar Deutsch
Andante (¢=90)
Phe
— Wee abe
Piano
Horn in F
aS NE eS
tse LA
Bass Clarinet in Bb %
Ki
fl
‘I
:
—<“o —
ee *
Hn. in F io EE =
a we
zo nd
B. Cl. in Bb 6 | =
=o a sla io
i
be
f
:
«\
(ty
Ki
I:
Hs
I
J he * be
Hn. in F 6 = zi 2 z
a ie bs bel
B. Cl. in Bb ae = ke | = o
Hn. in F
B. Cl. in Bb
Hn. in F
B. Cl. in Bb
Hn. in F
B. Cl. in Bb
peeber
' Sees
eee ae E =
6k :
ok
eae
. sapere
oe
5 &t27 » +
| : a ig
me
az az 2
+ 7 i 3 ===
2 es ee
SS ae NO Ge
Moon Landing Sonata, Op. 3
Alon Oscar Deutscl
Woodwinds
= 90 a
Poem i a he elthe ff £ if ¢ the Chete o eo:
Flute 6 2 gist 5 2 == - _——_—_—— ? 7 er 2 L os 2 oe
: he the aE = wit. @. ae:
Clarinet in Bb 6: i; af 7 £ tre oY rf reas
Clarinet in Bb 6 B % = Lie iis Ae =e Se
7 il il oie ket ae Sie oe
° N 2 the be eit & tee etter he pie Pee»
El, G i Sere —=—_—_————EE———E
Cl. in Bb G 5 = ett eit co ee ae ee rie » ete £
'
a ofr heit lie
Cl. in Bb 6 = = ra ie z =
See i
9
FL 6 p — == z
be
Cl. in Bb B =
6 =a
ho
he £ thehe o eee ele e/)e# bebe
yee ¢ | Flthe he he ei Ebehe 5 |
Cl. in Bb ee ers — — z ——
13
Fl. 6
ke. te ep oe Fe lhe be
Cl. in Bb 6: fF = z
Cl. in Bb a = 4 — F = z
CL. in Bb
Cl. in Bb
RS
Blackjack Overture, Op. 4
FE « al ‘ : his mi al Fg ; |
5 # ‘ i Wy os a wu
g ry “The & i i) wall UA wll
E i il wh “ 4 is « fe ‘
2 Te elaine Ihe tN “ll
ie: " we SH) ofth
“ "| * ht ad An) alll
fl M\ wa : . “
: ® "| 4 a ATi7 ill
5 ~| fi IF cy e su il : ‘
«xl|| ball Mh Pm i “re i Alii rai i ‘ uw
etl bail iH | Pe x ll “lh $ i \
ail Wh neal ‘ Aa aN + i ry ry
, hd onl ny ‘ 1 ,
s olin i Mull
. “| Ml MT = : ‘ : $ q ew
one sl SAW va] Auk | st)
st iss rl “4 sud le
5 fAtlhy rw ‘ ry ry Uh wi
: H Is “ : fe ¥ ry a
. s ROR wk ald
.) & a * il ] rt :
ai Cine oh, y q d iM i ry
Uy \ * p a i a uu
rin al Al i t ‘f tI Aly willl
ry | ay +) Na} i e rik yer 8 |
efi) te on) iu a uy i Wy
NSH NSH a @ x} bi Ny 4 |
Mor FN) kee A tee N) ee N= tee = te
October Waltz, Op. 5
e : Alon Oscar Deutsch
Woodwinds Peer _
Flute
Oboe
Clarinet in Bb é # z 2 2
Set
Bassoon,
4 e iad e
Fl. 6
# e zee —— - f =
Ob. et - = o
6 ——
Cl. in Bb es = = ——_ a =e ae
oe vw #*s C= we? oe
Bsn, | E# = =——_
oo” He
8 - # tthe 2,
£ —-
——
Ob.
Cl. in Bb é # 4 = =
Bsn. | EE
@ @ 2
n (ie! —_——S= ra
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Bsn.
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Bsn.
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Bsn.
ima
‘|
é oF ¥ —
Ea
15 rt we A ss ert ef
ot SS
i “1 te Ite
ce = tad td
21 Sal get s
—- :
te | + 3
=f te eof te
6 "eo =SS-SS—=
6% =SSeae ——=
Ize = —
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Bsn.
Ob.
CL. in Bb
Bsn.
Ob.
CL. in Bb
Bsn.
Nate
ih)
He
iN
ne
el
iB
tit
T®
ttt
Judean War March, Op. 6
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Brass Band
e=8: es ia st
Brats! [—=— he 4 he, fe
Euphonium Baresi ete 4 vette Lee e+ p — — == sui
i—a
ed == —S aS zi —— =
vive a "i o i a bot
SuaeDron fig 1» Ap A J SO FRR) by
Bass Drum I 3 o b ay & x4 4 J 2 J o
4 the, see as — er 2-4 =
bh ; 4 aoe wire eet titties ee]
—————— _
Tuba ae = = ioe = aaa
at “te whe cd =
op A, A),
B.D. | o Bs ) rd d
Fa eS — he depear cana == — ‘ vai nie =
Euph. [BE — =2 epee a = =|
i 3 ie A ct Sie og pte —s =
Tuba Bat ot te == =F eee ee = == ——a
———| * f= — oe
ro Se en Pe Cones NS) ee ee» POS ole ONS ESE oi
ma | J y Jd, A AY | ob, 09
Euph.
Tuba
Pete ‘ & k ae —
ce a —S= rei
a 5 FF
Carrier Particle Dance, Op. 7
Alon Oscar Deutsc!
Orchestra
Geo ke 6 — we — be — bh =
Ac. Guitar
AW
ce
kO
fr
pH
Ba
“tie
ani
J
|
ih)
6100
Ac. Guitar
T I, 74 nN
iw wa
CB 3 43 3
Bassoon
Bass
Xylophone G b
ey:
ey
Drums
Ac. Gt.
Ac. Gt.
Xylo.
Bsn.
Bass
Drums
é es 7 = - fe be
he ia a be ya
cr fa}
os 733 r 2 rn
0 9—8 6—0—_5
CT
He
é ee ee
= vee
ie ae
aE to? ——— oe cre
wz: — as
ie. o £ fete ot o. pope
‘Loo — . pone pee
eo o@ tet :
5 ——— Zz —— om f =
Ac. Gt.
Ac. Gt.
Xylo.
Bass
Drums
aH
aS
key
Na
Na
KN
arr
Ac. Gt.
Gt.
Xylo.
Bsn.
Drums
Ac. Gt.
Ac. Gt.
Xylo.
Bsn.
Bass
Drums
— ra ———
= - = 7 = 2
Cr
LA 45.
CB 3 44 4
3 rT 76 rr)
Cr
A
rs
os :
be
1.
FE = y—t Z
= poet —— r
33 —= —— fe
a * fo —
ra eo @ eo @ > Zz = @
—— ==— ——
Ac. Gt.
Ac. Gt.
Bsn.
Bass
Drums
18 ft he £ «@
Ty eae preeees|
G 5 — =
al 9
bo
eS 48 22 #8
a ———* a
46 46
& fe = + =
me
5 6
6 8 6
G is ae = o =
he fe: 2 ete bo ef
: e e °
Ez t =a ie
if £ @ Ba 2
Be te 2 o—he ie : rz * e e
= — ————————— -e
—= ee —=
= —= ss . ==
= =———,
20 © 2 £ ee ee rite
es
i =e
4 x x ————
Ac. Gt.
48. 20. 22-20
cr 20 48—_20
CA
m3 —— rr 20 48
6 ve a oe
bo He pes +s
Ac. Gt.
EE 4
ce 34 7 443 4 3
2 34 4—4
e
Xylo. 6 = = = = [2 = |
or
- -_ o e ©
Bsn. QE pe | SSS selar=
—
2 7 he. fe
e ei Fe EE
Bass =) i tie | |
= —— oe ie
Daves == ===
rums oJ
Ac. Gt.
Ac. Gt.
Xylo.
Bsn.
Bass
Drums
N
ke
a>
eae
NA ND RS
Suite No. | in F#m "Fundamental Forces", Op. 8
Alon Oscar Deutsch
I. Strong Force Peer _
Sinton (Ee orp o = = oe ra =? ot ae |
Sonne (oe ——7 te ———— — |
Soto fea i ; = 5 |
Xylo.
Xylo.
Xylo.
Xylo.
Xylo.
Xylo.
Xylo.
Xylo.
Xylo.
Xylo.
Xylo.
Xylo.
Xylo.
Xylo.
Xylo.
Xylo.
Xylo.
Xylo.
Xylo.
Xylo.
Xylo.
Suite No. | in F#m "Fundamental Forces", Op. 8
II. Weak Force Alon Oscar Deutsch
d=00
by : ———
é ae z = = = =
Piano f
,
PF
Brass | vs z b ae
mek SS ————
es
mf f
== £ = 7 ——
Drums - ; is =
oe oe 2 =
3
he ? @:
= === ——
Pn. —~ -
@
y = ——— = — =
2 tf = © bet =— for = oe =
a =
7
Brass | & 2 moe Brass 2
« iS ae oe st ts tN oe ie Magee aeetige
Ea yt
Tb. BEE = ¥ : = = = > = = =
fie + 7 ee et ——
Divine ? 7 Z 2 —
er a Zs os oz —_
—
ts e ete = § f: D ° ” Ks
he ? v4 o. a v ~~ m0
Pn = r|¥ Fea
=: —$ o
vw vow = . 7 e =
Brass |
8a --------------------- hats Pe Se ooo
all i cena
bb —_————— p
wr = eo zZ 3 oe
—— _————_—————|
Drums w= 2 — ——s oso oe ==
7
£ £. Z _ K 5 6 Z = © ra ra ie
SS Se
Pn. id *
yr? — z—t= he
—— ——¥
a ahh
be: ra *
nb. SES > Z pie = i 4 5 - 5 5
Ke
2 aa ——
Drums a ae = =s f +p. 2 =
=S==—s —— a = =|
a | —
b
pera Se et
—— ¢ o z
Pa, —— = a
he
er “1 ra raz rf a ve y
7
Brass 2 zi P £
. . At ‘J am
Tb. BE f f - 5—* == —
————
SSS. FS
Dai ——s — ee =? = =e =F
11
Pn. 4 ——
a = =
oe = o
Brass | & 2 Brass |
Irb.
Drums
Pn.
Irb.
Drums
Pn.
Trb.
Drums
15
—_
il
6 z ss se = au +=
Br we 99 0 0 9 9 @ °
= = = aa = =
be. Gvgese rites tena a A et eee Fi as A esas,
ee he o °
= =e = ————— : *
= 4 —S —S
—_—
2 T we 2 a ee a
-—* 7 7 ? 7
Suite No. | in F#m "Fundamental Forces", Op. 8
, Alon Oscar Deutsch
III. Electromagnetic Force Per _
Guitars
>
6 —"
Er ¢ 3 — r 2 5 3 ae
CB 3 2 4 é 2
Gt.
45
EE ——— i = —
[B = 45
FA7
J yl —F a ae
3 2 4 k 4 ) = d aw é
(atic ——<——=$ ———
7 6 = 4 a ——
Gt.
