Skip to main content <#maincontent>
We will keep fighting for all libraries - stand with us!
Internet Archive logo A line drawing of the Internet Archive
headquarters building façade.
Search icon An illustration of a magnifying glass.
Search icon An illustration of a magnifying glass.
Upload icon An illustration of a horizontal line over an up pointing
arrow. Upload
User icon An illustration of a person's head and chest. Sign up
| Log in
Web icon An illustration of a computer application window
Wayback Machine
Texts icon An illustration of an open book.
Books
Video icon An illustration of two cells of a film strip.
Video
Audio icon An illustration of an audio speaker.
Audio
Software icon An illustration of a 3.5" floppy disk.
Software
Images icon An illustration of two photographs.
Images
Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape
Donate
Ellipses icon An illustration of text ellipses.
More
Hamburger icon An icon used to represent a menu that can be toggled by
interacting with this icon.
Internet Archive Audio
Live Music Archive Librivox Free
Audio
Featured
* All Audio
* This Just In
* Grateful Dead
* Netlabels
* Old Time Radio
* 78 RPMs and Cylinder Recordings
Top
* Audio Books & Poetry
* Computers, Technology and Science
* Music, Arts & Culture
* News & Public Affairs
* Spirituality & Religion
* Podcasts
* Radio News Archive
Images
Metropolitan Museum
Cleveland
Museum of Art
Featured
* All Images
* This Just In
* Flickr Commons
* Occupy Wall Street Flickr
* Cover Art
* USGS Maps
Top
* NASA Images
* Solar System Collection
* Ames Research Center
Software
Internet Arcade Console
Living Room
Featured
* All Software
* This Just In
* Old School Emulation
* MS-DOS Games
* Historical Software
* Classic PC Games
* Software Library
Top
* Kodi Archive and Support File
* Vintage Software
* APK
* MS-DOS
* CD-ROM Software
* CD-ROM Software Library
* Software Sites
* Tucows Software Library
* Shareware CD-ROMs
* Software Capsules Compilation
* CD-ROM Images
* ZX Spectrum
* DOOM Level CD
Books
Books to Borrow Open Library
Featured
* All Books
* All Texts
* This Just In
* Smithsonian Libraries
* FEDLINK (US)
* Genealogy
* Lincoln Collection
Top
* American Libraries
* Canadian Libraries
* Universal Library
* Project Gutenberg
* Children's Library
* Biodiversity Heritage Library
* Books by Language
* Additional Collections
Video
TV News Understanding 9/11
Featured
* All Video
* This Just In
* Prelinger Archives
* Democracy Now!
* Occupy Wall Street
* TV NSA Clip Library
Top
* Animation & Cartoons
* Arts & Music
* Computers & Technology
* Cultural & Academic Films
* Ephemeral Films
* Movies
* News & Public Affairs
* Spirituality & Religion
* Sports Videos
* Television
* Videogame Videos
* Vlogs
* Youth Media
Search the history of over 835 billion web pages
on the Internet.
Search the Wayback Machine
Search icon An illustration of a magnifying glass.
Mobile Apps
* Wayback Machine (iOS)
* Wayback Machine (Android)
Browser Extensions
* Chrome
* Firefox
* Safari
* Edge
Archive-It Subscription
* Explore the Collections
* Learn More
* Build Collections
Save Page Now
Capture a web page as it appears now for use as a trusted citation in
the future.
Please enter a valid web address
* About
* Blog
* Projects
* Help
* Donate
* Contact
* Jobs
* Volunteer
* People
* Sign up for free
* Log in
Search metadata
Search text contents
Search TV news captions
Search radio transcripts
Search archived web sites
Advanced Search
* About
* Blog
* Projects
* Help
* Donate Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape
* Contact
* Jobs
* Volunteer
* People
Full text of "Protecting Powers: International Law
"
See other formats
DIPLOMATIC PROTECTION
[Agenda item 3]
DOCUMENT A/CN.4/514"
Second report on diplomatic protection,
by Mr. John R. Dugard, Special Rapporteur
[Original: English]
[28 February 2001]
CONTENTS
Page
Works: cited! inthe present report sii scscvccsciecevsscsvsaesescsssavessacscsdeaceacyeaceds avo iasesensecacstsatoasncavencusscesvatencdcnseaaunnasvevareevaes 98
Paragraphs
A. Exhaustion of local remedies 1-4 100
B. The general principle that local remedies must be exhausted 100
Article 10 100
C. The exhaustion of local remedies rule is a customary rule 5 100
D. Persons required to exhaust local remedies 6 101
E. Primary and secondary rules 7-10 101
F. Remedies to be exhausted 11-17 102
G. Local remedies must be exhausted where the claim is preponderantly based on injury toanational 18-34 103
Article 11 18-31 103
Articles 12-13 32-34 106
H. Codification 35-43 107
I. Judicial decisions 44-50 109
J. State practice 51-52 111
K. Opinions of writers 53-62 111
L. Conclusion 63-66 114
M. Future work 67 114
* Incorporating A/CN.4/514/Corr.1.
97
98 Documents of the fifty-third session
Works cited in the present report
AbeDE, A. O.
“A fresh look at the meaning of the doctrine of denial of justice un-
der international law”, Canadian Yearbook of International Law
(Vancouver), vol. XIV, 1976, pp. 73-75.
“A survey of treaty provisions on the rule of exhaustion of local
remedies”, Harvard International Law Journal, vol. 18, No. 1,
winter 1977, pp. 1-17.
AbLeR, Matthew H.
“The exhaustion of the local remedies rule after the International
Court of Justice’s decision in ELSI”, International and Compara-
tive Law Quarterly, vol. 39, July 1990, pp. 641-653.
AMERASINGHE, C. F.
“The formal character of the rule of local remedies”, Zeitschrift
fiir ausldndisches 6ffentliches Recht und Voélkerrecht, vol. 25,
No. 3, October 1965, pp. 445-477.
State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens. Oxford, Clarendon
Press, 1967.
“The local remedies rule in an appropriate perspective”, Heidelberg
Journal of International Law, vol. 36, 1976, pp. 727-759.
Local Remedies in International Law. Cambridge, Grotius, 1990.
“Whither the local remedies rule?”, ICSID Review: Foreign Invest-
ment Law Journal, vol. 5, No. 2, fall 1990, pp. 292-310.
Aronovitz, Alberto M.
“Notes on the current status of the rule of exhaustion of local rem-
edies in the European Convention of Human Rights”, Israel
Yearbook on Human Rights, vol. 25, 1995.
Baace, Algot
“Intervention on the ground of damage caused to nationals, with
particular reference to exhaustion of local remedies and the
rights of shareholders”, British Year Book of International Law,
1958 (London), vol. 34, pp. 162-175.
Borcuarb, Edwin M.
The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad or the Law of Inter-
national Claims. New York, Banks Law Publishing Co., 1915.
“Theoretical aspects of the international responsibility of States”,
Heidelberg Journal of International Law, vol. 1, 1929, pp. 223—
250.
Briaas, Herbert W.
“The local remedies rule: a drafting suggestion”, American Journal
of International Law (Washington, D.C.), vol. 50, No. 4, Octo-
ber 1956, pp. 921-927.
BRIERLY, J. L.
The Law of Nations. 6th ed. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1963.
Brown ig, Ian
Principles of Public International Law. 5th ed. Oxford, Oxford
University Press, 1998.
CANGCADO TRINDADE, A. A.
“The birth of State responsibility and the nature of the local
remedies rule”, International Law Review, vol. 56, No. 3, July—
September 1978, pp. 157-188.
“Denial of justice and its relationship to exhaustion of local rem-
edies in international law”, Philippine Law Journal, vol. 53, De-
cember 1978, pp. 404—421.
The Application of the Rule of Exhaustion of Local Remedies in
International Law: its Rationale in the International Protection
of Individual Rights. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,
1983.
ComsBacau, J. and D. ALLAND
“Primary” and ‘secondary’ rules in the law of State responsibility:
categorizing international obligations”, Netherlands Yearbook
of International Law (The Hague), vol. XVI, 1985, pp. 81-109.
Compacau, Jean and Serge Sur
Droit international public. 4th ed. Paris, Montchrestien, 1999.
801 p.
Daiuuier, Patrick and Alain PELLET
Droit international public. 6th rev. ed. Paris, LGDJ, 1999.
De VisscHeEr, Charles
“Notes sur la responsabilité internationale des Etats et la protec-
tion diplomatique d’aprés quelques documents récents, Revue
de droit international et de législation comparée, 3rd series, vol.
VIII, 1927, pp. 245-272.
“Le déni de justice en droit international”, Recueil des cours de
l’Académie de droit international de La Haye, 1935-II. Paris,
Sirey, 1935. Vol. 52.
DoEnRING, Karl
“Local remedies, exhaustion of”, in Rudolf Bernhardt, ed.,
Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. 3. Amsterdam,
Elsevier, 1997.
Dunn, Frederick Sherwood
The Protection of Nationals: a Study in the Application of Inter-
national Law. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press, 1932.
EaGLeton, Clyde
“Denial of justice in international law”, American Journal of
International Law (Washington, D.C.), vol. 22, 1928, pp. 538-559.
The Responsibility of States in International Law. New York,
New York University Press, 1928.
Facuirti, Alexander P.
“The local remedies rule in the light of the Finnish Ships Arbitra-
tion”, British Year Book of International Law, 1936 (London),
vol. 17.
Fawcett, J. E. S.
“The exhaustion of local remedies: substance or procedure?”,
British Year Book of International Law, 1954 (London), vol. 31,
pp. 452-458.
The Application of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1969.
FIrzMAvrIce, Sir Gerald
“Hersch Lauterpacht—the scholar as judge: part I”, British Year
Book of International Law, 1961 (London), vol. 37.
FREEMAN, Alwyn V.
The International Responsibility of States for Denial of Justice.
London, Longmans, Green and Co., 1938.
GarciA AMADOR, F. V.
“State responsibility: some new problems”, Recueil des cours de
l’Académie de droit international de la Haye, 1958-II. Leiden,
Sijthoff, 1959. Vol. 94, pp. 365-491.
The Changing Law of International Claims. Vol. Il. New York,
Oceana, 1984.
Gaia, Giorgio
L’Esaurimento dei ricorsi interni nel diritto internazionale. Milan,
Giuffré, 1967.
Geck, Wilhelm Karl
“Diplomatic protection”, Encyclopedia of Public International
Law, in Rudolf Bernhardt, ed., Encyclopedia of Public Inter-
national Law, vol. 1. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1992, pp. 1045-1066.
Go pik, L. F. E.
“State responsibility and the expropriation of property”, Inter-
national Lawyer, vol. 12, No. 1, winter 1978, pp. 63-82.
Diplomatic protection 99
HAESLER, Thomas
The Exhaustion of Local Remedies in the Case Law of International
Courts and Tribunals. Leiden, Sijthoff, 1968.
Hart, H. L. A.
The Concept of Law. 2nd ed. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994.
Heap, Ivan L.
“A fresh look at the local remedies rule”, Canadian Yearbook of
International Law (Vancouver), vol. V, 1967, pp. 142-158.
HERDEGEN, Matthias
“Diplomatischer Schutz und die Erschépfung von Rechtsbehelfen”,
in Georg Ress and Torsten Stein, eds., Der diplomatische Schutz
im Volker- und Europarecht: Aktuelle Probleme und Entwick-
lungstendenzen. Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft,
1996, pp. 63-82.
Hype, Charles Cheney
International Law Chiefly as Interpreted and Applied by the United
States. Boston, Little, Brown, and Company, 1922. Vol. 1.
JENNINGS, Sir Robert and Sir Arthur Warts, eds.
Oppenheim’s International Law, vol. 1, Peace, introduction and part 1.
9th ed. Harlow, Longman, 1992.
Jessup, Philip C.
A Modern Law of Nations: an Introduction. New York, Macmillan,
1956.
JIMENEZ DE ARECHAGA, Eduardo
“International responsibility”, in Max Sgrensen, ed., Manual of
Public International Law. London and Basingstoke, Macmillan,
1968, pp. 531-590.
“Tnternational law in the past third of a century”, Collected Courses
of The Hague Academy of International Law, 1978-I. Alphen
aan den Rijn, Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1979. Vol. 159, pp. 1-344.
Koxortrt, Juliane
“The exhaustion of local remedies”. Interim report. Interna-
tional Law Association. Report of the Sixty-Ninth Conference.
London, 2000.
Law, Castor H. P.
The Local Remedies Rule in International Law. Geneva, Droz,
1961. (Thesis, University of Geneva)
Litticu, R. B.
“Duties of States regarding the civil rights of aliens”, Collected
Courses of The Hague Academy of International Law, 1978-III.
Alphen an den Rijn, Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1980. Vol. 161,
pp. 329-442.
Meron, Theodor
“The incidence of the rule of exhaustion of local remedies”,
British Year Book of International Law, 1959 (London), vol. 35,
pp. 83-101.
O’ CONNELL, D. P.