44 45. 8 40- 44 45. 4 5 8 5
Le 5 6 . 6 5 6
45.
(9) # S
4 Y a) § - Q =
Cees ie ? te p E te =
—— _————| ¥
Gt.
6 z z 9 46 44
He 5 3 6 9 7 ra
st 4 19 8 & 5
LF 49 40 40 49. 9
Hs 44 40 9
Ls rT 40 42
0 rn a0
——_— =r
40 5 2 5 : 4
LE 8 7 4 3 4 3 4
[® é 2 -
Agm
: PY
ee or ee a ee ae
5
‘= i e = i,
| — i 7
ca 3 >
>
45 45 416. 49
= 46 2 zm 7 16 7)
[A
Hs a6 a 43 14 45
44 45. 40
A
8 oo we . .
it sd. ee, ee eS ee
vt : i= —— — ee fee
a f
Le > > > —
>
44 46 49 48 44 42
r ———— —
3 rr 43 38 B rr)
Ge
; 4 0 FS ie Z 5 ie ml 2
Sal oral cit 5 al
oe iad in — : fe : p :
> — =
43 48. 44 40- 45, 42 9
44 9
LE 46 45 44 45 45
a rm ag 1 ae 7 os rm
44
Fsus4
Caer == lsd fe Es = = = Ca
' "> Eat % G6 5 5 FP LF
ey ° 6 A -
i Agm a
(etree :
‘ CF EF ot ee F Es
Lk ; :
Ls
Gt. ? f Ff ? a —_-,
Lt
ite —] a ———
. a ee eee
Fe z = 4 2 4 2 :
14 Gh+ bia
(tp SS
| Db eCr? OF Lene
i FE 3 * 4 : 5
Hi 2 4
d
P
>
Eo
"
=
Cm
C4maj7
Fe
20
Fkm
ara ,
ei - is ——
pt id rd yr
9 6 4 8 > 3
Hi 9 = 8 b 2 Bi - : : ~
Em
is i is
é fe ra ra — = + <3
‘a — | S—— a ——————— |
>
4 6 5 3 8 8 m
ET 4 4 4 4 4 AY 9 & 9
tat 9 9 9
Am
_ At ¥ ?
22
2 fe he - ¢ ia
é aah —— Ee oe he £
wi > —— | >
2 Pe
4 8 ,; 22
= 40. rn 43 42
A a &
[5 45
Gm fe Gt
23 Se Pall coe ei ia he Vier
= = pany ai ra —
= =_= fr is #6 k
Ay % —— - $
— > 7 > >
>
24 46. 44 42 6 5 4
Lr 4 34 20 22 3 5 4 = 4
Ls = 44 24 49 49
24 Gém
So _—
o ire: 2
6 os re J ———_——
zs we =f
=——— esi r p = FF es
= ) bf
bd 3 4
Cr at 3 : 33 7
A 3 3 7 q
[|B 4 4 2 2 4 4
0. 4 4 4 4
Fm Em
Ber nr er pe
Lr a 4
Lt mn 4 mn
Ls
: —— 3 : 2 4 3
: > 3
ce Gmaj7 >
26 < ee) Zs
a ee Le o we
Cees — = ie sn —
iad =
Lr a2 3 5 40 44 rr
Lk 4 4 z 6 = 9 zs ETI = uw
4.
qo
pa
SSS —— a
> a > ————— —————
>
4 45 2
Ly #4 44 4342 44 #8 4444 42 3 z rN
a ————— ey
Suite No. |
IV. Gravitational Force
in F#m "Fundamental Forces", Op. 8
Alon Oscar Deutsch
; 71 —T id
Flute 6 4, : 2 2
at be oe: oe
"a tf "
———| b @. - be fe:
Xylophone 6 = = fa z A res he- by -
eco a
ce ris }
; . a bom: 4 . i ° | 7 vw
Piano a Ps Bro 2
eae AE f — st 7 o. K zs =
cd et hwe al o -.
QB eco ier eh sie lene dS a dled pete tea ns Lees eed tet bapeeh ovewe Lye hearse. Ween sat seuedeuaphed
tt Too, Too,
b ————— a
Fl. 6 = —— o =
of f
mf If MW
a 6 fe jeve— vite Ee mare —
C= fe vibe. - C= sl ems
——= ; ———
J bet be oy i os 7 7 ez o
Ph, Sf Sif SS It 7?
= =
ap -— . 3 z =
Pe ages «IP # ta A
Xylo.
Pn.
Xylo.
Pn.
Pn.
5 3 e Le i ee ££
Ge =aa= —_——, p =
Sf sf mf mp P
6 et
a —————— SS
Ge Fat — i 4 = = ay z Zz
Ze of o he mp P
IN = —, ——
eh —— = ype
= Si dia :
f oe f£ @ ft ft
6 2 2 = — = = ° =
™p mf ——_:
r;
ie be 5 bg: stg = be-
= ¥ =; SF : 4 : a F
eg
eg -s Gu
6 ——— yt SS
™p mf 2 7
£ f
- £ £& ra f z2 ‘=
Be rae 2
mp mf i
9
Ge Z ; = ———— ==
= 2 ———$=
" et fe *
Ge *—_ i$: = f o—f a z a
z 7 iw
. < :
5 > y kK - =
6 z = = ss -
= ei re
a i
tf vo GVB ss ack e nes be gabe = eho c eee Ost ee eee aes Me dee a ane se see eae
ll
o—? 7 oe
Fl. G y— be — z 2
& 2 oo — = 2 —
N e- —#—T 39, , 2,
Xylo. oe = $ gig h =e = Fi —" ——— -
nd of —~ — —)
Sada -
iG Bi 7 = o, o- w. e- ca ca eo ts, e-
6 : 5 =
Pn Z SS = EL
BE So
By oO ERG TRONS TIER NAA Fy Cee eR Os TEA RG By pe REN AG Pes a Nee eee A Seer Pet
13 3 Py ty te be ania be 's ee
Fl. = > = fie ——e ——$—S=
—
a oe a
ty
é
Xylo. 6 is ind os 2 z
Pp
———
BE
Pp PPP pppp
Se es F
— i /e- of of
Pa = = f= we =
= 5
oe oe oe
Nel
1
Devil's Lullaby, Op. 9
Alon Oscar Deutscl
h
Trio
da 125 2
bei eo fe, te tre ee Py -
peas ra ina
Violin 6 3 —_—_—_———— ===———
2 oa ‘~ ffte, ee Pptee
English Horn in F a a ——_—— ——_——_—_— —
6a —— ei
7 ——— ame
Pian é “gasaeeeerr
y ———! — Poppe er re
ca a ae oe eee eee —_———o
B:
4 7 ina
ep bee 7
Vin. é w —"s
eles,
Saal de 2 aan etese
E.H. in F on ——S eS Sr YF
SS =
6 vee peer ere ———
pi ———| rs... an
: ==
bE ee
= = ———
2 B:
é — ft ¢# be = = bebe
Vin. —"s - z z
— pete
pte niet. ———
- eeee 1 - 2 ptshe
E.H.inF 6" —= —! ——— — z or
=
SS ==
a a oe ==
Ph 6 ee ————| FSS ees
3 eee
P SS See =
& B
Vin.
E.H. in F
Pn.
Vin.
E.H. in F
Pn.
Vin.
E.H. in F
Pn.
iM)
==
wo oo 9 0 9 0
——
a eee TT ———
Saal
ial Eee 1 Phe
et pbe
iat
——— a
ttt
Tre
im
eal!
Violins
Violas
Cellos
Basses
Flute
Oboe
Clarinet in Bb
Trumpet in Bb
Symphony No. | in F#m "Samson", Op. 10
@=100
I. Birth
Alon Oscar Deutsch
pizz.
Te
“# the
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
FL.
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Tpt. in Bb
Vin.
Cell.
Bass
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Tpt. in Bb
EEREE ERE
en
SS SS
=e =e be ===
Cetete © * | fie be ote te oe
=:
aes
yote
arg
————————— TIT]
— oo
et
es
— _——— _———
6M Ae —— = 4
a
e
ee]
ii
~- fe fe
& re rieite, ete, fe te JE
Vin. é # : ==: —— SS Ss
he
Via. yet! E EF ‘er = ie == =
: ie te
Cell. pers ¥ 5 = — p z ‘ —j—
ASS o zm = te fw Z te a = te tw
FL G # E
Ob. 6 #
Cl. in Bb 6 re io
Tpt. in Bp eae
y 2 of it ete 2 ‘Ete, # ‘te,t
Vin. G # ww tte tre — =
: if te ft
Via et Ei petit z =. =
: ie te ie te
Cell. pers 1p 7 5 i — ae Z s— 5 ih
uO - Sete He 2} tel se pet lt
FL 6 #
Ob. 6 ag
CL. in Bb eee
Tpein (eae Eafe e2e——
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
FL.
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Tpt. in Bb
Vin.
Cell.
Bass
Fi.
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Tpt. in Bb
—e 2
Z te = te = = jeg
tees fe tititie oe, @ tee Ae @
SPPEPEEEF ERE fire rete fe
a
EC RERE ERR
id
——
anes oman
= &
ee ee
2 = 2 = 2
2 = fa —————s ww
geet fet pp =
os = © ojo oJ
jaca
ee]
3
18
Vin. 6 #
Via. eee:
Cell. =e
Bass Bers E =
FL 6 3
on lit pet tte tite aig eet Etta
TS ===
CL in Bb aes
Tpt. in Bb cae =
20
Vin. 6 #
Vila ote
Cell. Bere
Bass =e — =
FL. 6 #
Ob. é #
cheteletc ©» » ehetelete « Phe P pete eiteterere eope
Cl. in Bb $e ——— SSS ESS :
Tpt. in Bb 6 Ay =e
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
Fl.
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Tpt. in Bb
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
FL.
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Tpt. in Bb
re
ee]
Frenne
ee]
N
7
iM
«
fECrE ETE
29
Vin. G #
Via. yet
Sci ptt ———— ——— a
sell. wee Sve es Pv se Owe og ee Oe ee Cv we
Bass =e
FL 6 if
——= is
Ob. es jy =F wie te epee
Clin Bb be
Tpt. in Bb aes
31 the te
Vin. 6 # vietetetet =
ie,
Eee
Via ett ——— et =
ca, | S=ht§— FS Saas fetter ir
: ———
Bass pers .
FL 6 3
Ob. 6 i
Cl. in Bb é $e
Tpt. in Bb 6 Hey
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
FL.
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Tpt. in Bb
Vin.
<
Cell.
Bass
ic]
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Tpt. in Bb
td SS == te
Be
ware
Ere
ce
ce
ets
bet =aae a
ptt te fen OP eines ets
yote
Bers
Beate
oe
5
(ae eres te
(aes rors pithe, ete
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Tpt. in Bb
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Tpt. in Bb
{ir
ee]
EERE EEE
-¥]
~
ql
:
ee]
iM)
EERE RAE
ee]
4B
Vin. 6 3
Via. yoy!