International Law. 2nd ed. London, Stevens, 1970. Vol. 2.
Ross, Alf
On Law and Justice. London, Stevens, 1958.
ScHWaARZE, Jiirgen
“Rechtsschutz Privater bei vélkerrechtswidrigem Handeln fremder
Staaten”, Archiv des Vélkerrechts, vol. 24. Tiibingen, Mohr,
1986, pp. 408-433.
SCHWARZENBERGER, Georg
International Law. 3rd ed. London, Stevens, 1957. Vol. 1.
SEPULVEDA Amor, Bernardo
“International law and national sovereignty: the NAFTA and the
claims of Mexican jurisdiction”, Houston Journal of Interna-
tional Law, vol. 19, No. 3, spring 1997.
Suaw, Malcolm N.
International Law. 4th ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,
1997.
Sonn, Louis B. and R. R. BAXTER
“Responsibility of States for injuries to the economic interests of
aliens”, American Journal of International Law (Washington,
D.C.), vol. 55, 1961, pp. 545-584.
Starke, J. G.
“Tmputability in international delinquencies”, British Year Book of
International Law, 1938 (London), vol. 19, pp. 104-117.
TuirLway, Hugh
“The law and procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960—
1989”, British Year Book of International Law, 1995 (Oxford),
vol. 66, pp. 1-96.
Verpross, Alfred and Bruno SimMA
Universelles Vélkerrecht: Theorie und Praxis. 3rd ed. Berlin,
Duncker & Humblot, 1984.
VERZUL, J. H. W.
“La régle de l’épuisement des recours internes”, Annuaire de
l'Institut de Droit International (Basel), April 1956, vol. 46
(Grenada session), pp. 265-316.
International Law in Historical Perspective. Part VI. Juridi-
cal Facts as Sources of International Rights and Obligations.
Leiden, Sijthoff, 1973.
Warprick, Colin
“Protection of nationals abroad: Current legal developments”,
International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 37,
part 4, October 1988, pp. 1002-1012.
WELLENS, K. C.
“Diversity in secondary rules and the unity of international law:
some reflections on current trends”, Netherlands Yearbook
of International Law (The Hague), vol. XXV, 1994, pp. 3-38.
WHITEMAN, Marjorie M.
Digest of International Law. Vol. 8. Washington, D.C., U.S.
Government Printing Office, 1967.
100 Documents of the fifty-third session
A. Exhaustion of local remedies!
1. The exhaustion of local remedies rule is a rule of
customary international law. In the Interhandel case ICJ
stated that:
The rule that local remedies must be exhausted before interna-
tional proceedings may be instituted is a well-established rule of
customary international law; the rule has been generally observed
in cases in which a State has adopted the cause of its national whose
rights are claimed to have been disregarded in another State in vio-
lation of international law. Before resort may be had to an interna-
tional court in such a situation, it has been considered necessary that
the State where the violation occurred should have an opportunity
to redress it by its own means, within the framework of its own
domestic legal system.”
In the ELSI case ICJ described it not merely as a rule,
but as “an important principle of customary interna-
tional law”.?
2. Many reasons have been given for this rule. Borchard
advances the following reasons:
[Flirst, the citizen going abroad is presumed to take into account
the means furnished by local law for the redress of wrongs; sec-
ondly, the right of sovereignty and independence warrants the lo-
cal state in demanding for its courts freedom from interference,
on the assumption that they are capable of doing justice; thirdly,
the home government of the complaining citizen must give the
offending government an opportunity of doing justice to the in-
jured party in its own regular way, and thus avoid, if possible,
all occasion for international discussion; fourthly, if the injury is
committed by an individual or minor official, the exhaustion of
local remedies is necessary to make certain that the wrongful act
or denial of justice is the deliberate act of the state; and fifthly, if
it is a deliberate act of the state, that the state is willing to leave
the wrong unrighted. It is a logical principle that where there is
a judicial remedy, it must be sought. Only if sought in vain and
a denial of justice established, does diplomatic interposition be-
come proper.*
The foundation of the rule, according to Jiménez de
Aréchaga, is “the respect for the sovereignty and juris-
diction of the state competent to deal with the question
through its judicial organs”.°
3. An exhaustion of local remedies rule was included
in article 22 in the draft articles on State responsibility
adopted by the Commission on first reading. The com-
mentary to that article’ described the requirement of the
exhaustion of local remedies as “a principle of general
international law”. The draft articles on State responsi-
bility provisionally adopted by the Drafting Committee
on second reading in 20008 provide that the “responsi-
bility of a State may not be invoked if ... [t]he claim is
1 The Special Rapporteur wishes to acknowledge the invaluable
contribution made to the preparation of the report by Ms. Zsuzsanna
Deen-Racsmany of the University of Leiden.
2 Interhandel, Preliminary Objections, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports
1959, p. 27.
3 Elettronica Sicula S.p.A. (ELSI), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1989,
p. 42, para. 50.
4 The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad or the Law of In-
ternational Claims, pp. 817-818. For further reasons, see Doehring,
“Local remedies, exhaustion of”, p. 238; and Sepulveda Amor, “Inter-
national law and national sovereignty: the NAFTA and the claims of
Mexican jurisdiction”, p. 586.
° “International responsibility”, p. 584.
6 Yearbook ... 1996, vol. II (Part Two), p. 60.
7 Yearbook ... 1977, vol. II (Part Two), p. 31.
8 Yearbook ... 2000, vol. II (Part Two), annex, p. 65.
one to which the rule of exhaustion of local remedies
applies, and any available and effective local remedy
has not been exhausted”,? but leave the drafting of a
comprehensive rule on this subject to the present study.
4. Mr. Roberto Ago, the Special Rapporteur responsi-
ble for the drafting of article 22, succeeded in including
many of the principles comprising the exhaustion of local
remedies in a single article uninterrupted by a single full-
stop. It reads:
When the conduct of a State has created a situation not in confor-
mity with the result required of it by an international obligation con-
cerning the treatment to be accorded to aliens, whether natural or
juridical persons, but the obligation allows that this or an equivalent
result may nevertheless be achieved by subsequent conduct of the
State, there is a breach of the obligation only if the aliens concerned
have exhausted the effective local remedies available to them with-
out obtaining the treatment called for by the obligation or, where
that is not possible, an equivalent treatment.'°
No attempt is made to emulate this feat in the present re-
port, first, because the components of the exhaustion of
local remedies rule considered in this report go beyond
those addressed by Mr. Ago,!! and secondly, because the
goal of clarity is better achieved by a number of draft ar-
ticles. Consequently Mr. Ago’s single article is replaced
by several articles.
B. The general principle that local remedies
must be exhausted
Article 10
1. A State may not bring an international claim
arising out of an injury to a national, whether a natu-
ral or legal person, before the injured national has,
subject to Article 14, exhausted all available local le-
gal remedies in the State alleged to be responsible for
the injury.
2. “Local legal remedies” means the remedies
which are as of right open to natural or legal persons
before judicial or administrative courts or authorities
whether ordinary or special.
C. The exhaustion of local remedies rule
is a customary rule
5. That the exhaustion of local remedies is a well-
established rule of customary international law is not
disputed. It has been affirmed by the decisions of inter-
national!? and national courts, bilateral and multilateral
treaties, State practice, codification attempts by govern-
mental and non-governmental bodies and the writings
of jurists. The fact that treaties, particularly investment
treaties, may on occasion exclude the operation of the
9 Ibid., p. 69, art. 45.
10 Yearbook ... 1977 (see footnote 7 above), p. 30.
| Mr. Ago acknowledged that article 22 did not pretend to cover all
aspects of the exhaustion of local remedies rule, particularly those that
went beyond the purpose of the draft articles, namely the codification
of the general rules governing State responsibility (ibid. , pp. 48 and 50,
paras. (52) and (61) of the commentary to article 22).
12 See paragraph 1 above.
Diplomatic protection 101
rule in no way detracts from the generality of the rule
or the universality of its acceptance.!° The commentary
to article 22 of the draft articles on State responsibility
adopted by the Commission on first reading!* contains
a litany of sources proclaiming its validity. There is no
reason to rehearse those sources.
D. Persons required to exhaust local remedies
6. Both natural and legal persons are required to ex-
haust local remedies. A foreign company financed partly
or mainly by public capital is also required to exhaust
local remedies where it engages in acta jure gestionis.!°
Diplomats or State enterprises engaged in acta jure im-
perii, on the other hand, are not required to exhaust local
remedies, as an injury to them is a direct injury to the
State to which the exhaustion of local remedies rule is
inapplicable. !®
E. Primary and secondary rules
7. No attempt is made to define or describe the great
range of internationally wrongful acts that give rise to
State responsibility when an alien is injured to which
the exhaustion of local remedies rule applies. To do so
would be to trespass on the field of “primary rules” of
international law which the Commission has studiously
avoided in its draft articles on State responsibility, and
which it has suggested should likewise be avoided in the
study on diplomatic protection.!’ This policy has served
the Commission well in its approach to State respon-
sibility. However, it should be stressed, first, that there
is no clear distinction between primary and secondary
rules; secondly, that the distinction rests on unclear ju-
risprudential grounds; and thirdly, that it is a distinction
of dubious value in a study on the exhaustion of local
remedies.
8. That a clear distinction between primary and sec-
ondary rules is unattainable is evidenced by the many
occasions on which members of the Commission have
disagreed over the classification of a rule as primary
13 Yearbook ... 1977 (see footnote 7 above), p. 49, para. (55). See also
Amerasinghe, “Whither the local remedies rule?”.
14 Yearbook ... 1977 (see footnote 7 above), pp. 30-50.
15 Tbid., p. 46, para. 45; sixth report on State responsibility by
Mr. Ago, Yearbook ... 1977, vol. Il (Part One), document A/CN.4/302
and Add. 1-3, p. 40, para. 103; see also International Law Association,
Report of the Sixty-Ninth Conference (London, 2000), pp. 615-616;
Herdegen, “Diplomatischer Schutz und die Erschépfung von Rechts-
behelfen”, p. 65; and Law, The Local Remedies Rule in International
Law, pp. 116-121.
16 See paragraph 27 below.
17 At its forty-ninth session a working group of the Commission rec-
ommended that the study of diplomatic protection “will be limited to
codification of secondary rules: while addressing the requirement of
an internationally wrongful act of the State as a requisite, it will not
address the specific content of the international legal obligation which
has been violated, whether under customary or treaty law” (Yearbook...
1997, vol. II (Part Two), p. 61, para. 181).
or secondary.!® Scholars have likewise had difficulty
in drawing a clear distinction.'®
9. The distinction between primary and secondary
rules was invoked by Special Rapporteur Mr. Ago as a
tool for rescuing the Commission from the difficulties
caused by Special Rapporteur Mr. Garcia Amador’s
proposals to codify the international minimum stand-
ard in his draft articles on State responsibility.7° Little
attention was paid to the jurisprudential basis of the
distinction by Mr. Ago when he first introduced the
distinction in his second report on State responsibility,
in which he stated:
Responsibility differs widely, in its aspects, from the other sub-
jects which the Commission has previously set out to codify. In
its previous drafts, the Commission has generally concentrated
on defining the rules of international law which, in one sector of
inter-State relations or another, impose particular obligations on
States, and which may, in a certain sense, be termed ‘primary’, as
opposed to the other rules—precisely those covering the field of
responsibility—which may be termed ‘secondary’, inasmuch as
they are concerned with determining the consequences of failure
to fulfil obligations established by the primary rules.?!
Common-law lawyers familiar with the distinction
between primary and secondary rules expounded by
Hart in 1961 in The Concept of Law, which views sec-
ondary rules largely as rules of recognition designed
to identify the primary rules of obligation,?* will im-
mediately realize that Mr. Ago had some other juris-
prudential explanation in mind. It is more likely that
Mr. Ago was influenced by the writings of a jurist
such as Ross,*? who sees a legal rule as completed
only when the “secondary norms” of effectiveness (or
sanctions) are added to the “primary norms” of obli-
gation.2* Whatever the inspiration for the distinction
between primary and secondary rules as employed by
the Commission may be, it does not rest on a clear
jurisprudential foundation.
10. While the distinction between primary and sec-
ondary rules has served its purpose in the field of
State responsibility, it is a distinction that cannot be
18 The controversial article 19 in the draft articles on State respon-
sibility adopted by the Commission on first reading (see footnote 6
above), dealing with international State crimes, has been frequently
classified as a primary rule in a code of secondary rules. See Yearbook
... 1998, vol. II (Part One), document A/CN.4/490 and Add.1-7, p. 7,
para. 18.
19 See Lillich, “Duties of States regarding the civil rights of aliens”,
p. 373. See also Combacau and Allard, “‘Primary’ and ‘secondary’
rules in the law of State responsibility: categorizing international ob-
ligations”. This highly sophisticated article hardly produces clarity on
the distinction between primary and secondary rules. Rather, it provides
evidence of the difficulties inherent in drawing such a distinction.
20 See Mr. Ago’s first report on State responsibility, Yearbook ...
1969, vol. Il, document A/CN.4/217 and Add.1, pp. 125-141; and
his second report, Yearbook ... 1970, vol. Il, document A/CN.4/233,
pp. 177-197.
21 Yearbook ... 1970 (see footnote 20 above), p. 179, para, 11.
22 Wellens, “Diversity in secondary rules and the unity of interna-
tional law: some reflections on current trends”, addresses the question
of international law from the perspective of Hart’s distinction between
primary and secondary rules. It does not, however, suggest that it was
this distinction that inspired Mr. Ago’s approach to State responsibil-
ity.
23 On Law and Justice, pp. 209-210.
24 For an examination of this matter, see Goldie, “State responsibility
and the expropriation of property”.
102 Documents of the fifty-third session
too strictly maintained in a study on the exhaustion
of local remedies in the context of diplomatic protec-
tion, as the concept of denial of justice is intimately
connected with the exhaustion of local remedies rule.
Writers on the exhaustion of local remedies rule often
include an examination of denial of justice as an in-
tegral component of the exhaustion of local remedies
rule, or at least find it necessary to discuss the con-
nection between denial of justice and the exhaustion
of local remedies.*° Moreover, attempts at codifica-
tion of the local remedies rule often seek to give some
definition to denial of justice.2° Circumstances of this
kind, coupled with the fact that denial of justice may
be seen both as a secondary rule excusing recourse to
further remedies (associated with the “futility rule”,
discussed in article 15) or as a primary rule giving rise
to international responsibility, suggest that the attempt
at maintaining a rigid distinction between primary and
secondary rules followed in the study on State respon-
sibility should not be pursued with the same degree of
rigidity in the present study. The commentary on article
22 of the draft articles on State responsibility adopted by
the Commission on first reading warns that considera-
tion of the topic of exhaustion of local remedies “must
at all costs stop short of an examination of the content
of ‘primary’ rules of international law”.*” This warning
was, however, in the context of the codification of State
responsibility and does not preclude the Commission
from adopting a different approach in a study on diplo-
matic protection.
F. Remedies to be exhausted
11. The remedies available to an alien that must be
exhausted before an international claim is brought will,
inevitably, vary from State to State. No codification can
therefore succeed in providing an absolute rule govern-
25 Amerasinghe, Local Remedies in International Law, chap. III, p.
31; Borchard, op. cit., part I, chap. VIII, p. 330; Cangado Trindade,
“Denial of justice and its relationship to exhaustion of local remedies
in international law”; Eagleton, The Responsibility of States in Interna-
tional Law, p. 113, and “Denial of justice in international law”, p. 542;
O’Connell, International Law, pp. 945-950; Jennings and Watts, eds.,
Oppenheim’s International Law, pp. 525 and 544; Head, “A fresh look
at the local remedies rule”, p. 149; Adede, “A survey of treaty provi-
sions on the rule of exhaustion of local remedies”, and “A fresh look
at the meaning of the doctrine of denial of justice under international
law”, p. 76 (“the doctrine of denial of justice and the local remedies rule
are two sides of the same coin”); and Dunn, The Protection of Nation-
als: A Study in the Application of International Law, pp. 146-159.
26 Arts. 4 and 9 of Articles adopted in first reading by the Third Com-
mittee of the Conference for the Codification of International Law (The
Hague, 1930) (League of Nations publication, V. Legal, 1930.V.17,
document C.351(c)M.145(c).1930.V) (text in Yearbook ... 1956,
vol. II, document A/CN.4/96, pp. 225-226); art. IV, Project No. 16 on
diplomatic protection prepared by the American Institute of Interna-
tional Law (1925) (ibid., p. 227); arts. V-VI of the Draft on “inter-
national responsibility of States for injuries on their territory to the per-
son or property of foreigners”, prepared by the Institute of International
Law (1927) (ibid., p. 228); draft Convention on responsibility of States
for damage done in their territory to the person or property of foreign-
ers (particularly art. 9), prepared by Harvard Law School (1929) (ibid.,
p. 229); Principles of international law that govern the responsibil-
ity of the State in the opinion of Latin American countries (art. VIII),
prepared by the Inter-American Juridical Committee in 1962 (text in
Yearbook ... 1969 (see footnote 20 above), p. 153); third report on State
responsibility by Mr. Garcia Amador, Yearbook ... 1958, vol. II, docu-
ment A/CN.4/111, pp. 55-61.
27 Yearbook ... 1977 (see footnote 7 above), p. 48, para. (52).
ing all situations. The words “all”, “available” and the
limitation of local remedies to remedies before “judicial
or administrative courts or authorities whether ordinary
or special” offer some guidance but cannot hope to cover
all circumstances. This article must, moreover, be read
with article 15, which provides for exceptions to the rule
that all available local remedies must be exhausted.
12. There is strong support for the view that all legal
remedies that offer the injured individual a prospect of
success must be exhausted. In Nielsen v. Denmark?8 the
European Commission of Human Rights stated that the
exhaustion of local remedies rule requires “that recourse
should be had to all legal” remedies available under the
local law”; while in the Ambatielos Claim?? the arbitral
tribunal declared that “[iJt is the whole system of legal :
protection, as provided by municipal law, which must
have been put to the test”. Writers too formulate the rule
as requiring the exhaustion of legal remedies.*° There
is, however, some uncertainty as to the meaning of the
term “legal” in the context of local remedies.
13. “Legal” remedies clearly include judicial reme-
dies. The foreign national must exhaust all the available
judicial remedies provided for in the municipal law of
the respondent State. If the municipal law in question
permits an appeal in the circumstances of the case to the
highest court, such an appeal must be brought in order to
secure a final decision in the matter. Courts in this con-
nection include both ordinary and special courts since
“the crucial question is not the ordinary or extraordi-
nary character of a legal remedy but whether it gives
the possibility of an effective and sufficient means of
redress”.31
14. Legal remedies also include remedies before ad-
ministrative bodies—provided the foreign national has
a right to obtain redress from the tribunal. Some au-
thorities have formulated the recourse to administrative
authorities too broadly. The Draft convention on the in-
ternational responsibility of States for injuries to aliens,
prepared by the Harvard Law School, 1961°? states that
local remedies shall be considered to be exhausted “if
the claimant has employed all administrative, arbitral,
or judicial remedies which were made available to him
by the respondent State”. Moreover, the explanatory
commentary on the Draft declares that:
By administrative remedies are meant all those remedies which are
available through the executive branch of the government, as well
28 B. Schouw Nielsen v. Government of Denmark, European Com-
mission and European Court of Human Rights, application No. 343/57,
decision of 2 September 1959 (Yearbook of the European Convention
on Human Rights 1958-1959, p. 412).
29 The Ambatielos Claim, award of 6 March 1956 (UNRIAA, vol.
XII (Sales No. 63.V.3), p. 120).
30 See, for example, Jennings and Watts, eds., op. cit., p. 523;
Amerasinghe, Local Remedies ..., p. 157; and Cangado Trindade, The
Application of the Rule of Exhaustion of Local Remedies in Interna-
tional Law: its Rationale in the International Protection of Individual
Rights, p. 58.
31 Nielsen v. Denmark case (see footnote 28 above), p. 438. See also
the Lawless case, application No. 332/57, decision of 30 August 1958
(Yearbook of the European Convention on Human Rights 1958-1959,
pp. 318-322).
32 For the text, see Yearbook ... 1969 (footnote 20 above), p. 142.
33 [bid., art. 19, p. 146.
Diplomatic protection 103
as special remedies which may be provided by legislative action if
claims are routinely handled through private bills for relief.°4
This formula, supported by some writers,?° suggests
that the claimant is required to exhaust not only those
remedies which lie as of right, in accordance with the
maxim ubi jus ibi remedium, but may also be required to
approach the executive (or legislature?) for relief in the
exercise of its discretionary powers. Clearly, the exhaus-
tion of attempts to obtain such relief does not fall within
the scope of the exhaustion of local remedies rule. The
local remedies which must be exhausted include rem-
edies of a legal nature “but not extra-legal remedies or
remedies as of grace”*® or those whose “purpose is to
obtain a favour and not to vindicate a right”.?” Adminis-
trative or other remedies which are not judicial or quasi-
judicial in character and are of a discretionary character
therefore fall outside the application of the local rem-
edies rule.*8
15. The Ambatielos Claim,°9 in which an arbitration
commission, in finding that a foreign national had failed
in his endeavour to exhaust local remedies by not call-
ing a crucial witness, held that “‘local remedies’ include
not only reference to the courts and tribunals, but also
the use of the procedural facilities which municipal law
makes available to litigants before such courts and tribu-
nals”, has been rightly criticized as imposing too heavy
a burden on the foreign national.*? It seems both impos-
sible and unwise to draft a rule that accurately reflects
the complexities of the Ambatielos case. It seems bet-
ter simply to draw this case to the attention of litigants
as a reminder that litigants cannot have a “second try”
at the international level if, because of faulty prepara-
tion and presentation of the claim at the municipal level,
they fail in their action in the course of exhausting local
remedies.*!
34 Amerasinghe, Local remedies ..., p. 158.
35 Adede, “A survey ...”, pp. 4-7.
36 Brierly, The Law of Nations, p. 281; Brownlie, Principles of Public
International Law, p. 499; Amerasinghe, “The local remedies rule in an
appropriate perspective”, p. 747; Aronovitz, “Notes on the current status
of the rule of exhaustion of local remedies in the European Convention
of Human Rights”; Greece v. United Kingdom, application No. 299/57
(Yearbook of the European Convention on Human Rights 1958-1959),
p. 192; Claim of Finnish Shipowners against Great Britain in respect of
the Use of certain Finnish Vessels during the War, decision of 9 May
1934 (UNRIAA, vol. III (Sales No. 1949.V.2), p. 1479).
37 De Becker v. Belgium, application No. 214/56, decision of 9 June
1958 (Yearbook of the European Convention on Human Rights 1958-
1959), p. 238; and Jiménez de Aréchaga, “International law in the past
third of a century”, p. 293.
38 Cancado Trindade, op. cit., p. 62; Amerasinghe, Local Remedies
.... p. 161; Fawcett, The Application of the European Convention on
Human Rights, p. 295. In the Velasquez Rodriguez v. Honduras Case,
Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Merits, judgement of 29 July
1988, Series C No. 4, the Court defined remedies as those “which are
suitable to address an infringement of a legal right” (para. 64).
39 See footnote 29 above.
40 Ibid. See the dissenting opinion of Commissioner John Spiro-
poulos, ibid., p. 128; Amerasinghe, Local Remedies ..., pp. 215-249;
Jiménez de Aréchaga, “International responsibility”, pp. 586-587; and
Verzijl, “La régle de |’épuisement des recours internes”, pp. 306-307.
But on the contrary, Haesler, The Exhaustion of Local Remedies in
the Case Law of International Courts and Tribunals, pp. 81-92; Law,
op. cit., pp. 83-91; and Jennings and Watts, eds., op. cit., p. 524.
41 See O’Connell, op. cit., p. 1059.
16. In order to satisfactorily lay the foundation for an
international claim on the ground that local remedies
have been exhausted, the foreign litigant must raise in
the municipal proceedings all the arguments he intends
to raise in international proceedings. In the Finnish
Ships Arbitration the arbitrator stated that
all the contentions of fact and propositions of law which are brought
forward by the claimant Government ... must have been investigated
and adjudicated upon by the municipal Courts.42
This principle has been confirmed by ICJ in the ELSI
case.*3 Like the “rule” in Ambatielos, this principle
seems to belong in the commentary as an admonition
to prospective litigants rather than as a component of an
article on the exhaustion of local remedies.
17. Article 10 makes it clear that the local remedies
must be “available”. This means that the local remedies
must be available both in theory and in practice. There
is, however, some disagreement as to how far the foreign
national must test or exhaust local remedies that on the
face of it are available more in theory than in practice. In
the Forests of Central Rhodopia claim,“ the tribunal held
that there was no remedy to exhaust where the sovereign
was immune from suit under municipal law, while in the
Panevezys-Saldutiskis Railway case*° PCIJ refused to
accept that there was no local remedy in respect of a
challenge to the validity of an act of seizure jure imperii
on the part of the Government. The Court held that:
The question whether or not the Lithuanian courts have jurisdic-
tion to entertain a particular suit depends on Lithuanian law and is
one on which the Lithuanian courts alone can pronounce a final deci-
sion ... Until it has been clearly shown that [they] have no jurisdic-
tion ... the Court cannot accept the contention ... that the rule as to
the exhaustion of local remedies does not apply.
It will be for the Court to decide on the facts of each
case whether under the legal system of the State in
question there is no available remedy. While counsel’s
advice on the availability of a remedy should be given
serious attention, it cannot be conclusive.*® Issues re-
lated to availability of aremedy are further considered
in article 15.
G. Local remedies must be exhausted where the
claim is preponderantly based on injury to a national
Article 11
Local remedies shall be exhausted where an inter-
national claim, or request for a declaratory judge-
ment related to the claim, is brought preponderantly
42 UNRIAA (see footnote 36 above), p. 1502. See also the Ambatie-
los Claim (footnote 29 above), p. 123.