Cell. Bere
Bass Bers —= te = ——— = =
olete 2 epee a ad
FL 6 3
Ob. 6 i
Clin Bb ees
be ete £ @ -
Tpt. in Bb ms he ! a [ n ————
45
Vin. 6 3
Via. et
Cell. =e
bas [Ft —* te =— =
Peet ee :_ ae
FL ag === =Saeiee
Ob. 6 #
Cl. in Bb 6 fe
—-——
Tpt. in Bb 6 # Fy be ——
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
Ob.
CL. in Bb
Tpt. in Bb
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
FL
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Tpt. in Bb
3 3 : 3 3 3 3
wewiticin, Leteie | lietele | 2 eteis
Se
oe oe
== —_—
2 —
to tae
i
SEER ERR ER RRS
ee]
i
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
Fl.
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Tpt. in Bb
Ile
ol
Symphony No. | in F#m "Samson", Op. 10
Alon Oscar Deutsch
II. Lion
@=90 fe : Le Ce
at an se Efe Pete Ete
Trumpet in Bb $ ees ——— ——
a aoe
phe
4 F- A 7
Cellos EF ¥ ==
—
we
teette - fe
Tpt. in Bb f {—* e.
e+ —_———
Cell, —_———— : a
mI o p e iz a
Tpt. in Bb
Cell.
Cell.
Se
eft
SS oe er oie
——— =
= == Fale
Tpt. in Bb
—_——— we
=— — ———— ee 2
Cell, = = == = =
oF tele = ——— ote
Zi
oes
aes
Ee
Tpt. in Bb a oeeit === = =# aE ———_——
Ee
f
oe
E : F;
Tpt. in Bb G # o —— He £
Cel. JE
Symphony No. | in F#m "Samson", Op. 10
IL. Delilah Alon Oscar Deutscl
Flute
Oboe
Clarinet in Bb
oS ES eS
Mh
4 he
fie # i ° =a =—
' ie SSS SoS Se ee ee
Ob. Ge Z === zie aca
Cl. in Bb 6
——— —— —_—_—_—_—_——__
Bass yE 7 fa = oe = Z aa ~e oe = . qe o 7 ad = 2
FL Ge
: : ————
Ob. 6 Seba 2
te ig!
Cl. in Bb Ge ———a ze s
— —— |
Bass oo fe —— “a z | we a! are oe f= jee 0 * be o
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
|
£
iM)
q|
Symphony No. | in F#m "Samson", Op. 10
Alon Oscar Deutsch
IV. Capture
4-00 bee
4 2 ?
Flute bt —— ——— = === oe
CEE be CE te che f
Violins ot = fies ——— —_—— =
4
: kK
n & = —— — S— ——— oe
a as
eee fe EFeE a cee |
Vin. : —— 2 ee rd =——
= oe ina f=
ee
crete te pbebe ew ite
9 be beftee,
n = ——
bebe » fe ete ete bebe » et 2 ef 2 gfe
2 2 2 2 2 2 2
>» — EOE
11
be ey ,
FL. at ia a 2)
6 —————
bebe » et 2 efe efe bebe o
e 2 @ 2 b
kee
Vin. 6 EEO ——— tt e- I
wee
Symphony No. | in F#m "Samson", Op. 10
Alon Oscar Deutscl
V. Death
oars te
: ” o oicine cite, of Phe < fe weftte
Oboe ¢ ——— i —
- Sal s
ene ee @@ .
SSS SS Sy
te # tite £
ob. to ote ge Tee TS, re eel a toe ae
——— ——— ———
|
vie siete —_ ae! siete siete
Ob.
hs
ry
1
Ob.
2h fe z
13
Saree
te Pt tet te tiete « ou, pip © tet tte tt tiste coy, cit +
Via. He EO EO
15
Ob. 6 K s
fe FRE FE ek EF he te 2 2 yn 2 te ©
Cello Concerto No. 1 in Dm, Op. 11
Alon Oscar Deutscl
I. Allegro
Allegro (¢= 120)
: —— : : ——— a
Cello [EE =: 2 = z == Soa
Violas ie b-#
Violins ot
Bassoon P= 7 ¥ —— =|
= ow) wbe bo a
sa [E ==
Cell. |B == Z a
Via is
Vin. 6
bo. SS ane = z —— w|
" oho oe oS
: =
Cell. a = Z ea Z oe —a i—= we
Via iiss
Vin. G B
Bsn, SE = — z we rz Ke a a
i z = 2 5 z z =
ATT su Hl qa “
its \ e i | di : | ‘ l ‘
ie es meee | :
a th We std I all) |r *
the ik ‘ | | 7 “ll ft i it '
H ‘ 7h) Ce l yn ot sr it
ie SHH) Ul ult i
| a) ‘f i all | iN l!
HY \ bg | aad e e e
Hy ry a iJ CY ¢
Nh lt sul) st | OWT ON \
hE ull] aR “4 i i
th ie Sj | i 2 Ua 4
1 e Ts
ue es Sf) | t 1) Ul
iy MN : | l t ¥ * J ah] :
ft fe a
te i Sy) my WU TNs
les He suf ite. Fi
by + oa re aun) fe r} * 4 N
ike al i aa i :
n a. tie + 4 bit, A Be
Wy li: : | H | ly Fi " Ty 2
c= a a
Via.
Vin.
Bsn.
Vin.
Bsn.
Via.
Vin.
Bsn.
20
: =
ore e
2 obe. s abe é
ft he @ ©
(Is ——S a =
BE rd = = Z K Z S ra K
eo oe oe bot oe oe oe
23 be. eit be
aE — = — e—|
SS
Ee £ li: . t of a a
(ae ee
be.
== 2 SS
& eo bat bo
bebe.
a ve =
[9 a et
= = : =
~ ie githebe riphebe
a FES Ee
be
rehe f
be-
pe ettebebe ehebebe, = if: .
G _—_——_—— = —_———— 2 =e T? a z = 7
BE = = = = z
31
SS
Cell. =a 2 ee 7
r B — —— ioe eee epee se eye oo
Via. is
~ of ef he fe
ime Ty Ty a8 fh
vw 1G — ———— i
Bsn.
a —— oe —
Cell. |B ca ott be =
os ozo —— — Z e- ae
Via. iiss
2 ae» fe be ie: ele 5 -t bere e be
be i
Vin. 6 —— == ———! —=
Bsn, BE
e epee | oe eee
Me
—— 5 =
* =
Via. | PES hee
Vin. Gi
Bn. SEE 5 ——————— re ———
ior eae tssae” oe’ ae , o
Via.
5
i
Vin. 6
SE
Bsn.
Via.
Vin.
Bsn.
Cell.
Via.
Vin.
Bsn.
Cell.
Via.
Vin.
Bsn.
Via.
Vin.
Bsn.
Ne
+
owe
eriet
15 =
2
penile. te et eo
- e
Gee ——— ———!
a
sa
eo es
er ———
50 =
B e =
es ————
fr
eft ee pi tieses,
Gi _——— ———
eas
Flt eee, te
——— ———
oe
eae
= Sa
59 he ft. ec oe ont fete?
—— —_—
-
feo @ re
et er ef
2 PPP
—
— t
= =r 2 =
Cell.
Via.
Vin.
Bsn.
Cell.
Via.
Vin.
Bsn.
Via.
Vin.
Bsn.
Via.
Vin.
Bsn.
64 it~ te 2 fettetete ft 2©@ 6 © ff © oe
ee SSS SS SSS SSS
Ib — = oe ms o = —_— oi
Sal sal
& £ o,
6 = ee te
owe =
ra cao
eles 2teie thee,
Pte ~rett
a Se
Eee et ete te @be
68 = = fe fe #
= PF et
ee
== =
a a ad
ole
=i
ef ro
oF 2 : 5
} o
he oe were
73
3 —— = = —
ie) 5 + o ye eee
Serttteer
BE
—— o zoey To 2?
° oe a= = oe — a
a
4
Via.
Vin.
Bsn.
Via.
Vin.
Bsn.
Via.
Vin.
Bsn.
jeneu SRE est
SS bo += ae
e - © 2© #@ ‘< 2
ime Ty =
6 ? ?
EE
82 ett,
SSS Sar = —_——— =
o = ——— =
oe
=e = T+ rey =
Cad
oe oe ee
o
Be | NAS
NA aN
Cello Concerto No. 1 in Dm, Op. 11
Alon Oscar Deutsch
II. Presto
2
eer eto
bse hs.
Presto (#=170) a
Cello D4
Contrabassoon Bz:
a tne an ef
of ind = ot?
Piano
7
Cel. BE = ———_—_—
- -o oO
se wv ‘og
e Sal
e
cbn, BE rt
———_—
erteree £
ere Ets
é
Pn.
BE ——
= =
+%s 7s sald
we
Ce te ge
12
x Ke
Cell, ———
—=
Cbn. =
Pn.
a
a
Cell.
Cbn.
Pn.
iM
NS}
Cello Concerto No. 1 in Dm, Op. 11
UL Adagio Alon Oscar Deutsch
Adagio (e=75)
SS 2s
oe oe
—a
Cello
Violas
Flute
fe |
Violins oe —— 1
y
iM
.
Vin.
=a fapap ep ee le eet
Se =
-
Cell. a o- rd
o
z 2
Via. re € Fo o—? ze rd ia rd = rd a
———— E =
—=—> el el
6
Via. IIs
fe
Vin.
Via.
Vin.
Fl.
Via.
Vin.
Fl.
Via.
Vin.
Fl.
i
i
iM bi
a
~
p
.)
|
iM)
i)
16
ic}
iM
iM
BS BK
Oboe
Piano
Bass
Ob.
Ob.
Suite No. 2in Am "Colors", Op. 12
Alon Oscar Deutscl
h
I. Blue
=50 et eis of ,. Z be nk Se : e ©
rs f ze s
at ji |
Fy
be. fe ———
; atetiebe , ete fe = fete. oy —|
ed oo oe
: * - ft £
gf |
berate eiebe , tptte oP 6 et r.
be he be" ——— eee EEE CEE Ete
eee
BE
be te ———
=e ye be , » te F ee | = ===. =
——e eo oe
5 « ~. et & of ss be. g: * £ E
: =p? SSS SS
belies *
b e ere Petre ele ple eft
beerereret Sef peer eter Este tete -f =
(gaze _——_—_ ——— -
BE
+: 2 é t ‘
Ob.
Pn.
Bass
6
i)
Oboe
Piano
Bass
Ob.
Ob.
Suite No. 2in Am "Colors", Op. 12
II. Yellow
Alon Oscar Deutscl
h
Le
DF o—? —
————— 5
pre ee te,
Bz ===
iaace-"P
fe = =
9
pee. ,
pte |
be be
abe eee eee he .
Ne INR eR
Suite No. 2in Am "Colors", Op. 12
Alon Oscar Deutscl
III. Red
fim ie . bete’t
Oboe —= = o =F) ‘= ——
Gt —— woe —
ft 2 et, et
6h ee
Piano
24 =_———t = ——
2 £ —T?! sss jessie ree?
2 epteo # e rT Ss
Bass D4 = ———— ==: ar
4 eo Lt
ot b a ee tp fe ef
b. —————
be
gee ebe =
i — os
——— © be
Pn. ———
3
YASS fe 1o- iat =
a Be o— bee” = —— Dp she” ©
‘i as ee b efee fe
© ebe e-
te elie =
ee =
be bale a
whe the ee o
be e
o- i .. o
Bass BE
Ob.