43 1.C.J. Reports 1989 (see footnote 3 above), pp. 45-46. See also
the commentary to article 22 of the draft articles on State responsibility
adopted by the Commission on first reading, Yearbook ... 1977 (foot-
note 7 above), p. 47, para. (49), which asserts the demonstration of an
intent to win to be decisive.
44 Affaire des Foréts du Rhodope Central (fond), decision of
29 March 1933 (UNRIAA, vol. III (Sales No. 1949.V.2), p. 1420).
45 Panevezys-Saldutiskis Railway, Judgment, 1939, P.C.I.J., Se-
ries A/B, No. 76, p. 19. See also Amerasinghe, “The local remedies
rule ...”, pp. 752-754; International Law Association (footnote 15
above), p. 620; and Aronovitz, loc. cit., pp. 78-79.
46 Amerasinghe, Local Remedies ..., pp. 191-192.
104 Documents of the fifty-third session
on the basis of an injury to a national and where the
legal proceedings in question would not have been
brought but for the injury to the national. [In decid-
ing on this matter, regard shall be had to such factors
as the remedy claimed, the nature of the claim and
the subject of the dispute.]
18. The exhaustion of local remedies rule properly be-
longs to a study on diplomatic protection, as the rule ap-
plies only to cases in which the claimant State has been
injured “indirectly”, that is, through its national. It does
not apply where the claimant State is directly injured by
the wrongful act of another State,*” as here the State has
a distinct reason of its own for bringing an international
claim. Moreover, it could not be expected of a State to
exhaust local remedies in such a case, as this would vio-
late the principle of par in parem non habet imperium
non habet jurisdictionem.*®
19. In practice it is difficult to decide whether the
claim is “direct” or “indirect” where it is “mixed”, in the
sense that it contains elements of both injury to the State
and injury to the nationals of the State.49 Many disputes
before international courts have presented the phenom-
enon of the mixed claim. In Aerial Incident of 27 July
1955,°° in which Bulgaria shot down an El Al flight,
there was injury to both the State of Israel and to its na-
tionals on the flight; in the United States Diplomatic and
Consular Staff in Tehran case,°! there was a direct vio-
lation on the part of the Islamic Republic of Iran of the
duty it owed to the United States of America to protect
its diplomats and consuls, but at the same time there was
injury to the person of the nationals (diplomats and con-
suls) held hostage; and in the Interhandel case,°* there
were claims brought by Switzerland relating to a direct
wrong to itself arising out of breach of a treaty and to
an indirect wrong resulting from an injury to a national
corporation. In the Aerial Incident of 27 July 1955 it was
not necessary for ICJ to make a decision; in the United
States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran case the
Court treated the claim as a direct violation of interna-
tional law; and in the Interhandel case the Court found
that the claim was preponderantly indirect and that
Switzerland had failed to exhaust local remedies.
20. Writers have suggested various tests that may be
employed in deciding whether the claim is direct or in-
direct. However, the same decision is often employed
47 Jennings and Watts, eds., op. cit., p. 523; Amerasinghe, Local
Remedies ..., pp. 107 et seq.; Freeman, The International Responsibil-
ity of States for Denial of Justice, p. 404; Jessup, A Modern Law of
Nations: an Introduction, pp. 118-120; Cangado Trindade, op. cit.,
p. 172 (with special reference to human rights cases); Meron, “The in-
cidence of the rule of exhaustion of local remedies”, p. 85; Verdross
and Simma, Universelles V6lkerrecht: Theorie und Praxis, p. 886;
Herdegen, loc. cit., p. 68; Adede, “A survey ...”, p. 1, footnote 1;
and Restatement of the Law Third, The Foreign Relations Law of the
United States (St. Paul, Minn., American Law Institute Publishers,
1987), vol. 2, p. 348, para. 902 k. Cf. Brownlie, op. cit., p. 498.
48 Meron, loc. cit., pp. 83 and 85. Cf. Brownlie, op. cit., p. 498.
49 Fitzmaurice, “Hersch Lauterpacht—the scholar as judge: part 1”,
p. 54.
50 Aerial Incident of 27 July 1955 (Israel v. Bulgaria), Judgment,
C.J. Reports 1959, p. 127.
51 United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran, Judgment,
IL.C.J. Reports 1980, p. 3.
52 See footnote 2 above.
to support different tests and there is, moreover, some
overlap in respect of the different tests. The following
tests or factors are most commonly advanced to explain
the distinction between direct and indirect claims: pre-
ponderance, subject of the dispute, nature of the claim,
nature of the remedies and the sine qua non test.
21. In the case of a mixed claim it is incumbent upon
the tribunal to examine the different elements of the
claim and to decide whether the direct or the indirect
element is preponderant.°* Support for this test is to be
found in both the Interhandel case and the ELSI case.
In Interhandel the Court stated that, although the
dispute might contain elements of a direct injury,
such arguments do not deprive the dispute ... of the character of a
dispute in which the Swiss Government appears as having adopted
the cause of its national.>+
In ELSI a Chamber of ICJ rejected the argument of the
United States that part of its claim was premised on the
violation of a treaty and that it was therefore unneces-
sary to exhaust local remedies, holding that
the Chamber has no doubt that the matter which colours and pervades
the United States claim as a whole, is the alleged damage to Raytheon
and Machlett [United States corporations].°°
22. Closely related to the preponderance test is the
sine qua non or “but for” test, which asks whether the
claim comprising elements of both direct and indirect
injury would have been brought were it not for the claim
on behalf of the injured national. If this question is an-
swered affirmatively, the claim is an indirect one and lo-
cal remedies must be exhausted.°° Reliance for this test
is placed on the ELSI case, but as shown above, the ELSI
case may also be invoked in support of the preponder-
ance test.
23. There is little to distinguish the preponderance
test from the “but for” test. If a claim is preponderantly
based on injury to a national this is evidence of the fact
that the claim would not have been brought but for the
injury to the national. Conversely, if there is evidence
to show that the claim would not have been brought but
for the injury to the national, this evidence will usually
demonstrate that the claim is preponderantly indirect.
Article 11 adopts both tests, as together they emphasize
53 According to the Restatement of the Law Second, The Foreign
Relations Law of the United States (St. Paul, Minn., American Law
Institute Publishers, 1965), the exhaustion of local remedies rule is in-
applicable if “the state of the alien’s nationality, which has espoused his
claim, is asserting on its own behalf a separate and preponderant claim
for direct injury to it arising out of the same wrongful conduct” (part IV,
p. 618, para. 208 (c)). The Restatement of the Law Third (see foot-
note 47 above) contains the same principle:
“Under international law, before a state can make a formal claim
on behalf of a private person ... that person must ordinarily exhaust
domestic remedies available in the responding state ... Local remedies
need not be exhausted for violations of international law not involving
private persons; a state is not required to seek a remedy for violations of
its rights in the courts of the responsible state, even where the state suf-
fered injury to its own interests as a result of a violation of international
law that also caused injury to its nationals.”
See also Meron, loc. cit., p. 86; and Whiteman, Digest of International
Law, p. 779.
41.C.J. Reports 1959 (see footnote 2 above), p. 28.
55 .C.J. Reports 1989 (see footnote 3 above), p. 43, para. 52.
56 Adler, “The exhaustion of the local remedies rule after the Interna-
tional Court of Justice’s decision in ELSI”.
Diplomatic protection 105
the need for the injury to the national to be the dominant
factor in the initiation of the claim if local remedies are
required to be exhausted.
24. The other “tests” invoked to establish whether the
claim is direct or indirect are not so much tests as factors
that must be considered in deciding whether the claim
is preponderantly weighted in favour of a direct or an
indirect claim or whether the claim would not have been
brought but for the injury to the national. The principal
factors to be considered in making this assessment are
the subject of the dispute, the nature of the claim and the
remedy claimed.
25. The subject of the dispute is clearly a factor to be
considered in the classification of a claim as direct or
indirect. Where the injury is to a diplomatic or consular
official (as in the United States Diplomatic and Con-
sular Staff in Tehran case)?’ or to State property (as in
Aerial Incident of 27 July 1955°8 or Corfu Channel),
the claim will normally be direct.©° In most circums-
tances the breach of a treaty will give rise to a direct
claim unless the treaty violation is incidental and sub-
ordinate to an injury to the national, as in Interhandel
and ELSI.
26. Meron, in considering the nature of the claim as a
factor to be taken into account suggests that “the true test
is to be found in the real interests and objects pursued by
the claimant State”.®! This determining factor has been
elaborated upon by other authors. Thirlway states:
It appears therefore that, in the Court’s jurisprudence, what counts
for the applicability or otherwise of the local remedies rule is the
nature of the principal element of the claim. Obviously if the claim
is such that it does not involve injury of a kind which could be rem-
edied by recourse to the local courts, the rule is totally excluded; not
however because purely inter-State rights are involved, but because
the claim is of such a kind that redress could not be obtained in local
courts. But if the essence of the matter is injury to nationals, whose
claim is being espoused by their State, and redress by the local courts
will effectively put an end to the dispute, then the rule will apply to
render inadmissible also any subsidiary aspects of the claim which
might be regarded as strictly matters of direct inter-State relations.®
Amerasinghe, while approving the “nature of the claim”
test, argues that:
The rule of exhaustion relates to the right violated or the injury com-
mitted and not to the claim based on it as such, which reflects a sec-
ondary or remedial right. It is also the essence of the substantive right
violated, as determined by the objects and interests promoted therein,
that is of importance.®
Support for this approach is to be found in the Interhan-
del case, in which ICJ stated:
57 See footnote 51 above.
58 See footnote 50 above.
59 Corfu Channel, Merits, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1949, p. 4.
60 Meron, loc. cit., p. 87; and Garcia Amador, The Changing Law
of International Claims, pp. 467—468. See also the draft Convention
on the responsibility of States for damage done in their territory to
the person or property of foreigners, prepared by the Harvard Law
School, and the commentary thereto, supplement to the American Jour-
nal of International Law (Washington, D.C.), vol. 23, special number
(April 1929), pp. 156-157.
61 Loc. cit., p. 87.
62 “The law and procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960—
1989”, pp. 89-90.
63 Local Remedies ..., p. 129.
The Court considers that one interest, and one alone, that of Inter-
handel, which has led the latter to institute and to resume proceedings
before the United States courts, has induced the Swiss Government to
institute international proceedings.“
Clearly “the real interests and objects” of the claimant
State in bringing the claim (Meron, loc. cit., p. 87), “the
nature of the principal element of the claim” (Thirlway,
loc. cit., p. 89) and “the essence of the substantive right
violated” (Amerasinghe, Local Remedies ..., p. 129)
are factors to be considered in the classification of the
claim. None, however, is conclusive. Ultimately the
question to be answered is whether the claim is prepon-
derantly based on injury to a national and whether the
claim would have been brought but for this injury.
27. The nature of the remedy sought by the claimant
State will also assist in the classification of the claim.
Where a State seeks purely declaratory relief the claim
will be direct; while where a State seeks monetary relief
or restitution for its national, the claim will be indirect.
There is certainly support for the view that where a State
makes no claim for damages for an injured national, but
simply requests a decision on the interpretation and
application of a treaty, there is no need for local rem-
edies to be exhausted. In the Air Service Agreement ®
arbitration between the United States and France, the
United States objected to decisions of the French
Government causing damage to United States carriers
that the United States alleged were in breach of a bi-
lateral air services agreement. France contended that
Pan American Airlines, the United States carrier most
affected by France’s conduct, was required to exhaust
local remedies before an international claim might be
brought; while the United States argued that it was clear
from the remedy it sought—an authoritative interpreta-
tion of the Air Services Agreement—that its interest in
the arbitration extended beyond the problems experi-
enced by Pan American Airlines to other United States-
designated carriers. In upholding the United States’
argument the arbitration panel held that there was no
need for local remedies to be exhausted, as the dispute
involved “a right granted by one government to the
other government”.®°°Further support may be found
for this approach in the ICJ opinion in the Applica-
bility of the Obligation to Arbitrate under Section 21
of the United Nations Headquarters Agreement in
which the Court stated that the alleged dispute arising
out of the United States legislation directed to closing
the PLO Mission to the United Nations
relates solely to what the United Nations considers to be its rights
under the Headquarters Agreement. The purpose of the arbitration
procedure envisaged by that Agreement is precisely the settlement
of such disputes as may arise between the Organization and the
host country without any prior recourse to municipal courts, and it
would be against both the letter and the spirit of the Agreement for
64 1.C.J. Reports 1959 (see footnote 2 above), p. 29.
65 Case concerning the Air Service Agreement of 27 March 1946
between the United States of America and France, decision of 9 De-
cember 1978 (UNRIAA, vol. XVIII (Sales No. E/F.80.V.7), p. 415);
and ILR, vol. 54, p. 304.
S6 TLR, vol. 54, p. 324. See also Swiss Confederation v. German
Federal Republic, ILR, vol. 25 (1958-1), p. 47, noted in The British
Year Book of International Law, 1958, vol. 34, p. 363. Relying on these
decisions, Adler has contended that “[a]uthorities prior to ELSI sug-
gested that the nature of the remedy sought should determine whether
the exhaustion rule applied to mixed claims” (loc. cit., p. 643).
106 Documents of the fifty-third session
the implementation of that procedure to be subjected to such prior
recourse. It is evident that a provision of the nature of section 21
of the Headquarters Agreement cannot require the exhaustion of
local remedies as a condition of its implementation.®”
28. Not infrequently States seek “mixed” remedies
in international claims. In both Interhandel and ELSI
the claimant State sought a declaratory judgement re-
lating to the interpretation and application of a treaty
alleged to have been violated by the respondent State
in the course of, or incidental to, its unlawful treat-
ment of a national. In neither case did the claimant
State succeed in its bid to avoid the local remedies rule.
In Interhandel ICJ held that the Swiss claim was prima-
rily designed “for the purpose of securing the restitution
to that company of assets vested by the Government of
the United States”®®; while in ELSI the Court held that
the United States claim for monetary damages on behalf
of its nationals “colours and pervades the United States
claim as a whole”.®
29. Interhandel and ELSI indicate that local remedies
must be exhausted where the request for a declaratory
judgement is linked to other relief arising out of injury
to a national. It seems, however, that a State may seek
a declaratory judgement on the interpretation of a treaty
relating to the treatment of nationals without exhausting
local remedies provided it does not couple this request
with a claim for compensation or restitution on behalf of
its national.”° This is an undesirable situation as it would
allow a State “to circumvent the local remedies rule by
promoting declaratory judgments which would acquire
force of res judicata with respect to subsequent interna-
tional proceedings seeking reparation”.”!
30. It is impossible to draft a rule that subjects the
claimant State to compliance with the local remedies
rule in the above case without imposing an obligation
on States to comply with exhaustion of local remedies
in cases involving the inte eet On of a treaty where
this would be unwarranted.’< Article 11 does, however,
make it clear that a request for a declaratory judgement
per se is not exempt from the exhaustion of local reme-
dies rule. Where the request for a declaratory judgement
is incidental to or related to a claim involving injury to
a national—whether linked to a claim for compensa-
tion or restitution on behalf of the injured national or
not—it is still possible for a tribunal to hold that in all
the circumstances of the case the request for a declara-
tory judgement is preponderantly brought on the ba-
sis of an injury to the national. Such a decision would
be fair and reasonable where there is evidence that the
claimant State has deliberately requested a declaratory
judgement in order to avoid compliance with the local
remedies rule.
31. Article 11 includes in parenthesis a number of fac-
tors to be taken into consideration in the classification
87 Applicability of the Obligation to Arbitrate under Section 21 of
the United Nations Headquarters Agreement of 26 June 1947, Advisory
Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1988, p. 29, para. 41.
68 [.C.J. Reports 1959 (see footnote 2 above), pp. 28-29.
69 1.C.J. Reports 1989 (see footnote 3 above), p. 43.
70 Adler, loc. cit., p. 652; and Meron, loc. cit., p. 86.
71 Jiménez de Aréchaga, “International law ...”, p. 293.
72 As in the cases described in paragraph 29 above.
of a claim as direct or indirect. The Commission may,
understandably, take the view that such factors are best
left to the commentary for, as a rule, codification should
avoid the inclusion of examples of this kind in a legisla-
tive text.
Article 12
The requirement that local remedies must be ex-
hausted is a procedural precondition that must be
complied with before a State may bring an inter-
national claim based on injury to a national arising out
of an internationally wrongful act committed against
the national where the act complained of is a breach of
both local law and international law.
Article 13
Where a foreign national brings legal proceedings
before the domestic courts of a State in order to ob-
tain redress for a violation of the domestic law of that
State not amounting to an international wrong, the
State in which such proceedings are brought may in-
cur international responsibility if there is a denial of
justice to the foreign national. Subject to article 14,
the injured foreign national must exhaust any fur-
ther local remedies that may be available before an
international claim is brought on his behalf.
32. In the Encyclopedia of Public International Law
Doehring states that:
As long as the local remedies rule exists, controversy will remain
as to the question of its conceptual nature, i.e. the question of whether
the rule forms a part of procedural law or whether it operates as a part
of substantive law.”
This controversy, which has not left the Commission un-
touched, has produced three positions.’4 The first main-
tains that the internationally wrongful act of the wrong-
doing State is not complete until local remedies have
been exhausted without success; that the exhaustion of
local remedies is a substantive condition on which the
very existence of international responsibility depends.
According to the second position, the exhaustion of
local remedies rule is simply a procedural condition
which must be met before an international claim may be
brought. The third’° distinguishes between an injury to
an alien under domestic law and under international law.
If the injury is caused by a violation of domestic law
not constituting a violation of international law, interna-
tional responsibility arises only from an act or omission
constituting a denial of justice committed against the al-
ien by the judicial organs of the respondent State in the
course of his attempt to secure redress for the violation
of domestic law. Here the exhaustion of local remedies
tule is a substantive condition for the existence of in-
ternational responsibility. In contrast, where the injury
73 Loc. cit., p. 240.
74 Another position which has not received much support maintains
that where the international responsibility of the State is established
by the original injury, the exhaustion of local remedies is no longer
required (see Verzijl, quoted in Briggs, “The local remedies rule: a
drafting suggestion”, p. 923).
75 Fawcett, “The exhaustion of local remedies: substance or proce-
dure?”; and Brownlie, op. cit., p. 497.
Diplomatic protection 107
to the alien arises from a violation of international law,
international responsibility occurs at the moment of in-
jury and the requirement that local remedies must still
be exhausted before an international claim is brought
is merely a procedural precondition. There is no need
to establish a denial of justice on the part of the judi-
cial organs of the respondent State. Moreover, if the act
or omission violates international law and not domestic
law, the absence of local remedies obviates the need to
exhaust such remedies.
33. Some jurists have suggested that the debate over
the question whether the exhaustion of local remedies
rule is one of substance or procedure is purely theoreti-
cal.”° This is manifestly incorrect as the critical time
at which international responsibility arises will differ
according to the approach adopted. If the rule is sub-
stantive, international responsibility will arise only
after all local remedies have been exhausted, whereas
international responsibility is incurred immediately on
the commission of an internationally wrongful act if the
tule is procedural. This difference has serious conse-
quences for the principle of nationality of claims, which
generally requires the injured alien to be a national of
the claimant State at the time the international wrong
is committed.’” It may also affect the jurisdiction of
a tribunal if a State party to a dispute has attached a
time limit to its acceptance of jurisdiction, as occurred
in Phosphates in Morocco.’® Furthermore the position
adopted on the nature of the rule has decisive implica-
tions for the rendering of a declaratory judgement in the
absence of the exhaustion of local remedies, and for the
waiver of the need for recourse to local remedies by the
respondent State as, logically, neither would be possible
if the rule is characterized as substantive.’? Whether the
rule is characterized as substantive or procedural may
also affect the question whether it is to be treated as a
preliminary objection (if it is procedural) or considered
as part of the merits (if it is substantive) in proceedings
before an international tribunal.®°
34. The debate over the nature of the exhaustion of
local remedies rule has surfaced in codification at-
tempts, judicial decisions, separate judicial opinions and
the practice of States. Furthermore no serious academic
work on the exhaustion of local remedies rule is com-
plete without an expression of views on the question
whether the rule is substantive or procedural.
76 According to Schwarzenberger,
“On the level of unorganised international society, it would
be as pointless as in the case of the nationality test to attempt to
classify the local remedies rule by reference to irrelevant distinctions
between substance and procedure.” (International Law, p. 611)
See also Dunn, op. cit., p. 156; and Yearbook ... 1977 (footnote 7
above), p. 35, para. (14) of the commentary to article 22.
77 Doehring, loc. cit., p. 240.
78 Phosphates in Morocco, Judgment, 1938, P.C.I.J., Series A/B,
No. 74, p. 10.
79 Amerasinghe, State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens, pp. 201—
208; “The formal character of the rule of local remedies”, pp. 447—455;
and Local Remedies ..., pp. 330-337.
80 Amerasinghe, Local Remedies ..., pp. 333-335. But on the con-
trary, see Yearbook ... 1977 (footnote 7 above), p. 42, para. (33).
H. Codification
35. Attempted codifications of the exhaustion of lo-
cal remedies rule have generally avoided a clear com-
mitment to either the procedural or the substantive ap-
proach. There was, however, a discernible trend in fa-
vour of the procedural view before the endorsement of
the substantive position by the Commission in 1977.
36. In 1927, the Institute of International Law re-
solved that:
No demand for reparation can be brought through diplomatic
channels of a State so long as the wronged individual has at his dis-
posal effective and sufficient means to obtain for him the treatment
due him.
Nor can any demand for reparation take place if the responsible
State places at the disposal of the wronged individual an effective
means of obtaining the corresponding damages.*!
Although hardly a model of clarity, this provision has
been interpreted as a reflection of the view that the ex-
haustion of local remedies rule is concerned with the
admissibility of the claim rather than the origin of re-
sponsibility. It does, moreover, suggest support for the
view that responsibility arises at the time of the injury.®
37. Two years later, in 1929, the Preparatory Com-
mittee of the Conference for the Codification of Inter-
national Law (The Hague, 1930) drew up a provision
which read:
Where the foreigner has a legal remedy open to him in the courts
of the State (which term includes administrative courts), the State
may require that any question of international responsibility shall re-
main in suspense until its courts have given their final decision. This
rule does not exclude application of the provisions [on State respon-
sibility for denial of justice].8°
The text adopted in first reading by the Third Committee
of the Conference for the Codification of International
Law provided:
The State’s international responsibility may not be invoked as
regards reparation for damage sustained by a foreigner until after
exhaustion of the remedies available to the injured person under the
municipal law of the State.®4
Both these formulations may be seen as examples of
deliberate ambiguity.®° On the one hand they suggest
that international responsibility does not arise until
local remedies have been exhausted, while on the
other hand they suggest that responsibility is simply
suspended pending the exhaustion of local remedies.®°
38. The provisions of the draft Convention on
responsibility of States for damage done in their terri-
tory to the person or property of foreigners prepared by
81 Yearbook ... 1956 (see footnote 26 above), annex 8, art. XII,
p. 228.
82 Borchard, “Theoretical aspects of the international responsibility
of States”, p. 235; and De Visscher, “Notes sur la responsabilité in-
ternationale des Etats et la protection diplomatique d’aprés quelques
documents récents”, p.245.
83 Yearbook ... 1956 (see footnote 26 above), basis of discussion
No. 27, p. 225.
84 Tbid., annex 3, art. 4, p. 225.
85 Yearbook ... 1977 (see footnote 7 above), pp. 36-37, para. (19) of
the commentary to article 22.
86 See Cancado Trindade, “The birth of State responsibility ...”,
pp. 157-158.
108 Documents of the fifty-third session
the Harvard Law School in 1929 lend support to the
substantive position. They provide as follows:
Article 6
A state is not ordinarily responsible (under duty to make repa-
ration to another state) until the local remedies available to the
injured alien have been exhausted.
Article 7
(a) A state is responsible if an injury to an alien results from
the wrongful act or omission of one of its higher authorities within
the scope of the office or function of such authority, if the local
remedies have been exhausted without adequate redress.
(b) A state is responsible if an injury to an alien results from
the wrongful act or omission of one of its subordinate officers or
employees within the scope of his office or function, if justice is
denied to the injured alien, or if, without having given adequate
redress to the injured alien, the state has failed to discipline the
officer or employee.
Article 8
(a) A state is responsible if an injury to an alien results from
its non-performance of a contractual obligation which it owes to
the alien, if local remedies have been exhausted without adequate
redress.
(b) A state is not responsible if an injury to an alien results
from the non-performance of a contractual obligation which its
political subdivision owes to an alien, apart from responsibility
because of a denial of justice.
Article 9
A state is responsible if an injury to an alien results from a
denial of justice ...87
The resolution adopted at the Seventh International
Conference of American States (Montevideo, 1933),
in stating that “diplomatic protection cannot be
initiated”°? unless local remedies have been exhaust-
ed, gave further support to the substantive view.
39. In 1956, the Institute of International Law, after
rejecting a radical proposal of Verzijl®° to abandon the
local remedies rule, adopted a resolution endorsing
the view that the exhaustion of local remedies rule is
procedural in nature:
When a State claims that an injury to the person or property
of one of its nationals has been committed in violation of interna-
tional law, any diplomatic claim or claim before a judicial body
vested in the State making the claim by reason of such injury to
one of its nationals is irreceivable if the internal legal order of the
87 Yearbook ... 1956 (see footnote 26 above), annex 9, p. 229.
88 Tbid., annex 6, p. 226.
89 Tn his preliminary report to the Institute Verzijl proposed:
“(1) Where the injury to the person or property of an alien does
not in itself involve the international responsibility of the State on
whose territory the injury was committed, no diplomatic claim may
be brought before international responsibility exists as a result of a
denial of justice ...