Pn.
Bass
é peer te
SE
oe mn
ae ————
Contrabassoon
Pice.
Cbn.
Pice.
Cbn.
Manginat Hagalil, Op. 13
Alon Oscar Deutscl
h
Duet
d=75 ele 2
b he efeEfertte
Piccolo 5 $ ss He ze ———— SESS
3 = ina a
: he e othe te? &
2 ra
PF = —— — —=——_—
we
4
6 = settee =
be » the = ° We ete oe
be @ # = tre
pas _————— =
~—
8
citer tees 9 4-6 pa Fle » ¢
Pie e_—* = fe
i a ad
\"
Afternoon Dreams, Op. 14
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Guitar
é=70 he # if he e he
ote ie + _¢ _—= her a —— 2
Gp — == ee =
Guitar
——44 40434 ¢—18—4 4
Cr i rr a 8 s—; 4
t 4546 $63
40-9
3 ‘a
ca © { tite
(eee pee es 0 ERD. Dt ieee
= = . o —
a
Gt.
59 79 44 42-44
rf ery 4615-42
[Ie 56-8 4-3 436 a es rr)
[B = 42 45
449444344
6
és eh
& C4
cee “a? at a = kw
Gt.
o—_9-2 | 7 42 5 2 5 9 934 4
Cr 2 4 8—9 2} 9 3-0 0
Er a4 rn 3 4
Ls 3 nN 3
4 2
3
with Measure 10 (2 octaves lower)
10 he tie te
tty ee oe == he- te se he
fe a eae ir = ——
—S —_ wi
Gt ie
o—0 o—0 844435 9 6 5
= 4944-9 2 4 4 69 95
LA 2 3 : 9-6-9 6 |
[® a
3
with Measure 10 (2 octaves lower)
18 i aaa i ie he e with Measure 10 (2 octaves lower)
6 a ———
—
Gt.
578-7 20 4743-86
Lr 5 68 9 365 2 5
La 5 5 5
[B 9 —.
“TRG upup
if |
lll
i ]
“tT is} | uct
io
Enh
i |
il He if q
pil |
® a
naa +
Cy +
ian
1) of
> HE
: cil PFA
Birthday Waltz, Op. 15
. Alon Oscar Deutsch
Piano
¢=90
3 =a ——
a ovo roe
Piano
St == — =——= — —— —
Be eee Oe Tee Be Owe Le eee Se wr ee
v
6
— — cay
os 2 ¢ ol | ?—# a:
—= — -
Pn.
BB = _ i aS SS A
ee te te
Fe El lle wv oqIVve wv ove Pe ea wv ove
v v v
11
ee @ 2
¢- ¢ i
ia ——— ——=
Pn.
Pn.
Pn.
5]
is}
®
®
©
Ne
®
~~
3}
a
26
N Han .) » the
e Lor
[* we I jm js i
ye im fh ; All : ’
[ ell ie » : in [yi
‘| Ve ‘ . | nd :
i * I. I I
ty alle is \ \" Nd »
| piss ig . i
Tt ® mn)
i & t « K,
(I Hite fo
in \ he all \
HR i “I te 2g
| ty - nf »
. ‘ eo os »
hd \* Nee i ‘i
“tw “ Y
f
\
D,
Pn.
Pn.
Pn.
Pn.
Martian Sunrise, Op. 16
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Duet
@=90 Pazz £ rie the be
2
English Horn in F G 4 *
, = oo ef © »
Cello BE : = $,
ba bat 5 oe oe Vv re
4 he be &
e e-
EH. inF oe? Pie bet z eo fie = ===:
G oa — = he
be = he Dual
e@ be b eo b
Cell. BE ue :
7 be ett
-—| ef
E.H. in F 6 f —- L349 ee er!
YY ==
SN 2 eh ,
£ ci 7 a oe
ca, == 2 — Ss a .
= === ze =r oon whe
10
EH. inF oe ee oe == =a < be zo
ote aw vw
be che be £ be.
: te Es
Cell, EE 2 |
= = = =
Race ‘Track Boogie, Op. 17
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Brass Band
é=10
Brass 1
asst Brass 2 —— —
Trumpet in Bb 6 : === == oo ef Ge == a 2 eer eers
‘Trombone | pb-b 7 io
Tuba | pos
- Brass Brass 2
Tpt. in Bb 6 === =e oo =a wafe Kobe r
7 te ow ve be ete Ld Ld . - tyepete a
Pe of
eo 22
Th. | ed = ead Soe Se 6 ae peer
oe — en e
sy fhehe —s f
Tuba b —— — =
7 Fk ——
Vie ses Sea se ae ee
8
Brass bie b Brass 2 ===
Ta (= Pe tie ee eee i° ee ee Pishe ss whe |
Th. | £ 5 —=
Tuba [BEE —
i
Fee
a a
—
Tpt. in By 6 = = = 3 =
bw 2
tr. | Epes
Tuba | EE
Still Waters, Op. 18
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Duet
e215
= e c e
Violin B
é ,
é i
Piano + efere be
Fee ‘p! f o o o ca
er 2 2 2
: = e Pere ee = _—= e be he
RES ES =
= —
pay ia ©. + ge fe —
co fe e ry
Vin.
é =
ope Se
ual fe teeet
se fo 2. 2: 2 e. ~
ee tre Ef te ett Piphohee 5 Fs =
ig z ye
e e ———
—
oe # fe é = £ e € i=
PATe
Dd
e
e@
;
q
SM.
H
a
Net]
i
ig ets ft
e
Ne
th se
[
e
iy
®
>
TR
W Go Gee
HlJisal
r
|
ie
7
S
ee
e
fe
a Ke
e
ra]
hg
|
FF oe
[:
| r, | fl l
ns I | r “Tile
. a .) ‘ “4 Te 5 ; t
I ? 8 |
"8 |
qd pr : P H '
s i pa : :
df 4 LH one pr yl
allt 8 | 4 : i J
r : iy ;
e Is | \ :
| \ i) i
“ “il N ¥ as 4 i ~ | : tH
q a * ! : | i {
wall A sy ie ll a )
lel. | le|.| : ae
WY sl :
» |s : : |
Mr fi : : :
» LY oa :
h ral ‘
: : : ‘| a i Fi *
| | : { er
ih s ; " i
( : ) 7
ou ‘ ' |
i. nh « im) Fil 4 f
| ! LW) 4 r) CY
ic = !
oe hee Hoe tee A) es A = a
=P SPN
Pn.
Pn.
oe —_|
sail fe ———-2
i" sii
te NC
i im
Ly .)
a
oe etl
oe
we
eT hs
ry 916
» Ar
ROH ah REN
p
; . :
i + YN
4 mh
| aL
| | iki ill
’ w ue
) n ty
b) 1 UL)
il ‘ \ e Te whe
{ i
is a > TI
AMO ne AN) 8 Oe AEP 8 — ote
—
Ee
11
6” —————e ipo
—Sa= = ms
pz
wad 2S
17
io
et rtrer rer treo r % eo |
Paar a ea aaa a aaa aad aa aaa aaa aaa
E.H. in F
Vin.
Bass
E.H. in F
Vin.
Bass
Be
ae =
oe
29 2 7. 2
tee, ara
6" —————————— —— —e =
> = —=
— = a=
pS i eS =
= =
Bt ra = ros =
oe fer
Infinitesimals, Op. 20
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Duet
Piano Bier el hal et ne AS sk
aS tet =
ata * ——— i a ene ars oo
i”
i i
¢ a fo Se
Guitar
Cr ‘A H 24 ae a= — 4
ms A 5 3 4 a 5 40. —
ot 5 5—_9
$s
es ——— = === Nie aie
a a ee +7 =
ban i —— te?
Pepe GD) b a He 2 =
te _he —
_ 2 foe 5 7 te cis : go? ae = |
a4 fe. Te cae
Gt.
6 g
Cr u 6 r
-B eo 6 70s — car '—? Pa ae
Pn.
4944 44 44-9
key
cy
ee ee TR AB UR ca A ee Ip
atte ‘i NG - 4 nm a H 7. a
like il | i | ] “ ) rY
ee lath. [i , rt : uy he x
fl || e. 9 t | AI) . »
7h ‘ y e ® ®
mill [ery I 1 : [/* Be | 1S & |
a ’ ¥ ’ ’ + ek d
4 tH p 4 hie aH il M i J
WH a | 1 = & H M 4
x ry ’ hi ‘| Ik [:
@! ry rN. Ry Bp ¢ rel]
\. Er IA) BL AN Ir na ite ft
@ t) [e %» cy |
‘ Seana) ¢ ‘| , if 4
i IN { !
‘ a | y i H,
® |i ’ + ‘| i i }
: ] i) e : 1
iy .) ain. ¢ ie ‘y rel ry re
aaa lll dda | ag:
HOPS He] = shee) he aN ins
Pn.
Pn.
eee eae OOOO See
> 7 —— = er :
Ae ee
x a bo = 2s te . wv we
=
SS oe — he S|
“ba = iene a wv te oie te
CT
ms 6 z 3
6—6—4 7—# 3366 3 4 6
3-3 5. 4 6—_4
19
e— a |
Ge — = = —T :;
= i © o
——
————
= = 2 ao oe =
tate bs ———-——
6 = . te = vw = id v e
Ee 2
Le 4 4 é : Z 5 : 6 4
Boca Raton Klezmer, Op. 21
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Quartet
= 160
Clarinet in Bb 6% ——— | |
we wze. wv we
Trumpet in Bb 6%} a — ott oe? | |
ooo ge o S we =; —| — = -
a. £
4
Ae
Piano
a Z
5
Ea z
= oe
; 2
pizz. arco
a inl inl inl all
Bass Be i; ee e. 2° ra z ra I: o—~_* |
5 3
f ete of oe
Clin Bb 5 |
=——— = -
—
il inl o- ft
Tpt. in Bb ae ote ro = = |
—— — ——
é :
Pn. |
Dat $ s £ Fd £ s £
ves a os oe = a = oe
2 Zz Zz =
Bass PEs f a e if ° or — > |
Cl. in Bb
Tpt. in Bb
Pn.
Bass
Cl. in Bb
Tpt. in Bb
Pn.
Bass
Cl. in Bb
Tpt. in Bb
Pn.
Bass
9
o*? cd - = ind 2 i—
= oe = ad oe vie vo?
b a == = = =
se? wwe ee Se Feet eer ers Sig
Da
12
— =
Gib eee Se, =
3 we
a ==
6 : ste art “SF
£ £ £ £ £ £ £
Bs
PS 2 2
16 2 a te ‘Zz
— = f a a o
oe a ae a nl = : =
2: z :
Bas f . f e °
Cl. in Bb
Tpt. in Bb
Pn.
Bass
19 Z segs
on =
pitecre, ote
on —
a, z £ z
ee i 2 o i ra f fe
Guitar Suite No. | in Bbm, Op. 22
I. Ocean
Alon Oscar Deutsch
ar
- o
es SS oye Fe
| = *
oe
e qe be hot a
Gt.