“(I) Where the injury to the person or property of an alien in-
volves in itself the international responsibility of the State on whose
territory the injury was committed, there is no valid motive for sub-
ordinating a diplomatic claim to the previous exhaustion of local
remedies.”
(Annuaire de I|’Institut de Droit international, vol. 45 (Aix-en-Provence
session, 1954), p. 24). See further on this proposal Briggs, loc. cit.
State against which the claim is made provides means of redress
available to the injured person which appear to be effective and
sufficient so long as the normal use of these means of redress has
not been exhausted.”
40. In 1956, the Commission commenced its study
o the subject. Mr. Garcia Amador, Special Rapporteur,
presented his first report on State responsibility, in which
he proposed the following basis of discussion:
The following, among others, may be considered as exonerating
circumstances [for international responsibility]:
(a) Failure to resort to local remedies, in the sense that, so long
as these remedies have not been exhausted, an international claim
will not lie and the duty to make reparation will not be enforceable.°!
The commentary explains that
the rule implies a suspensive condition, which may be procedural or
substantive, but to which the right to bring international claims is sub-
ordinated. Responsibility may or may not exist, as the case may be,
but unless and until the said condition is fulfilled, the claiming State
has only a potential right. Responsibility as such may be imputable,
but the duty to make reparation cannot be claimed. Consequently, in
pure legal theory, failure to exhaust local remedies may or may not be
grounds for exoneration from international responsibility, according
to the circumstances, but it will always constitute a complete bar to
the bringing of an international claim.°?
In his third report he modified this provision to read:
An international claim brought for the purpose of obtaining repa-
ration for injuries alleged by an alien ... shall not be admissible until
all the remedies established by municipal law have been exhausted.”
At about the same time, in 1960, the Harvard Law
School proposed the following rule, which inclined
more clearly in favour of the procedural position:
(a) An alien is entitled to present an international claim under
this Convention only after he has exhausted the local remedies pro-
vided by the State against which the claim is made.
(b) A State is entitled to present a claim under this Convention
only on behalf of a person who is its national, and only if the local
remedies and any special international remedies provided by the State
against which the claim is made have been exhausted.°4
41. In 1977, at the strong urging of the Special
Rapporteur, Mr. Ago, the Commission adopted ar-
ticle 22 of the draft articles on State responsibility on
first reading, which adopts the substantive view:
When the conduct of a State has created a situation not in con-
formity with the result required of it by an international obligation
concerning the treatment to be accorded to aliens, whether natural or
juridical persons, but the obligation allows that this or an equivalent
result may nevertheless be achieved by subsequent conduct of the
State, there is a breach of the obligation only if the aliens concerned
90 Annuaire de I’Institut de Droit International, vol. 46 (Granada
session, 1956), p. 364.
91 Yearbook ... 1956 (see footnote 26 above), p. 220, basis of discus-
sion No. V, para. (2).
%2 Tbid., p. 206, para. 173. The author expressed the same view in
Garcia Amador, “State responsibility: some new problems”, p. 449; and
his third report, Yearbook ... 1958 (see footnote 26 above), p. 56, para.
3 of the commentary to article 18.
93 Yearbook ... 1958 (see footnote 26 above), p. 55, art. 15, para.
1. The same provision is to be found in each subsequent draft sub-
mitted by the Special Rapporteur. For the last formulation, see
Yearbook ... 1961, vol. Il, document A/CN.4/134 and Add.1, p. 48,
art. 18, para. 1.
°4Draft Convention on the International Responsibility of States
for Injuries to Aliens, art. 1, para. 2, reproduced in Sohn and Baxter,
“Responsibility of States for injuries to the economic interests of
aliens”, p. 548.
Diplomatic protection 109
have exhausted the effective local remedies available to them without
obtaining the treatment called for by the obligation or, where that is
not possible, an equivalent treatment.9°
This provision is premised on the distinction between
obligations of conduct and result contained in articles
20-21 of the draft articles on State responsibility adopt-
ed on first reading.
42. The draft articles provisionally adopted by the
Drafting Committee of the Commission on second
reading®® make only passing reference to the exhaus-
tion of local remedies rule in article 45 and leave it to
the present report on diplomatic protection to deal fully
with the rule. Moreover, these draft articles abandon the
distinction between obligations of conduct and of result
upon which article 22 of the draft articles adopted on
first reading is premised.
43. In 2000, the Committee on Diplomatic Protection
of Persons and Property of the International Law As-
sociation submitted its first report to the plenary meet-
ing of the Association in London. In an interim report to
the Committee it was recommended that a draft article
should be adopted to read:
According to the general principles of international law the ex-
haustion of local remedies is a procedural precondition for the exer-
cise of diplomatic protection.%”
I. Judicial decisions
44. Judicial decisions do not provide a clear answer to
the question under consideration. Courts, like codifica-
tion bodies, have often preferred to leave their reason-
ing on the nature of the local remedies rule deliberately
vague. This explains why proponents of both the sub-
stantive and the procedural positions often rely on the
same decision for support.%°
45. The Mexican Union Railway case gives clear sup-
port to the substantive position as it held that:
the responsibility of a State under international law can only com-
mence when the persons concerned have availed themselves of all
remedies open to them under the national laws of the State in ques-
‘on 99
tion.
On the other hand, implied support for the procedural
approach is to be found in the Certain German Inter-
ests in Polish Upper Silesia case,!°° which held that a
9% Yearbook ... 1977 (see footnote 7 above), p. 30. For the debate
on this provision in the Commission, see Yearbook ... 1977, vol. I,
1463rd meeting, pp. 250-255, and 1465th—1469th meetings, pp. 258—
282.
56 See footnote 8 above.
97 Kokott, “The exhaustion of local remedies”, p. 629.
98 Here it is interesting to compare the reasoning of the principal
proponents of the two schools, Amerasinghe and Ago. See Ameras-
inghe, State Responsibility ..., pp. 216-235; “The formal character ...”,
pp. 462-476; and Local Remedies ..., pp. 337-356; and Yearbook ...
1977 (footnote 15 above), pp. 27-32, paras. 62—79. See also Yearbook
... 1977 (footnote 7 above), pp. 37-41, paras. 20-31.
99 Mexican Union Railway (Limited) (Great Britain) v. United
Mexican States, decision No. 21 of February 1930 (UNRIAA, vol. V
(Sales No. 1952.V.3), p. 122).
100 Certain German Interests in Polish Upper Silesia, Jurisdiction,
Judgment No. 6, 1925, P.C.I.J., Series A, No. 6.
declaratory judgement could be given before local rem-
edies had been exhausted, and in cases such as Chorz6w
Factory'®! and Electricity Company of Sofia and
Bulgaria,'°* in which the local remedies rule was con-
sidered as a preliminary objection.
02
46. The Phosphates in Morocco case,!™ in which Mr.
Ago appeared as counsel for Italy to argue the substan-
tive position, has given rise to conflicting opinions:
In its preliminary application of 30 March 1932 to the Permanent
Court of International Justice, the Italian Government asked the
Court to judge and declare that the decision of the Mines Department
dated 8 January 1925 and the denial of justice which had followed it
were inconsistent with the international obligation incumbent upon
France to respect the rights acquired by the Italian company Miniere
e Fosfati. The French Government had accepted the compulsory ju-
risdiction of the Court by a declaration dated 25 April 1931, for “any
disputes which may arise after the ratification of the present declara-
tion with regard to situations or facts subsequent to such ratifica-
tion”. The question thus arose whether the internationally wrongful
act of which the Italian Government was complaining could or could
not be regarded as a “fact subsequent” to the critical date. The Italian
Government contended that the breach of an international obligation
initiated by the decision of 1925 only became a completed breach fol-
lowing certain acts subsequent to 1931, in particular a note of 28 Jan-
uary 1933 from the French Ministry for Foreign Affairs to the Italian
Embassy and a letter of the same date sent by the same Ministry to the
Italian individual concerned. The Italian Government saw that note
and that letter as an official interpretation of the acquired rights of
Italian nationals which was inconsistent with the international obliga-
tions of France. It saw in them a confirmation of the denial of justice
to the Italian nationals concerned, constituted by the refusal of the
French Resident-General to permit them to submit to him a petition
for redress ... The new denial of justice now consisted in the final
refusal of the French Government to make available to the claimants
an extraordinary means of recourse, whether administrative or other,
in view of the lack of ordinary means. On the basis of these facts, the
Italian Government opted for the thesis that an internationally wrong-
ful act, though begun by initial State conduct contrary to the result
required by an international obligation, is completed only when the
injured individuals have resorted without success to all existing ap-
propriate and effective remedies. It was thus from that moment that,
in its view, the responsibility came into being.
In opposition to the Italian Government, the French Government
maintained that, if, as the former affirmed, the decision of 1925 by
the Mines Department really merited the criticisms made against it—
breach of treaties, breach of international law in general—it was at
that date that the breach by France of its international obligations
had been committed and completed, and at that date that the alleged
internationally wrongful act had taken place. The French representa-
tive affirmed:
“Here, therefore, the rule of the exhaustion of local remedies
is no more than a rule of procedure. The international responsi-
bility is already in being; but it cannot be enforced through the
diplomatic channel or by recourse to an international tribunal or
appeal to the Permanent Court of International Justice unless local
remedies have first been exhausted.”!04
In its judgment of 14 June 1938, the Court indicated that it did
not discern in the action of the French Government subsequent to the
decision of 1925 any new factor giving rise to the dispute in question,
and that the refusal by the French Government to accede to the re-
quest to submit the dispute to extraordinary judges did not constitute
an unlawful international act giving rise to a new dispute. The Court
went on to say:
101 Factory at Chorz6w, Jurisdiction, Judgment No. 8, 1927, P.C.I.J.,
Series A, No. 9.
102 Electricity Company of Sofia and Bulgaria, Judgment, 1939,
P.C.IL.J., Series A/B, No. 77, p. 64.
103 See footnote 78 above.
104This account of the case is taken from Yearbook ... 1977
(see footnote 7 above), pp. 38-39, paras. (25)-(27) of the commentary
to article 22 in the draft articles on State responsibility adopted by the
Commission on first reading.
110 Documents of the fifty-third session
“The Court cannot regard the denial of justice alleged by the
Italian Government as a factor giving rise to the present dispute.
In its Application, the Italian Government has represented the de-
cision of the Department of Mines as an unlawful international
act, because that decision was inspired by the will to get rid of the
foreign holding and because it therefore constituted a violation of
the vested rights placed under the protection of the international
conventions. That being so, it is in this decision that we should
look for the violation of international law—a definitive act which
would, by itself, directly involve international responsibility. This
act being attributable to the State and described as contrary to the
treaty right of another State, international responsibility would
be established immediately as between the two States.” In these
circumstances the alleged denial of justice, resulting either from
a lacuna in the judicial organization or from the refusal of admin-
istrative or extraordinary methods of redress designed to supple-
ment its deficiencies, merely results in allowing the unlawful act
to subsist. It exercises no influence either on the accomplishment
of the act or on the responsibility ensuing from it.!
Mr. Ago maintains that although PCIJ rejected Italy’s
application it did not reject Italy’s argument that the lo-
cal remedies rule was substantive in nature.!°° This ar-
gument is difficult to accept, particularly in the light of
the Court’s finding that international responsibility was
established “immediately as between the two States”
following the decision of the Department of Mines and
not after the exhaustion of local remedies.!° For this
reason the assessment of Amerasinghe on the finding of
this case is to be preferred:
The PCIJ clearly held that the initial act, which was a violation of
international law, gave rise to international ... responsibility, and that
such responsibility did not arise solely after the later actions, relat-
ing to the exhaustion of local redress, alleged by the claimant State
to have taken place. The time at which international responsibility
arose was critical for this case and therefore the decision in the case
is based on the understanding that international responsibility arose
before any resort to local remedies might have taken place. This is
clearly based on a procedural view of the rule of local remedies.!°
47. Although of limited value, the Panevezys-
Saldutiskis Railway case provides some support for
the procedural position in referring to the local rem-
edies rule as one which “in principle subordinates
the presentation” of an international claim to such an
exhaustion”.!°9 Moreover, in that case, as in the Prince
von Pless Administration™® and the Losinger!" cases,
although the objection concerning the exhaustion of
local remedies was joined to the merits owing to the
complexity of the issue, it was treated as a preliminary
objection rather than a defence to the merits of the case.
48. The Finnish Ships Arbitration!!? is another case
on which opinions are divided. According to the Com-
mission commentary, Arbitrator Bagge “maintained a
sort of neutrality between the two approaches to the re-
95 Phosphates in Morocco (see footnote 78 above), p. 28.
96 Yearbook ...1977 (see footnote 7 above), pp. 39-40, para. (28).
°7 The sentence in italics in the passage in the Court’s judgment
cited above, which seems to provide the key to the Court’s decision, is
omitted from the account of the case in the Commission’s commentary,
ibid., p. 39, para. (27).
98 Local Remedies ..., pp. 349-350.
09 Panevezys-Saldutiskis Railway (see footnote 45 above), p. 18.
10 Prince von Pless Administration, Order of 11 May 1933, P.C.I.J.,
Series A/B, No. 54, p. 150.
"1 Losinger, Order of 27 June 1936, P.C.I.J., Series A/B, No. 67,
p. 15.
!2 See footnote 36 above.
quirement of the exhaustion of local remedies”!!3 while
other writers have seen in the award support for the pro-
cedural view.'4 Arbitrator Bagge’s reasoning undoubt-
edly lends some support to Mr. Ago’s interpretation!!®
that the award is inconclusive on the nature of the local
remedies rule. In an article published!!® more than 20
years later, Bagge again failed to state his position on
the question whether the local remedies rule is proce-
dural or substantive but there is suggested support for
the former view.
49. No ICJ decision gives support to the view that the
local remedies rule is substantive in nature. While clear
judicial support for the procedural view is not forthcom-
ing either, there are some signs that this approach is pre-
ferred. In several decisions the local remedies rule has
been treated as a preliminary objection!!” or joined to
the merits as a preliminary objection,!!8 which some
writers see as signs of support for the procedural
view!!9—although this is denied in the Commission
commentary.!29 More important perhaps is the obit-
er dictum of the Court in the ELSI case that parties
might agree in a treaty “that the local remedies rule
shall not apply to claims based on alleged breaches of
that treaty”.!*! If the rule is procedural such a waiver
presents no difficulty. If however the rule is substan-
tive the question may legitimately be asked whether
parties to a treaty can “decide to agree that action
which would ordinarily not be a breach of internation-
al law unless and until it had given rise to a subsequent
denial of justice, should, as between those parties, be
treated ab initio as a breach of the treaty”. 122
50. The division of views on the nature of the local
remedies rule is reflected in separate and dissenting
judicial opinions. Support for the substantive posi-
tion is to be found in the opinions of Judges Hudson, !*?
3 Yearbook ... 1977 (see footnote 7 above), p. 38, para. (24).
4 Amerasinghe, Local Remedies ..., pp. 344-347; and Fachiri, “The
local remedies rule in the light of the Finnish Ships Arbitration”, p. 19.
° See in particular the award (footnote 36 above), pp. 1502-1503.
6 «Ttervention on the ground of damage caused to nationals, with
particular reference to exhaustion of local remedies and the rights of
shareholders”, p. 162.
7 Ambatielos, Merits, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1953, pp. 18 and
22-23.
8 Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, Prelimi-
nary Objections, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1964, pp. 41-44.
° Amerasinghe, Local Remedies ..., pp. 347 and 350-352.
20 Yearbook ... 1977 (see footnote 7 above), p. 42, para. (33).
211.C.J. Reports 1989 (see footnote 3 above), p. 42, para. 50.
22 Thirlway, loc. cit., p. 84.
?31In his dissenting opinion in the Panevezys-Saldutiskis Railway
case (p. 47), Judge Hudson stated:
“Tt is a very important rule of international law that local rem-
edies must have been exhausted without redress before a State may
successfully espouse a claim of its national against another State.
This is not a rule of procedure. It is not merely a matter of orderly
conduct. It is part of the substantive law as to international, i.e.
State-to-State, responsibility. If adequate redress for the injury is
available to the person who suffered it, if such person has only to
reach out to avail himself of such redress, there is no basis for a
claim to be espoused by the State of which such person is a national.
Until the available means of local redress have been exhausted, no
international responsibility can arise.”
(See footnote 45 above)
Diplomatic protection 111
Cordova, !24 Morelli!2° and Schwebel.!2° On the other
hand, Judges Lauterpacht,!?” Armand-Ugon!?® and
Tanaka!*9 have expressed opinions in favour of the
procedural view.
J. State practice
51. State practice in respect of the nature of the lo-
cal remedies rule is mainly to be found in arguments
presented by States in legal proceedings before in-
ternational tribunals. The value of such practice, if it
can properly be so called, is highly questionable as
inevitably States (or more accurately their counsel)
have chosen to advance the procedural or substantive
position for functional reasons and not out of convic-
tion. Thus Italy in the Phosphates in Morocco case
relied strongly on the substantive approach,!°° while
50 years later in ELSI‘! it argued that the local rem-
edies rule was procedural in nature! In these circum-
stances it is pointless to attempt to extract evidence
of usus or opinio juris for a particular position from
counsel’s arguments.
52. Onrare occasions States have taken positions on
the nature of the local remedies rule outside the con-
text of legal proceedings. In response to Mr. Garcia
Amador’s first report on State responsibility, the
United States Department of State prepared a memo-
randum which expressed strong support for the “third
position” described in paragraph 32 above:
Under existing international law where the initial act or wrong
of which complaint is made is not imputable to the State, the ex-
haustion of local remedies is required with a resultant denial of
justice on the part of the State ... In this view, the exhaustion
of remedies rule is a substantive rule, i.e., it is required from a
substantive standpoint under international law in order to impute
responsibility to a State.
On the other hand, where the initial act or wrong of which
complaint is made is imputable to the State, substantively it is un-
necessary to exhaust local remedies in order to impute responsibil-
ity to the State. If the draft ultimately prepared by the International
Law Commission requires the exhaustion of local remedies in the
latter situation, the rule of exhaustion of local remedies in such
circumstance is procedural, i.e., a condition precedent to the pres-
entation of a formal claim.
Accordingly, the rule of exhaustion of local remedies may be
substantive in certain types of cases and procedural in others. !°?
In 1985 the British Government issued a set of rules
relating to international claims in which it stated:
Rule VII
HMG [Her Majesty’s Government] will not normally take over and
formally espouse a claim of a UK national against another State
24 Interhandel case (see footnote 2 above), pp. 45-46.
25 Barcelona Traction case (see footnote 118 above), p. 114.
26 ELSI case (see footnote 3 above), p. 116.
27 Certain Norwegian Loans, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1957, p. 41.
28 Interhandel case (see footnote 2 above), pp. 88-89.
29 Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, Second
Phase, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1970, p. 143.
30 See paragraph 46.
311.C.J. Pleadings, Elettronica Sicula S.p.A. (ELSI), Vol. II,
pp. 156-165; and I.C.J. Reports 1989 (see footnote 3 above), p. 21.
32 Reproduced in Whiteman, op. cit., pp. 789-790.
until all the legal remedies, if any, available to him in the State
concerned have been exhausted.
Comment. Failure to exhaust any local remedies will not constitute
a bar to a Claim if it is clearly established that in the circumstances
of the case an appeal to a higher municipal tribunal would have
had no effect. Nor is a claimant against another State required to
exhaust justice in that State if there is no justice to exhaust.
Rule VIII
If, in exhausting any municipal remedies, the claimant has met
with prejudice or obstruction, which are a denial of justice, HMG
may intervene on his behalf to secure redress of injustice.!°%
Although not expressed in unequivocal terms, the
formulation of rule VII and the implication of rule
VIII that a denial of justice is not required in every
case suggests that, like the United States, the British
Government prefers the third position, which views
the local remedies rule as procedural where an inter-
national wrong has been committed against an alien,
but as substantive where, in the course of exhausting
local remedies, a denial of justice has occurred.
K. Opinions of writers
53. Academic opinion is divided on the nature of
the local remedies rule, but there is, in the words of
the Commission commentary, “no clearly dominant
opinion”!34 among authors. Moreover, it is difficult to
speak of clear schools of thought “since the arguments
advanced for or against a particular thesis vary so great-
ly from one author to another that writers sometimes
arrive at similar conclusions from virtually opposite
directions”.!°5 Subject to this admonition, Mr. Ago has
produced a bibliography of the three different schools.!26
The present study makes no attempt to provide a com-
prehensive account of the different opinions of writers.
Instead, it will draw attention to the views expressed by
the main proponents of the three different schools.
54. The most ardent supporters of the substantive
school are Borchard and Ago.
In 1929, Borchard wrote:
[I]t [is] very questionable whether the prevailing view regards the alien
State as automatically injured whenever an officer of the State injures
an alien. The alien is not regarded as the living embodiment of his State,
by virtue of which the State is to be deemed simultaneously injured
whenever the national is injured.
However logical [the procedural] view may seem, it is apparently
rejected in international practice, doubtless because in the majority of
countries the local law has not yet advanced to the stage of regard-
ing the state as immediately responsible for torts of its officers. But
even apart from this fact, the view above set forth fails to perceive
the vital distinction between municipal responsibility to the alien and
international responsibility to his State. The majority view, to the ef-
fect that there is no international injury to the claimant state—and it
seems proper to regard the international claim or injury as arising si-
multaneously with the right of diplomatic interposition and not before
then—auntil the alien has exhausted his local remedies if available
133 Rules applying to international claims, published in 1985, repro-
duced in Warbrick, “Protection of nationals abroad”, p. 1008.
134 Yearbook ... 1977 (see footnote 7 above), p. 34, para. (13).
135 Tbid., pp. 35-36, para (13).
136 Tbid., p. 34, footnotes 135-137.
112 Documents of the fifty-third session
and effective, is strongly influenced by the fact that the alien must
ordinarily accept the same treatment from the law that nationals en-
joy, and that if nationals have recourse only against the wrong-doing
officer, that is all that aliens can demand, and the state assumes no
greater responsibility toward aliens than it does toward nationals. The
view seems entirely sound.!3”
Frequent reference has been made above to the views
of Mr. Ago expressed in his 1977 report to the Commis-
sion. The present study would, however, be incomplete
without a more complete expression of Mr. Ago’s views
on the nature of the local remedies rule. The following
statement, it is hoped, provides an accurate account of
Mr. Ago’s views:
It should be recalled that the fact of establishing that a State has
committed, for example, a breach of an obligation laid on it by a
treaty to accord a certain treatment to a national of another State, and
has thus infringed the right of the other State that its national shall
be accorded the treatment provided for in the treaty, is tantamount
to saying that the first State has incurred, if all conditions for this
are satisfied, an international responsibility towards the second State.
And generation of an international responsibility is equivalent, in the
example we have taken, to the creation of a new right of the injured
State: the right to reparation for infringement of the right accorded
to it by the treaty. But it would be difficult to conceive that this new
right, attributed to the injured State by the international legal order,
should depend on the result of proceedings instituted by a private
individual at the internal level, which may lead to the restoration of
the right of that individual, but not to the restoration of a right which
belongs to the State at the international level and has been infringed
at that level. If, so long as the condition of exhaustion of local rem-
edies has not been satisfied, the injured State has no faculty to claim
reparation for an internationally wrongful act allegedly committed to
its detriment in the person or property of its national, it is because for
the time being its new right to reparation of an injury suffered by it
has not yet been created. In other words, a breach of the obligation
imposed by the treaty has not yet occurred or, at least, has not yet
definitively occurred. At this moment, therefore, the international re-
sponsibility, which in our case is reflected precisely in the right of the
State to reparation of the injury suffered by it, has not yet arisen. In
other words, the finding that the right of the State to demand repara-
tion exists only after the final rejection of the claims of the private in-
dividuals concerned inevitably leads to the conclusion that the breach
of the international obligation has not been completed before those
remedies are exhausted, that is to say, before the negative effects of
the new conduct of the State in regard to those remedies have been
added to those of the initial conduct adopted by the State in the case
in point, thereby rendering the result required by the international
obligation definitively impossible of achievement.*8
Although his name is clearly associated with the sub-
stantive view, it should be pointed out that Mr. Ago’s
arguments concern only what he called “obligations of
result”, !°9 i.e. obligations not concerned with the way
the specified result was reached. In cases of violations
of an “obligation of conduct”, in other words where the
mere conduct of the State violates an international obli-
gation irrespective of the legality of the result reached,
the international responsibility of the State is not con-
ditional upon the exhaustion of local remedies. Indeed,
although not spelled out in the report, it appears that the
rule is not applicable at all in these cases in Mr. Ago’s
scheme.
55. Writers in favour of the substantive school include
Gaja,!4° who argues that the exhaustion of local rem-
137 Borchard, loc. cit., pp. 236-237.
138 Yearbook ... 1977 (see footnote 7 above), pp. 35-36, para. (15).
139 Tbid., p. 9, para. 27.
140 ’Esaurimento dei ricorsi interni nel diritto internazionale,
pp. 12 and 33.
edies rule is a “presupposition” for unlawfulness, and
O’Connell,!*! who emphasizes the right of the State
to attempt to redress the wrong within its own legal
system.
56. The substantive view has drawn heavy criticism
from legal scholars, particularly Amerasinghe who has
published profusely in support of the procedural posi-
tion.'*? In his view there is something intrinsically in-
correct about the substantive view’s insistence that in-
ternational responsibility is dependent upon local action
and that the violation of international law—and inter-
national responsibility—is only completed once local
courts have so pronounced.