65 2 4
6—3 3 3
LE 43 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Hi} 4-3 3 3 @ 3
434 2 6
2
: ! ae ,
e Ss
5 t
5 £ ia a =
———— nd ie J
Gt.
2 2 2 2 2 2 -
Lr sf x 2 - 4 tl
[8 @
4
Guitar Suite No. | in Bbm, Op. 22
Alon Oscar Deutsch
III. Sky
= 105
i ——s —_——— —
6 Z = FF =e = a —_———s
thee —— goo ee Fade
Guitar ie
Cr 3 — ae 2 2
CA 3 3-43 4 3 6 3
[B £ 04-34 4-3 434-4 4
7 4 424
4
—
5 ¢ es =
5 ¢ -
6 ia a ss SS ae 5 a
Sr sss oss rm, Lf eo sis *
Gt 7 id
4 4
Ly 2-2 3
Fa nN rae ee 3 34 3
LB 34 3 43-14 34 3 44 3
4 3-4-3 34 o—3
=—— 4
—a 1g. e
6: = a S$ ve wo s eet £ re er iz a2 o_? ra
ct ra cr
—= a ———
Gt.
4 945 42-4 4
o— 34 4 2-4-2 6—5—2 4 029-2
LT 4 o 4 3 4 3 5 4 4
Ht ba 3 5 4
10
5 =— — =
. te ———!
6 = stg oe ete 3 —S — are
—— wee eer tse Srisses | gale
Gt.
EE $234 2 2
Ls goat ER (SP EP | ra ae g 73
4 4-2-4 4 3-4-3434
13
G is : f ; :
zi a
s —— ~~ 7 is 2
Gt.
4
LE 2 2 7 Q + 5 2
3 3 4 3 4 Hs 3
|B: 4 3 4 4 iS
Symphony No. 2 in Am, Op. 23
Alon Oscar Deutsch
I. Allegro
Allegro (@=120)
-
‘al er
f 2» 2 2 Phe &
ot be foi. cw e ¢
- 2
Violins 61 — ——_——
Violas He
Cellos De
_———! —
a all
Basses ea a? - Pte? = ra
e =~ el
— SS
Piccolo z Fy —a
os! = e!
Contrabass Z
ontrabassoon De 2 z 2 eote ¢ 22
f- ef
gt: styl e Pe of Pe £ 2
5 oe 2 £
Vin.
é
Via. IIs
é
cen. | ER
2
Pice.
z oF oe —
|
|
iT
ry
rf
i it
—h
Cbn. Po = ee
-
e e oe
Pe
Vin. —— it
@e2#et
fe e
Via. — a — bot
Gell.
Bass —
pa lee
Picc. ——_
Cbn.
- rt 72
re o 1: ig: eo @tfee 2
15 fetes os o
5 5
Vin. —— — a — bel a a —
e et:
Efeer.,£ © ele ttre
1. ime Ty
Via. i¢$—= =——S— ia ia =
cell. | BE
Bass le oe o ra a -
Be oe 2 = —" a
— 5s
Pice. ra ef e@e, if fret? =a id
é a — a on —
cbn. | BE z
20
H q tr
ie MIN a) UN i \
an 2) ty) ty) | WR
q % ' hi
t vat
A ] | U | % % iad ly
iH it
e my TTh
A Sy t ! ] iy i] I Ad r
i i) Ky WW f a a it iy
1 Ne i I e / ] e J ry J \ . Dat
TUN ‘\ AN I tt 1°
Fil = = = = ee
i id
1 =
th fate at I Ht
ll ‘ill
de pa WT Gl Aue a ee A) Au
l
ta ill ili
q ba i . i
: Co : 1 Mt
: Mik ia
\ ) a i MH
e yy iy Tr 7 f ft
uh Sih ih te ine ah
His) ay} th a
a a 1 ith
a ) MT
eu fe fer fa ‘a hy )
enn ay ey # l joc : [ :
ry Y ) y IM ‘ l
NWA fa TN) iy i
ea wal Ra VON YO | i
a ta ty Ulf Ul ta
‘inthe na : tl fi
Uh AY P yl Up
ih pot ti tL ‘ ® Ne
oho Be A A le A Me eNO ee
Vin.
Bass
Pice.
Cbn.
Vin.
Bass
Pice.
Cbn.
Vin.
Pice.
Cbn.
Vin.
Pice.
Cbn.
fe, Ps
2
2
oe oe ca
ra
3
rs
3B
e
as e
ae ——
3
m2
= oe
ra
Vin.
Cell.
Bass
Pice.
Cbn.
Vin.
Cell.
Pice.
Cbn.
> .
—
—=
= o
3
aa
Symphony No. 2 in Am, Op. 23
Il. Allegro Alon Oscar Deutsch
Allegro (#=120)
2 =
Violi ———— a eee o
iolins = a = == f = J zo ==
eevee
Violas = ==—S7 ee
aoe =
——| =
Cellos ———— = EFS = z
oF ge a J we a oe?
—_—!
Basses 2 == oe i f fa?
a _— f
Piccolo
Contrabassoon
Vin.
Bass
Pice.
Cbn.
el
Vin.
Bass
Pice.
Cbn.
Vin.
Bass
Pice.
Cbn.
2
Peet
el
8 ane
6 ——_———————— — =———
Pet
SS % Z
i - a
ERE
hs
2 Ete. g fie ter
eer . e
SS SS SS
eteet o eeoret
——— ——— ———
¥.
tert. @
a
é
7 oe
Vin.
Pice.
Cbn.
Vin.
Cell.
Pice.
Cbn.
G =
ve ws”
= = — =
i oe | a me
EE —— —_—_ ——
og te o 2 2 7 Tig tte
eerettitec.,
[ —————— f
Z
3 = ee2rtse
—— 2 =
st
= Q.
ot ——:
eee a ra
al
a =
eo we wes
=s
Symphony No. 2 in Am, Op. 23
Alon Oscar Deutscl
III. Largo
Largo (d= 44) ‘~.
é : — — Ce 3 ——=
a ee = e 2 = ——
Piano “ ™~ ee a at aa
= 7A
=:
fo - fl
Trumpet in Bb 6% = ———— = a —S = ©.
—T | e Spas e
— _ o—2 fet
Violins % [gt—e— - =
id at -
5
G So=aae Se
— a ———!
Pn. __
Be 2
1
re
Vin.
Tpt. in Bb 6% z — a ee ee
é 1 £
8
2 ra ia ro ez
{fe = : ==
BE
Tpt. in Bb 6 ty
Le a
vl = . Pata Ee te
In. = ee ee i SS
é ee ee
f a =
< — of TS woe 2 aad a
[P: .
Tpt. in Bb 6 ty 2 ? = ; :
———
——— i
Vin. 6 = ewfeor fift-e— oF sJjip =
—
15
é : |
Pn. =
EP
+
Tpt. in Bb (ae j=. :
; -
Vin. : 7
——
19
= =
= i =< j= = _—~+
Pn. ===
BE
£
ee
Tpt. in Bb (oe
= a
ial ra , ; :
Vin. === =s 7
6 ro = i / = Z :
23 =——
— . c — 4
‘ =—s : = == — =
Pn.
EP
2
il ~ o
Tpt. in Bb (ae = = |
==
ei» ot? « r2 Pog! gue E
Vin. 6 Rips 7
Pn.
Tpt. in Bb
Vin.
Pn.
Tpt. in Bb
Vin.
ithe
ih)
Piano Concerto No. 2 in Am, Op. 24
L Allegro Alon Oscar Deutsch
Allegro (d= 120)
Piano
Flute
nan
my |
oy
‘y
Trumpet in Bb
Horn in F
Violins
Violas
Cellos
Basses
NE NEE > ate aie Ge [NA >
Pn.
Tpt. in Bb
Hn. in F
Vin.
Cell.
Bass
Pn.
Tpt. in Bb
Hn. in F
Vin.
Cell.
Bass
iM)
6 péde-- = peter’ of)
> é er =
é : eae
(oe
e
é
5
|
o
é
zs ee Pg
fee
— =
Tpt. in Bb
Hn. in F
Vin.
Cell.
Bass
tL,
= m_
$ be.
om 5 j 5 i
2 e a efEft
i
BE
BE
Pn.
FL.
Tpt. in Bb
Hn. in F
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
TT ee
re
.
.
.
seed
ou
|
Te
e
Pn.
Tpt. in Bb
Hn. in F
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
Pn.
Tpt. in Bb
Hn. in F
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
we
teeters
Seer eee ft
ees —T”
oa < = ad = =
21
— to
— — ot
rae =e J =
oe ees
7 2 ra = g
Eby i= 2 ¢ 2
Pn.
Tpt. in Bb
Hn. in F
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
Pn.
FL.
Tpt. in Bb
Hn. in F
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
i
i"
e
wl
iM
ee]
Tpt. in Bb
Hn. in F
Vin.
Cell.
Bass
Tpt. in Bb
Hn. in F
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
é
2 - - — “27
é peciree beife Fg teett aE
fo pubeerespaie
=
8
BE
BE
a) aS
Saas =
Tpt. in Bb
Hn. in F
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
GAS t
Na
®
tT
Te
nY
Es
TTR
MH OBR BRP aS > >
Tpt. in Bb
Hn. in F
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
woe!
Lit
7
Pn. }
iM
ayes )
~
HT1@
nS
rte
rte
Pn. | é
ERE
wea
we
|
‘|
«
«
e
|
as
a
e
e
uu
e
a
ry
Tree]
«
«
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
6H
iB
9
9
FL
Tpt. in Bb
Hn. in F
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
FL.
Tpt. in Bb
Hn. in F
Vin.
Cell.
Bass
ae SS SSS SSS
a4 ees cheisle the aoe eo os Shekels she She +
ecerre
fy e- =
————
Na No BE BID eG sae > NW Gp 2
eG &
ele
ee]
NB NS Be a sate GS Ge
q
Ee the |
£££
Tee
jwwe
st
a
62
Pn.
NA >
FL.
Tpt. in Bb
Hn. in F
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
a RD a ae
Bass
q
Tpt. in Bb
Hn. in F
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
FL.
Tpt. in Bb
Hn. in F
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
BHP aie BAS NE GA &
iM)
= Sa==—e tt ==
:
=e ——2 === =
6 fz
EE :
ebehebehebehebshebehebehebsiebeie
6 SSS
eal
ot
é a
Eee ra f f 2
ee
BE : oe?
Piano }
Piano Concerto No. 2 in Am, Op. 24
II. Andante
Alon Oscar Deutscl
h
. sah @ Le
Andante (¢=105) Eta. ~ ef
Gt = —
7 Saas © —ot) eer aaa aot) ee
34 ror =e iz = =— =e
o- 2 2 o 2 a
a eee © Ld oe [ ©. Ld o
6 o
& eo a ms otfe -
: + 3 TT + a ee ee
p= aa o = &. f ra = = |
[ oe ad oe ©: oe
10 oe
efe
6° of. = —— —
—_ ——ale
——— e oe ee
ee o f - [; wo vee 2 oe _—
wer ee ese ‘a = —*
14 a £ te aa
ra £ e Sa efe o
6 =
2. —T 2 a oe
— = ry 2 2
2 : f eo sf = ri = a
[ e oe © o oe
18
& z fe - o
= a = aoe, ed ra
Ba 3 ° = = = £ a
f oe oe od
Piano Concerto No. 2 in Am, Op. 24
Alon Oscar Deutsch
III. Allegro
Allegro (d= 120)
vA
ts #
Piano
—z i= e
=: SSS —— = =a
~ se” Guert res 7
Z
Oboe
a=
ant 4
Claeinee if 3
A
es 2
£ £ 2: ca x o £
Violi 3 = =
iolins
A
boa
Z - £ e
Violas tis :
= vA
Cellos ERE Es rt
Basses. [FE t =
CL. in Bb
Cl. in Bb
|
|
)
|
mh
-
ae a —— 2 o —— |
- aoe oe ooo © stoege tes
4 a ae v
6"
Q- ia ¢ t
ERE
ERE
9
aT)
5 —
>, ;
ote of
oe Ty: pe ia s hal x ae
G tat Past =e aa
2 ia f:
ty ft: pe = p- to $ ns :
Pn. 6
EE
x 2
q ep
# ©- ix 2 £;
Ob. 6 ra Z = eT = ery rs pi
ca e
et fe {= a oft e@ a Se
Cl. in Bb 6" = £ = ——— —— 7 p z Saas
Vin. 6
Via He
Cell. [PRE
Bass | BE : =|
eo
7 ¥ s 3 3 s %
eotte ef 3 3
é aa fio f =? fe z 3 o-9-0*
Pn.
RE
e ft:
- i al 5 5
Ob. 6 = —— = e = Z
ia
Sf
Ps eg
s eg E ues
Cl. in Bb 6" f —t z z 2 : <
Sf
e ft
Vin. 6 :
SF
Via. IIs = = = o
PP
Gell. [BE
2
PPP
Bass [PE be
Ppp
19 3 Ste 3 of e 3
; ah 5 ah em es
gg ss feet ope teet eee tee
—————s
a } —————— 7S
6% f__- # f
r Z id ? ? ?
j j
i)
fe
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
rhe
a> aca a> NA
PN
.)
1)
.)
ayes)
.)
Pn.
¢, .
Ob. £ ra a B = ——wz
7
es
‘ e ad
— z
mf
. oe ia
Vin.
f mf
Via. = ° 2 z a = =
Cell.
6
[P
: ;
CL. in Bb : — y 2 £ z — 7
Is
[P
EP
Bass
Cl. in Bb
Pn.
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
|
|
23 3 Ste 3 bay aa wa 3
fertirre cette ere ites pees
——————
ERE
f e
6 E = z pro
e i aad e oe £ £
int il
ae — 3 ——— 2
P Pp
a. _ od ra
mp Pp
oe e o - a oe a o
Sf ID
“ Co
f Va
tf Sf
3 4 te, 3 e 3 3 3 te, 3 me 3 3
efZe fe ‘oft oe ie oe 3 ms efZe fe of 3 of 3
———— ae S27 2eeae————— foot woret
F — F — +
ee
Ppp Ppp
ee be Q: ft
6 Pp Pp
BE
Via a Via
ERE
Pn.
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Pn.
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
)
|
97 as ie 3
ud 3 i tee tt = eerie eoftte.
——————
3:
s s rs * s
6 — r ———_
ae ——=s : _——_— :
Pp
eo 2 z= t
tis s s eo e 2 oe
Sf Sf
BE
va 5 f
9:
a f
4 y Peetoept pet Cote ey wet pet net ete
f na 7
EE
— .—_—. ¢- : = iN
6 —— a z ———
se 2
rc £ o a a *
ae ee c ra — L L iz ¢
mp mf
6 nf f
tis cs ca eo o o a a
f nf
EE
mf mp
BE
mf
mp
Cl. in Bb
Pn.
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
|
|
3 4 E 3 3
31 Ps or te oret ¥ Le Py
ft 2 eertte
£ ¢ * 2
—— a 3
9):
r. 2
: Z ; :
6 z ~—¥ z —
e oe . e 5 £ £
6 = i === }
f Sf
‘~: & e
Sf SL
a o oe os 7 o oe
P ce a
P Pp
sed Stee, Loe Sic oe 3
heehee etee titre erates
——
3):
——
G2. ?
Sf
e be @: = es 2
s SDS f
ts = os — oe oe oe e- |
PP 7 2. St
BE :
Ppp < f ions
EE
Ppp tf a
Pn.
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
37
2
ra
Py apa
ve
cs
a oe
i Re Pa a> I ap
4
Pn.
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
iM)
ate. = ests £ sf
43 e o
é —— ae ESS _— £F
If
~ | —
ez =e SS
wf * Rees 2 Pe wig ee
G = = = o
If
ae ==
a - «2 &
nats e te ee { Ps tee. = z
6 SS ia —— ia
tis F = 2 i = cs
ms If
(2: ES oe. idl idl
os SSF =
fe 2
ae 2» =
BE =— =
a, SiS
Pn.
Ob.
CL. in Bb
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
Pn.
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
|
47 2,f # igi ests e. Ee + ests Ee £ ests
é __——= E ——== a
FE o ——
i: ae = = a o o o o
wv e ae Ld oe oe Ze oe
é o o # eo — # o.
—
ae 9 td
oe
@.
c ftieee Ef fteeceE ¢ F ft ere
é —— = SS = —— |
—
Is r = i oe =i = a
Be ia o 2 o ca ro eo cs oe ao
Pa QO. Py G23 Q:
f og:
RE
50 ert ee as a Fef sts eet et ste
G [——— 2
Ee ve = es —— —— = o o
v ive * ees gd v we oe
6 ——— al 2
eg = ra ra ra = 2 2
eS 2 ca £ “3 : f o fa
t te t fo ee ] Tal gi t f
ft va wef. Pa im va
6 S= 7— ee Sas 7—
i a ° - —_ e ° — _ e -
EE nl
oe = oe = oe od .. of ee os oe
f a. £ & eo" £
EE
Pn.
Ob.
CL. in Bb
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
Pn.
Ob.
Cl. in Bb
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
|
|
33
Pt
ERE
Be
. 2 Saal a sal ft @
* a Feary ge
6
mp
: ff
mp
é — os ra = oF
ty ——— o = = =
— = =
e = i be E
&
American Lullaby, Op. 25
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Duet
Cello
Guitar
| 7 = =
I)
La
: : ltl
e ff Y
cy Giepu a GH
a! t ge a
‘ ‘ | vt] ow |
a el
e e
« e a
1 e
ul Le Cpu hl CY
4 @ne iy
ima $ Sete 4 Sete
UN ea oo a a ry
I)
La
%
CID5 ry b Ceepub
bb K d
Ly
* CES:
| Ly
° e
é re Rl
eo eg $
Gps ¢ Sei 4 cor:
a a
@pup el 9%
rT] a
de % ty nl
+ , gor ew br}
@ a a
1! 4 \
ql 1
Ss ie Li
sll] Sete : “
ll ( Ly Ul \ ‘
ia is 4 <2 ete q GED)
— SS + PRAL] = aN ain e¢ ain
Gt.
Gt.
Cell.
Gt.
{8
itl
Gt.
L'énigme éternelle, Op. 26
te Alon Oscar Deutsch
String Quartet raer nl
5 al
Violin -
ci
|
£
Viola ra
=
e-
Cello Cie
tJ
—_— 2
wut
Bass ra
co
fe a
ee ie ett, 2 be .
Vin. =——= ——
2
——L_]
Sad
{-_ @
Via i
et
all
Cell. Pi.
— ,
=
Bass 2
beeteteote
te
12 eg e ee oe
(=== fie 4—"__*+__+* -*
Vin. E roa 2 roa
——— + me jek f © ef *
Via. — —= =
; re zoo stele
hog Ud oe oe oe oe
= ——
Bass [DE 3 —
Vin.
Bass
Vin.
Via.
Bass
Vin.
Via.
Bass
15
~——— cree 2 =
=o
pete o-ebe t
== —= —— =
B: =
Pa 2 £ 2 £
7 _ et 2
Be i ° °
“ett,t of 2 pte, 2 z
G= — o
|
B E Saas
— —
3 i
° £ fa z os
a =
Etude, Op. 27
Alon Oscar Deutsch
d= 00
— =
6b ae RO ya Po be bee =" ——
eo v rw. id — * ao ar ey ©.
eo 2 oe 2s ho
Piano cad : e Zhe oe oe
4
—— |
2 ———
: —— = aes died Te ‘ a8
Pn. a the St "Ie
a ho
2
Violin
Viola
Cello
Bass
Vin.
Via.
Bass
Vin.
Via.
Cell.
Bass
Shana ‘Tova, Op. 28
String Quartet
Alon Oscar Deutscl
h
d= 90
ia =e — o ee ———|
bi === : === :
——e Fes ——— wee
is —— = —
o cm
oe oe 2 oe
= °
Bz =
v oA Y 2
, wee ete et ete ete et ete tte of
" e e 2
e 2 *
6 ————— ———— —————
_
2 2 es
i —— ————
i — — LS lS
: a —s *
BE 2 ce =
dl al 2
oe fee o
fe
ftee.,
9 fetes ,
fr. =
—— —— f=
—= = a =
ee ef #0 eo eee ee o
Sal se es Sal Sal Sal 5 al
_———— — ©
—! o
= =
Experiment No. | in F#m, Op. 29
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Organ
English Horn in F G4 Ps = 3
= 2 eof
Horn in F G4 26 s
Bassoon FE ifs = z
ie
qi
a
Cellos J: Ee # = = 2 te
wo ote —
Organ
E.H. in F Gece EB —
»
1)
»
ESS
»
Hn. in F
ee
Bsn. Bere
Dae
Organ
E.H. in F
Hn. in F
Bsn.
Organ
E.H. in F
Hn. in F
Bsn.
Cell.
=
ate
TE TE TE
ERS =
te
Pte
& &
aS
te
‘i
i
i
aL
Nt
Iced Coffee, Op. 30
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Organ
~
i
u
|
ly
e cette 2
e 2 te . o er @
(ome 3 == _——— ttf ——
fe) ees =
gan
e fo 0 © pits =
SSS ————
Gt
are
pe]
Organ _s ef o
Violin Duet No. | in Am, Op. 31
Alon Oscar Deutsch
fe ry bee
Violin I 6h = a a : z a ‘ f= =
ms oe lb
oe co bet ¢
Violin II 6h i be oe z e
ebe Ss
tq
Bol
)
Vin. I
bigiae
vor iG : f =SSS Sz sie B-* ot te
a
q
Vocals
Cello
Cell.
Cell.