In the case of international law, an international court is the proper
organ finally to make the decision that a rule of international law has
been broken. Municipal courts may pronounce on the issue, but it is
clear that for the international legal system this cannot be final.!4°
Amerasinghe challenges the substantive view’s reason-
ing that an international wrong is not committed until
local remedies have been exhausted:
What international law prohibits is the initial injury to the alien. To
say that international law merely prohibits the perpetuation of the
injury after resort to local remedies, and therefore does not take par-
ticular note of the initial injury as a violation of international norms,
provided the result is brought about that satisfaction is given to the
injured alien, seems to twist the truth to suit the theory. In short, it
seems difficult to accept an interpretation of the situation which re-
quires the State merely to fulfil its secondary obligation, of making
reparation through whichever means it chooses, as the result to be
achieved by the obligation imposed by international law, and there-
fore characterizes this secondary obligation as the only one that has
not been fulfilled, while not attaching special importance to the pri-
mary obligation not to cause injury to the alien in the first place. The
local remedies rule really pertains only to secondary obligation, leav-
ing the fact of the violation of the primary obligation substantially
unaltered.144
57. Doehring maintains that in certain cases it is im-
possible to argue that the original act is not a violation
of international law.'¢5 Even though his example, the
killing of an individual, may be more closely linked
with the protection of human rights, it is also highly
relevant from the perspective of treatment of aliens
and is therefore of broader applicability.'4° Moreover,
it is claimed that the exceptions to the local remedies
rule—for instance, waiver by the State in an arbitration
141 Op. cit., p. 1053:
“A State is only internationally responsible to foreign nationals
when the injuries they have suffered at its hands are irremediable
at their own instance through the agency of the State’s own law. If
an avenue of redress is available under that law, either through ap-
peal to the highest courts or through executive instrumentalities, the
injury is not complete until the avenue has been explored in vain.”
See also Head, loc. cit., p. 150; Daillier and Pellet, Droit international
public, pp. 774-775, para. 490; and Combacau and Sur, Droit interna-
tional public, p. 546.
42 State Responsibility ..., pp. 169-270; Local Remedies ...; and
“The local remedies rule ...”, p. 727.
43 State Responsibility ..., p. 215.
44 Local Remedies ..., p. 328.
45 Loc. cit., p. 240. Support for Doehring’s views has been expressed
by other German authors: Herdegen, loc. cit., p. 65; Kokott, loc. cit.,
p. 612; and Geck, “Diplomatic protection”, p. 1056.
46 Tn the context of human rights protection, the procedural nature of
the rule of exhaustion of local remedies is more broadly accepted than
with regard to diplomatic protection. See, for example, Amerasinghe,
Local Remedies ..., pp. 354 et seq.
Diplomatic protection 113
agreement—are incompatible with the idea that interna-
tional responsibility arises only after the exhaustion of
local remedies.'4’ Also, the continuous nationality rule
is illogical if the international wrong is committed only
after the exhaustion of local remedies. !“°
58. An important argument against perceiving the rule
in substantive terms is stated by Verzijl in the following
terms:
If it be assumed that no international delinquency exists at all until
the local remedies have been exhausted, the rule is necessarily much
more rigid than in the other construction, since in that case the inter-
national claim itself is provisionally devoid of any juridical founda-
tion. If, on the contrary, its merely procedural nature is recognized,
much greater freedom is left to mitigate and qualify the rule with a
view to obviating the evident abuses which can be, and regrettably
often are, made of the rule.!49
59. Although the American Law Institute’s Restate-
ment of the Law Third does not take a position on the
nature of the local remedies rule, the Restatement of the
Law Second provides:
Procedural nature of requirement of exhaustion. As indicated in
§168, there are some types of conduct causing injury to aliens that are
in themselves wrongful under international law and others that mere-
ly give rise to a duty to make reparation, in which case a violation of
international law does not occur until and unless there is a failure to
make such payment. However, once an international wrong has been
committed, whether in causing the original injury or in failure to pay
compensation, the international responsibility of the state is engaged
and the exhaustion of available remedies is primarily a procedural
requirement. !50
60. Reasons of the above kind have led many interna-
tional lawyers to support the procedural position.!>!
61. The third school, which has its origins in the writ-
ings of Hyde and Eagleton, is not incompatible with the
procedural position. The main difference is that its pro-
ponents consider that
in the examination of claims, it becomes important to distinguish
events which tend to show internationally illegal conduct on the part
of a territorial sovereign, from those which tend to show a failure on
its part to afford a means of redress in consequence of such conduct.
147 Verdross and Simma, op. cit., pp. 882-883, footnote 42. Other
German authors have also adopted this view. See, for example, Kokott,
loc. cit., p. 612; Herdegen, loc. cit., p. 65; and Schwarze, “Rechtschutz
Privater bei vélkerrechtswidrigem Handeln fremder Staaten”, pp. 428—
429. See further Adede, “A survey ...”, p. 15.
148 Schwarze, loc. cit., p. 429.
149 Verzijl, International Law in Historical Perspective, p. 629.
150 Restatement of the Law Second (see footnote 53 above),
pp. 612-613, para. 206 d.
151 See De Visscher, “Le déni de justice en droit international”,
p. 421; Freeman, op. cit., pp. 407 et seq.; Shaw, International Law,
pp. 567-569; Jessup, op. cit., p. 104; Geck, loc. cit., p. 1056; Herdegen,
loc. cit., p. 65; Kokott, loc. cit., p. 612; and Schwarzenberger, op. cit.,
pp. 603-604. Arguably this is also the position taken in Jennings and
Watts, eds., op. cit., pp. 522-524) in the following statement:
“[W]here a state has treated an alien in its territory inconsistently
with its international obligations but could nevertheless by subse-
quent action still secure for the alien the treatment (or its equiva-
lent) required by its obligations, an international tribunal will not
entertain a claim put forward on behalf of that person unless he has
exhausted the legal remedies available to him in the state concerned.
So long as there has been no final pronouncement on the part of the
highest competent authority within the state, it cannot be said that a
valid international claim has arisen.”
The former serves to establish national responsibility; the latter to
justify interposition.!°*
In other words, this school considers the rule as one rep-
resenting a procedural condition when it concerns cases
where the original act or omission by itself amounts to
a violation of international—as well as municipal—law.
In contrast, where the injury is caused by an act consti-
tuting a violation of municipal law but not of interna-
tional law, international responsibility commences only
after the exhaustion of local remedies resulting in a de-
nial of justice.
62. The leading proponent of this school is Fawcett.
In an article published in 1954!°? in which he seeks to
distinguish clearly between the cause of action and the
right of action, he set out three possible legal situations
in which the operation of the local remedies rule must
be considered:
Case I: The action complained of ... is a breach of international
law but not of the local law.
Case II: The action complained of is a breach of the local law
but not of international law.
Case III: The action complained of is a breach both of the local
law and of international law.!°*
In the first case, where the action complained of is a breach of
international law but not of the local law, the local remedies rule does
not ... come into play at all; for, since there has been nothing done
contrary to the local law, there can be no local remedies to exhaust.!°°
Examples that would fall under this case include an in-
jurious act committed by the highest executive authority
of the State for which there is no remedy in domestic
law; or where a State official commits a crime against
humanity (e.g. apartheid) which is condoned or promot-
ed by local law.
In the second case, where the action complained of is a breach of
the local law but not initially of international law, the international
responsibility of the State is not engaged by the action complained
of: it can only arise out of a subsequent act of the State constituting a
denial of justice to the injured party seeking a remedy for the original
action of which he complains.!°°
Here the local remedies rule operates as a substantive
bar to an international claim as no claim arises until a
denial of justice can be shown. In the third case,
Where the act complained of is a breach both of the local law and
of an international agreement or customary international law, the rule
of the exhaustion of local remedies operates as a procedural bar to an
international claim ...157
152 Hyde, International Law Chiefly as Interpreted and Applied
by the United States, p. 493. See also Eagleton, op. cit., pp. 97-100.
Writers of this period who lean towards the third school include Dunn,
op. cit., p. 166 (this is implied in his interpretation and criticism of arti-
cle 8 (a) of the draft Convention on responsibility of States for damage
done in their territory to the person or property of foreigners prepared
by the Harvard Law School in 1929); Fachiri, loc. cit., p. 33; and Starke,
“Tmputability in international delinquencies”, pp. 107-108.
153 Fawcett, loc. cit.
154 Thid., p. 454.
155 Tbid., p. 455.
156 Thid., pp. 455-456.
157 Ibid., p. 458.
114 Documents of the fifty-third session
Fawcett’s simple, but clear, analysis, which has won the
support of Fitzmaurice!*® and Brownlie,” provides the
answer to the debate over the nature of the local rem-
edies rule. It is unfortunate that it received so little atten-
tion in Mr. Ago’s study.!®° Amerasinghe has attempted
to reconcile Fawcett’s position with his own procedur-
al view by arguing that Fawcett’s second case, which
adopts the substantive approach, has nothing to do with
the local remedies rule.
What is called the substantive aspect of the rule is really not an aspect
of the rule at all. It is misapplied terminology to an area of State respon-
sibility for injuries to aliens which deals with breaches of international
law committed in connexion with the administration of justice. That
which has been called the substantive aspect of the rule really related to
“denials of justice” and should be dealt with in those terms.!*!
Once this is understood, he continues, Fawcett’s view can
be reduced “to a basically procedural view of the rule”.!®
L. Conclusion
63. The “third position” is, logically, the most satis-
factory. If a State commits an internationally wrongful
act—for example, by torturing an alien—it incurs in-
ternational responsibility from that moment. The act of
torture gives rise to a cause of action against the respon-
sible State but the right of action, the right to bring an
international claim, is suspended until the State has had
the opportunity to remedy the situation, for example by
means of reparation, through its own courts. In such a
case the local remedies rule is procedural. This view en-
joys the support of some codification attempts, several
judicial decisions and the majority of writers, as it is a
view supported by both those who favour the procedur-
al position and those who belong to the “third school”.
Supporters of the substantive view are unable to accept
this explanation of the local remedies rule largely be-
cause of their refusal to distinguish between injurious
acts to the alien that violate international law and those
that violate only local law.
64. There is an even clearer consensus that where the
original injury is caused by an act or omission in viola-
tion of local law only, a denial of justice arising in the
course of the domestic proceedings is required before
an international claim can be brought. Substantivists ac-
cept this and so do proceduralists, but the latter school
denies that this phenomenon falls within the purview of
the local remedies rule. The refusal of the procedural
school to consider this type of case as belonging to the
subject of exhaustion of local remedies is of no practical
relevance and does not warrant further consideration.
65. There remains one last issue to be considered:
whether a denial of justice further necessitates the ex-
haustion of remaining local remedies, not only in the
context of the situation described in paragraph 64 above,
but also where denial of justice follows a violation of in-
158 Loc, cit., p. 53.
159 Op. cit., p. 497.
160 Yearbook ... 1977 (see footnote 7 above), p. 34, para. 13, foot-
note 137.
161 Amerasinghe, State Responsibility ..., p. 214. A similar view is
expressed by Law, op. cit., p. 34.
162 Local Remedies ..., p. 326.
ternational law. Authors who have expressed an opinion
on this issue in the works reviewed!63 support the view
that local remedies need to be exhausted in such cases.
This is logical if one perceives a denial of justice as a
violation of international law. This view is not contra-
dicted by codification attempts, international decisions
or State practice.
66. The above draft articles seek to give effect to the
conclusions reached in the present report. The decision
to depart from the substantive position advanced by
Mr. Ago in draft article 22 of the draft articles on State
responsibility adopted on first reading has not been
taken lightly. That position was, however, premised on
the distinction between obligations of conduct and re-
sult, which has not been retained in the draft articles on
State responsibility provisionally adopted by the Draft-
ing Committee in 2000. The substantive view does not
have substantial support from codification attempts, ju-
dicial decisions and writers. Moreover, the trend among
writers since 1977 has been in favour of the procedural
view or the third school. In these circumstances it is
suggested that the Commission should approve the
philosophy contained in draft articles 12-13.
M. Future work
67. The commentary to draft article 14 is still in the
course of preparation. It is likely that the article will take
the following form:
Local remedies need not be exhausted where:
(a) There are no effective remedies;
(b) The exhaustion of local remedies would be
futile;
(c) The respondent State has waived the require-
ment that local remedies be exhausted;
(d) There is no voluntary link between the injured
individual and the respondent State;
(e) The internationally wrongful act upon which
the international claim is based was not committed
within the territorial jurisdiction of the respondent
State.
Further articles on the exhaustion of local remedies
will deal with the burden of proof and advance waiv-
er of an international claim by the foreign national
(Calvo clause). It will also be desirable to draft a provi-
sion on the meaning of “denial of justice” in the light of
the reference to this term in draft article 13, despite the
fact that this will possibly involve the formulation of a
primary rule. However, as pointed out in the commen-
tary to draft article 10, the distinction between primary
and secondary rules is of uncertain value in the present
codification exercise.
163 | aw, op. cit., p. 34; Fitzmaurice, loc. cit., p. 59; and Amerasinghe,
“The local remedies rule ...”, p. 732.