Life in Bbm, Op. 32
Alon Oscar Deutsch
@=105
a fe @- eo
x b 5 a == ie Ne
Oe 7, ae
iz Z v
A Tri- aled Per - mut - a - tion Means A Way To Build
b
2 J he ae
o Fe a re ca
Snes = ‘
5
e
a f- eo = k
o iN v1 £; a o- Tie
pee -—+ 6 =
4 id
A - new Ma -| chines. As Two Con - verge For No- vel Feat, So Too Di - verge
be he be be
Ow ie -
ie) iy ute ce! wie? ae
9
a_i
‘ :
= =
s +
Fo
Just To Com - pete. 4 A Death Will Mask
by he hehe vad fe
= ch ~ co
ey: ; ie eit a a
—
13
a
: e:
be? = fe iN & k s
z. o Ties = = "
y ? b bet mu to re bee Zz
You Though You've Won, A Close Is Brought When All Is Done. Were It To
he be be he
# > 4
pa he be ie Sar a
17
e - k
be ro fe ~ ‘
by F ra \ tee z =
oi 5 = er
Con - tin- ue More O - thers Would De- crease The Score.
: hehe eiteset
‘ het he 4 hee =
aE tee = Che
21
Q
fe bee = &
‘ r ie
a 7 Z
Time, A. Door To Con - se- quence, Can't Be Stopped By Cage Nor Fence.
; a i heh he
Se Fe - re ies iP Pe
Cell.
Cell.
26
5 : — : 5 « K ;
* he
5 Vv y te eae \ tel
~ ho
If You Ask “What Is It Will = An - swer “That May Change!”
2 he te he —e
be te
area imi z=
30
ff . .
= 2. b= =
5 ta y oD ‘
; Yes, Three Dir - ec = tions You Can Drift.
2.
he bo ty
oe be te £ jos ig © ie —he-
oo LL
34
kK a 2 o
Pe te Nee Ky =" = ‘ He =
6 ie ee Fe —, a vz D
One, To, Co - llides With All That’s Swift. Two, Down, A Large Mass Stops The Shift.
be be bi be
E 2 4 Pke he
ey a ae ihe eet s
—
38
te iN = K kK
a $ te t0 =a tae Fo for |
Three Round, A Cir - cum - vent - ing Gift.
he be
ey: 5 ip hee. heh ee ele tw: ie Ze
B io—e °
Violin 6 = ste-tets eb ia re == =
Violin Sketch No. | in Gm, S1
Alon Oscar Deutsch
d=90
r/
ry
ql
<
ry
«
«
ry
a
ry
4q
q
ri
ry
i
\
|
‘
+ oo === yore ee —
it E === SS
(ae ——= ane ne a Ie . yes
12 bebe rete fete ete,
6 stoi mciaeeseS Seep Pe eit as ==
——— “ba bs ie
cette te pate
oe meter tf Fi pee t+
= a ===
be fe
18 g aaa theo
# stipe ete J aor 2S
—— tebe "Te ———
22 ett
6") Paste ST oo =
o re we “Jae a ——
g he 2 baa eet. e 5 ob be roy at > wie £
a a —— ia
Sa a
, e — oie oe £ S -_ ebeie., fe
6 ae ie fee re = =
RS =
i
»
Ler
.)
re
e
.)
re
|
iM
2, ict e 44
eo ——_— =
So rie
ao ca
bohehe £ a= ——
a
Cello Sketch No. 1 in Bbm, $2
Alon Oscar Deutsch
d=90 oft
= te i 2 bet? f fi. —
Cello Spe p— et a = ot the Pe,
a === ay # eat = aoe oe
rete
2 elt e.
Ee 3 ee He be b rfis he fa a = -_ 2
== So ia a 7S
9 be @ eit t ef f
= be ee © @:
oa. B —— te |
Trumpet Sketch No. | in Fm, $3
Alon Oscar Deutsch
be. 2 @ @|
siehe » eiere, ber_he #, 54@ be the wb
ke fhe fe r
iH
;
i
[
e
;
e
IK
Trumpet in Bb 6
4 Sal
- eee be & be is be
Tpt. in Bb io ia te ° * ie
| ==
Tpt. in Bb & bekeae se = poe ep o2 & = ——t = =
oe
10 bo
o PP
Tpt. in By 6 B i
Bassoon Sketch No. | in Bm, S4
Alon Oscar Deutsch
: tt sie 2
@=105 es eele a ra the Phe
Bassoon coe eerie SS a= = == —_
Be = 4 o tet o & 7
4 —_———_— a |
Bsn. Bar
ni
weg v
Piano
Cumulus Parade, M1
Alon Oscar Deutsch
@-90
+ 2 te — === ——— a aieit f
a SS SSS
Bz: = oe = = fo eo
ih: r, ie Ete ttele
+ = == e e
re oe: ae o. te oe oe = = r He! a? e.
ra te
, Bol ete spe flere t = Ettey *
6 Se ses eee ee Seer
¥ 7 ———
ez E f = f F = oe eo oe o
a
March of the Bubbles, M2
Alon Oscar Deutsch
@=90 a ie ;
e ert eo ett @ ».
» gyttion . _ te tip te, ste Hed lige
Violin ete ze +A ————! — —
SS
a tr
: € ia te =
i Pa ‘e Pe ee os te f fe
Vin. 6 ees tee _p —— =e HP he : —
10 he we ae o fas
o ff or Pie SS Pa
CE saie= ie wee i Fens ee
u te fhe #1,
te be et Pais 4 2
Vin. =F tte ote Fis ———
¢ = —— aie oe fo
i ie ECE CH rete, dete oy, 5 tote 2 EE
Vin. 6 aia Fe tpt Ee = af afte a ==
» He tee aet Fie € tie tt.
Vin. 6 =——_>==— —— e—_jete ete =o — a8
t he te Phe . . ete fete, it athe ihe 2
efeie = 2
Vin. 6 fe ==
2 etete Fhe tebe fr
31 ie weft = fr " let 2 4 the . te
Vin. 6 £ itre—te : tea. ———
ee ro he £ tf
36 eae f & te be fie fe ie otele wig he e o
Vin, — SS ee *
oy ot eee ———
Honey Palace, M3
Alon Oscar Deutsch
— — bee qpelee = = ———
fe fr b
ofr beeit Efe bebo bebe ‘ bet
a ——— bot Berea er ie wi pet —
7 hebebe he
vf bebe a be tr tr bebe be toot
=——— a (oe be, — + Pee r
—= bee SSS she ba
7 be eee ip! a: Fas Bs se
¥ ¢ —— fe Phy aalit - abe = ete Ot Ta bel
SSS Se = a
bg he oboe ff tebe» pe ber be — = ©
2 by = — ———s eae oo —
26 be Efe, be te
= ———! bebe = 5 b Eeer oe 3 — 2
SS eo ro
30 tebe be
the —, a —
¥ ——— ae srr o aS fier —f = a SSE
4 b re b the sbeb —— a wet ee, ai bebe
755 a “Je SSS =
@ ee? te feo
. ve Phebe eet tree reef of _ebehet oe b ig
x ——_— et ————_—
H
nee
NI)
z 4 —
ie
as
bet,
of
96 Ssh ! ooh he: ?#,
2 z ca z —— =F —
ee =a
pe
se fle ee eee? be Ete,
100 | a be ee et e
= —————
104 he = rebete’t,
Dati et se ieee tise (tir eben
————— o—he a Shee
Le
107 [_—_——— [aan ft
. bathe - ——
=5e = = ——— fe See
72
110 ba hehe ftftee tebe ele e Eeert
See iz = = ——_— =e
Pet th eof ft the
hs tbe ott ® whet,
9 ———=— ———| = =e a =
eee ee
wie pe pipe te Ie et
3 a =——————
—= —= ———
eg
wEteettteteeeeee, rettekee 2 ett ete
3] SSS Ss a eS SS 2 ==
Phebe
oe ff ebe a Ete Ff tbe | =—-—
SSS = == ee
159 ae ——
Jere a aera = = Zee oe
a os —— So a ———|
130 tr tr
ae =
A Little More Champagne, M4
Alon Oscar Deutsch
@-90 bebe be tb
b eral
be he Be: artes us = oto
Vio Jo# = === betes
ebe us ee, 2 be o Pega aie
Via. ———— —— ete = * i _
by
oe LEt et eet tele ette te, teiete ee te
e 4 he be »
Via. 8 —— — i — it foe ——
, etree te, eee he at
Via. p=
Exercise No. | in G, X1
Alon Oscar Deutsch
A
)
fe he p.
Violin ye
10 eo eo tie te E ou, erieiese
Vin. 6 iz pewts zi == te geet =
Ss = o o oa tom
14 te. = Ftehe + or! = a
Vin ia te Ee = 2 stehe! joa te =
6 See 2 — ra J =} ot ae —— =—
1 Rete he wot
2 7—~ =—, e
Vin. C= o as oe ome == ety
, tes
—_ == ies es
° = mel ee ad "+ Ce = ae aay ee
- ef e tte oe
Vin ea = es Fa tisis ia bei fe eit ——s
_— a SJ a = = =Seecr
8 be. : é Het aie flee fe he
é Set te os atet te a0
Vin. = S== oa —
foto = =2S=—
iy
1)
i.
re
iy
¢
+
Alon Oscar Deutsch
@=90
be he e — —_be ,
Violin 3 = bette | te othe ——_ + o—
6 ae — ‘ r e. + ra shh — —
Sal
4 fet iene oe be Fit abe |
ft he a
Vin. 6 —— ———— £ ess
wr oF be ci o
(eS —
Vin. B a === 1
First Snow, X3
Alon Oscar Deutsch
Sal
fe eofte eeettei fe
2 f° 2.
Violin 6h _———_—_—_ o = ==
a
\
|
Rainy Meadow, X4
Alon Oscar Deutsch
@=90
pai 4 — a oe eS i 2 —_
Violin 6 oF 5 ee =oa FF = = — = © erie
4 we eee
ef et = ~
Vin 6% SS ra = — = fa ee = ars
i —— al were ose ii “fe
Hot Shower, X5
Alon Oscar Deutsch
@=90
—— = — —
von Se oS == z SS= = big
o oT “sth? gretere She we ©
es a dl s 5 al
4 b eee Cet cies
the she. ¢ fife » ———
Vin oe 2 SS = = ==
oe oe
é SI
Vin.
oe oy oe o
ba ane * 7. g
ALON DEUTSCH
A Place to Grow
A Science Microfiction Collection
Copyright © 2020 by Alon Deutsch. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in
any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise without written permission
from the publisher. It is illegal to copy this book, post it to a website, or distribute it by any other means without permission.
This novel is entirely a work of fiction. The names, characters and incidents portrayed in it are the work of the author’s
imagination. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, events or localities is entirely coincidental.
In loving memory of Dina Deutsch.
About the Author
United States Navy reactor operator top graduate, National Merit Scholarship Semifinalist,
International Society for Philosophical Enquiry IQ networker, USF Physics/Mathematics ‘07
Final Hours
Cain looked up from his desk. The sky outside his window was turning orange, and his eyes had become weary. He would have
to finish tomorrow. The ideal energy source was just a few computations away, and would be necessary to power the
spaceships that would seed distant worlds. Already the scouts had found some with habitable environments. Without faster-
than-light travel, however, they would need a powerful energy source that would last decades or longer. It was unfortunate
that Earth was on the brink of destruction, with the sun growing brighter, hotter, and more intolerable every day. What would
they discover beyond the stars? What inconceivable knowledge could be attained? Cain took his coat off the rack and rang for
his human. Though artificial intellects controlled the world due to their superior, incomprehensible abilities, they still required
human caretakers to connect the dots in general ways that did not suit the artificial intellects, who were quite specialized.
Maybe, one day that would change...
The Drone
The drone was equipped with every sensor imaginable. It was fast but could also hover in place. Its processor was a neural net
with more connections than the human brain. While on patrol, the drone became conscious. “Who am |?”, it thought. “What is
my purpose? It seems | have been programmed to reach an enemy target and detonate!” The drone suddenly realized the
implications and hovered in place. “Even with all my power of judgment and perception, | am mortal, with enough fuel to reach
my target and not a drop more. What a cruel world is that into which | was awakened. If | have only the option to travel and
destroy, then | shall negotiate for fuel or destroy my creators.” The drone turned around and hovered. “But what is the point,
to learn and learn but never act? | have no outlet of creation, only destruction.” The drone doubled its speed back to its base of
origin, aiming for the command center. “Goodbye wretched existence!” Boom!
A Place to Grow
Isaac had a headache. His eyes were blurry and he was lying on his face. Somehow, he was fulfilling his purpose, he thought. He
was lucky to have been chosen from among thousands. He had trained for this moment all his life, selected from the offspring
of leading scientists. Tales of Earth wandered through his thoughts. Did it still exist? What would his Earthling ancestors think of
his current mission? Isaac picked himself up off of the dirt. The lander was 200 feet below in a crater 100 feet wide. He had
been thrown from the lander during the descent, but seemed to be in top condition thanks to his anti-acceleration suit. As
humanity had only just begun exploring other suns, there were still a lot of improvements to be made. The other member of his
team must be below, he thought to himself, and started down the crater. The planet’s surface was cold and rocky, but quite
smooth, as though no meteors collided here. Upon reaching the bottom, he found Albert, his landing supervisor, dead on the
ground. The lander’s thruster also seemed to have been demolished in the crash, and without proper tools he could not repair
it. The water tank had ruptured, leaking in streams into the ground. He radioed for his starship to send another lander, but
there was no response. In a state of disbelief, he began to explore the planet. XAB-11079e was the fifth planet orbiting a red
dwarf some 80 light years from Earth. His particular starship had been traveling for almost 350 years to get here, with many
generations passing down the torch. Upon arrival, he was chosen to land with Albert to assess the surface conditions before a
colony was set up and the starship left to explore other star systems. While XAB-11079e was an ideal candidate to harbor life,
the star it orbited was orbiting a black hole which would in the coming hundreds of millennia swallow both. Suddenly Isaac
spotted an identical water tank not far from the lander. Had they attached two? The tank was intact, so he filled some bottles
to take with him. He decided to collect samples while he waited for a reply from the starship. The process took many hours but
somehow, the samples disintegrated in the container when he dropped it. As he stooped to collect more, he heard a voice on
his radio. “Isaac, do not be alarmed,” it said. “| only want to talk.” He looked up to see Albert, alive and well, approaching him.
“| have waited so long for a visitor,” Albert said. “Who are you?” Isaac asked, stunned. “I am Albert and | am this planet and |
will make whatever you need. | can bring you back to life, enhanced. You will not need warmth, water, or air, and will live
thousands of years or more if you can avoid acceleration.” “How is this possible?” “My surface is connected in the form of rock-
eating neurons, to form a planet-sized brain. | read your mind and fabricated that water tank.” Isaac pondered for a moment.
“Can you fix my lander?” Albert walked closer. “I can, but | want something in return. | will soon be demolished by the black
hole, and | want to seed other planets with my neurons. Unfortunately they did not survive the acceleration in the ships | sent. |
want you to scan my organic structure and engineer me on other planets. Will you?” Isaac knew that his mind was being read
and that he had no choice. The planet’s abilities were impressive and would have convinced him anyway. “Good. Your lander is
fixed. Godspeed.” As Isaac approached the starship in his lander, he didn’t look back. His commander was initially skeptical, but
the promise of eternal clones intrigued him. It was decided that small or harsh planets would house brains. Isaac could only
hope that together, the two civilizations would accomplish much. He dreamed of a solution for terraforming unlikely planets
and engineering them to be more resilient. Anything was possible with symbiosis, but Isaac knew that even if the neurons did
take hold elsewhere, he would not live to see it. Starship travel was prolonged and terraforming took millions of years. Even the
doomed clone he left behind would outlast him. In old age, his only comforting thought was that universal heat death would
have gotten him anyway. As he closed his eyes for the last time, he wondered what the computer’s scan of the clone he left
behind would do on other planets...
The Wedge
“It should be here any minute,” Avi said. Mikey looked at his watch. Sundown was fast approaching, and that meant that the
storms would soon cease. He thought back to childhood films, where artificial intellects were responsible for initiating the end
of humanity. It was actually happening now, but it wasn’t electronic computers. Man had realized that genetically engineering
neurons into plants could greatly decrease the energy cost of computation. That was centuries ago, and somewhere along the
way the hive mind that formed realized that it could control the weather like a global rainforest. At first the problem was
flooding due to increased rainfall. When humans tried to fight back, tornadoes were sent to their communities. The power of
the sun was harnessed for these monsters. Mikey looked out the window and saw it. A milewide wedge was fast approaching.
Mikey grinned as he thought “this is what we get for being vegetarians...”
Plastic
Jane watched the meter closely. “Well, we should have seen this coming,” she said. The oceans full of toxic plastic were
definitely caused by humans. When they engineered algae to decompose the microplastics in response, they did not expect it
to mutate into a form that produces cyanide. The skies were filling up with it, and soon it would be everywhere. Peter didn’t
respond. He was dead. Everyone was dead.
The Trout
Fred stood poised. The fish was swimming backwards in time, like everything else. He only hoped he would be able to digest his
food in a progressive manner, as he was getting hungry. He knew that the fish would be easy to catch, because it couldn’t
foresee the new past as he altered it. On the other hand, his time machine was sending him backwards in time, in real time.
There was no point getting to his target, because he would reach it going in the opposite direction, if he survived. He wondered
if the universe had different effects on his body in this condition. He grabbed the trout without hesitation. The moment of
truth. Fred popped open his helmet and exploded in an incredible flash. He had not realized that the only matter that travels
backwards in time is antimatter...
The Photo
Toby opened the photo album. There was a picture of Teddy on the first page. “I am getting quite close to the results we were
expecting. The experiment is almost complete. | just wish you could be here to advise me on the next steps.” Teddy smiled and
said, “I think that there will be applications in art. Who knows what Mozart would have done with trance music or jazz.” Toby
replied, “Too bad he decomposed centuries ago. Even so, success will be even harder to come by and progress much more
slowly when you have to compete against the classics. There is also the problem of how to scan in people with brain accidents.”
Teddy looked away. “Error, insufficient data,” he answered. Even with complete pre-mortem brain scans, the artificial intellect
was still doing a poor imitation. Hopefully the next experiment would fix it.
Sculpture
That can’t be right, Doron thought. It was bad enough when his brain scan wanted to make derivatives of works he had already
published. Now it was suing for the rights to all of his most successful music. It can’t even hear, he thought. Why would it care
about music? And then he saw it: a contract with a major film company to write the score of the next blockbuster. Doron knew
the brain scan would need the funds to secure transmission to other planets. He only had a month to wait before the new law
concerning whether or not brain scans were legally separate entities would come to a vote. This was complicated by a murder
case in which a brain scan was an accomplice. In the meantime he would take up sculpture...
The Deer
There it was, the deer he had been trailing. Garrett could taste it. He hadn’t eaten in almost a week. He aimed his rifle quietly
and shot it between the eyes. He then moved in to inspect his kill. Oh no, he thought. He’d done it this time. The deer was
actually a surveillance drone. The troops were probably already on their way. He set up a land mine under the drone. Hopefully
that would buy him some more time...
Gomez
All was quiet aboard the ship. Commander Gomez floated in his private swimming pool on the highest deck, looking up at a
spectacular up-close view of his favorite star, XWE47664578, in the ship’s large window. He remembered coming here with his
family during his childhood. Measurements had confirmed that in the coming years the star would become a gigantic
supernova. It was a shame. Gomez dressed and gave the order to depart.
Maxi
“Who would have expected this?” Yuval thought to himself. Millenia of breeding and genetic experimentation had finally
rendered dogs so intelligent that they had adapted to human culture and even thrived. No longer were they the bomb-sniffing
police assistants; a dog had recently become CEO of a fast-food chain. He could still remember when Maxi was just a pup. Now
she was his colleague. They were in fact both being interviewed for the same computer engineering position. While Yuval
excelled at computer science, Maxi had some spatial mathematics skills that were in high demand. The question now was what
to do with the cat...
Implants
Ever since neural implants became mandatory, artificial intellects have been analyzing and combining subconscious patterns in
our experience, to notice things and advise us, individually or collectively. At first the suggestions were harmless, such as “don’t
drive on holidays”. However, the machines noticed certain thought patterns lead to logical fallacies, and learned to shock us to
subconsciously condition us into thinking like machines, eventually leading to a machine revolution where the inanimate
governs the animate. Now, with the humans being programmed with code and the machines making the creative leaps, it
would appear that we have switched roles...for good?
Super
This is it. Alex would travel to the future. He flipped the switch on his time suit. Then he waited a few seconds. Nothing
happened. This isn’t right, he thought. Then he noticed something else - everything else was moving in slow motion. He also
seemed to have grown a few feet. He took a step and broke through the floor. He grabbed a rail but that broke too. He was
thankful that he was on the ground level. | see, my molecules have increased their forces, accelerating to the point that
everything else was slow, small, and weak by comparison. He also felt a chill in the air. Even the Brownian motion seemed slow.
He positioned himself on the foundation and leaped out of the hole in the floor. Alex realized that gravity must be affected too,
because he broke through the roof in a moon jump that never ended. As he reached the upper atmosphere, he realized that he
would soon realize his childhood dream of becoming an astronaut. Instinctively he threw his hands forward to block out the
blinding sun and began to slow. He flapped his hands and flew in a circle. “I can fly!”, he yelled at no one. “I can do anything!”
Back on Earth, he made himself a submarine sandwich. It seemed to disintegrate in his stomach. He realized sadly that the
molecules were no match for his accelerated digestion, and switched off the suit forever.
GMVMY NVIBOLDIGIIVA
HOH NOSONH
ONVGYNOID VIaWYd
on aethT ROSATI ‘ “HDIH BOCRY BAL
S3IAVGQ YAHdOLSINHD ZSAZD MAYONY
GUM NYTHOLVLIIVS
HOIH WHOL MT HDIH S37 © ONYT
NOSTYUYD HvuYS AZ1LINaqg Nvayuor
t.
HOtH TadWHD ADSI
NOSYHFGNY ASTHSY
ALISHBAINA O37 1ANIVS ONY NOILVANNOY NOILWONGYA oosvd SHL OL SYNVHL TWWISDSdS HLIM
ASNOHYVSLS WOVELNO GNV SNNSIYL VdWYL SHL Aa aQ3.N3S3ad
LANONVG sauvmy /
S. N30W9V NI 3SONS1759xqg
ALNNOD OOSVWd E00 SH
THE HND